2 x AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core testing with a Giga Computing MZ73-LM0-000 (F24 BIOS) and ASPEED (WDDM) on Microsoft Windows Server 2022 Standard Build 20348 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2408200-NE-TESTDUCT228
test-duct,
"Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 - Primate Phylogeny Analysis",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",1059.265,1001.787,1051.172,1022.697,1040.236
"BlogBench 1.1 - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",15463,12934,15969,15185,15170,15785,15616,14480,15988
"ebizzy 0.3 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",3718,3818,3991,3900,3970,3950,3994,3863
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",26345.348644,27327.35373,27120.13526
"Blender 4.2 - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",140.09,146.64,135.96,145.65,143.92,136.44,141.91,132.67,143.05,151.3,142.37,133.79
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: In-Memory Database Shootout",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",17795.034053,17806.702693,17959.738703
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Twitter Finagle",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",1509.3179,1474.1574,1454.6518
"PHPBench 0.8.1 - PHP Benchmark Suite",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",322508,314723,338586,305996,340560,334063,322685,309628,332201,343335,344908,349850,339050,351225,344060
"Blender 4.2 - Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",39.64,42.45,42.59,45.66,40.23,44.05,41.35,41.52,38.55,42.08,44.07,43.14,42.31,40.67,41.73
"Blender 4.2 - Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",48.17,48.6,45.31,49.41,51.58,44.95,42.21,46.55,47.91,50.82,49.05,51.17
"SVT-AV1 2.1 - Encoder Mode: Preset 3 - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",3.524,3.482,3.479
"asmFish 2018-07-23 - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",180215666,178934976,179160935
"CacheBench - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",6710.714949,6630.441511,6383.31132,6736.985022
"CacheBench - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",39812.244539,38065.74496,38056.707051,39658.644116
"Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 - Algorithm: skein",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",129810,229440,201720,194380,139850,212820,135340,194660,330830,250130,339930,285910,170460,225760,191490
"Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 - Algorithm: m7m",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",2233.64,10240,920.33,732.97,1200.91,1262.65,788.18,1469.22,1004.62,903.24,1407.22,852.34,1606.17,778.93,5389.96
"Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 - Algorithm: sha256t",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",254540,393310,381560,284250,323250,486030,332780,315790,415100,317860,324130,472560,416540,250820,260450
"Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 - Algorithm: deep",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",241170,296420,47200,132010,72780,199930,16560,95880,47640,234540,107580,373210,97520,40240,212560
"Java SciMark 2.2 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",2701.56,2737.07,2556.57,2751.75,2643.24,2659.05,2884.62,2851.49,2803.46,2675.96,2724.16,2823.06,2987.16,2975.12,2497.03
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Savina Reactors.IO",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",11011.13289,11003.02893,10891.3599
"SVT-AV1 2.1 - Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",24.181,27.536,32.64,24.555,28.801,30.108,28.786,36.949,22.27,27.645,32.686,24.195,27.508,25.624,28.001
"Stockfish 16.1 - Chess Benchmark",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",194092095,188606435,194012148
"CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",80146.238424,77735.538994,78232.562933
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Scala Dotty",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",1673.526925,1673.484058,1670.733541
"Blender 4.2 - Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",19.66,20.93,20.59,19.64,21.91,22.12,23.16,19.34,21.25,21.1,20.06,20.21
"Tesseract OCR v4.0.0.20181030 - Time To OCR 7 Images",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",81.793,81.724,82.681
"Primesieve 12.1 - Length: 1e13",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",74.643,76.273,73.883
"SVT-AV1 2.1 - Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",50.888,57.331,43.496,58.665,50.279,62.263,25.561,28.518,30.577,41.222,38.026,39.031
"x264 2022-02-22 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",52.44,52.55,48.3,48.65,27.07,30.22,32.54,38.26,30.3,29.12,29.45,33.8
"SVT-AV1 2.1 - Encoder Mode: Preset 3 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",9.501,9.358,9.349
"Blender 4.2 - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",15.65,16.6,16.1,14.22,14.6,14.31,14.61,14.8,14.31,14.34,15.02,13.92
"SVT-AV1 2.1 - Encoder Mode: Preset 5 - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",10.835,10.801,10.897
"libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0 - Test: Decompression Throughput",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",157.154527,149.659541,150.187653,147.159968,147.021168,151.423763
"FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 - WAV To FLAC",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",27.871,28.013,27.718,27.639,27.62
