amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2023.4.20240401 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2404109-NE-R54XLARGE24
r5.4xlarge,
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Copy",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",85000.8,84826.6,84619.8,84450.1,84620.5
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Scale",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",64952.3,64352.9,64557.7,64377.2,64254.7
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Triad",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",71774.8,71621.9,71352.4,71005.6,71132.1
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Add",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",71745.8,71523.8,71502.4,71233.5,71349
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Idle Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",90.4,89.6,90
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",91534.92,91037.22,91074.81
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",96925.48,95331.99,96798.16
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",96103.6,96169.46,96476.49
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",96619.11,96803.61,97607.27
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",89253.42,88994.44,89778.43
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",90912.7,90367.1,91227.7
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",94837.4,94348.3,95486.1
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",92396.1,92898.6,93161.4
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",85995.3,86766.2,86751.9
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",85643.2,85763.9,85874.7
"CacheBench - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",5898.258071,5902.952444,5903.059051
"CacheBench - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",40367.10312,40165.08236,40125.47098
"CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",67603.518627,67567.012827,68301.409262
"GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",1268.4,1278.4,1273.8
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",777,778.2,778.4
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",324,321.9,322.5
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",816.3,819.3,817.4
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",124.2,130.2,125.8
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",783.3,780,781.3
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",10.4,10.3,10.3
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",668.9,671.1,673.1
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",685.9,682.1,676.8
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",806.6,808.8,807.3
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",342,342.7,341.8
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",828.5,825.6,825.7
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",5.39,5.43,5.28
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",650.6,651.4,648.9
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",431.23,430.88,431.11
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",2524.4,2522.7,2518.6
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",70.71,70.78,70.81
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",2354.7,2354.2,2355.2
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",24.59,24.59,24.58
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",2466.1,2462.2,2466.3
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: SHA256",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",2146810330,2147324260,2148368740
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: SHA512",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",2398160980,2396141990,2396892180
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: RSA4096",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",1881.3,1880.4,1891.4
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: RSA4096",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",124475.1,124504.1,124486.2
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: ChaCha20",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",34789184850,34830462160,34796909090
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: AES-128-GCM",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",37952987410,37961300920,37933605680
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: AES-256-GCM",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",27676151530,27673967550,27671342280
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",17878740450,17896464930,17885908170
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: KASUMI",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",68.315,68.343,68.342
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: KASUMI - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",66.851,66.893,66.918
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: AES-256",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",2889.222,2887.002,2886.296
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: AES-256 - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",2892.663,2892.251,2892.969
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Twofish",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",246.71,246.756,247.023
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Twofish - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",245.622,245.63,245.904
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Blowfish",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",300.308,300.764,300.895
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Blowfish - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",296.573,296.883,297.033
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: CAST-256",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",102.719,102.474,102.706
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",102.687,102.67,102.711
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: ChaCha20Poly1305",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",566.326,563.998,564.972
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",562.193,559.426,559.796
"x264 2022-02-22 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",16.09,16.03,16.12
"x264 2022-02-22 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",68.52,68.39,68.39
"x265 3.6 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",7.84,7.56,7.71
"x265 3.6 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",36.73,36.95,37.52
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: go",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",388,388,388
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: 2to3",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",467,466,467
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: chaos",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",174,174,174
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: float",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",186,186,188
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: nbody",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",221,221,221
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: pathlib",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",26.1,26,26.1
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: raytrace",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",765,767,769
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: json_loads",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",36.9,36.9,36.9
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: crypto_pyaes",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",178,178,178
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: regex_compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",257,257,257
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: python_startup",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",12.1,12,12
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: django_template",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",71.8,71.8,71.7
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: pickle_pure_python",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",679,678,680
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Atol",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",89.094,89.257,89.083
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Ctype",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",40.434,40.428,40.43
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Math Library",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",413.303,414.128,413.583
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Random Numbers",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",1283.267,1283.192,1283.032
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Stepanov Vector",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",120.902,120.891,120.996
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Function Objects",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",18.987,18.985,18.986
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Stepanov Abstraction",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",47.8,47.806,47.803
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Swirl",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",64,64,64
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Rotate",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",117,116,115
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Sharpen",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",20,20,20
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Enhanced",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",27,27,27
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Resizing",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",134,135,135
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Noise-Gaussian",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",35,35,35
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: HWB Color Space",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",131,131,131
"Smallpt 1.0 - Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",15.588,15.532,15.426
"Stockfish 16.1 - Chess Benchmark",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",9780310,9697987,9452356
"C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",109.16,109.166,109.205
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",491.16,495.42,492.15
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",106.71,106.73,106.7
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",218.28,238.06,222.26
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",561.01,561.49,561.26
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",693.83,694.73,694.62
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",875.96,876.11,875.88
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Scala Dotty",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Random Forest",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: ALS Movie Lens",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Apache Spark ALS",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Apache Spark Bayes",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Savina Reactors.IO",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Apache Spark PageRank",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Finagle HTTP Requests",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: In-Memory Database Shootout",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Jython",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Eclipse",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: GraphChi",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Tradesoap",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Tradebeans",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Spring Boot",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Apache Kafka",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Apache Tomcat",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: jMonkeyEngine",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Apache Cassandra",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: H2 Database Engine",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: FOP Print Formatter",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning",
Lower Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",
"BlogBench 1.1 - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",2468259,2398640,2364546
"BlogBench 1.1 - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"r5.4xlarge",10677,10610,10419