piccbxonotic Intel Core i7-6800K testing with a Gigabyte X99-Designare EX-CF and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8192MB on Fedora 24 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1611280-LO-PICCBXONO72 xonotic graphics Processor: Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte X99-Designare EX-CF, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 129024MB, Disk: 4001GB Seagate ST4000DM000-2AE1 + 480GB Kingston SHPM228, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8192MB (1620/5005MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Network: Intel Connection + Intel Wireless 8260
OS: Fedora 24, Kernel: 4.8.8-200.fc24.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 367.57, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.8, Compiler: GCC 6.2.1 20160916, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Effects Quality: Ultimate xonotic graphics 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.23, N = 3 242.62 MIN: 49 / MAX: 622
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultimate xonotic graphics 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.52, N = 3 243.15 MIN: 50 / MAX: 628
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Effects Quality: Ultimate xonotic graphics 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 242.61 MIN: 48 / MAX: 604
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Effects Quality: Ultimate xonotic graphics 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 242.54 MIN: 51 / MAX: 599
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: Ultimate xonotic graphics 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 244.73 MIN: 49 / MAX: 602
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultimate xonotic graphics 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.22, N = 3 242.38 MIN: 49 / MAX: 598
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultimate xonotic graphics 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.06, N = 3 240.50 MIN: 51 / MAX: 599
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 303.10 MIN: 138 / MAX: 623
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Effects Quality: Ultra xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 303.29 MIN: 129 / MAX: 624
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultra xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.94, N = 3 302.52 MIN: 135 / MAX: 622
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.22, N = 3 339.57 MIN: 177 / MAX: 796
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Effects Quality: High xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 337.69 MIN: 176 / MAX: 805
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Effects Quality: Ultra xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.54, N = 3 302.97 MIN: 174 / MAX: 619
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Effects Quality: Ultra xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.65, N = 3 300.19 MIN: 139 / MAX: 620
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: Ultra xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.75, N = 3 300.27 MIN: 175 / MAX: 618
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: High xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 3.03, N = 3 338.59 MIN: 153 / MAX: 777
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultra xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 4.01, N = 3 308.02 MIN: 153 / MAX: 647
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultra xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.22, N = 3 300.06 MIN: 148 / MAX: 628
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low xonotic graphics 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.18, N = 3 391.00 MIN: 183 / MAX: 945
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Effects Quality: Low xonotic graphics 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 391.48 MIN: 213 / MAX: 934
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Effects Quality: High xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 336.68 MIN: 132 / MAX: 803
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Effects Quality: High xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.21, N = 3 335.19 MIN: 168 / MAX: 771
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: High xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 336.41 MIN: 149 / MAX: 799
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Low xonotic graphics 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.81, N = 3 389.91 MIN: 178 / MAX: 935
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: High xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 338.75 MIN: 140 / MAX: 803
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: High xonotic graphics 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 3.30, N = 3 338.21 MIN: 180 / MAX: 800
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Effects Quality: Low xonotic graphics 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.10, N = 3 392.42 MIN: 186 / MAX: 939
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Effects Quality: Low xonotic graphics 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 2.88, N = 3 390.18 MIN: 190 / MAX: 961
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: Low xonotic graphics 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 4.35, N = 3 393.67 MIN: 191 / MAX: 979
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Low xonotic graphics 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 391.62 MIN: 218 / MAX: 935
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Low xonotic graphics 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.40, N = 3 390.96 MIN: 216 / MAX: 931
xonotic graphics Processor: Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte X99-Designare EX-CF, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 129024MB, Disk: 4001GB Seagate ST4000DM000-2AE1 + 480GB Kingston SHPM228, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8192MB (1620/5005MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Network: Intel Connection + Intel Wireless 8260
OS: Fedora 24, Kernel: 4.8.8-200.fc24.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 367.57, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.8, Compiler: GCC 6.2.1 20160916, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave
Testing initiated at 28 November 2016 09:41 by user piccb.