lxc testing on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-as --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NOOP / data=ordered,relatime,rw,stripe=1024Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performancePython Notes: Python 2.7.15rc1 + Python 3.6.5Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full AMD retpoline IBPB + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp
SkySilk EPYC Super Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.20GHz (64 Cores), Motherboard: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10 (A40 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Family 17h, Memory: 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2400MT/s, Disk: 2 x 128GB SAMSUNG MZNLF128, Graphics: Matrox G200eH, Monitor: Smart Cable, Network: Broadcom Limited NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.18-1-pve (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: lxc
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic OpenBenchmarking.org Phoronix Test Suite 2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.20GHz (64 Cores) HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10 (A40 BIOS) AMD Family 17h 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2400MT/s 2 x 128GB SAMSUNG MZNLF128 Matrox G200eH Smart Cable Broadcom Limited NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe Ubuntu 18.04 4.15.18-1-pve (x86_64) GCC 7.3.0 ext4 1024x768 lxc Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Monitor Network OS Kernel Compiler File-System Screen Resolution System Layer SkySilk EPYC Gigantic Benchmarks System Logs - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-as --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v - NOOP / data=ordered,relatime,rw,stripe=1024 - Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance - Python 2.7.15rc1 + Python 3.6.5 - __user pointer sanitization + Full AMD retpoline IBPB + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic vs. SkySilk EPYC Super Comparison Phoronix Test Suite Baseline +17.6% +17.6% +35.2% +35.2% +52.8% +52.8% 8.1% Total Time 70.2% CPU 63.2% Time To Compile 61.2% Boat - CPU-only 59% R.4.b.P 55.9% BMW27 - CPU-Only 52.5% C.S.T 49.2% Server Room - CPU-only 42.8% json 42.3% P.R.W.S.S.M 34.2% H.2.V.E 32.9% H.2.V.E 31.7% garbage 29.2% Masskrug - CPU-only 26% SMP Parallel 25.6% Time To Compile 25% SET 21.8% Server Rack - CPU-only 19.2% Buffer Test - Normal Load - Read Write 15.1% build 12.2% Memory Copy - 512 MiB T.S.I 7.7% S.W.P.S 3.5% P.B.S 2.7% GET 2.3% Stockfish Sysbench Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Darktable OpenSSL Blender 7-Zip Compression Darktable Go Benchmarks TTSIOD 3D Renderer x264 x265 Go Benchmarks Darktable Radiance Benchmark Timed Apache Compilation Redis Darktable PostgreSQL pgbench Go Benchmarks MBW SQLite Apache Benchmark PHPBench Redis SkySilk EPYC Gigantic SkySilk EPYC Super
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile darktable: Boat - CPU-only openssl: RSA 4096-bit Performance blender: BMW27 - CPU-Only compress-7zip: Compress Speed Test darktable: Server Room - CPU-only go-benchmark: json ttsiod-renderer: Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping x265: H.265 Video Encoding go-benchmark: garbage radiance: SMP Parallel darktable: Server Rack - CPU-only mbw: Memory Copy - 512 MiB sqlite: Timed SQLite Insertions phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite pybench: Total For Average Test Times pgbench: Buffer Test - Normal Load - Read Write sysbench: CPU redis: GET redis: SET stockfish: Total Time x264: H.264 Video Encoding go-benchmark: build build-apache: Time To Compile darktable: Masskrug - CPU-only apache-siege: 200 apache: Static Web Page Serving SkySilk EPYC Gigantic SkySilk EPYC Super 94.93 9.17 2296 257 39214 5.07 9438146 216 8.48 2755386 328 0.26 6609 63.05 357260 2542 2425 22660 1206141 1056984 20024594 48.93 25381396266 32.66 11.29 3557.71 14731 153.04 14.58 1473 392 26285 7.24 13432848 161 6.44 3559815 412 0.31 7144 67.90 347870 2543 2107 13883 1178994 868137 11763162 36.82 28469418176 40.84 14.22 14239 OpenBenchmarking.org
Blender OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79a Performance / Cost - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 9 18 27 36 45 39.20 20.59 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 7 Minutes, 5 Seconds: cost approximately 0.1 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 4 Minutes, 32 Seconds: cost approximately 0.08 dollar.
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 Performance / Cost - Time To Compile SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 5 10 15 20 25 21.43 12.34 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 10 Minutes, 16 Seconds: cost approximately 0.14 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 6 Minutes, 46 Seconds: cost approximately 0.13 dollar.
Stockfish OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Better Stockfish 9 Performance / Cost - Total Time SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 40M 80M 120M 160M 200M 117631620.00 200245940.00 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 7 Minutes, 3 Seconds: cost approximately 0.1 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 5 Minutes, 30 Seconds: cost approximately 0.1 dollar.
Darktable OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Performance / Cost - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 0.0338 0.0676 0.1014 0.1352 0.169 0.15 0.09 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 54 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 36 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar.
