Chaos Group V-RAY

This is a test of Chaos Group's V-RAY benchmark. V-RAY is a commercial renderer that can integrate with various creator software products like SketchUp and 3ds Max. The V-RAY benchmark is standalone and supports CPU and NVIDIA CUDA/RTX based rendering.

You must manually download the (free) V-RAY CLI benchmark program from https://www.chaosgroup.com/vray/benchmark and place it in your Phoronix Test Suite download cache prior to test installation/execution.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark v-ray.

Project Site

chaosgroup.com

Test Created

28 July 2018

Last Updated

25 June 2022

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel

Test Type

System

Accolades

50k+ Downloads

Supported Platforms

Supported Architectures

x86_64

Revision History

pts/v-ray-1.4.0 [View Source] Sat, 25 Jun 2022 07:19:50 GMT
Update against V-RAY 5.02 upstream.

pts/v-ray-1.3.0 [View Source] Sat, 06 Feb 2021 18:35:44 GMT
Update against V-Ray 5 Benchmark upstream release.

pts/v-ray-1.2.1 [View Source] Sun, 17 May 2020 15:55:15 GMT
Add macOS support.

pts/v-ray-1.2.0 [View Source] Sat, 01 Feb 2020 09:46:33 GMT
Update against upstream V-Ray Next 4.10.07.

pts/v-ray-1.1.0 [View Source] Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:38:54 GMT
Update against latest upstream

pts/v-ray-1.0.2 [View Source] Fri, 17 Aug 2018 07:53:28 GMT
Very easy Windows support here too.

pts/v-ray-1.0.1 [View Source] Sat, 28 Jul 2018 14:39:49 GMT
Set MinimumLength to avoid false positives if trying to run test on GPU when no CUDA device is available.

pts/v-ray-1.0.0 [View Source] Sat, 28 Jul 2018 14:03:11 GMT
Initial commit of Chaos Group V-RAY

Suites Using This Test

Multi-Core

CPU Massive

Creator Workloads

Renderers

NVIDIA GPU Compute

Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02

Mode: CPU

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 426 public results since 25 June 2022 with the latest data as of 15 April 2023.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component

Percentile Rank

# Compatible Public Results

vsamples (Average)

