AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS Linux benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2402117-NE-JANUARYLA61 Tuxedo Drivers Ryzen 7 7840HS Linux Perf - Phoronix Test Suite Tuxedo Drivers Ryzen 7 7840HS Linux Perf AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS Linux benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2402117-NE-JANUARYLA61&grr&export=pdf&sro&rro .
Tuxedo Drivers Ryzen 7 7840HS Linux Perf Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution stock performance AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS @ 5.29GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads) NB05 TUXEDO Pulse 14 Gen3 R14FA1 (8.06 BIOS) AMD Device 14e8 4 x 8GB DRAM-6400MT/s Micron MT62F2G32D4DS-026 WT 2000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB AMD Phoenix1 4GB (2700/800MHz) AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio MEDIATEK MT7921K Ubuntu 23.10 6.7.0-060700-generic (x86_64) GNOME Shell 45.2 X Server 1.21.1.7 4.6 Mesa 24.1~git2401200600.ebcab1~oibaf~m (git-ebcab14 2024-01-20 mantic-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 16.0.6 DRM 3.56) GCC 13.2.0 ext4 2880x1800 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Processor Details - Scaling Governor: amd-pstate-epp powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xa704104 Graphics Details - GLAMOR - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 4096 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-PHXGENERIC-001 Python Details - Python 3.11.6 Security Details - gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of Safe RET + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Tuxedo Drivers Ryzen 7 7840HS Linux Perf build-godot: Time To Compile selenium: Jetstream 2 - Firefox unigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGL tensorflow: CPU - 64 - ResNet-50 appleseed: Emily pytorch: CPU - 64 - Efficientnet_v2_l gravitymark: 1920 x 1080 - Vulkan llamafile: mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q8_0 - CPU vvenc: Bosphorus 4K - Fast pytorch: CPU - 64 - ResNet-152 blender: BMW27 - CPU-Only vkmark: 1920 x 1080 - Mailbox appleseed: Disney Material glmark2: 1920 x 1080 build-linux-kernel: defconfig pytorch: CPU - 1 - Efficientnet_v2_l selenium: Jetstream 2 - Google Chrome v-ray: CPU vvenc: Bosphorus 4K - Faster build-php: Time To Compile compress-zstd: 19 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Compression Speed embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crown compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed 3dmark: 1920 x 1080 compress-zstd: 12 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 12 - Compression Speed openvino: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU pyperformance: python_startup indigobench: CPU - Bedroom indigobench: CPU - Supercar openvino: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - CPU openvino: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - CPU openvino: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - CPU openvino: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - CPU openvino: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - CPU pytorch: CPU - 64 - ResNet-50 rawtherapee: Total Benchmark Time pytorch: CPU - 1 - ResNet-152 openscad: Pistol embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon build-ffmpeg: Time To Compile svt-av1: Preset 4 - Bosphorus 4K selenium: Speedometer - Google Chrome paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 uvg266: Bosphorus 4K - Very Fast svt-av1: Preset 13 - Bosphorus 4K llamafile: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - CPU paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 pyperformance: django_template pyperformance: crypto_pyaes selenium: PSPDFKit WASM - Google Chrome uvg266: Bosphorus 4K - Super Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Very Fast pyperformance: regex_compile uvg266: Bosphorus 4K - Ultra Fast openscad: Mini-ITX Case compress-lz4: 9 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Compression Speed compress-7zip: Decompression Rating compress-7zip: Compression Rating pytorch: CPU - 1 - ResNet-50 compress-lz4: 1 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Compression Speed pyperformance: json_loads kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Super Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Ultra Fast svt-av1: Preset 8 - Bosphorus 4K gimp: unsharp-mask build-apache: Time To Compile gimp: auto-levels paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 pybench: Total For Average Test Times phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite selenium: Kraken - Google Chrome gimp: resize gimp: rotate selenium: WASM collisionDetection - Google Chrome tensorflow: CPU - 1 - ResNet-50 svt-av1: Preset 12 - Bosphorus 4K darktable: Boat - CPU-only selenium: WASM imageConvolute - Google Chrome darktable: Masskrug - CPU-only openscad: Projector Mount Swivel darktable: Server Room - CPU-only darktable: Server Rack - CPU-only stock performance 430.845 183.417 68.9 22.88 369.681163 8.31 42.8 5.48 4.072 12.75 148.69 2646 205.2241 4538 113.468 12.01 288.392 10610 8.411 68.176 1619.5 12.3 11.1522 1574.6 6.85 96.51 1949.9 121.1 403.27 9.90 7.30 1.853 4.122 66.21 60.32 7.33 542.97 35.91 221.43 6.83 582.18 4.55 1735.47 7.93 997.22 0.38 19400.10 30.22 59.745 20.32 55.485 13.3324 56.202 3.640 295 3703.303 231.46 16.93 98.374 9.03 2949.858 29.43 21.2 45.5 2524 17.87 21.39 71.4 21.22 25.650 5257.5 44.54 63606 75487 49.94 5574.7 878.16 5048.5 138.27 11.8 26.97 36.13 28.767 15.451 20.222 13.876 1623.833 155.82 587 1103866 422.3 13.485 13.187 258.23 12.58 100.910 6.144 19.23 3.867 4.245 2.815 0.392 399.748 186.909 69.0 23.19 333.212986 8.73 42.8 5.55 4.426 13.52 131.21 2651 182.142765 4597 103.240 12.10 286.906 11943 8.187 65.278 1638.9 12.4 12.1618 1557.8 6.80 97.50 1986.9 120.9 352.27 11.34 7.28 2.088 4.649 59.34 67.32 6.46 614.63 31.13 256.24 5.99 663.25 3.95 1999.21 6.90 1150.78 0.33 22003.95 31.88 57.480 21.33 55.092 14.1399 50.973 4.149 296 3827.156 239.20 19.98 106.441 9.11 2949.412 29.42 21.0 45.5 2546 21.42 24.46 71.1 25.67 25.706 5219.7 44.50 70001 78807 50.88 5594.7 879.97 5043.9 137.82 11.8 31.06 41.29 33.708 15.349 19.709 13.807 1693.833 162.54 593 1103996 422.4 13.390 13.290 258.85 12.95 110.992 5.566 19.32 3.643 4.261 2.637 0.354 OpenBenchmarking.org
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile stock performance 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 430.85 399.75
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox stock performance 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.49, N = 3 SE +/- 1.40, N = 11 183.42 186.91 1. firefox 121.0.1
