DotHill-XFS DotHill Perf Disk with XFS
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1302220-AR-DOTHILLXF09 DotHill-XFS Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5620 @ 2.39GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: IBM 94Y7614, Chipset: Intel 5520 I/O + ICH10, Memory: 53248MB, Disk: 1022GB ServeRAID M5015 + 2 x 29976GB DH3000, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200EV, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-37-generic (x86_64), Display Driver: matrox, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: xfs
System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.7.3.
PostMark This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance DotHill-XFS 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 13.67, N = 3 3232
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance DotHill-XFS 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 337.81
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance DotHill-XFS 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 1.40, N = 3 4325.10
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance DotHill-XFS 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 305.64
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance DotHill-XFS 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 0.82, N = 3 4291.53
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance DotHill-XFS 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 304.68
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance DotHill-XFS 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 17.14, N = 3 4166.74
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance DotHill-XFS 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 301.67
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance DotHill-XFS 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 0.80, N = 3 4926.27
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance DotHill-XFS 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 338.06
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance DotHill-XFS 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 8.50, N = 3 4886.93
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance DotHill-XFS 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 304.34
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance DotHill-XFS 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 17.28, N = 3 4836.69
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance DotHill-XFS 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 303.35
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance DotHill-XFS 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 13.85, N = 3 4671.19
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance DotHill-XFS 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 300.67
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance DotHill-XFS 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 4.96, N = 3 4202.41
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance DotHill-XFS 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 331.14
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance DotHill-XFS 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 32.97, N = 3 4144.36
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance DotHill-XFS 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 294.26
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance DotHill-XFS 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 14.78, N = 3 4126.08
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance DotHill-XFS 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 293.10
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance DotHill-XFS 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 5.99, N = 3 4027.42
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance DotHill-XFS 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 291.24
DotHill-XFS Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5620 @ 2.39GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: IBM 94Y7614, Chipset: Intel 5520 I/O + ICH10, Memory: 53248MB, Disk: 1022GB ServeRAID M5015 + 2 x 29976GB DH3000, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200EV, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-37-generic (x86_64), Display Driver: matrox, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: xfs
System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.7.3.
Testing initiated at 21 February 2013 11:15 by user bench.