test_ubuntu_64bit_11.04 Running pts/aio-stress-1.1.0, pts/apache-1.3.0, pts/build-linux-kernel-1.2.0, pts/c-ray-1.0.0, pts/doom3-1.1.0, pts/dcraw-1.0.0, pts/encode-mp3-1.3.1, pts/etqw-1.1.0, pts/ffmpeg-1.5.0, pts/fs-mark-1.0.0, pts/gnupg-1.3.1, pts/gcrypt-1.0.0, pts/john-the-ripper-1.0.1, pts/lightsmark-1.2.0, pts/qgears2-1.0.1, pts/quake4-1.1.0, pts/systester-1.0.0, pts/urbanterror-1.1.0, pts/x11perf-1.1.0, pts/x264-1.2.0.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1106253-IV-TESTUBUNT57 test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit Processor: Intel Core i5-2410M @ 2.30GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 03PH4G, Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 320GB Western Digital WDC WD3200BEKT-0, Graphics: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family IGP 256MB, Audio: IDT 92HD90BXX
OS: Ubuntu 11.04, Kernel: 2.6.38-8-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 3.8.14, Display Server: X Server 1.10.1, Display Driver: intel 2.14.0, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Compiz and Firefox were running on this system. Intel SpeedStep was enabled.
x11perf OpenBenchmarking.org Operations / Second, More Is Better x11perf 1.5 Test: Char in 80-char aa line test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1120000
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations / Second, More Is Better x11perf 1.5 Test: PutImage XY 500x500 Square test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 0.27 0.54 0.81 1.08 1.35 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations / Second, More Is Better x11perf 1.5 Test: Copy 500x500 From Pixmap To Pixmap test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 5.77, N = 3 2100
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations / Second, More Is Better x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px Compositing From Window To Window test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 17.64, N = 3 2043
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations / Second, More Is Better x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px Compositing From Pixmap To Window test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 5.77, N = 3 2010
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations / Second, More Is Better x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px Copy From Window To Window test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.33, N = 3 2073
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations / Second, More Is Better x11perf 1.5 Test: Fill 300 x 300px AA Trapezoid test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 3.33, N = 3 1603
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations / Second, More Is Better x11perf 1.5 Test: Scrolling 500 x 500 px test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 3.33, N = 3 1447
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations / Second, More Is Better x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px PutImage Square test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 10.00, N = 3 1680
QGears2 This test runs qgears2, which is a test written by Zack Rusin and is based upon cairogears. This test can see how well different rendering backends perform and uses Qt4. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Image Scaling test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 3.48, N = 3 688.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Text test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.70, N = 3 93.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Gears test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.18, N = 3 138.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Image Scaling test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 55.56
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Text test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.61, N = 3 197.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Gears test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 98.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Image Scaling test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 37.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Text test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 105.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Gears test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 46.68
dcraw OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.34, N = 6 24.93
test_ubuntu_11.04_64bit Processor: Intel Core i5-2410M @ 2.30GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 03PH4G, Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 320GB Western Digital WDC WD3200BEKT-0, Graphics: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family IGP 256MB, Audio: IDT 92HD90BXX
OS: Ubuntu 11.04, Kernel: 2.6.38-8-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 3.8.14, Display Server: X Server 1.10.1, Display Driver: intel 2.14.0, Compiler: GCC 4.5.2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Compiz and Firefox were running on this system. Intel SpeedStep was enabled.
Testing initiated at 25 June 2011 09:25 by user neonatus.