kernel_test

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 testing with a Supermicro X10DRL-C v1.01 (3.1 BIOS) and astdrmfb on CentOS Linux 7 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1907156-HV-KERNELTES36&grs.

kernel_testProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskGraphicsOSKernelCompilerFile-SystemScreen Resolutionkernel test suiteIntel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 3.40GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads)Supermicro X10DRL-C v1.01 (3.1 BIOS)4 x 8192 MB DDR4-2133MT/s Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1480GB SMC3108 + 2000GB SMC3108astdrmfbCentOS Linux 73.10.0-957.10.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64)GCC 4.8.5 20150623xfs1024x768OpenBenchmarking.org- --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=generic - DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Python 3.6.1 :: Anaconda 4.4.0 (64-bit)- l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: SMT vulnerable L1D conditional cache flushes + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of Load fences __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full retpoline

kernel_testschbench: 32 - 32schbench: 32 - 24schbench: 32 - 16schbench: 16 - 32schbench: 16 - 24schbench: 16 - 16schbench: 8 - 32schbench: 8 - 24schbench: 8 - 16schbench: 6 - 32schbench: 6 - 24schbench: 6 - 16schbench: 4 - 32schbench: 4 - 24schbench: 4 - 16schbench: 32 - 8schbench: 32 - 6schbench: 32 - 4schbench: 32 - 2schbench: 2 - 32schbench: 2 - 24schbench: 2 - 16schbench: 16 - 8schbench: 16 - 6schbench: 16 - 4schbench: 8 - 8schbench: 8 - 6schbench: 8 - 4schbench: 8 - 2schbench: 6 - 8schbench: 6 - 2schbench: 4 - 6schbench: 4 - 2stress-ng: System V Message Passingstress-ng: Glibc Qsort Data Sortingstress-ng: Glibc C String Functionsstress-ng: Context Switchingstress-ng: Socket Activitystress-ng: Memory Copyingstress-ng: Vector Mathstress-ng: Matrix Mathstress-ng: Semaphoresstress-ng: CPU Stressstress-ng: Tsearchstress-ng: Lsearchstress-ng: Hsearchstress-ng: Forkingstress-ng: Bsearchstress-ng: Cryptoopenssl: RSA 4096-bit Performancehackbench: 32 - Processhackbench: 16 - Processhackbench: 8 - Processhackbench: 4 - Processhackbench: 2 - Processhackbench: 16 - Threadhackbench: 1 - Processhackbench: 8 - Threadhackbench: 4 - Threadhackbench: 2 - Threadhackbench: 1 - Threadencode-mp3: WAV To MP3compress-pbzip2: 256MB File Compressionc-ray: Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixelcompress-7zip: Compress Speed Testmafft: Multiple Sequence Alignmentpostmark: Disk Transaction Performancecompilebench: Read Compiled Treecompilebench: Initial Createcompilebench: Compileiozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Write Performanceiozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Read Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performanceiozone: 1MB - 8GB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Read Performanceiozone: 1MB - 8GB - Read Performancedbench: 256dbench: 128dbench: 48dbench: 12dbench: 6dbench: 1fs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSyncfs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threadsfs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizesqlite: Timed SQLite Insertionsschbench: 16 - 2schbench: 6 - 6schbench: 6 - 4schbench: 4 - 8schbench: 4 - 4schbench: 2 - 8schbench: 2 - 6schbench: 2 - 4schbench: 2 - 2fs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizekernel test suite449365354475245845245009189355142080144640116693845231151579160564448846936934143200143445116779563413645946144330881850770054495573722739147300481282967300697412741764347846.37100.27323266.233176948.187865.132025.8813354.1847775.50568535.522930.37160.1681.2841747.4965255.592552.791076.691853.7388.4047.9424.9412.967.1048.474.0325.6013.497.384.2138.235.25114.82362653.843554521.59236.791672.85493.596132.83461.44491.884010.335891.725751.555946.956555.566596.933789.59374.751764.40422.37273.975.1312046189721093416841107115296833542367.03OpenBenchmarking.org

Schbench

Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32kernel test suite100K200K300K400K500KSE +/- 3612.33, N = 3449365

Schbench

Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24kernel test suite80K160K240K320K400KSE +/- 2238.27, N = 3354475

Schbench

Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16kernel test suite50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 2746.62, N = 3245845

Schbench

Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32kernel test suite50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 2703.31, N = 15245009

Schbench

Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24kernel test suite40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 1038.12, N = 3189355

Schbench

Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16kernel test suite30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 1938.40, N = 3142080

Schbench

Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32kernel test suite30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 1564.19, N = 3144640

Schbench

Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24kernel test suite20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 840.44, N = 3116693

Schbench

Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16kernel test suite20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 371.96, N = 384523

Schbench

Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32kernel test suite20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 1006.07, N = 3115157

