1080p Linux Gaming Compare NVIDIA AMD

Low-end graphics card benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1905063-HV-1080PLINU87
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 2 Tests
Steam 11 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
RX 560
May 02 2019
  3 Hours, 50 Minutes
RX 570
May 03 2019
  3 Hours, 48 Minutes
RX 580
May 02 2019
  3 Hours, 51 Minutes
GTX 1060
May 03 2019
  3 Hours, 58 Minutes
GTX 1650
May 03 2019
  3 Hours, 57 Minutes
GTX 1660
May 02 2019
  3 Hours, 56 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  3 Hours, 54 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

RX 560

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB (1300/1750MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.9-050009-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.1.0-devel padoka PPA (LLVM 9.0.0), Vulkan: 1.1.90, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Kernel Notes: amdgpu.cik_support=1
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

RX 570

Changed Graphics to Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X 4GB (1244/1750MHz).

RX 580

Changed Graphics to MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X 8GB (1366/2000MHz).

GTX 1060

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB (1506/4006MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.9-050009-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.09, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.1.99, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

GTX 1650

Changed Graphics to ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB (1485/4001MHz).

GTX 1660

Changed Graphics to ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB (1530/4001MHz).

1080p Linux Gaming Compare NVIDIA AMDOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS)Intel Cannon Lake PCH16384MBSamsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENTSapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB (1300/1750MHz)Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X 4GB (1244/1750MHz)MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X 8GB (1366/2000MHz)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB (1506/4006MHz)ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB (1485/4001MHz)ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB (1530/4001MHz)Realtek ALC1220Acer B286HKIntel I219-VUbuntu 19.045.0.9-050009-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.32.0X Server 1.20.4modesetting 1.20.4NVIDIA 430.094.5 Mesa 19.1.0-devel padoka PPA (LLVM 9.0.0)4.6.01.1.901.1.99GCC 8.3.0ext41920x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriversOpenGLsVulkansCompilerFile-SystemScreen Resolution1080p Linux Gaming Compare NVIDIA AMD BenchmarksSystem Logs- RX 560, RX 580: amdgpu.cik_support=1- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- RX 560, RX 570, RX 580: GLAMOR- __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

RX 560RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 1660Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%143%187%230%273%Unigine SuperpositionTotal War: WARHAMMER IIRise of the Tomb RaiderDeus Ex: Mankind DividedA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAStrange BrigadeDawn of War IIIDiRT Rally 2.0HITMAN 2F1 2018TesseractBioShock InfiniteDota 2Xonotic

RX 560RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 1660Per Dollar Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%123%146%169%192%TesseractXonoticStrange BrigadeDota 2DiRT Rally 2.0Deus Ex: Mankind DividedHITMAN 2Dawn of War IIITotal War: WARHAMMER IIBioShock InfiniteF1 2018Unigine SuperpositionRise of the Tomb RaiderA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAP.D.G.MP.D.G.MP.D.G.MP.D.G.MP.D.G.MP.D.G.MP.D.G.MP.D.G.MP.D.G.MP.D.G.MP.D.G.MP.D.G.MP.D.G.MP.D.G.M

1080p Linux Gaming Compare NVIDIA AMDthronesofbritannia: 1920 x 1080 - Mediumthronesofbritannia: 1920 x 1080 - Highthronesofbritannia: 1920 x 1080 - Ultrabioshock-infinite: 1920 x 1080 - Ultradow3: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - OpenGLdow3: 1920 x 1080 - High - OpenGLdeus-exmd: 1920 x 1080 - Low Qualitydeus-exmd: 1920 x 1080 - High Qualitydirt-rally2: 1920 x 1080 - Lowdirt-rally2: 1920 x 1080 - Highdota2: 1920 x 1080 - Vulkanf12018: 1920 x 1080 - High Qualityhitman2: 1920 x 1080 - Mediumhitman2: 1920 x 1080 - Ultrariseofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Off - Spine Of The Mountainriseofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Off - Prophets Tombriseofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Off - Geothermal Valleyriseofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Very High - Off - Spine Of The Mountainriseofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Very High - Off - Prophets Tombriseofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Very High - Off - Geothermal Valleystrange-brigade: 1920 x 1080 - Mediumstrange-brigade: 1920 x 1080 - Highstrange-brigade: 1920 x 1080 - Ultratesseract: 1920 x 1080tww2: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Skaven Battletww2: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra - Skaven Battleunigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGLunigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGLxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - UltimateRX 560RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 166061.7349.5327.8715749.3245.1635.0724.9713045.5810414536.0433.7163.0043.6047.4049.1037.4034.5057.5353.7349.2035140.6721.9049.9025.50277102.5782.3747.5320585.8978.1963.0745.2321075.0013623759.5353.61104.6371.7379.7781.5362.4358.2760606053169.4738.8383.3342.67322120.7796.4057.33212103.2896.6572.7052.5025990.3013625372.1366.34125.0387.0395.7396.8076.1370.9760606059787.4046.6097.0751.73323125.93102.3756.0325488.5882.7169.2749.6319175.0914226359.2255.53118.4384.4092.00100.9075.8071.63115.53107.0099.5743585.4748.10125.6360.8330994.3775.1740.8021267.8262.5758.0740.0315460.3814122446.6443.4397.2369.3369.8781.5760.7053.8781.8775.1769.7736164.2335.6090.8744.63238134.80110.7361.1325396.4690.4081.7057.3721287.6214327369.3064.00141.40102.70105.33118.8091.6781.77126.10115.87107.0343594.9054.17138.9068.33298OpenBenchmarking.org