Sysbench OpenBenchmarking.org Events Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Better Sysbench 2018-07-28 Performance / Cost - Test: CPU SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 1388315.00 2265964.00 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 35 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 34 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar.
Darktable Darktable is an open-source photography / workflow application this will use any system-installed Darktable program or on Windows will automatically download the pre-built binary from the project. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 14.58 9.17
OpenSSL OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.0f Performance / Cost - RSA 4096-bit Performance SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 73633.50 114793.50 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 1 Minute, 20 Seconds: cost approximately 0.02 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 1 Minute, 12 Seconds: cost approximately 0.02 dollar.
OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.0f RSA 4096-bit Performance SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 46.76, N = 3 SE +/- 35.48, N = 3 1473 2296 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
7-Zip Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS Per Dollar, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Performance / Cost - Compress Speed Test SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K 90637.93 140050.00 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 21 Minutes, 37 Seconds: cost approximately 0.29 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 15 Minutes, 19 Seconds: cost approximately 0.28 dollar.
Cost To Run Tests OpenBenchmarking.org Cost / Price Per Hour, Fewer Is Better Cost To Run Tests Cost / Price Per Hour SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 0.45 0.9 1.35 1.8 2.25 1.33 2.00 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, running tests consumed 1 Hour, 37 Minutes, 41 Seconds: cost approximately 1.33 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, running tests consumed 1 Hour, 47 Minutes, 43 Seconds: cost approximately 2 dollar.
PHPBench OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Dollar, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 Performance / Cost - PHP Benchmark Suite SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M 17393500.00 11908666.67 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 1 Minute, 31 Seconds: cost approximately 0.02 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 1 Minute, 29 Seconds: cost approximately 0.03 dollar.
Darktable Darktable is an open-source photography / workflow application this will use any system-installed Darktable program or on Windows will automatically download the pre-built binary from the project. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 7.24 5.07
Go Benchmarks OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation x Dollar, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Performance / Cost - Test: json SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K 134328.48 94381.46 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 59 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 39 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar.
OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: json SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 147148.84, N = 3 SE +/- 58206.19, N = 3 13432848 9438146
Darktable OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Performance / Cost - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 0.0158 0.0316 0.0474 0.0632 0.079 0.07 0.05 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 31 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 25 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar.
PostgreSQL pgbench OpenBenchmarking.org TPS Per Dollar, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Performance / Cost - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K 23411.44 17321.71 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 6 Minutes, 48 Seconds: cost approximately 0.09 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 7 Minutes, 46 Seconds: cost approximately 0.14 dollar.
TTSIOD 3D Renderer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Dollar, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Performance / Cost - Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 3223.80 4326.20 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 3 Minutes, 45 Seconds: cost approximately 0.05 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 2 Minutes, 56 Seconds: cost approximately 0.05 dollar.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.55, N = 3 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 161 216 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mtune=native -flto -msse -mrecip -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -mssse3 -lSDL -fopenmp -fwhole-program -lstdc++
Go Benchmarks OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation x Dollar, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Performance / Cost - Test: build SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 160M 320M 480M 640M 800M 569388363.52 761441887.98 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 1 Minute, 30 Seconds: cost approximately 0.02 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 1 Minute, 26 Seconds: cost approximately 0.03 dollar.
x264 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Better x264 2018-07-28 Performance / Cost - H.264 Video Encoding SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 3682.00 4893.00 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 55 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 42 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar.
Go Benchmarks OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation x Dollar, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Performance / Cost - Test: garbage SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K 35598.15 27553.86 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 55 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 44 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar.
OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: garbage SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 800K 1600K 2400K 3200K 4000K SE +/- 90092.22, N = 3 SE +/- 25273.91, N = 3 3559815 2755386
Darktable OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Performance / Cost - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 0.0315 0.063 0.0945 0.126 0.1575 0.14 0.11 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 51 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 42 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar.
Timed Apache Compilation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7 Performance / Cost - Time To Compile SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 0.459 0.918 1.377 1.836 2.295 2.04 1.63 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 3 Minutes, 40 Seconds: cost approximately 0.05 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 2 Minutes, 56 Seconds: cost approximately 0.05 dollar.
PyBench OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Performance / Cost - Total For Average Test Times SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 30 60 90 120 150 101.72 127.10 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 2 Minutes, 59 Seconds: cost approximately 0.04 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 2 Minutes, 54 Seconds: cost approximately 0.05 dollar.
Redis OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Better Redis 4.0.8 Performance / Cost - Test: SET SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 86813746.00 105698441.00 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 39 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 37 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar.