Schbench

Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24kernel test suite20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 814.03, N = 391605

Schbench

Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16kernel test suite14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 461.51, N = 364448

Schbench

Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32kernel test suite20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 615.35, N = 384693

Schbench

Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24kernel test suite15K30K45K60K75KSE +/- 603.12, N = 1169341

Schbench

Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16kernel test suite9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 484.60, N = 343200

Schbench

Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8kernel test suite30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 1628.06, N = 3143445

Schbench

Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6kernel test suite30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 1128.85, N = 3116779

Schbench

Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4kernel test suite12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 237.56, N = 356341

Schbench

Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2kernel test suite8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 112.89, N = 336459

Schbench

Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32kernel test suite10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 369.50, N = 346144

Schbench

Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24kernel test suite7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 195.52, N = 333088

Schbench

Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16kernel test suite4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 277.33, N = 318507

Schbench

Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8kernel test suite15K30K45K60K75KSE +/- 877.74, N = 1570054

Schbench

Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6kernel test suite11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 307.67, N = 349557

Schbench

Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4kernel test suite8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 298.67, N = 337227

Schbench

Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8kernel test suite8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 524.30, N = 339147

Schbench

Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6kernel test suite6K12K18K24K30K30048

Schbench

Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4kernel test suite3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 158.59, N = 512829

Schbench

Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2kernel test suite1530456075SE +/- 0.58, N = 367

Schbench

Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8kernel test suite6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 21.33, N = 330069

Schbench

Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2kernel test suite1632486480SE +/- 1.11, N = 474

Schbench

Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6kernel test suite3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 108.25, N = 312741

Schbench

Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2kernel test suite2040608010076

Stress-NG

Test: System V Message Passing

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: System V Message Passingkernel test suite900K1800K2700K3600K4500KSE +/- 63015.29, N = 34347846.37

Stress-NG

Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sortingkernel test suite20406080100SE +/- 0.05, N = 3100.27

Stress-NG

Test: Glibc C String Functions

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Glibc C String Functionskernel test suite70K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 939.80, N = 3323266.23

Stress-NG

Test: Context Switching

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Context Switchingkernel test suite700K1400K2100K2800K3500KSE +/- 27773.38, N = 33176948.18

Stress-NG

Test: Socket Activity

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Socket Activitykernel test suite2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 33.05, N = 37865.13

Stress-NG

Test: Memory Copying

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Memory Copyingkernel test suite400800120016002000SE +/- 22.51, N = 32025.88

Stress-NG

Test: Vector Math

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Vector Mathkernel test suite3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 6.20, N = 313354.18

Stress-NG

Test: Matrix Math

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Matrix Mathkernel test suite10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 100.85, N = 347775.50

Stress-NG

Test: Semaphores

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Semaphoreskernel test suite120K240K360K480K600KSE +/- 786.79, N = 3568535.52

Stress-NG

Test: CPU Stress

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: CPU Stresskernel test suite6001200180024003000SE +/- 2.55, N = 32930.37

Stress-NG

Test: Tsearch

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Tsearchkernel test suite4080120160200SE +/- 0.39, N = 3160.16

Stress-NG

Test: Lsearch

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Lsearchkernel test suite20406080100SE +/- 0.04, N = 381.28

Stress-NG

Test: Hsearch

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Hsearchkernel test suite9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 34.43, N = 341747.49

Stress-NG

Test: Forking

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Forkingkernel test suite14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 123.08, N = 365255.59

Stress-NG

Test: Bsearch

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Bsearchkernel test suite5001000150020002500SE +/- 13.62, N = 32552.79

Stress-NG

Test: Crypto

OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.07.26Test: Cryptokernel test suite2004006008001000SE +/- 0.11, N = 31076.69

OpenSSL

RSA 4096-bit Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgSigns Per Second, More Is BetterOpenSSL 1.1.1RSA 4096-bit Performancekernel test suite400800120016002000SE +/- 10.64, N = 31853.73

Hackbench

Count: 32 - Type: Process

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 32 - Type: Processkernel test suite20406080100SE +/- 0.13, N = 388.40

Hackbench

Count: 16 - Type: Process

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 16 - Type: Processkernel test suite1122334455SE +/- 0.04, N = 347.94

Hackbench

Count: 8 - Type: Process

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 8 - Type: Processkernel test suite612182430SE +/- 0.01, N = 324.94

Hackbench

Count: 4 - Type: Process

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 4 - Type: Processkernel test suite3691215SE +/- 0.00, N = 312.96

Hackbench

Count: 2 - Type: Process

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 2 - Type: Processkernel test suite246810SE +/- 0.01, N = 37.10

Hackbench

Count: 16 - Type: Thread

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 16 - Type: Threadkernel test suite1122334455SE +/- 0.01, N = 348.47

Hackbench

Count: 1 - Type: Process

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 1 - Type: Processkernel test suite0.90681.81362.72043.62724.534SE +/- 0.01, N = 34.03