A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA

A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. NOTES for cross-platform comparisons: TODO See notes in install.sh for a few small tweaks including disabling the CPU governor check when testing for it's effects Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: MediumRX 560GTX 1650RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 1660306090120150SE +/- 0.47, N = 3SE +/- 0.42, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.49, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 0.65, N = 361.7394.37102.57120.77125.93134.80MIN: 2 / MAX: 173.2MIN: 3.6 / MAX: 207.5MIN: 2.8 / MAX: 183.9MIN: 2.2 / MAX: 239.8MIN: 3.6 / MAX: 254.9MIN: 3.6 / MAX: 246.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Total Frame TimeRX 560GTX 1650RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 166050100150200250Min: 6.3 / Avg: 15.98 / Max: 247.7Min: 5.2 / Avg: 10.65 / Max: 254.8Min: 5.5 / Avg: 9.76 / Max: 250.6Min: 4.2 / Avg: 8.23 / Max: 254.1Min: 3.9 / Avg: 7.88 / Max: 254.8Min: 4.1 / Avg: 7.35 / Max: 253.3

MinAvgMaxRX 58028.299.4130.1GTX 10607.190.0122.1GTX 16607.279.2111.1RX 57031.177.692.0GTX 16506.155.968.7RX 5605.240.354.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166053.067.175.0RX 57053.064.469.0GTX 106050.063.169.0RX 56046.062.369.0GTX 165047.061.067.0RX 58031.054.163.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: HighRX 560GTX 1650RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 166020406080100SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.41, N = 3SE +/- 0.50, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 3SE +/- 0.50, N = 349.5375.1782.3796.40102.37110.73MIN: 3.9 / MAX: 133.7MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 175.7MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 144.2MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 180MIN: 3.7 / MAX: 190.9MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 202.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Total Frame TimeRX 560GTX 1650RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 166050100150200250Min: 7.5 / Avg: 20.3 / Max: 258.3Min: 5.7 / Avg: 13.4 / Max: 257.6Min: 7.3 / Avg: 12.05 / Max: 255.5Min: 6 / Avg: 10.42 / Max: 261.4Min: 5.3 / Avg: 9.83 / Max: 253.8Min: 4.9 / Avg: 9.05 / Max: 253.6

MinAvgMaxRX 58029.0101.5127.3GTX 10607.194.8123.6GTX 16607.583.2110.3RX 57031.079.292.2GTX 16506.257.068.3RX 5605.241.454.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166057.068.976.0RX 57056.065.569.0GTX 106053.065.271.0GTX 165050.062.367.0RX 56047.060.566.0RX 58038.056.863.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: UltraRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060RX 580GTX 16601428425670SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 327.8740.8047.5356.0357.3361.13MIN: 3.7 / MAX: 98.2MIN: 3.9 / MAX: 114.3MIN: 3.7 / MAX: 112.8MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 131.5MIN: 3.6 / MAX: 104.3MIN: 3.7 / MAX: 117.5

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Total Frame TimeRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060RX 580GTX 166050100150200250Min: 10.7 / Avg: 35.95 / Max: 255Min: 8.9 / Avg: 24.64 / Max: 255.2Min: 8.9 / Avg: 21.03 / Max: 255.9Min: 7.6 / Avg: 17.98 / Max: 263.9Min: 9.6 / Avg: 17.51 / Max: 257.2Min: 8.5 / Avg: 16.31 / Max: 256

MinAvgMaxRX 58028.3102.6130.2GTX 10607.392.5121.3GTX 16607.681.3106.6RX 57031.179.092.0GTX 16506.456.768.6RX 5605.240.851.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166057.068.374.0RX 57056.065.869.0GTX 106055.065.771.0RX 56048.062.569.0GTX 165050.062.267.0RX 58037.056.963.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: MediumRX 560RX 580GTX 1660GTX 1060GTX 1650RX 5700.16650.3330.49950.6660.83250.570.610.620.630.630.741. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. RX 580: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.4. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.5. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: HighRX 560RX 580GTX 1650GTX 1060GTX 1660RX 5700.13280.26560.39840.53120.6640.450.480.500.510.510.591. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. RX 580: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.4. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.5. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: UltraRX 560GTX 1650GTX 1060GTX 1660RX 580RX 5700.07650.1530.22950.3060.38250.260.270.280.280.290.341. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.3. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.4. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.5. RX 580: $199 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

BioShock Infinite

A Steam-based test of the BioShock Infinite game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBioShock InfiniteResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraRX 560RX 570GTX 1650RX 580GTX 1660GTX 106060120180240300SE +/- 0.46, N = 3SE +/- 1.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 2.79, N = 4SE +/- 0.47, N = 3SE +/- 1.83, N = 3157205212212253254MIN: 32.43 / MAX: 157.17MIN: 33.96 / MAX: 207.35MIN: 30.09 / MAX: 212.62MIN: 36.86 / MAX: 219.96MIN: 29.39 / MAX: 253.85MIN: 29.31 / MAX: 255.58

