2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core testing with a Dell 02MJ3T (1.2.5 BIOS) and Matrox Matrox G200eW3 on Ubuntu 18.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Dual EPYC 7601 Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.62GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 02MJ3T (1.2.5 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Family 17h, Memory: 516096MB, Disk: 120GB SSDSCKJB120G7R, Graphics: Matrox Matrox G200eW3, Monitor: VE228, Network: Broadcom and subsidiaries BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA
OS: Ubuntu 18.10, Kernel: 4.18.0-8-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200
Environment Notes: CXXFLAGS=-O3-march=native CFLAGS=-O3-march=nativeCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vPython Notes: Python 2.7.15+ + Python 3.6.7rc1Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full AMD retpoline IBPB + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp
Timed LLVM Compilation Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 150.1 394.4 559.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 System Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 151.6 349.3 553.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 System Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Y-Cruncher Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 147.6 359.5 525.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Y-Cruncher 0.7.5.9481 System Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Stockfish Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 156.8 507.3 543.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stockfish 9 System Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
John The Ripper Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 147.1 405.2 508.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 System Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Primesieve Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 150.2 298.6 498.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 7.1 System Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
ebizzy Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 149.9 440.8 493.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ebizzy 0.3 System Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Rodinia Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 155.0 281.0 507.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 2.4 System Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Parboil Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 147.5 375.2 444.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 System Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
PostgreSQL pgbench Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 147.4 215.2 436.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 System Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
OpenSSL Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 148.5 367.3 432.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 System Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Rodinia Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 148.5 290.5 431.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 2.4 System Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
m-queens Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 146.0 360.7 423.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better m-queens 1.1 System Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 154.8 381.9 441.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better m-queens 1.2 System Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
John The Ripper Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 153.5 346.3 426.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 System Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Apache Siege Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 150.2 397.7 412.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 System Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Open Porous Media Git Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 154.6 402.2 422.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media Git System Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Stream Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 147.2 333.9 399.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 System Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Chaos Group V-RAY Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 204.6 447.1 540.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Blender Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 207.6 477.5 531.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79a System Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Open Porous Media Git Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 153.6 370.8 384.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media Git System Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 153.5 368.9 384.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media Git System Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
7-Zip Compression Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 207.2 384.2 499.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 16.02 System Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
GraphicsMagick Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 153.0 296.7 356.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 System Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
NAMD Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 245.0 506.2 569.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.13b1 System Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
GNU Octave Benchmark Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 167.1 274.0 380.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GNU Octave Benchmark 4.4.1 System Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Parboil Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 151.7 293.4 324.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 System Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Open Porous Media Git Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 151.7 298.7 306.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media Git System Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 182.3 349.5 361.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media Git System Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
PostgreSQL pgbench Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 148.7 196.3 287.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 System Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Darktable Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 251.9 362.8 473.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.4 System Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Blender Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 293.6 482.7 546.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79a System Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
