r5.4xlarge

amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2023.4.20240401 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2404100-NE-R54XLARGE42
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
r5.4xlarge
April 10
  6 Hours, 16 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

r5.4xlarge, "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Copy", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",85000.8,84826.6,84619.8,84450.1,84620.5 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Scale", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",64952.3,64352.9,64557.7,64377.2,64254.7 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Triad", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",71774.8,71621.9,71352.4,71005.6,71132.1 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Add", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",71745.8,71523.8,71502.4,71233.5,71349 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Idle Latency", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",90.4,89.6,90 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",91534.92,91037.22,91074.81 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",96925.48,95331.99,96798.16 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",96103.6,96169.46,96476.49 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",96619.11,96803.61,97607.27 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",89253.42,88994.44,89778.43 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",90912.7,90367.1,91227.7 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",94837.4,94348.3,95486.1 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",92396.1,92898.6,93161.4 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",85995.3,86766.2,86751.9 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",85643.2,85763.9,85874.7 "CacheBench - Test: Read", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",5898.258071,5902.952444,5903.059051 "CacheBench - Test: Write", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",40367.10312,40165.08236,40125.47098 "CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",67603.518627,67567.012827,68301.409262 "GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 - ", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge", "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",1268.4,1278.4,1273.8 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",777,778.2,778.4 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",324,321.9,322.5 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",816.3,819.3,817.4 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",124.2,130.2,125.8 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",783.3,780,781.3 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",10.4,10.3,10.3 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",668.9,671.1,673.1 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",685.9,682.1,676.8 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",806.6,808.8,807.3 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",342,342.7,341.8 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",828.5,825.6,825.7 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",5.39,5.43,5.28 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",650.6,651.4,648.9 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",431.23,430.88,431.11 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",2524.4,2522.7,2518.6 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",70.71,70.78,70.81 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",2354.7,2354.2,2355.2 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",24.59,24.59,24.58 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 - Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",2466.1,2462.2,2466.3 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: SHA256", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",2146810330,2147324260,2148368740 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: SHA512", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",2398160980,2396141990,2396892180 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: RSA4096", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",1881.3,1880.4,1891.4 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: RSA4096", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",124475.1,124504.1,124486.2 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: ChaCha20", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",34789184850,34830462160,34796909090 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: AES-128-GCM", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",37952987410,37961300920,37933605680 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: AES-256-GCM", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",27676151530,27673967550,27671342280 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",17878740450,17896464930,17885908170 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: KASUMI", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",68.315,68.343,68.342 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: KASUMI - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",66.851,66.893,66.918 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: AES-256", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",2889.222,2887.002,2886.296 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: AES-256 - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",2892.663,2892.251,2892.969 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Twofish", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",246.71,246.756,247.023 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Twofish - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",245.622,245.63,245.904 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Blowfish", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",300.308,300.764,300.895 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Blowfish - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",296.573,296.883,297.033 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: CAST-256", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",102.719,102.474,102.706 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",102.687,102.67,102.711 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: ChaCha20Poly1305", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",566.326,563.998,564.972 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",562.193,559.426,559.796 "x264 2022-02-22 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",16.09,16.03,16.12 "x264 2022-02-22 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",68.52,68.39,68.39 "x265 3.6 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",7.84,7.56,7.71 "x265 3.6 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",36.73,36.95,37.52 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: go", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",388,388,388 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: 2to3", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",467,466,467 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: chaos", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",174,174,174 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: float", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",186,186,188 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: nbody", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",221,221,221 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: pathlib", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",26.1,26,26.1 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: raytrace", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",765,767,769 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: json_loads", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",36.9,36.9,36.9 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: crypto_pyaes", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",178,178,178 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: regex_compile", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",257,257,257 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: python_startup", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",12.1,12,12 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: django_template", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",71.8,71.8,71.7 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: pickle_pure_python", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",679,678,680 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Atol", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",89.094,89.257,89.083 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Ctype", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",40.434,40.428,40.43 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Math Library", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",413.303,414.128,413.583 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Random Numbers", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",1283.267,1283.192,1283.032 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Stepanov Vector", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",120.902,120.891,120.996 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Function Objects", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",18.987,18.985,18.986 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Stepanov Abstraction", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",47.8,47.806,47.803 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Swirl", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",64,64,64 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Rotate", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",117,116,115 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Sharpen", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",20,20,20 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Enhanced", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",27,27,27 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Resizing", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",134,135,135 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: Noise-Gaussian", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",35,35,35 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 - Operation: HWB Color Space", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",131,131,131 "Smallpt 1.0 - Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",15.588,15.532,15.426 "Stockfish 16.1 - Chess Benchmark", Higher Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",9780310,9697987,9452356 "C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel", Lower Results Are Better "r5.4xlarge",109.16,109.166,109.205