MinAvgMaxRX 58029.086.8126.1RX 57031.179.192.1GTX 10606.070.4110.8GTX 166014.357.588.4GTX 165016.451.168.6RX 5605.243.052.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBioShock InfiniteGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRX 56044.067.173.0RX 57045.062.968.0RX 58030.056.665.0GTX 166037.054.066.0GTX 165032.052.764.0GTX 106029.049.561.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterBioShock InfiniteGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterBioShock InfinitePerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraRX 580GTX 1660GTX 1060GTX 1650RX 560RX 5700.33080.66160.99241.32321.6541.071.161.281.421.441.471. RX 580: $199 reported cost.2. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.3. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.5. RX 560: $109 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

Dawn of War III

Dawn of War III Mad Max on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060GTX 1660RX 58020406080100SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.86, N = 5SE +/- 0.72, N = 3SE +/- 1.03, N = 6SE +/- 1.24, N = 5SE +/- 0.71, N = 349.3267.8285.8988.5896.46103.28MIN: 40.84 / MAX: 76.69MIN: 35.57 / MAX: 100.9MIN: 71.71 / MAX: 134.87MIN: 46.21 / MAX: 133.6MIN: 52.63 / MAX: 145.13MIN: 85.74 / MAX: 159

MinAvgMaxRX 58029.080.1133.0GTX 10607.065.3114.5RX 57031.163.691.2GTX 16607.254.793.0GTX 16505.942.568.1RX 5605.233.053.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRX 57055.060.565.0GTX 166051.058.465.0RX 56046.057.466.0GTX 106047.055.062.0GTX 165046.054.362.0RX 58035.048.461.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Renderer: OpenGLRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060GTX 1660RX 58020406080100SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 345.1662.5778.1982.7190.4096.65MIN: 37 / MAX: 70.37MIN: 53.68 / MAX: 91.72MIN: 63.75 / MAX: 124.13MIN: 70.86 / MAX: 124.5MIN: 77.69 / MAX: 135.19MIN: 81.03 / MAX: 151.24

MinAvgMaxRX 58029.082.1134.2GTX 10606.665.4115.5RX 57030.263.592.2GTX 16607.254.895.0GTX 16505.942.568.6RX 5605.233.354.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRX 57052.059.365.0GTX 166050.057.665.0RX 56045.056.265.0GTX 165045.053.462.0GTX 106045.053.362.0RX 58034.048.661.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1660GTX 1060RX 560GTX 1650RX 580RX 5700.13950.2790.41850.5580.69750.440.450.450.460.520.621. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.3. RX 560: $109 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.5. RX 580: $199 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1660RX 560GTX 1060GTX 1650RX 580RX 5700.1260.2520.3780.5040.630.410.410.420.420.490.561. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RX 560: $109 reported cost.3. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.5. RX 580: $199 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

This is a benchmark of Deus Ex: Mankind Divided on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPreset: 1920 x 1080 - Low QualityRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060RX 580GTX 166020406080100SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.77, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 335.0758.0763.0769.2772.7081.70MIN: 21.5 / MAX: 52.6MIN: 41.7 / MAX: 78.4MIN: 43.3 / MAX: 89.6MIN: 50.9 / MAX: 89.1MIN: 48.8 / MAX: 102.4MIN: 60.9 / MAX: 110

MinAvgMaxRX 58028.287.1122.2RX 57031.172.992.1GTX 10606.848.0105.4GTX 16607.242.391.2RX 5605.238.447.1GTX 16506.133.768.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRX 57049.062.269.0RX 56050.061.967.0RX 58033.053.265.0GTX 166036.051.371.0GTX 165031.047.366.0GTX 106030.045.663.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPreset: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060RX 580GTX 16601326395265SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 324.9740.0345.2349.6352.5057.37MIN: 14.7 / MAX: 36.9MIN: 29.4 / MAX: 54.2MIN: 32.1 / MAX: 64.7MIN: 37.7 / MAX: 64.7MIN: 36 / MAX: 73.5MIN: 42.7 / MAX: 75.1

MinAvgMaxRX 58029.099.5124.1GTX 10606.982.5108.4RX 57031.180.092.1GTX 16607.574.192.7GTX 16506.355.968.4RX 5605.240.048.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRX 57056.066.470.0GTX 166054.066.072.0RX 56049.064.069.0GTX 165048.061.367.0GTX 106048.059.866.0RX 58037.054.761.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPerformance / Cost - Preset: 1920 x 1080 - Low QualityRX 560GTX 1060GTX 1660RX 580GTX 1650RX 5700.10130.20260.30390.40520.50650.320.350.370.370.390.451. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.4. RX 580: $199 reported cost.5. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPerformance / Cost - Preset: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityRX 560GTX 1060GTX 1660RX 580GTX 1650RX 5700.07430.14860.22290.29720.37150.230.250.260.260.270.331. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.4. RX 580: $199 reported cost.5. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

DiRT Rally 2.0

This is a benchmark of DiRT Rally 2.0 running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized scene. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: LowRX 560GTX 1650GTX 1060RX 570GTX 1660RX 58060120180240300SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.64, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3130154191210212259MIN: 106.37 / MAX: 159.76MIN: 129.22 / MAX: 193.91MIN: 158.59 / MAX: 239.06MIN: 174.75 / MAX: 264.92MIN: 173.8 / MAX: 262.64MIN: 216.98 / MAX: 324.59