MariaDB Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 152.2 259.2 279.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better MariaDB 10.3.8 System Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Parboil Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 207.6 312.6 377.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 System Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
POV-Ray Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 306.8 457.0 549.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 System Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
asmFish Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 307.4 519.6 535.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better asmFish 2017-09-19 System Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Darktable Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 160.0 211.6 275.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.4 System Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 145.4 200.8 248.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.4 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
GraphicsMagick Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 153.1 232.4 255.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 System Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 151.2 233.8 252.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 System Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
OpenCV Benchmark Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 149.7 236.0 249.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenCV Benchmark 3.3.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
GraphicsMagick Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 149.0 218.2 230.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cryptsetup Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 152.9 205.5 236.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cryptsetup 2.0.4 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
GraphicsMagick Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 154.5 216.7 232.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Tesseract OCR Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 152.0 207.5 222.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tesseract OCR 4.0.0-beta.3-249-g607e System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 151.6 201.0 218.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Tinymembench Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 148.3 204.1 212.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tinymembench 2018-05-28 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Node.js Octane Benchmark Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 148.9 202.3 212.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Node.js Octane Benchmark System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
MBW Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 148.7 206.2 212.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Memcached mcperf Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 146.7 192.3 207.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Open Porous Media Git Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 223.5 306.8 315.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media Git System Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Sysbench Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 226.9 296.2 319.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Sysbench 2018-07-28 System Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Memcached mcperf Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 151.7 204.6 212.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 148.3 193.0 207.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Sysbench Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 216.4 277.1 297.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Sysbench 2018-07-28 System Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
GraphicsMagick Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 149.1 198.9 202.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 System Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Swet Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 154.9 196.0 206.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Swet 1.5.16 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Rodinia Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 326.9 380.6 419.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 2.4 System Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
RAR Compression Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 196.5 233.6 247.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RAR Compression 5.6.1 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Rust Prime Benchmark Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 212.3 241.5 259.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rust Prime Benchmark System Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
DaCapo Benchmark Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 204.4 224.0 248.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 189.2 207.5 226.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
TTSIOD 3D Renderer Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 369.8 384.0 402.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b System Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Aircrack-ng Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 437.9 465.5 472.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Aircrack-ng 1.3 System Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
GraphicsMagick Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 201.3 210.5 212.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
FFTW Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 203.3 205.7 213.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
RAMspeed SMP Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 218.4 226.7 228.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
FFTW Min Avg Max Dual EPYC 7601 203.8 205.5 209.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Meta Performance Per Watt OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better Meta Performance Per Watt Performance Per Watt Dual EPYC 7601 6M 12M 18M 24M 30M 29078372.54
CloverLeaf OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CloverLeaf System Power Consumption Monitor Dual EPYC 7601 90 180 270 360 450 417.0
Apache Siege OpenBenchmarking.org Transactions Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Dual EPYC 7601 10 20 30 40 50 42.09
Memcached mcperf OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Set Dual EPYC 7601 50 100 150 200 250 216.06
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Get Dual EPYC 7601 70 140 210 280 350 327.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Add Dual EPYC 7601 40 80 120 160 200 198.90
Sysbench OpenBenchmarking.org Events Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: CPU Dual EPYC 7601 70 140 210 280 350 300.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Events Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: Memory Dual EPYC 7601 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 15188.53
Darktable OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.4 System Power Consumption Monitor Dual EPYC 7601 50 100 150 200 250 231.2
