luajit-1.1.0run

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 testing with a ASUS Z9PE-D8 WS (5503 BIOS) and ASPEED on CentOS Stream 9 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2405030-NE-LUAJIT11022
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
NewGVNTrunkO2
April 29
  2 Minutes
NewGVNTrunkO3
April 30
  2 Minutes
NoGVNTrunkO2
May 01
  2 Minutes
NoGVNTrunkO3
May 02
  2 Minutes
GVNTrunkO2
May 03
  2 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  2 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

luajit-1.1.0run, "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation", Higher Results Are Better "NewGVNTrunkO2",1118.6,1094.24,1114.49 "NewGVNTrunkO3",1117.65,1118.49,1107.96 "NoGVNTrunkO2",1106.28,1097.97,1088.94 "NoGVNTrunkO3",1107.22,1079.3,1093.65 "GVNTrunkO2",1099.73,1110.78,1086.08 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization", Higher Results Are Better "NewGVNTrunkO2",1569.69,1545.87,1561.49 "NewGVNTrunkO3",1569.74,1596.04,1556.49 "NoGVNTrunkO2",1542.13,1556.61,1552.5 "NoGVNTrunkO3",1553.3,1551.88,1556.87 "GVNTrunkO2",1559.59,1553.77,1559.83 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Composite", Higher Results Are Better "NewGVNTrunkO2",803.21,783.22,794.14 "NewGVNTrunkO3",803.18,805.59,794.98 "NoGVNTrunkO2",790.26,794.23,790.6 "NoGVNTrunkO3",791.9,785.45,793.57 "GVNTrunkO2",793.26,796.11,784.91 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Monte Carlo", Higher Results Are Better "NewGVNTrunkO2",307.11,300.27,290.13 "NewGVNTrunkO3",307.4,293.15,306.49 "NoGVNTrunkO2",302.68,296.96,298.2 "NoGVNTrunkO3",301.46,299.37,302.3 "GVNTrunkO2",300.35,298.59,300.55 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply", Higher Results Are Better "NewGVNTrunkO2",791.05,765.07,789.88 "NewGVNTrunkO3",792.46,791.03,781.71 "NoGVNTrunkO2",772.97,793.34,788.21 "NoGVNTrunkO3",772.63,786.32,788.66 "GVNTrunkO2",777.22,786.56,778.82 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Fast Fourier Transform", Higher Results Are Better "NewGVNTrunkO2",229.6,210.64,214.73 "NewGVNTrunkO3",228.62,229.22,222.25 "NoGVNTrunkO2",227.23,226.26,225.13 "NoGVNTrunkO3",224.9,210.37,226.38 "GVNTrunkO2",229.42,230.85,199.25