MinAvgMaxRX 58028.2101.0132.1GTX 10607.088.2110.5RX 57031.182.392.2GTX 16607.378.297.6GTX 16506.059.468.4RX 5605.246.154.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRX 57057.068.873.0GTX 166054.068.673.0RX 56051.068.073.0GTX 165048.064.369.0GTX 106050.063.869.0RX 58030.055.464.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: HighRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060GTX 1660RX 58020406080100SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 345.5860.3875.0075.0987.6290.30MIN: 38.03 / MAX: 57.46MIN: 47.7 / MAX: 76.53MIN: 63.54 / MAX: 94.59MIN: 58.54 / MAX: 94.86MIN: 69.69 / MAX: 109.25MIN: 76.19 / MAX: 113.53

MinAvgMaxRX 58029.0109.8133.0GTX 10607.291.2108.2RX 57031.183.694.2GTX 16607.382.797.9GTX 16506.260.068.1RX 5605.245.252.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166055.070.275.0RX 57059.067.972.0RX 56052.067.772.0GTX 106052.065.470.0GTX 165051.064.669.0RX 58039.059.864.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: LowGTX 1060GTX 1660GTX 1650RX 560RX 580RX 5700.33980.67961.01941.35921.6990.960.971.031.191.301.511. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.2. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.4. RX 560: $109 reported cost.5. RX 580: $199 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: HighGTX 1060GTX 1660GTX 1650RX 560RX 580RX 5700.12150.2430.36450.4860.60750.380.400.410.420.450.541. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.2. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.4. RX 560: $109 reported cost.5. RX 580: $199 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

Dota 2

This is a benchmark of Valve's Dota 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you have rights to Dota 2. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanRX 560RX 570RX 580GTX 1650GTX 1060GTX 1660306090120150SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 1.45, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.86, N = 3104136136141142143MIN: 104.3 / MAX: 104.5MIN: 133.8 / MAX: 138.8MIN: 136 / MAX: 136.8MIN: 140.1 / MAX: 141.5MIN: 141.2 / MAX: 142MIN: 141.5 / MAX: 144.3

MinAvgMaxRX 57031.157.890.2RX 58028.257.7112.2GTX 106027.453.697.9GTX 16607.040.393.8GTX 16505.838.767.8RX 5605.230.353.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDota 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRX 57055.061.268.0RX 56046.054.362.0GTX 166049.052.456.0GTX 106048.051.856.0GTX 165044.049.956.0RX 58024.035.945.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDota 2GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterDota 2Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanGTX 1660RX 580GTX 1060GTX 1650RX 560RX 5700.22050.4410.66150.8821.10250.650.680.710.950.950.981. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RX 580: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.5. RX 560: $109 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

F1 2018

This is a benchmark of F1 2018 running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 2018Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityRX 560GTX 1650RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 166060120180240300SE +/- 0.88, N = 3145224237253263273MIN: 129 / MAX: 169MIN: 196 / MAX: 263MIN: 189 / MAX: 275MIN: 188 / MAX: 286MIN: 200 / MAX: 305MIN: 204 / MAX: 309

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterF1 2018Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - High Quality - Total Frame TimeRX 560GTX 1650RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 166048121620Min: 5.77 / Avg: 6.86 / Max: 15.2Min: 3.63 / Avg: 4.47 / Max: 7.74Min: 3.42 / Avg: 4.22 / Max: 9.99Min: 3.15 / Avg: 3.92 / Max: 11.18Min: 3.05 / Avg: 3.79 / Max: 9.92Min: 2.88 / Avg: 3.63 / Max: 7.36

MinAvgMaxRX 58028.281.1115.0RX 57031.072.691.1GTX 10606.670.098.0GTX 16606.858.083.5GTX 16505.850.968.5RX 5605.233.247.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 2018GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRX 57050.062.669.0GTX 166047.059.266.0GTX 165042.057.265.0GTX 106041.057.164.0RX 56040.056.166.0RX 58029.049.059.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterF1 2018GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterF1 2018Performance / Cost - Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityGTX 1660RX 580GTX 1060RX 560GTX 1650RX 5700.38480.76961.15441.53921.9241.251.271.321.331.501.711. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RX 580: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.4. RX 560: $109 reported cost.5. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

GPU Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsGPU Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringRX 580GTX 1660GTX 1060RX 570GTX 1650RX 560306090120150Min: 28.17 / Avg: 90.83 / Max: 134.2Min: 7.11 / Avg: 81.06 / Max: 102.07Min: 6.04 / Avg: 79.82 / Max: 123.6Min: 30.17 / Avg: 75.21 / Max: 94.18Min: 6.05 / Avg: 58.98 / Max: 68.83Min: 5.17 / Avg: 32.8 / Max: 59.11

GPU Temperature Monitor

MinAvgMaxGTX 166032.067.174.0RX 57045.064.873.0GTX 165046.063.768.0GTX 106029.060.972.0RX 56033.057.173.0RX 58024.053.265.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsiusGPU Temperature MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System Monitoring20406080100

HITMAN 2

This is a benchmark of HITMAN 2 on Steam running on Linux under Steam Play. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHITMAN 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: MediumRX 560GTX 1650GTX 1060RX 570GTX 1660RX 5801632486480SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 336.0446.6459.2259.5369.3072.13MIN: 35.97 / MAX: 36.14MIN: 46.49 / MAX: 46.76MIN: 59.17 / MAX: 59.32MIN: 59.37 / MAX: 59.64MIN: 69.03 / MAX: 69.65MIN: 71.94 / MAX: 72.38