PostgreSQL pgbench OpenBenchmarking.org TPS Per Watt, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write Dual EPYC 7601 6 12 18 24 30 25.65
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS Per Watt, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only Dual EPYC 7601 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2334.42
MariaDB OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better MariaDB 10.3.8 Clients: 32 Dual EPYC 7601 0.8978 1.7956 2.6934 3.5912 4.489 3.99
Cryptsetup OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Cryptsetup 2.0.4 PBKDF2-whirlpool Dual EPYC 7601 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 3064.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Second, More Is Better Cryptsetup 2.0.4 PBKDF2-whirlpool Dual EPYC 7601 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 908.00, N = 3 629651
Aircrack-ng OpenBenchmarking.org k/s Per Watt, More Is Better Aircrack-ng 1.3 Dual EPYC 7601 40 80 120 160 200 176.08
OpenSSL OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Dual EPYC 7601 6 12 18 24 30 25.14
Tachyon OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tachyon 0.98.9 System Power Consumption Monitor Dual EPYC 7601 30 60 90 120 150 147.4
Node.js Octane Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Node.js Octane Benchmark Dual EPYC 7601 30 60 90 120 150 146.09
ebizzy OpenBenchmarking.org Records/s Per Watt, More Is Better ebizzy 0.3 Dual EPYC 7601 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3896.18
Swet OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Average Dual EPYC 7601 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K 2696386.73
asmFish OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second Per Watt, More Is Better asmFish 2017-09-19 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Dual EPYC 7601 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K 232034.75
Stockfish OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Stockfish 9 Total Time Dual EPYC 7601 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K 202014.26
7-Zip Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS Per Watt, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test Dual EPYC 7601 90 180 270 360 450 406.85
GraphicsMagick OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: HWB Color Space Dual EPYC 7601 0.225 0.45 0.675 0.9 1.125 1.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Dual EPYC 7601 0.18 0.36 0.54 0.72 0.9 0.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Resizing Dual EPYC 7601 0.081 0.162 0.243 0.324 0.405 0.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Enhanced Dual EPYC 7601 0.1958 0.3916 0.5874 0.7832 0.979 0.87
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Sharpen Dual EPYC 7601 0.1778 0.3556 0.5334 0.7112 0.889 0.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Rotate Dual EPYC 7601 0.2138 0.4276 0.6414 0.8552 1.069 0.95
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Swirl Dual EPYC 7601 0.2025 0.405 0.6075 0.81 1.0125 0.90
TTSIOD 3D Renderer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping Dual EPYC 7601 0.2385 0.477 0.7155 0.954 1.1925 1.06
Node.js Express HTTP Load Test OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Dual EPYC 7601 6 12 18 24 30 26.47
John The Ripper OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: Traditional DES Dual EPYC 7601 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K 637839.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Dual EPYC 7601 40 80 120 160 200 202.81
FFTW OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops Per Watt, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Dual EPYC 7601 14 28 42 56 70 61.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops Per Watt, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Dual EPYC 7601 6 12 18 24 30 25.59
Parboil OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 System Power Consumption Monitor Dual EPYC 7601 70 140 210 280 350 313.7
MBW OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s Per Watt, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB Dual EPYC 7601 13 26 39 52 65 59.57
Tinymembench OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset Dual EPYC 7601 12 24 36 48 60 55.61
Stream OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy Dual EPYC 7601 90 180 270 360 450 434.45
RAMspeed SMP OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer Dual EPYC 7601 30 60 90 120 150 140.37
Open Porous Media Git OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media Git OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 32 - Solver Time Dual EPYC 7601 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 70.34 1. Build Time Fri Oct 12 08:04:54 EDT 2018;
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media Git OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 16 - Solver Time Dual EPYC 7601 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 1.39, N = 3 60.38 1. Build Time Fri Oct 12 08:04:54 EDT 2018;
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media Git OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Extra - Threads: 32 - Solver Time Dual EPYC 7601 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.91, N = 3 213 1. Build Time Fri Oct 12 08:04:54 EDT 2018;
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media Git OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Extra - Threads: 16 - Solver Time Dual EPYC 7601 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.66, N = 3 288 1. Build Time Fri Oct 12 08:04:54 EDT 2018;
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media Git OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 8 - Solver Time Dual EPYC 7601 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.71, N = 3 112 1. Build Time Fri Oct 12 08:04:54 EDT 2018;
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media Git OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Extra - Threads: 8 - Solver Time Dual EPYC 7601 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.06, N = 3 328 1. Build Time Fri Oct 12 08:04:54 EDT 2018;
OpenBenchmarking.org Events Per Second, More Is Better Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: Memory Dual EPYC 7601 900K 1800K 2700K 3600K 4500K SE +/- 14382.56, N = 3 4208363 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -O3 -funroll-loops -ggdb3 -march=native -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm
MariaDB OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.3.8 Clients: 32 Dual EPYC 7601 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 7.82, N = 3 1035 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -fno-rtti -O2 -lpthread -llzma -lbz2 -laio -lnuma -lz -lm -lpcre -lcrypt -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test measures the RSA 4096-bit performance of OpenSSL. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Dual EPYC 7601 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 13.53, N = 3 9233 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
POV-Ray This is a test of POV-Ray, the Persistence of Vision Raytracer. POV-Ray is used to create 3D graphics using ray-tracing. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Dual EPYC 7601 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 12.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -pthread -lSDL -lXpm -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lIlmImf -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lIexMath -lIlmThread -lpthread -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lz -lrt -lm -lboost_thread -lboost_system
