without_dualchannel

Intel Core i7-3520M testing with a LENOVO 2325CN9 and Intel HD 4000 on Ubuntu 14.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1412204-SO-WITHOUTDU44
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive 4 Tests
Java 3 Tests
Single-Threaded 5 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
without_dualchannel
December 17 2014
 
withdualchannel
December 20 2014
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


without_dualchannelOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i7-3520M @ 2.90GHz (4 Cores)LENOVO 2325CN9Intel 3rd Gen Core DRAM8192MB16384MB500GB HITACHI HTS72505 + 256GB M4-CT256M4SSD3Intel HD 4000 (1250MHz)Realtek ALC269VCIntel 82579LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205Ubuntu 14.043.13.0-43-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.10.4X Server 1.15.1intel 2.99.910GCC 4.8ext41366x768ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionWithout_dualchannel BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- SNA- Python 2.7.6.- data=ordered,errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw

without_dualchannel vs. withdualchannel ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+43.3%+43.3%+86.6%+86.6%+129.9%+129.9%+173.2%+173.2%173.2%66.4%51.6%27.5%17.9%4.5%Read Compiled TreeCompile1366 x 7681366 x 768Initial CreateF.E.T15.5%linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2Compile BenchCompile BenchUnigine HeavenWarsowCompile BenchBork File EncrypterUnpacking The Linux Kernelwithout_dualchannelwithdualchannel

without_dualchannelcompilebench: Compilecompilebench: Initial Createcompilebench: Read Compiled Treeunpack-linux: linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2unigine-heaven: 1366 x 768warsow: 1366 x 768network-loopback: Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopbackmrbayes: Primate Phylogeny Analysisjava-scimark2: FFT Performancejava-scimark2: SOR Performancejava-scimark2: Composite Performancejava-scimark2: Monte Carlo Performancebork: File Encryption Timecompress-gzip: 2GB File Compressionsudokut: Total Timephpbench: PHP Benchmark Suitesunflow: Global Illumination + Image Synthesiswithout_dualchannelwithdualchannel404.67228.05757.839.7918.5541.6014.4225.951151.881497.101812.67839.6812.8613.0418.071161515.65673.50268.832070.049.3728.1353.0314.4025.651160.901509.861839.59846.3814.8513.0217.861171555.64OpenBenchmarking.org

Compile Bench

Compilebench tries to age a filesystem by simulating some of the disk IO common in creating, compiling, patching, stating and reading kernel trees. It indirectly measures how well filesystems can maintain directory locality as the disk fills up and directories age. This current test is setup to use the makej mode with 10 initial directories Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Compilewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel150300450600750SE +/- 2.26, N = 3SE +/- 18.16, N = 6673.50404.67
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Compilewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel120240360480600Min: 669.61 / Avg: 673.5 / Max: 677.43Min: 349.15 / Avg: 404.67 / Max: 477.37

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial Createwithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel60120180240300SE +/- 11.27, N = 3SE +/- 3.84, N = 6268.83228.05
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial Createwithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel50100150200250Min: 246.94 / Avg: 268.83 / Max: 284.42Min: 209.73 / Avg: 228.05 / Max: 235.81

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled Treewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel400800120016002000SE +/- 10.78, N = 3SE +/- 10.42, N = 32070.04757.83
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled Treewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel400800120016002000Min: 2048.49 / Avg: 2070.04 / Max: 2081.13Min: 746.94 / Avg: 757.83 / Max: 778.66

Unpacking The Linux Kernel

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterUnpacking The Linux Kernellinux-2.6.32.tar.bz2withdualchannelwithout_dualchannel3691215SE +/- 0.11, N = 7SE +/- 0.21, N = 89.379.79
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterUnpacking The Linux Kernellinux-2.6.32.tar.bz2withdualchannelwithout_dualchannel3691215Min: 9.23 / Avg: 9.37 / Max: 10.06Min: 9.3 / Avg: 9.79 / Max: 10.76

Unigine Heaven

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.01366 x 768withdualchannelwithout_dualchannel714212835SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 628.1318.55
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.01366 x 768withdualchannelwithout_dualchannel612182430Min: 27.79 / Avg: 28.13 / Max: 28.76Min: 18.21 / Avg: 18.55 / Max: 20.03