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: Medium - Total Frame TimeRX 560GTX 1650GTX 1060RX 570GTX 1660RX 58020406080100Min: 12.73 / Avg: 27.8 / Max: 114.16Min: 9.68 / Avg: 21.42 / Max: 40.95Min: 7.29 / Avg: 16.9 / Max: 45.96Min: 7.31 / Avg: 16.84 / Max: 79.05Min: 6.27 / Avg: 14.49 / Max: 25.82Min: 6.32 / Avg: 13.88 / Max: 28.02

MinAvgMaxRX 58028.3105.4129.2GTX 10607.392.8119.2GTX 16607.382.2102.1RX 57031.181.192.1GTX 16506.259.968.8RX 5605.244.353.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRX 57055.067.872.0GTX 106051.067.272.0RX 56047.066.172.0GTX 166032.065.174.0GTX 165046.063.768.0RX 58034.058.264.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 2GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHITMAN 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: UltraRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060GTX 1660RX 5801530456075SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 333.7143.4353.6155.5364.0066.34MIN: 33.62 / MAX: 33.85MIN: 43.4 / MAX: 43.46MIN: 53.48 / MAX: 53.81MIN: 55.43 / MAX: 55.7MIN: 63.89 / MAX: 64.16MIN: 66.11 / MAX: 66.53

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: Ultra - Total Frame TimeRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060GTX 1660RX 5801530456075Min: 13.4 / Avg: 29.54 / Max: 65.23Min: 10.19 / Avg: 23.04 / Max: 38.64Min: 7.84 / Avg: 18.7 / Max: 79.37Min: 7.53 / Avg: 17.95 / Max: 47.51Min: 6.73 / Avg: 15.65 / Max: 37.08Min: 6.44 / Avg: 15.13 / Max: 61.5

MinAvgMaxRX 58029.0106.0130.1GTX 10607.293.2117.4RX 57031.183.591.2GTX 16607.182.4101.9GTX 16506.159.768.5RX 5605.244.453.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166055.069.374.0RX 57060.068.873.0GTX 106055.067.572.0RX 56052.066.771.0GTX 165049.064.168.0RX 58040.059.164.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 2GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterHITMAN 2Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: MediumGTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 1660RX 560RX 580RX 5700.09680.19360.29040.38720.4840.300.310.320.330.360.431. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.2. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.3. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.4. RX 560: $109 reported cost.5. RX 580: $199 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterHITMAN 2Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: UltraGTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 1660RX 560RX 580RX 5700.08780.17560.26340.35120.4390.280.290.290.310.330.391. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.2. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.3. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.4. RX 560: $109 reported cost.5. RX 580: $199 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. NOTES for cross-platform comparisons: Due to the extreme demands of "Very High" 4K Texture Detail on all platforms, which can need ~6GB+ of VRAM, the "Very High" graphics preset on Linux only sets Texture Detail to "High". Nvidia ambient occlusion modes are not featured on the Linux version (HBAO+ and VXAO). See notes in install.sh for a few small tweaks including disabling the CPU governor check when testing for it's effects Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: Off - Scene: Spine Of The MountainRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060RX 580GTX 1660306090120150SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.62, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 3SE +/- 0.78, N = 363.0097.23104.63118.43125.03141.40MIN: 40.1 / MAX: 90.3MIN: 60.4 / MAX: 142.4MIN: 63.7 / MAX: 154.6MIN: 56.2 / MAX: 167.1MIN: 82.1 / MAX: 172.3MIN: 68.6 / MAX: 214.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: Off - Scene: Prophets TombRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060RX 580GTX 166020406080100SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 343.6069.3371.7384.4087.03102.70MIN: 19 / MAX: 86.9MIN: 32.2 / MAX: 148MIN: 34.3 / MAX: 134.2MIN: 43.8 / MAX: 183.5MIN: 43.2 / MAX: 196.3MIN: 41.7 / MAX: 204

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: Off - Scene: Geothermal ValleyRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060RX 580GTX 166020406080100SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 347.4069.8779.7792.0095.73105.33MIN: 33.8 / MAX: 57.9MIN: 52.8 / MAX: 98.3MIN: 45.5 / MAX: 99.5MIN: 72.3 / MAX: 118MIN: 31.3 / MAX: 118.6MIN: 48.6 / MAX: 143.3

MinAvgMaxRX 58029.0103.2132.0GTX 10607.193.1119.7GTX 16607.283.9107.6RX 57031.179.892.1GTX 16506.057.468.5RX 5606.042.753.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166054.068.776.0RX 57056.066.069.0GTX 106051.064.371.0RX 56051.061.166.0GTX 165047.061.066.0RX 58037.056.864.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: Off - Scene: Spine Of The MountainRX 560RX 570GTX 1650RX 580GTX 1060GTX 1660306090120150SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.42, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 349.1081.5381.5796.80100.90118.80MIN: 26 / MAX: 74.1MIN: 18.1 / MAX: 124.5MIN: 34.9 / MAX: 127.4MIN: 32.4 / MAX: 149.7MIN: 59.7 / MAX: 149.3MIN: 32 / MAX: 168.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: Off - Scene: Prophets TombRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060RX 580GTX 166020406080100SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 337.4060.7062.4375.8076.1391.67MIN: 16.2 / MAX: 79MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 94.6MIN: 26 / MAX: 90.9MIN: 26.2 / MAX: 171.3MIN: 42.5 / MAX: 134.1MIN: 33.7 / MAX: 192.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: Off - Scene: Geothermal ValleyRX 560GTX 1650RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 166020406080100SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 334.5053.8758.2770.9771.6381.77MIN: 28.4 / MAX: 45.9MIN: 36.1 / MAX: 73.1MIN: 46 / MAX: 75.1MIN: 59.7 / MAX: 93.6MIN: 36.4 / MAX: 104.7MIN: 67.2 / MAX: 112.6