Stockfish This is a test of Stockfish, an advanced C++11 chess benchmark that can scale up to 128 CPU cores. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Stockfish 9 Total Time Dual EPYC 7601 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M SE +/- 495197.34, N = 3 102477345 1. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -O3 -march=native -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 -pedantic -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -flto
GraphicsMagick This is a test of GraphicsMagick with its OpenMP implementation that performs various imaging tests to stress the system's CPU. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: HWB Color Space Dual EPYC 7601 50 100 150 200 250 210 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -march=native -pthread -ljbig -lwebp -lwebpmux -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Dual EPYC 7601 40 80 120 160 200 186 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -march=native -pthread -ljbig -lwebp -lwebpmux -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Resizing Dual EPYC 7601 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.19, N = 3 108 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -march=native -pthread -ljbig -lwebp -lwebpmux -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Enhanced Dual EPYC 7601 40 80 120 160 200 190 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -march=native -pthread -ljbig -lwebp -lwebpmux -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Sharpen Dual EPYC 7601 40 80 120 160 200 183 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -march=native -pthread -ljbig -lwebp -lwebpmux -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Rotate Dual EPYC 7601 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 189 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -march=native -pthread -ljbig -lwebp -lwebpmux -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Swirl Dual EPYC 7601 40 80 120 160 200 196 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -march=native -pthread -ljbig -lwebp -lwebpmux -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
TTSIOD 3D Renderer A portable GPL 3D software renderer that supports OpenMP and Intel Threading Building Blocks with many different rendering modes. This version does not use OpenGL but is entirely CPU/software based. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping Dual EPYC 7601 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 4.31, N = 3 407 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mtune=native -flto -msse -mrecip -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -mssse3 -lSDL -fopenmp -fwhole-program -lstdc++
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Dual EPYC 7601 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 5.99, N = 3 5265 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -O3 -march=native -lm
NAMD NAMD is a parallel molecular dynamics code designed for high-performance simulation of large biomolecular systems. NAMD was developed by the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group in the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.13b1 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms Dual EPYC 7601 0.1007 0.2014 0.3021 0.4028 0.5035 SE +/- 0.00087, N = 3 0.44749
Rodinia Rodinia is a suite focused upon accelerating compute-intensive applications with accelerators. CUDA, OpenMP, and OpenCL parallel models are supported by the included applications. This profile utilizes the OpenCL and OpenMP test binaries at the moment. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Dual EPYC 7601 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 21.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Dual EPYC 7601 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 12.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Parboil The Parboil Benchmarks from the IMPACT Research Group at University of Illinois are a set of throughput computing applications for looking at computing architecture and compilers. Parboil test-cases support OpenMP, OpenCL, and CUDA multi-processing environments. However, at this time the test profile is just making use of the OpenMP and OpenCL test workloads. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Dual EPYC 7601 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 5.18, N = 3 538 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
Tinymembench OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset Dual EPYC 7601 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 150.46, N = 3 11351 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -O3 -march=native -lm
System Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts System Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Dual EPYC 7601 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 145.4 / Avg: 276.23 / Max: 569.4
CloverLeaf CloverLeaf is a Lagrangian-Eulerian hydrodynamics benchmark. This test profile currently makes use of CloverLeaf's OpenMP version and benchmarked with the clover_bm8192.in input file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Dual EPYC 7601 0.387 0.774 1.161 1.548 1.935 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 1.72 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops -fopenmp
Parboil The Parboil Benchmarks from the IMPACT Research Group at University of Illinois are a set of throughput computing applications for looking at computing architecture and compilers. Parboil test-cases support OpenMP, OpenCL, and CUDA multi-processing environments. However, at this time the test profile is just making use of the OpenMP and OpenCL test workloads. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Dual EPYC 7601 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 2.57, N = 3 14.80 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Dual EPYC 7601 0.4275 0.855 1.2825 1.71 2.1375 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 1.90 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Dual EPYC 7601 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 31.94 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
Dual EPYC 7601 Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.62GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 02MJ3T (1.2.5 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Family 17h, Memory: 516096MB, Disk: 120GB SSDSCKJB120G7R, Graphics: Matrox Matrox G200eW3, Monitor: VE228, Network: Broadcom and subsidiaries BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA
OS: Ubuntu 18.10, Kernel: 4.18.0-8-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200
Environment Notes: CXXFLAGS=-O3-march=native CFLAGS=-O3-march=nativeCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vPython Notes: Python 2.7.15+ + Python 3.6.7rc1Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full AMD retpoline IBPB + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp
Testing initiated at 12 October 2018 11:44 by user phoronix.