Darktable Darktable is an open-source photography / workflow application this will use any system-installed Darktable program or on Windows will automatically download the pre-built binary from the project. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 0.0698 0.1396 0.2094 0.2792 0.349 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 0.31 0.26
Radiance Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Better Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Performance / Cost - Test: SMP Parallel SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 9 18 27 36 45 37.12 32.76 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 6 Minutes, 55 Seconds: cost approximately 0.09 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 5 Minutes, 30 Seconds: cost approximately 0.1 dollar.
x265 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Better x265 2.8 Performance / Cost - H.265 Video Encoding SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 30 60 90 120 150 107.33 121.14 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 4 Minutes, 45 Seconds: cost approximately 0.06 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 3 Minutes, 40 Seconds: cost approximately 0.07 dollar.
Apache Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Better Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Performance / Cost - Static Web Page Serving SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K 237319.83 210449.57 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 4 Minutes, 29 Seconds: cost approximately 0.06 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 3 Minutes, 44 Seconds: cost approximately 0.07 dollar.
SQLite OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.22 Performance / Cost - Timed SQLite Insertions SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 0.8505 1.701 2.5515 3.402 4.2525 3.40 3.78 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 3 Minutes, 32 Seconds: cost approximately 0.05 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 3 Minutes, 14 Seconds: cost approximately 0.06 dollar.
MBW OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s Per Dollar, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Performance / Cost - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K 714440.00 660858.00 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 27 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 29 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar.
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 26.33, N = 3 SE +/- 61.05, N = 3 7144 6609 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
SQLite This is a simple benchmark of SQLite. At present this test profile just measures the time to perform a pre-defined number of insertions on an indexed database. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.22 Timed SQLite Insertions SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 67.90 63.05 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lz -ldl -lpthread
PHPBench PHPBench is a benchmark suite for PHP. It performs a large number of simple tests in order to bench various aspects of the PHP interpreter. PHPBench can be used to compare hardware, operating systems, PHP versions, PHP accelerators and caches, compiler options, etc. The number of iterations used is 1,000,000. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 1617.85, N = 3 SE +/- 1082.12, N = 3 347870 357260
Redis OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Better Redis 4.0.8 Performance / Cost - Test: GET SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 30M 60M 90M 120M 150M 117899358.00 120614085.00 1. SkySilk EPYC Super: $0.8185 reported cost per hour, test consumed 38 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar. 2. SkySilk EPYC Gigantic: $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 38 Seconds: cost approximately 0.01 dollar.
PyBench This test profile reports the total time of the different average timed test results from PyBench. PyBench reports average test times for different functions such as BuiltinFunctionCalls and NestedForLoops, with this total result providing a rough estimate as to Python's average performance on a given system. This test profile runs PyBench each time for 20 rounds. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 2.67, N = 3 SE +/- 5.78, N = 3 2543 2542
Apache Siege OpenBenchmarking.org Transactions Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Performance / Cost - Concurrent Users: 200 SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 6588.35 1. $1.1161 reported cost per hour, test consumed 28 Minutes, 52 Seconds: cost approximately 0.54 dollar.
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 4.0.8 Test: SET SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 118517.44, N = 3 SE +/- 30724.42, N = 3 868137 1056984 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread
Stockfish This is a test of Stockfish, an advanced C++11 chess benchmark that can scale up to 128 CPU cores. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Stockfish 9 Total Time SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M SE +/- 622177.03, N = 3 SE +/- 72212.64, N = 3 11763162 20024594 1. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -flto
x264 This is a simple test of the x264 encoder run on the CPU (OpenCL support disabled) with a sample video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x264 2018-07-28 H.264 Video Encoding SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 3.93, N = 3 SE +/- 3.47, N = 3 36.82 48.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -ffast-math -std=gnu99 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize
Darktable Darktable is an open-source photography / workflow application this will use any system-installed Darktable program or on Windows will automatically download the pre-built binary from the project. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 14.22 11.29
Apache Benchmark This is a test of ab, which is the Apache benchmark program. This test profile measures how many requests per second a given system can sustain when carrying out 1,000,000 requests with 100 requests being carried out concurrently. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving SkySilk EPYC Super SkySilk EPYC Gigantic 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 500.37, N = 3 SE +/- 446.17, N = 3 14239 14731 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
SkySilk EPYC Gigantic Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-as --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NOOP / data=ordered,relatime,rw,stripe=1024Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performancePython Notes: Python 2.7.15rc1 + Python 3.6.5Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full AMD retpoline IBPB + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp
Testing initiated at 9 September 2018 16:16 by user root.
SkySilk EPYC Super Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.20GHz (64 Cores), Motherboard: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10 (A40 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Family 17h, Memory: 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2400MT/s, Disk: 2 x 128GB SAMSUNG MZNLF128, Graphics: Matrox G200eH, Monitor: Smart Cable, Network: Broadcom Limited NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.18-1-pve (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: lxc
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-as --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NOOP / data=ordered,relatime,rw,stripe=1024Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performancePython Notes: Python 2.7.15rc1 + Python 3.6.5Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full AMD retpoline IBPB + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp
Testing initiated at 9 September 2018 19:13 by user root.