MinAvgMaxRX 58029.1102.8126.0GTX 10607.091.1116.5GTX 16607.383.0104.8RX 57031.180.991.2GTX 16506.157.368.6RX 5605.241.952.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166055.068.675.0RX 57055.065.068.0GTX 106051.064.071.0GTX 165048.061.567.0RX 56048.059.364.0RX 58038.056.463.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: Off - Scene: Spine Of The MountainRX 560GTX 1060RX 580GTX 1650GTX 1660RX 5700.16880.33760.50640.67520.8440.580.600.630.650.650.751. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.3. RX 580: $199 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.5. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: Off - Scene: Prophets TombRX 560GTX 1060RX 580GTX 1650GTX 1660RX 5700.1170.2340.3510.4680.5850.400.420.440.470.470.521. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.3. RX 580: $199 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.5. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: Off - Scene: Geothermal ValleyRX 560GTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 1660RX 580RX 5700.12830.25660.38490.51320.64150.430.460.470.480.480.571. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.4. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.5. RX 580: $199 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: Off - Scene: Spine Of The MountainRX 560RX 580GTX 1060GTX 1660GTX 1650RX 5700.13280.26560.39840.53120.6640.450.490.510.540.550.591. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. RX 580: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.4. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.5. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: Off - Scene: Prophets TombRX 560GTX 1060RX 580GTX 1650GTX 1660RX 5700.10130.20260.30390.40520.50650.340.380.380.410.420.451. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.3. RX 580: $199 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.5. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: Off - Scene: Geothermal ValleyRX 560GTX 1060GTX 1650RX 580GTX 1660RX 5700.09450.1890.28350.3780.47250.320.360.360.360.370.421. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.4. RX 580: $199 reported cost.5. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

Strange Brigade

This is a benchmark of Strange Brigade running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized scene. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterStrange BrigadeResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: MediumRX 560RX 570RX 580GTX 1650GTX 1060GTX 1660306090120150SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 357.5360.0060.0081.87115.53126.10MIN: 29.9 / MAX: 126.9MIN: 59.5 / MAX: 60.5MIN: 59.4 / MAX: 60.5MIN: 18.2 / MAX: 407.2MIN: 21.8 / MAX: 420.5MIN: 28.2 / MAX: 406.2

MinAvgMaxGTX 10606.875.1114.8GTX 16607.064.299.9RX 57030.258.886.2RX 58028.258.085.2GTX 16505.946.667.9RX 5605.229.950.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterStrange BrigadeGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166052.061.870.0GTX 106049.059.768.0RX 57052.059.064.0GTX 165046.055.963.0RX 56037.053.866.0RX 58032.040.948.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterStrange BrigadeGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterStrange BrigadeResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: HighRX 560RX 570RX 580GTX 1650GTX 1060GTX 1660306090120150SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 353.7360.0060.0075.17107.00115.87MIN: 28 / MAX: 244MIN: 59.4 / MAX: 60.5MIN: 59.5 / MAX: 60.5MIN: 14.7 / MAX: 394.6MIN: 19.4 / MAX: 403.8MIN: 23.8 / MAX: 399.1

MinAvgMaxGTX 10607.078.6114.8GTX 16607.265.9100.1RX 57031.062.388.1RX 58028.260.788.2GTX 16506.047.568.9RX 5605.231.849.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterStrange BrigadeGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166053.062.471.0GTX 106051.060.167.0RX 57053.059.965.0RX 56046.057.566.0GTX 165047.056.363.0RX 58030.040.748.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterStrange BrigadeGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterStrange BrigadeResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: UltraRX 560RX 570RX 580GTX 1650GTX 1060GTX 166020406080100SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 349.2060.0060.0069.7799.57107.03MIN: 24.7 / MAX: 110.9MIN: 59.4 / MAX: 60.6MIN: 58.1 / MAX: 61.8MIN: 14.7 / MAX: 384.8MIN: 19.6 / MAX: 392.4MIN: 18.8 / MAX: 403

MinAvgMaxGTX 10606.976.9114.2GTX 16607.165.299.0RX 57030.363.689.2RX 58028.262.293.2GTX 16505.947.068.0RX 5605.231.449.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterStrange BrigadeGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166053.062.170.0RX 57053.059.665.0GTX 106050.059.166.0RX 56046.056.965.0GTX 165046.056.163.0RX 58030.041.049.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterStrange BrigadeGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterStrange BrigadePerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: MediumRX 580RX 570RX 560GTX 1650GTX 1060GTX 16600.13050.2610.39150.5220.65250.300.430.530.550.580.581. RX 580: $199 reported cost.2. RX 570: $139 reported cost.3. RX 560: $109 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.5. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.6. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterStrange BrigadePerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: HighRX 580RX 570RX 560GTX 1650GTX 1660GTX 10600.12150.2430.36450.4860.60750.300.430.490.500.530.541. RX 580: $199 reported cost.2. RX 570: $139 reported cost.3. RX 560: $109 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.5. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.6. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterStrange BrigadePerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: UltraRX 580RX 570RX 560GTX 1650GTX 1660GTX 10600.11250.2250.33750.450.56250.300.430.450.470.490.501. RX 580: $199 reported cost.2. RX 570: $139 reported cost.3. RX 560: $109 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.5. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.6. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080RX 560GTX 1650GTX 1060GTX 1660RX 570RX 580130260390520650SE +/- 1.80, N = 3SE +/- 0.60, N = 3SE +/- 4.54, N = 3SE +/- 2.57, N = 3SE +/- 6.84, N = 3SE +/- 5.19, N = 3351361435435531597

