ARMv8 Cortex-A72 testing on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2109032-TJ-20210902R79
20210902-rpi-8g-2rpt,
"Primesieve 7.4 - 1e12 Prime Number Generation",
Lower Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",524.191,556.727
"5.14.0-cacule",586.226,561.027
"7-Zip Compression 16.02 - Compress Speed Test",
Higher Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",3850,3862
"5.14.0-cacule",
"John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Blowfish",
Higher Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",1229,1364
"5.14.0-cacule",
"John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: MD5",
Higher Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",32313,32128
"5.14.0-cacule",32315,32292
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",4976.483,4963.421
"5.14.0-cacule",5090.882,5085.182
"C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel",
Lower Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",692.376,731.462
"5.14.0-cacule",616.595,619.987
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",5659.617028,5771.690242
"5.14.0-cacule",5728.61045,5696.715642
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",0.177,0.173
"5.14.0-cacule",0.175,0.176
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",870.840944,871.692599
"5.14.0-cacule",870.11143,858.35613
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",1.148,1.147
"5.14.0-cacule",1.149,1.165
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",8018.617083,7651.613158
"5.14.0-cacule",8535.588495,8515.163876
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",6.236,6.535
"5.14.0-cacule",5.858,5.872
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",6922.730829,6885.659447
"5.14.0-cacule",8004.92467,8034.642605
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",14.447,14.524
"5.14.0-cacule",12.494,12.448
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",6683.520494,6646.019972
"5.14.0-cacule",7534.2914,7493.585272
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",37.41,37.62
"5.14.0-cacule",33.185,33.366
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",1445.167937,1459.840921
"5.14.0-cacule",1588.434437,1583.736288
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",34.601,34.254
"5.14.0-cacule",31.48,31.574
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",1375.645582,1383.106851
"5.14.0-cacule",1451.289818,1445.59068
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",72.701,72.308
"5.14.0-cacule",68.912,69.183
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",1208.322945,1208.602851
"5.14.0-cacule",1223.343972,1223.912151
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",206.921,206.873
"5.14.0-cacule",204.379,204.284
"ebizzy 0.3 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"5.14.0-cfs",6003,5979
"5.14.0-cacule",6325,6308