amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2404231-NE-C5LARGE7810
c5.large,
"BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 - Computational Test: Dhrystone 2",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",31433895.4,29651791,30474518.7,31426179,30500190.2
"Sysbench 1.0.20 - Test: RAM / Memory",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",7418.4,7440.43,7448.76
"c5.large",7351.01,7371.4,7402.47
"Sysbench 1.0.20 - Test: CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",2043.25,2043.03,1462.66,1336.53,2010.74,2041.65,2042.17,2040.64,2041.3,2040.63,2043.42,2042.15,2042.98,2042.9,2042.9
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Copy",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",10964.6,10958.5,10951.8,10964.8,10955.2
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Scale",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",12945.9,12970.2,12943.7,12942.4,12943.9
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Triad",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",13597.6,13591.9,13595.2,13623.9,13589.6
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Add",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",13676,13625,13617.9,13641.2,13629.4
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Idle Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",89.5,89.4,89.4
"c5.large",89.1,90.3,93
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",15097.66,15550.15,15275.26
"c5.large",13670.71,15584.39,15594.27,15700.02,15603.16,15709.7,15618.63,15559.46,15581.47,13477.38,14938.39,15180.09
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",17988.47,18125.23,18129.19
"c5.large",17843.6,18286.22,18263.15,18344.41,18220.66,18295.81,18246.45,18228.95,18343.92,17953.78,17387.34,17904.98
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",18881.87,17496.84,18675.64
"c5.large",18685.06,18939.33,18899.03,18936.95,18837.11,18848.13,18891.03,18871.15,18740.56,18551.47,18294.09,18696.46
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",22844.83,20136.73,22524.62
"c5.large",21965.27,22888,22785.49,22663.59,22644.87,22810.82,22897.29,22765.81,22529.28,22014.32,20697.04
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",13489.62,12527.45,13373.26
"c5.large",13339.47,13470.38,13457.84,13451.99,13493.11,13479.9,13500.59,13242.96,12419.06,13165.36,12541.59
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",15412.9,15462.3,15463.5
"c5.large",15306.2,13867.9,13960.5,14776.5,15126.9,15199.6,14989.5,15396.8,14740.2,15369.8,15001.9,15297.5,15393.7,15273.7,15443.5
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",18131.1,18043.3,18137.8
"c5.large",17706.5,16856.5,17039.9,17170.8,17773.9,17878,17676.6,18009.3,17369.8,17911.5,17796.7,17875,18000.9,17196.7,18027.9
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",17382.7,17365.3,17396.1
"c5.large",17125,16466.6,16525.7,16657.8,17197.4,17235.6,17039.8,16476.5,16801.4,16748.9,17128.4,17194.6,17334.1,17237.5,17277.4
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",15535,15536.6,15443.7
"c5.large",14409.1,14265.9,14404.6,14663,15264.3,15048.8,14016.1,14625,15111.9,14986.4,15174.9,15241.5,14908,15338.9,15226.2
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",13104.9,13092.1,13057.4
"c5.large",12468.5,12467.6,12511.3,12738.6,12936.8,12925.9,12442.3,12309.9,12978.7,12819.6,12862.5,12968.3,12962,13018.8,12997.5
"CacheBench - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",6832.323712,6831.408555,6827.058838
"CacheBench - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",44880.243752,44838.567754,44917.045945
"CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",64446.335929,64753.715992,64831.592719
"GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 - Total Time",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",
"c5.large",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",229.6,228.7,229
"c5.large",233.3,233,233.1
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",882.9,878,880
"c5.large",900,901,900.8
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",59.6,59.8,59.8
"c5.large",59.8,59.7,59.8
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",928.7,929.9,926.5
"c5.large",931.1,933.4,934.3
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",25.6,25.6,25.6
"c5.large",25.3,25.3,25.3
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",880.9,879.4,882.5
"c5.large",884.9,881.9,877.7
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",2.85,2.75,2.9,2.86
"c5.large",2.79,2.77,2.89
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",752.9,759.3,759,756
"c5.large",761.2,757.1,758.7
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",186,185.6,185.4
"c5.large",185.9,185.5,185.4
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",933.4,932.9,938.2
"c5.large",933.8,937.5,936.8
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",57.9,58,57.8
"c5.large",57.9,58.2,55.3,57.2
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",935.7,936.9,940.1
"c5.large",938,937.2,938.7,942
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",2.77,2.71,2.63,2.45,2.48,2.69,2.54,2.63,2.33,2.4,2.45,2.52
"c5.large",2.61,2.64,2.6
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",745.4,744,745.8,717.5,719.3,746.7,743.8,671.7,699,693.7,704.8,744.6
"c5.large",749,745,745.5
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",496.52,496.76,496.82
"c5.large",496.64,496.26,496.41
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",2680,2681.7,2681.5
"c5.large",2680,2677,2680.7
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",81.39,81.43,81.42
"c5.large",81.23,81.19,81.26
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",2494.3,2494,2493.4
"c5.large",2494.3,2494.8,2494.5
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",28.52,28.52,28.52
"c5.large",28.47,28.48,28.47
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",2597.1,2602.9,2603.5
"c5.large",2602,2607.2,2606.8
"OpenSSL 3.3 - Algorithm: SHA256",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",305195260,305300940,305149350
"c5.large",305095940,305082370,305049400
"OpenSSL 3.3 - Algorithm: SHA512",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",341403380,341408520,341397950
"c5.large",341117190,341209090,341194080
"OpenSSL 3.3 - Algorithm: RSA4096",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",274,273.8,270.8
"OpenSSL 3.3 - Algorithm: RSA4096",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",17908.9,17965.6,17981.1
"c5.large",17968.5,17969.8,17957.5