Unigine Superposition Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL stock performance 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.62, N = 7 68.9 69.0 MAX: 101 MAX: 103.8
TensorFlow Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 stock performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 22.88 23.19
Appleseed Scene: Emily OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily stock performance 80 160 240 320 400 369.68 333.21
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l stock performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 8.31 8.73 MIN: 5.73 / MAX: 8.96 MIN: 5.86 / MAX: 9.52
GravityMark Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: Vulkan OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better GravityMark 1.82 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: Vulkan stock performance 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 42.8 42.8
Llamafile Test: mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q8_0 - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second, More Is Better Llamafile 0.6 Test: mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q8_0 - Acceleration: CPU stock performance 1.2488 2.4976 3.7464 4.9952 6.244 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.48 5.55
VVenC Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast stock performance 0.9959 1.9918 2.9877 3.9836 4.9795 SE +/- 0.038, N = 3 SE +/- 0.006, N = 3 4.072 4.426 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto=auto -fno-fat-lto-objects
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 12.75 13.52 MIN: 8.78 / MAX: 13.12 MIN: 8.45 / MAX: 14.03
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only stock performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 148.69 131.21
VKMark Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Present Mode: Mailbox OpenBenchmarking.org VKMark Score, More Is Better VKMark 2022-05-16 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Present Mode: Mailbox stock performance 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 2646 2651 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -ldl -std=c++14 -O0 -MD -MQ -MF
Appleseed Scene: Disney Material OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material stock performance 50 100 150 200 250 205.22 182.14
GLmark2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better GLmark2 2023.01 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 4538 4597
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Build: defconfig OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig stock performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 113.47 103.24
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 12.01 12.10 MIN: 9.63 / MAX: 12.36 MIN: 9.85 / MAX: 12.78
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.71, N = 3 288.39 286.91 1. chrome 120.0.6099.224
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org vsamples, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 Mode: CPU stock performance 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 41.36, N = 3 SE +/- 93.51, N = 3 10610 11943
VVenC Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster stock performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.008, N = 3 SE +/- 0.013, N = 3 8.411 8.187 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto=auto -fno-fat-lto-objects
Timed PHP Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile stock performance 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 68.18 65.28
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed stock performance 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.94, N = 3 SE +/- 10.94, N = 3 1619.5 1638.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 12.3 12.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 11.15 12.16 MIN: 11.02 / MAX: 11.44 MIN: 12.01 / MAX: 12.57
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed stock performance 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 5.90, N = 3 SE +/- 1.31, N = 3 1574.6 1557.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed stock performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 6.85 6.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 96.51 97.50
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed stock performance 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 27.48, N = 3 SE +/- 9.54, N = 3 1949.9 1986.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed stock performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 121.1 120.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
OpenVINO Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU stock performance 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 403.27 352.27 MIN: 194.05 / MAX: 453.01 MIN: 250.33 / MAX: 410.52 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 9.90 11.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
PyPerformance Benchmark: python_startup OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup stock performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 7.30 7.28
IndigoBench Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/s, More Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom stock performance 0.4698 0.9396 1.4094 1.8792 2.349 SE +/- 0.006, N = 3 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 1.853 2.088
IndigoBench Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/s, More Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar stock performance 1.046 2.092 3.138 4.184 5.23 SE +/- 0.011, N = 3 SE +/- 0.011, N = 3 4.122 4.649
OpenVINO Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU stock performance 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 66.21 59.34 MIN: 41.75 / MAX: 97.23 MIN: 34.42 / MAX: 85.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU stock performance 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 60.32 67.32 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU stock performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 7.33 6.46 MIN: 5.45 / MAX: 17.77 MIN: 4.46 / MAX: 20.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU stock performance 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.97, N = 3 542.97 614.63 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU stock performance 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 35.91 31.13 MIN: 25.74 / MAX: 58.33 MIN: 19.45 / MAX: 58.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU stock performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.86, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 221.43 256.24 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU stock performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 6.83 5.99 MIN: 4.03 / MAX: 19.87 MIN: 3.35 / MAX: 22.