MinAvgMaxRX 58029.096.2132.1RX 57031.079.494.0GTX 10606.973.5101.8GTX 16607.157.484.5GTX 16505.954.466.4RX 5605.245.557.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRX 57054.062.265.0RX 56046.061.767.0GTX 166052.058.261.0GTX 165046.057.662.0GTX 106048.055.859.0RX 58038.052.558.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1660GTX 1060GTX 1650RX 580RX 560RX 5700.85951.7192.57853.4384.29751.992.192.423.003.223.821. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.4. RX 580: $199 reported cost.5. RX 560: $109 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

Total War: WARHAMMER II

Total War: WARHAMMER II on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. NOTES for cross-platform comparisons: TODO Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven BattleRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060RX 580GTX 166020406080100SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.91, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.26, N = 340.6764.2369.4785.4787.4094.90MIN: 5.6 / MAX: 218.9MIN: 11.8 / MAX: 256.6MIN: 6 / MAX: 227.6MIN: 12.7 / MAX: 274.6MIN: 5.9 / MAX: 209.2MIN: 12.6 / MAX: 299.5

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeRX 560GTX 1650RX 570GTX 1060RX 580GTX 16601326395265Min: 5.1 / Avg: 24.33 / Max: 56.8Min: 4 / Avg: 15.7 / Max: 37.3Min: 4.4 / Avg: 14.34 / Max: 38.6Min: 4.2 / Avg: 11.75 / Max: 68.5Min: 5.1 / Avg: 11.57 / Max: 69.1Min: 3.4 / Avg: 10.54 / Max: 61.5

MinAvgMaxRX 58028.286.4131.2GTX 10607.379.5123.3GTX 16607.770.1110.2RX 57031.067.291.1GTX 16506.347.568.4RX 5605.233.753.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166052.063.973.0RX 57053.061.266.0GTX 106050.060.969.0RX 56045.057.367.0GTX 165046.057.265.0RX 58033.050.362.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Skaven BattleRX 560GTX 1650RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 16601224364860SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 321.9035.6038.8346.6048.1054.17MIN: 10.1 / MAX: 133.9MIN: 11.5 / MAX: 163.3MIN: 12.8 / MAX: 157.1MIN: 12.3 / MAX: 149.3MIN: 12.3 / MAX: 202.5MIN: 12.8 / MAX: 152.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeRX 560GTX 1650RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 166020406080100Min: 8.8 / Avg: 45.71 / Max: 99.2Min: 6.1 / Avg: 28.23 / Max: 64.2Min: 8.2 / Avg: 25.57 / Max: 61.1Min: 7.3 / Avg: 21.36 / Max: 52.9Min: 7 / Avg: 20.96 / Max: 49.6Min: 7.2 / Avg: 18.46 / Max: 46.6

MinAvgMaxRX 58028.284.2125.1GTX 10607.277.4117.5RX 57031.069.091.1GTX 16607.567.7105.6GTX 16506.147.768.0RX 5605.232.449.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166053.063.072.0RX 57054.061.667.0GTX 106050.059.767.0GTX 165046.056.965.0RX 56045.056.164.0RX 58033.049.360.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven BattleRX 560GTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 1660RX 580RX 5700.11250.2250.33750.450.56250.370.430.430.430.440.501. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.4. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.5. RX 580: $199 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Skaven BattleRX 560RX 580GTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 1660RX 5700.0630.1260.1890.2520.3150.200.230.240.240.250.281. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. RX 580: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.5. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLRX 560RX 570GTX 1650RX 580GTX 1060GTX 1660306090120150SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 349.9083.3390.8797.07125.63138.90MAX: 73.1MAX: 134.5MAX: 124.8MAX: 154.5MAX: 171.9MAX: 194.2

MinAvgMaxRX 58029.0105.2133.1GTX 10607.598.0114.3GTX 16607.388.099.8RX 57030.285.391.2GTX 16506.062.268.6RX 5605.242.351.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166052.070.675.0RX 57051.067.672.0GTX 106048.065.570.0GTX 165048.064.868.0RX 56047.064.069.0RX 58034.058.964.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLRX 560RX 570GTX 1650RX 580GTX 1060GTX 16601530456075SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 325.5042.6744.6351.7360.8368.33MAX: 32.9MAX: 55.8MAX: 56.1MAX: 68.7MAX: 77.6MAX: 89

MinAvgMaxRX 58028.3112.2134.1GTX 10607.2102.3118.8GTX 16607.591.6102.0RX 57031.185.892.2GTX 16506.362.668.8RX 5605.246.753.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 166058.072.976.0RX 57060.068.772.0GTX 106055.068.571.0GTX 165052.066.069.0RX 56045.064.570.0RX 58041.061.764.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLRX 560RX 580RX 570GTX 1650GTX 1060GTX 16600.14180.28360.42540.56720.7090.460.490.600.610.630.631. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. RX 580: $199 reported cost.3. RX 570: $139 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.5. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.6. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLRX 560RX 580GTX 1650GTX 1060GTX 1660RX 5700.06980.13960.20940.27920.3490.230.260.300.310.310.311. RX 560: $109 reported cost.2. RX 580: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.4. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.5. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.6. RX 570: $139 reported cost.