2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core

100th

65775 ^{+/- 3114}

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380

100th

64839 ^{+/- 1326}

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core

98th

49817 ^{+/- 1562}

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280

98th

47283 ^{+/- 494}

2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core

96th

37226 ^{+/- 379}

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core

94th

33245 ^{+/- 1196}

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 24-Cores

94th

32905 ^{+/- 374}

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core

90th

32479 ^{+/- 587}

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core

88th

31266 ^{+/- 95}

Intel Core i9-13900K

84th

29467 ^{+/- 1642}

2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5220R

83rd

28127 ^{+/- 94}

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core

80th

26266 ^{+/- 1241}

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 12-Core

78th

24399 ^{+/- 343}

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D 12-Core

77th

23418 ^{+/- 26}

Mid-Tier

75th

< 21335

AMD Ryzen 9 7900 12-Core

74th

21197 ^{+/- 29}

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core

71st

21077 ^{+/- 251}

AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core

71st

20893 ^{+/- 55}

Intel Core i9-12900K

69th

20782 ^{+/- 177}

Intel Core i7-13700KF

67th

20355 ^{+/- 340}

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24-Core

65th

20066 ^{+/- 313}

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core

64th

18795 ^{+/- 640}

Intel Core i5-13600K

63rd

18408 ^{+/- 114}

Intel Core i9-10980XE

61st

17915 ^{+/- 84}

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core

59th

17475 ^{+/- 134}

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X 8-Core

57th

16728 ^{+/- 33}

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 8-Core

54th

15681 ^{+/- 84}

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core

52nd

15371 ^{+/- 776}

AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core

52nd

15144 ^{+/- 346}

Intel Xeon Gold 6226R

51st

14924 ^{+/- 116}

Median

50th

14744

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core

50th

14653 ^{+/- 124}

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core

48th

14046 ^{+/- 303}

Intel Core i9-10900K

47th

13593 ^{+/- 56}

Intel Core i5-12600K

46th

13095 ^{+/- 129}

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X 6-Core

43rd

12568 ^{+/- 70}

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core

42nd

12475 ^{+/- 295}

Intel Core i9-11900K

41st

12442 ^{+/- 35}

AMD Ryzen 5 7600 6-Core

38th

12208 ^{+/- 113}

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core

38th

12206 ^{+/- 157}

Intel Core i5-13400

37th

12171 ^{+/- 24}

Intel Xeon Silver 4216

34th

11638 ^{+/- 102}

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

33rd

11086 ^{+/- 87}

AMD EPYC 72F3 8-Core

32nd

10877 ^{+/- 143}

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

32nd

10489 ^{+/- 27}

AMD EPYC 7F32 8-Core

30th

10271 ^{+/- 43}

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core

28th

9588 ^{+/- 169}

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core

28th

9450

Intel Core i5-12400

27th

9448 ^{+/- 169}

Intel Core i9-9900K

26th

9112 ^{+/- 2}

Low-Tier

25th

< 9109

Intel Core i5-11600K

25th

8245 ^{+/- 49}

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

24th

8196 ^{+/- 16}

Intel Core i5-10600K

22nd

7688 ^{+/- 30}

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U

20th

7303 ^{+/- 57}

Intel Core i7-1280P

18th

7075 ^{+/- 652}

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U

17th

6942 ^{+/- 568}

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U

17th

6812 ^{+/- 74}

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

13th

5214 ^{+/- 98}

AMD Ryzen 7 4700U

12th

4713 ^{+/- 17}

Intel Core i3-10100

11th

4487 ^{+/- 12}

Intel Core i7-1165G7

9th

4263 ^{+/- 39}

Intel Core i3-12100

9th

4219 ^{+/- 69}

Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5

8th

4066 ^{+/- 19}

Intel Core i7-1185G7

8th

3968 ^{+/- 134}

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

7th

3876 ^{+/- 29}

Intel Core i7-8565U

6th

3122 ^{+/- 154}

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4

5th

3093 ^{+/- 14}

Intel Core i7-1065G7

4th

2379 ^{+/- 114}

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

2nd

1545 ^{+/- 21}

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 - Mode: CPU) has an average run-time of 4 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 0.1%.

Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?

Yes, based on the automated analysis of the collected public benchmark data, this test / test settings does generally scale well with increasing CPU core counts. Data based on publicly available results for this test / test settings, separated by vendor, result divided by the reference CPU clock speed, grouped by matching physical CPU core count, and normalized against the smallest core count tested from each vendor for each CPU having a sufficient number of test samples and statistically significant data.

Notable Instruction Set Usage

Notable instruction set extensions supported by this test, based on an automatic analysis by the Phoronix Test Suite / OpenBenchmarking.org analytics engine.

Instruction Set

Support

Instructions Detected

SSE2 (SSE2)

Used by default on supported hardware.

MOVDQA XORPD MOVAPD CVTSI2SD DIVSD MOVD PSHUFD PUNPCKLQDQ MOVDQU MULSD CVTTSD2SI PADDQ CVTSS2SD PSHUFLW

SSSE3 (SSSE3)

Used by default on supported hardware.

PHADDD

SSE 4.2 (SSE4_2)

Used by default on supported hardware.
Found on Intel processors since at least 2010.
Found on AMD processors since Bulldozer (2011).

PCMPGTQ

Last automated analysis: 27 June 2022

This test profile binary relies on the shared libraries libpthread.so.0, libdl.so.2, librt.so.1, libc.so.6, libz.so.1, libm.so.6.

Tested CPU Architectures

This benchmark has been successfully tested on the below mentioned architectures. The CPU architectures listed is where successful OpenBenchmarking.org result uploads occurred, namely for helping to determine if a given test is compatible with various alternative CPU architectures.

CPU Architecture

Kernel Identifier

Verified On

Intel / AMD x86 64-bit