Tests for a future article. 2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ testing with a Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS (3B05.TEL4P1 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2403266-NE-EMRMARCH467
emr march
Tests for a future article. 2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ testing with a Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS (3B05.TEL4P1 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
a:
Processor: 2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ @ 3.90GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS (3B05.TEL4P1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 1008GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Intel X710 for 10GBASE-T
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.0-rc5-phx-patched (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
b:
Processor: 2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ @ 3.90GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS (3B05.TEL4P1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 1008GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Intel X710 for 10GBASE-T
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.0-rc5-phx-patched (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
BRL-CAD 7.38.2
VGR Performance Metric
VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better
a . 5340792 |==================================================================
b . 5248584 |=================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 154.02 |==================================================================
b . 155.85 |===================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 147.76 |===================================================================
b . 148.25 |===================================================================
Blender 4.1
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 127.00 |================================================
b . 177.77 |===================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 554.53 |===================================================================
b . 552.43 |===================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 92.79 |====================================================================
b . 92.10 |===================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 491.23 |===================================================================
b . 489.24 |===================================================================
RocksDB 9.0
Test: Overwrite
Op/s > Higher Is Better
a . 176533 |===================================================================
b . 175868 |===================================================================
RocksDB 9.0
Test: Random Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better
a . 176723 |===================================================================
b . 176991 |===================================================================
RocksDB 9.0
Test: Update Random
Op/s > Higher Is Better
a . 164280 |===================================================================
b . 164944 |===================================================================
RocksDB 9.0
Test: Read Random Write Random
Op/s > Higher Is Better
a . 1529756 |==================================================================
b . 1530210 |==================================================================
RocksDB 9.0
Test: Read While Writing
Op/s > Higher Is Better
a . 11076608 |=================================================================
b . 10797502 |===============================================================
RocksDB 9.0
Test: Random Read
Op/s > Higher Is Better
a . 378034441 |===============================================================
b . 383625077 |================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 63.99 |====================================================================
b . 63.27 |===================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 39.06 |====================================================================
b . 38.28 |===================================================================
Blender 4.1
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 41.87 |===================================================================
b . 42.35 |====================================================================
Blender 4.1
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 36.73 |====================================================================
b . 35.29 |=================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3.91 |=================================================================
b . 4.14 |=====================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 2092.21 |=================================================================
b . 2108.31 |==================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 309.22 |===================================================================
b . 302.23 |=================================================================
Blender 4.1
Blend File: Junkshop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 22.94 |====================================================================
b . 22.50 |===================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 196.88 |===================================================================
b . 194.73 |==================================================================
Blender 4.1
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 17.42 |====================================================================
b . 17.54 |====================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 1727.27 |==================================================================
b . 1728.92 |==================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 118.68 |===================================================================
b . 114.99 |=================================================================
Timed Mesa Compilation 24.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 14.47 |====================================================================
b . 14.46 |====================================================================
Blender 4.1
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 12.60 |====================================================================
b . 12.66 |====================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 12.95 |==================================================================
b . 13.40 |====================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 911.72 |===================================================================
b . 908.49 |===================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 589.20 |===================================================================
b . 577.74 |==================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 358.16 |===================================================================
b . 352.65 |==================================================================
TensorFlow 2.16.1
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 35.22 |===================================================================
b . 36.01 |====================================================================