Hackbench

Count: 8 - Type: Thread

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 8 - Type: Threadkernel test suite612182430SE +/- 0.01, N = 325.60

Hackbench

Count: 4 - Type: Thread

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 4 - Type: Threadkernel test suite3691215SE +/- 0.02, N = 313.49

Hackbench

Count: 2 - Type: Thread

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 2 - Type: Threadkernel test suite246810SE +/- 0.02, N = 37.38

Hackbench

Count: 1 - Type: Thread

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 1 - Type: Threadkernel test suite0.94731.89462.84193.78924.7365SE +/- 0.01, N = 34.21

LAME MP3 Encoding

WAV To MP3

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.100WAV To MP3kernel test suite918273645SE +/- 0.03, N = 338.23

Parallel BZIP2 Compression

256MB File Compression

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12256MB File Compressionkernel test suite1.18132.36263.54394.72525.9065SE +/- 0.08, N = 135.25

C-Ray

Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterC-Ray 1.1Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixelkernel test suite306090120150SE +/- 0.07, N = 3114.82

7-Zip Compression

Compress Speed Test

OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 16.02Compress Speed Testkernel test suite8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 344.91, N = 336265

Timed MAFFT Alignment

Multiple Sequence Alignment

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MAFFT Alignment 7.392Multiple Sequence Alignmentkernel test suite0.8641.7282.5923.4564.32SE +/- 0.05, N = 43.84

PostMark

Disk Transaction Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction Performancekernel test suite8001600240032004000SE +/- 16.67, N = 335541. (CC) gcc options: -O3

Compile Bench

Test: Read Compiled Tree

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled Treekernel test suite110220330440550SE +/- 1.67, N = 3521.59

Compile Bench

Test: Initial Create

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial Createkernel test suite50100150200250SE +/- 3.36, N = 3236.79

Compile Bench

Test: Compile

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Compilekernel test suite400800120016002000SE +/- 4.53, N = 31672.85

IOzone

Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performancekernel test suite110220330440550SE +/- 1.32, N = 3493.591. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performancekernel test suite13002600390052006500SE +/- 105.98, N = 36132.831. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performancekernel test suite100200300400500SE +/- 5.09, N = 15461.441. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performancekernel test suite110220330440550SE +/- 3.14, N = 3491.881. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performancekernel test suite9001800270036004500SE +/- 30.49, N = 34010.331. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performancekernel test suite13002600390052006500SE +/- 82.47, N = 35891.721. (CC) gcc options: -O3

Dbench

Client Count: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.0Client Count: 256kernel test suite12002400360048006000SE +/- 7.41, N = 35751.551. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2

Dbench

Client Count: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.0Client Count: 128kernel test suite13002600390052006500SE +/- 55.33, N = 35946.951. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2

Dbench

Client Count: 48

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.0Client Count: 48kernel test suite14002800420056007000SE +/- 44.60, N = 36555.561. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2

Dbench

Client Count: 12

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.0Client Count: 12kernel test suite14002800420056007000SE +/- 15.86, N = 36596.931. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2

Dbench

Client Count: 6

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.0Client Count: 6kernel test suite8001600240032004000SE +/- 17.97, N = 33789.591. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2

Dbench

Client Count: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.0Client Count: 1kernel test suite80160240320400SE +/- 1.13, N = 3374.751. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2

FS-Mark

Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSynckernel test suite400800120016002000SE +/- 8.14, N = 31764.401. (CC) gcc options: -static

FS-Mark

Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threadskernel test suite90180270360450SE +/- 1.52, N = 3422.371. (CC) gcc options: -static

FS-Mark

Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizekernel test suite60120180240300SE +/- 0.55, N = 3273.971. (CC) gcc options: -static

SQLite

Timed SQLite Insertions

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.22Timed SQLite Insertionskernel test suite1.15432.30863.46294.61725.7715SE +/- 0.07, N = 35.131. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lz -ldl -lpthread

Schbench

Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2kernel test suite3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 187.33, N = 1512046

Schbench

Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6kernel test suite4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 446.47, N = 1218972

Schbench

Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4kernel test suite2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 274.05, N = 1510934

Schbench

Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8kernel test suite4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 329.72, N = 1516841

Schbench

Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4kernel test suite20406080100SE +/- 30.75, N = 15107

Schbench

Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8kernel test suite306090120150SE +/- 29.40, N = 13115

Schbench

Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6kernel test suite60120180240300SE +/- 164.65, N = 15296

Schbench

Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4kernel test suite2004006008001000SE +/- 424.44, N = 12833

Schbench

Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2kernel test suite120240360480600SE +/- 353.10, N = 12542

FS-Mark

Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizekernel test suite80160240320400SE +/- 34.83, N = 15367.031. (CC) gcc options: -static

Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4