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",113,112,112
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",35,35,35
"t-test1 2017-01-13 - Threads: 1",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",34.343,33.732,33.592
"x264 2022-02-22 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",134.29,121.43,73.3,95.62,114.83,69.3,85.52,108.5,85.22,102.9,99.8,113.27,118.09,75.01,78.94
"Crafty 25.2 - Elapsed Time",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",6511368,6701685,6478051
"SVT-AV1 2.1 - Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",123.241,118.495,219.901,115.551,207.29,196.046,136.41,202.327,93.146,117.867,148.313,232.784,106.242,165.54,163.823
"7-Zip Compression 24.05 - Test: Decompression Rating",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",95869,94163,94114
"7-Zip Compression 24.05 - Test: Compression Rating",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",106034,106585,108422
"Kvazaar 2.2 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",23.93,23.72,23.48
"Kvazaar 2.2 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",23.87,24.07,23.93
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",1036,1035,1035
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",216,217,218
"XZ Compression 5.2.4 - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",24.823,24.351,24.85
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",733,734,730
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",435,435,435
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",558,558,553
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",351,354,355
"SVT-AV1 2.1 - Encoder Mode: Preset 5 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",32.365,32.716,32.773
"t-test1 2017-01-13 - Threads: 2",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",17.945,18.303,17.773
"dav1d 1.4.2 - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",211.81,210.82,209.55
"Kvazaar 2.2 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",38.93,39.2,38.38
"Kvazaar 2.2 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",39.78,39.53,39.5
"Kvazaar 2.2 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",40.41,40.07,40.49
"Primesieve 12.1 - Length: 1e12",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",6.695,6.699,7.037,6.57,6.83,6.727
"SVT-AV1 2.1 - Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",74.892,74.995,74.92
"LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 - WAV To MP3",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",11.597,11.488,11.549
"Kvazaar 2.2 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",72.04,71.09,71.22
"Kvazaar 2.2 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",73.52,73.39,73.69
"Java Gradle Build - Gradle Build: Reactor",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"dav1d 1.4.2 - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",471.92,479.17,479.06
"m-queens 1.2 - Time To Solve",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",6.496,6.53,6.257
"BLAKE2 20170307 - ",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",8.95,4.28,8.02,8.96,6.12,8.95,8.01,4.28,8.95,4.27,8.96,5.33,6.15,8.99,5.3
"Kvazaar 2.2 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",151.71,152.33,151.09
"Kvazaar 2.2 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",153.54,149.93,151.1
"Kvazaar 2.2 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",157.97,158.63,157.96
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Apache Spark Bayes",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Apache Spark PageRank",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Apache Spark ALS",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Geekbench 6.1 - Test: Multi Core",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Geekbench 6.1 - Test: Single Core",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 - ",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Darktable - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Darktable - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Darktable - Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Darktable - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"LeelaChessZero 0.31.1 - Backend: BLAS",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"R Benchmark - ",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Novabench - Test: CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Go Benchmarks - Test: garbage",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Go Benchmarks - Test: http",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Novabench - Test: RAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Go Benchmarks - Test: json",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Go Benchmarks - Test: build",
Lower Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",
"Java SciMark 2.2 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",1265.32,1181.45,1290.89
"Java SciMark 2.2 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",8978.68,9219.24,8372.58
"Java SciMark 2.2 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",1955.13,1927.53,1832.66
"Java SciMark 2.2 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",234.94,267.05,250.04
"Java SciMark 2.2 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",1073.74,1090.09,1036.68
"BlogBench 1.1 - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"466GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO",307,315,342