Iris 6200 Early Linux Tests

Running pts/xonotic-1.4.0, pts/gputest-1.3.1, pts/tesseract-1.1.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1507060-BE-1507057BE87
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
i7 5775C Iris 6200
July 05 2015
 
My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 6200
July 06 2015
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  1 Minute
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Iris 6200 Early Linux TestsProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen Resolutioni7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 6200Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.70GHz (8 Cores)ASRock Z97 Extreme6Intel Broadwell-U- DMI16384MB120GB Toshiba MKNSSDEC120GBIntel Broadwell-U (1150MHz)Intel Broadwell-U AudioDELL P2210HIntel ConnectionUbuntu 15.104.1.0-040100-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.3.2X Server 1.17.1intel 2.99.9173.3 Mesa 10.5.8GCC 4.9.2ext41920x1080Intel Core i5-4570S @ 3.60GHz (4 Cores)ASUS B85M-EIntel 4th Gen Core DRAM4096MB60GB OCZ VERTEX3 + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EARX-00PIntel HD 4600 (1150MHz)Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4thSMS24A850Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411Ubuntu 15.044.1.1-gnu (x86_64)KDE Frameworks 51920x1200OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 6200: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveGraphics Details- My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 6200: SNA

i7 5775C Iris 6200 vs. My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 6200 ComparisonPhoronix Test Suite 10.8.4Baseline+62.8%+62.8%+125.6%+125.6%+188.4%+188.4%Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen251.1%Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen232.9%Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen201.7%1920 x 1080151.5%1920 x 1080 - High149.5%Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen117.5%1920 x 1080 - Low111.8%Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen75.5%GpuTestGpuTestGpuTestTesseractXonoticGpuTestXonoticGpuTesti7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 6200

Iris 6200 Early Linux Testsxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Lowxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highgputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreentesseract: 1920 x 1080i7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 6200293.81167.0477629697127826370697.40138.7466.964424276327747923438.72OpenBenchmarking.org

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Lowi7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 620060120180240300SE +/- 31.65, N = 6SE +/- 0.73, N = 3293.81138.74MIN: 106 / MAX: 6687MIN: 75 / MAX: 204
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Lowi7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 620050100150200250Min: 215.15 / Avg: 293.81 / Max: 438.74Min: 137.29 / Avg: 138.74 / Max: 139.59

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Highi7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 62004080120160200SE +/- 3.80, N = 6SE +/- 0.22, N = 3167.0466.96MIN: 88 / MAX: 266MIN: 36 / MAX: 89
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Highi7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 6200306090120150Min: 155.37 / Avg: 167.04 / Max: 180.85Min: 66.69 / Avg: 66.96 / Max: 67.4

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 620017003400510068008500SE +/- 11.46, N = 3SE +/- 3.21, N = 377624424
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 620013002600390052006500Min: 7740 / Avg: 7761.67 / Max: 7779Min: 4418 / Avg: 4424 / Max: 4429

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 62002004006008001000SE +/- 5.36, N = 3SE +/- 1.20, N = 3969276
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 62002004006008001000Min: 963 / Avg: 969.33 / Max: 980Min: 274 / Avg: 276.33 / Max: 278

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 620015K30K45K60K75KSE +/- 722.65, N = 3SE +/- 603.17, N = 37127832774
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 620012K24K36K48K60KMin: 70196 / Avg: 71278.33 / Max: 72649Min: 31568 / Avg: 32774.33 / Max: 33379

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 620060120180240300SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 326379
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 620050100150200250Min: 263 / Avg: 263 / Max: 263Min: 79 / Avg: 79 / Max: 79

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 6200150300450600750SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3706234
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 6200120240360480600Min: 706 / Avg: 706 / Max: 706Min: 234 / Avg: 234 / Max: 234

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080i7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 620020406080100SE +/- 0.46, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 397.4038.72
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080i7 5775C Iris 6200My Haswell HD4600 vs Iris 620020406080100Min: 96.61 / Avg: 97.4 / Max: 98.21Min: 38.63 / Avg: 38.72 / Max: 38.78