Warsow

This is a benchmark of Warsow, a popular open-source first-person shooter. This game uses the QFusion engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.511366 x 768withdualchannelwithout_dualchannel1224364860SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 353.0341.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.511366 x 768withdualchannelwithout_dualchannel1122334455Min: 52.6 / Avg: 53.03 / Max: 53.5Min: 41.3 / Avg: 41.6 / Max: 42

Loopback TCP Network Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterLoopback TCP Network PerformanceTime To Transfer 10GB Via Loopbackwithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel48121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 314.4014.42
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterLoopback TCP Network PerformanceTime To Transfer 10GB Via Loopbackwithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel48121620Min: 14.38 / Avg: 14.4 / Max: 14.44Min: 14.25 / Avg: 14.42 / Max: 14.51

Timed MrBayes Analysis

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MrBayes Analysis 3.1.2Primate Phylogeny Analysiswithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel612182430SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 325.6525.95
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MrBayes Analysis 3.1.2Primate Phylogeny Analysiswithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel612182430Min: 25.62 / Avg: 25.65 / Max: 25.67Min: 25.94 / Avg: 25.95 / Max: 25.95

Java SciMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0FFT Performancewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel2004006008001000SE +/- 1.17, N = 4SE +/- 0.25, N = 41160.901151.88
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0FFT Performancewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel2004006008001000Min: 1158.19 / Avg: 1160.9 / Max: 1163.21Min: 1151.31 / Avg: 1151.88 / Max: 1152.46

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0SOR Performancewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel30060090012001500SE +/- 0.51, N = 4SE +/- 0.76, N = 41509.861497.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0SOR Performancewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel30060090012001500Min: 1508.97 / Avg: 1509.86 / Max: 1511.34Min: 1495.5 / Avg: 1497.1 / Max: 1498.41

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Composite Performancewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel400800120016002000SE +/- 0.50, N = 4SE +/- 13.00, N = 41839.591812.67
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Composite Performancewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel30060090012001500Min: 1838.49 / Avg: 1839.59 / Max: 1840.45Min: 1785.82 / Avg: 1812.67 / Max: 1836.37

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Monte Carlo Performancewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel2004006008001000SE +/- 0.16, N = 4SE +/- 0.49, N = 4846.38839.68
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Monte Carlo Performancewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel150300450600750Min: 846.13 / Avg: 846.38 / Max: 846.8Min: 838.86 / Avg: 839.68 / Max: 840.83

Bork File Encrypter

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBork File Encrypter 1.4File Encryption Timewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel48121620SE +/- 1.15, N = 6SE +/- 0.07, N = 314.8512.86
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBork File Encrypter 1.4File Encryption Timewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel48121620Min: 12.24 / Avg: 14.85 / Max: 18.41Min: 12.78 / Avg: 12.86 / Max: 13.01

Gzip Compression

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGzip Compression2GB File Compressionwithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel3691215SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 313.0213.04
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGzip Compression2GB File Compressionwithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel48121620Min: 12.96 / Avg: 13.02 / Max: 13.05Min: 12.94 / Avg: 13.04 / Max: 13.11

Sudokut

This is a test of Sudokut, which is a Sudoku puzzle solver written in Tcl. This test measures how long it takes to solve 100 Sudoku puzzles. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSudokut 0.4Total Timewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel48121620SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 317.8618.07
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSudokut 0.4Total Timewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel510152025Min: 17.84 / Avg: 17.86 / Max: 17.87Min: 18.06 / Avg: 18.07 / Max: 18.08

PHPBench

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterPHPBench 0.8.1PHP Benchmark Suitewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 63.51, N = 3SE +/- 72.34, N = 3117155116151
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterPHPBench 0.8.1PHP Benchmark Suitewithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel20K40K60K80K100KMin: 117044 / Avg: 117154.67 / Max: 117264Min: 116062 / Avg: 116150.67 / Max: 116294

Sunflow Rendering System

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSunflow Rendering System 0.07.2Global Illumination + Image Synthesiswithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel1.27132.54263.81395.08526.3565SE +/- 0.02, N = 2SE +/- 0.05, N = 25.645.65
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSunflow Rendering System 0.07.2Global Illumination + Image Synthesiswithdualchannelwithout_dualchannel246810Min: 5.62 / Avg: 5.64 / Max: 5.66Min: 5.61 / Avg: 5.65 / Max: 5.7