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateGTX 1650RX 560GTX 1660GTX 1060RX 570RX 58070140210280350SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 1.01, N = 3SE +/- 1.28, N = 3SE +/- 2.25, N = 3SE +/- 1.60, N = 3238277298309322323MIN: 57 / MAX: 403MIN: 54 / MAX: 468MIN: 59 / MAX: 544MIN: 56 / MAX: 554MIN: 57 / MAX: 750MIN: 58 / MAX: 808

MinAvgMaxRX 58029.073.2113.3RX 57030.267.992.2GTX 10606.765.795.4GTX 16607.355.377.4GTX 16506.149.063.5RX 5605.240.459.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRX 56049.059.064.0GTX 166052.058.262.0RX 57053.058.161.0GTX 165049.057.762.0GTX 106049.054.958.0RX 58039.046.452.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateGTX 1660GTX 1060GTX 1650RX 580RX 570RX 5600.57151.1431.71452.2862.85751.361.551.601.622.322.541. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1060: $199 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $149 reported cost.4. RX 580: $199 reported cost.5. RX 570: $139 reported cost.6. RX 560: $109 reported cost.

Harmonic Mean Of Frames Per Second Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHarmonic Mean Of Frames Per Second Test ResultsHarmonic MeanRX 560GTX 1650RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 16602040608010046.6769.8274.8686.9390.50101.77

Geometric Mean Of All Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterGeometric Mean Of All Test ResultsResult Composite - 1080p Linux Gaming Compare NVIDIA AMDRX 560GTX 1650RX 570RX 580GTX 1060GTX 166030609012015055.5480.0086.7299.87102.64113.65

120 Results Shown

A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA
A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA:
  1920 x 1080 - Medium - Total Frame Time
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA
A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA:
  1920 x 1080 - High - Total Frame Time
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA
A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA:
  1920 x 1080 - Ultra - Total Frame Time
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Medium
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra
BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra
Dawn of War III
Dawn of War III:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
Dawn of War III
Dawn of War III:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Medium - OpenGL
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High - OpenGL
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Low Quality
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High Quality
DiRT Rally 2.0
DiRT Rally 2.0:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
DiRT Rally 2.0
DiRT Rally 2.0:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Low
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High
Dota 2
Dota 2:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Vulkan
F1 2018
F1 2018:
  1920 x 1080 - High Quality - Total Frame Time
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High Quality
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring
HITMAN 2
HITMAN 2:
  1920 x 1080 - Medium - Total Frame Time
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
HITMAN 2
HITMAN 2:
  1920 x 1080 - Ultra - Total Frame Time
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Medium
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra
Rise of the Tomb Raider:
  1920 x 1080 - Medium - Off - Spine Of The Mountain
  1920 x 1080 - Medium - Off - Prophets Tomb
  1920 x 1080 - Medium - Off - Geothermal Valley
Rise of the Tomb Raider:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
Rise of the Tomb Raider:
  1920 x 1080 - Very High - Off - Spine Of The Mountain
  1920 x 1080 - Very High - Off - Prophets Tomb
  1920 x 1080 - Very High - Off - Geothermal Valley
Rise of the Tomb Raider:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Off - Spine Of The Mountain
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Off - Prophets Tomb
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Off - Geothermal Valley
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Very High - Off - Spine Of The Mountain
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Very High - Off - Prophets Tomb
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Very High - Off - Geothermal Valley
Strange Brigade
Strange Brigade:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
Strange Brigade
Strange Brigade:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
Strange Brigade
Strange Brigade:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Medium
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra
Tesseract
Tesseract:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II:
  1920 x 1080 - Medium - Skaven Battle - Total Frame Time
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II:
  1920 x 1080 - Ultra - Skaven Battle - Total Frame Time
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Skaven Battle
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra - Skaven Battle
Unigine Superposition
Unigine Superposition:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
Unigine Superposition
Unigine Superposition:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGL
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGL
Xonotic
Xonotic:
  GPU Power Consumption Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultimate
  Harmonic Mean
  Result Composite - 1080p Linux Gaming Compare NVIDIA AMD

RX 560

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB (1300/1750MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.9-050009-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.1.0-devel padoka PPA (LLVM 9.0.0), Vulkan: 1.1.90, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Kernel Notes: amdgpu.cik_support=1
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Testing initiated at 2 May 2019 12:00 by user phoronix.

RX 570

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X 4GB (1244/1750MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.9-050009-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.1.0-devel padoka PPA (LLVM 9.0.0), Vulkan: 1.1.90, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Testing initiated at 3 May 2019 13:40 by user phoronix.

RX 580

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.9-050009-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.1.0-devel padoka PPA (LLVM 9.0.0), Vulkan: 1.1.90, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Kernel Notes: amdgpu.cik_support=1
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Testing initiated at 2 May 2019 16:11 by user phoronix.

GTX 1060

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB (1506/4006MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.9-050009-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.09, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.1.99, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Testing initiated at 3 May 2019 05:07 by user phoronix.

GTX 1650

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB (1485/4001MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.9-050009-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.09, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.1.99, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Testing initiated at 3 May 2019 08:24 by user phoronix.

GTX 1660

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB (1530/4001MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.9-050009-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.09, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.1.99, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Testing initiated at 2 May 2019 19:18 by user phoronix.