"OpenSSL 3.3 - Algorithm: ChaCha20",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",5048705300,5049548530,5047088740
"c5.large",5052291210,5052522770,5050168390
"OpenSSL 3.3 - Algorithm: AES-128-GCM",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",5527914630,5528209000,5528115610
"c5.large",5533330090,5534336610,5525502090
"OpenSSL 3.3 - Algorithm: AES-256-GCM",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",4025536240,4025428100,4027139410
"c5.large",4028832970,4027938410,4027456170
"OpenSSL 3.3 - Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",2559107620,2825234840,2826109470,2813621040,2823714410,2560862070,2560145820,2561872150,2561936320,2560623410,2560280710,2548891920
"c5.large",2562017690,2561528630,2562449950
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: KASUMI",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",80.042,80.007,79.995
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: KASUMI - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",77.391,77.342,77.347
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: AES-256",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",3359.271,3361.425,3361.964
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: AES-256 - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",3354.978,3357.326,3357.113
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Twofish",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",308.901,308.82,308.888
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Twofish - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",312.572,312.48,312.76
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Blowfish",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",388.954,388.268,388.571
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Blowfish - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",385.268,384.904,384.938
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: CAST-256",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",120.903,121.004,121.082
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",120.876,119.645,121.062
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: ChaCha20Poly1305",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",658.951,657.553,658.791
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",655.462,653.44,654.153
"x264 2022-02-22 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",2.31,2.32,2.3
"x264 2022-02-22 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",10.03,10.17,10.19
"x265 3.6 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",1.98,2,1.92
"x265 3.6 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",9.33,9.38,9.38
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: go",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",383,381,382
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: 2to3",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: chaos",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",173,172,172
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: float",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",168,169,169
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: nbody",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: pathlib",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",25.4,25.4,25.4
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: raytrace",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",772,770,772
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: json_loads",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",36.2,36.1,36.2
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: crypto_pyaes",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: regex_compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: python_startup",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",10.8,10.8,10.8
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: django_template",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",83.2,82.9,82.9
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: pickle_pure_python",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",679,680,681
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Atol",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",81.292,81.356,81.33
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Ctype",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",37.421,41.65,37.419,37.42,37.421,37.42,37.421,37.431,37.425,37.427,37.423,37.428,37.425
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Math Library",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",490.85,488.039,490.144
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Random Numbers",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",1235.73,1236.803,1237.097
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Stepanov Vector",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",103.007,103.041,103.015
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Function Objects",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",17.706,17.712,17.699
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Stepanov Abstraction",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",40.808,40.804,40.785
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Swirl",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Rotate",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",133,132,132
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Sharpen",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Enhanced",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Resizing",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Noise-Gaussian",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: HWB Color Space",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",
"Smallpt 1.0 - Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",109.64,109.741,109.785
"Stockfish 16.1 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",
"C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel",
Lower Results Are Better
"c5.large",824.235,825.058,824.217
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",570.24,569.55,570.3
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",121.11,121.16,121.11
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",265.46,263.21,265.95
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",650.63,650.12,650.67
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",797.58,797.05,797.45
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"c5.large",1016.43,1016.23,1016.3