20210902-rpi-8g-2rpt

ARMv8 Cortex-A72 testing on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2109032-TJ-20210902R79
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

C/C++ Compiler Tests 4 Tests
CPU Massive 7 Tests
Multi-Core 7 Tests
Server 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 4 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
5.14.0-cfs
September 02 2021
  4 Hours, 50 Minutes
5.14.0-cacule
September 02 2021
  4 Hours, 52 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  4 Hours, 51 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

20210902-rpi-8g-2rpt, "Primesieve 7.4 - 1e12 Prime Number Generation", Lower Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",524.191,556.727 "5.14.0-cacule",586.226,561.027 "7-Zip Compression 16.02 - Compress Speed Test", Higher Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",3850,3862 "5.14.0-cacule", "John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Blowfish", Higher Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",1229,1364 "5.14.0-cacule", "John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: MD5", Higher Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",32313,32128 "5.14.0-cacule",32315,32292 "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",4976.483,4963.421 "5.14.0-cacule",5090.882,5085.182 "C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel", Lower Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",692.376,731.462 "5.14.0-cacule",616.595,619.987 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",5659.617028,5771.690242 "5.14.0-cacule",5728.61045,5696.715642 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",0.177,0.173 "5.14.0-cacule",0.175,0.176 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",870.840944,871.692599 "5.14.0-cacule",870.11143,858.35613 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",1.148,1.147 "5.14.0-cacule",1.149,1.165 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",8018.617083,7651.613158 "5.14.0-cacule",8535.588495,8515.163876 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",6.236,6.535 "5.14.0-cacule",5.858,5.872 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",6922.730829,6885.659447 "5.14.0-cacule",8004.92467,8034.642605 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",14.447,14.524 "5.14.0-cacule",12.494,12.448 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",6683.520494,6646.019972 "5.14.0-cacule",7534.2914,7493.585272 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",37.41,37.62 "5.14.0-cacule",33.185,33.366 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",1445.167937,1459.840921 "5.14.0-cacule",1588.434437,1583.736288 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",34.601,34.254 "5.14.0-cacule",31.48,31.574 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",1375.645582,1383.106851 "5.14.0-cacule",1451.289818,1445.59068 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",72.701,72.308 "5.14.0-cacule",68.912,69.183 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",1208.322945,1208.602851 "5.14.0-cacule",1223.343972,1223.912151 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",206.921,206.873 "5.14.0-cacule",204.379,204.284 "ebizzy 0.3 - ", Higher Results Are Better "5.14.0-cfs",6003,5979 "5.14.0-cacule",6325,6308