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU stock performance 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.80, N = 3 582.18 663.25 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU stock performance 1.0238 2.0476 3.0714 4.0952 5.119 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.55 3.95 MIN: 2.69 / MAX: 25.68 MIN: 2.35 / MAX: 13.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU stock performance 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.83, N = 3 SE +/- 0.93, N = 3 1735.47 1999.21 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU stock performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 7.93 6.90 MIN: 4.16 / MAX: 25.9 MIN: 3.65 / MAX: 24.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU stock performance 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.75, N = 3 SE +/- 0.97, N = 3 997.22 1150.78 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU stock performance 0.0855 0.171 0.2565 0.342 0.4275 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.38 0.33 MIN: 0.19 / MAX: 7.73 MIN: 0.19 / MAX: 9.78 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU stock performance 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 9.12, N = 3 SE +/- 18.25, N = 3 19400.10 22003.95 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 stock performance 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 30.22 31.88 MIN: 19.6 / MAX: 31.2 MIN: 21.53 / MAX: 33.62
RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time stock performance 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 59.75 57.48 1. RawTherapee, version 5.9, command line.
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 stock performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 20.32 21.33 MIN: 13.74 / MAX: 21.11 MIN: 17.23 / MAX: 22.16
OpenSCAD Render: Pistol OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenSCAD Render: Pistol stock performance 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 55.49 55.09 1. OpenSCAD version 2021.01
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon stock performance 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 13.33 14.14 MIN: 13.23 / MAX: 13.55 MIN: 13.98 / MAX: 14.43
Timed FFmpeg Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile stock performance 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 56.20 50.97
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K stock performance 0.9335 1.867 2.8005 3.734 4.6675 SE +/- 0.017, N = 3 SE +/- 0.005, N = 3 3.640 4.149 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 295 296 1. chrome 120.0.6099.224
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 33.02, N = 15 SE +/- 36.04, N = 15 3703.30 3827.16
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.06, N = 15 SE +/- 2.25, N = 15 231.46 239.20
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast stock performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 4 16.93 19.98
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K stock performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.01, N = 15 SE +/- 1.95, N = 15 98.37 106.44 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
Llamafile Test: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second, More Is Better Llamafile 0.6 Test: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - Acceleration: CPU stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 9.03 9.11
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 2949.86 2949.41
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 29.43 29.42
PyPerformance Benchmark: django_template OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template stock performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 21.2 21.0
PyPerformance Benchmark: crypto_pyaes OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes stock performance 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 45.5 45.5
Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 7.51, N = 3 SE +/- 4.06, N = 3 2524 2546 1. chrome 120.0.6099.224
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast stock performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 17.87 21.42
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast stock performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 4 21.39 24.46 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
PyPerformance Benchmark: regex_compile OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile stock performance 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 71.4 71.1
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast stock performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 21.22 25.67
OpenSCAD Render: Mini-ITX Case OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenSCAD Render: Mini-ITX Case stock performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 25.65 25.71 1. OpenSCAD version 2021.01
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed stock performance 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 19.83, N = 3 SE +/- 30.09, N = 3 5257.5 5219.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed stock performance 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 44.54 44.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating stock performance 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 280.35, N = 3 SE +/- 420.21, N = 3 63606 70001 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
7-Zip Compression Test: Compression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating stock performance 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 125.57, N = 3 SE +/- 32.20, N = 3 75487 78807 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 stock performance 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.71, N = 3 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 49.94 50.88 MIN: 31.46 / MAX: 52.62 MIN: 39.51 / MAX: 53.02
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed stock performance 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 4.68, N = 3 SE +/- 6.53, N = 3 5574.7 5594.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed stock performance 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.46, N = 3 SE +/- 1.58, N = 3 878.16 879.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed stock performance 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 10.93, N = 3 SE +/- 19.77, N = 3 5048.5 5043.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed stock performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 138.27 137.82 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
PyPerformance Benchmark: json_loads OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 11.8 11.8
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast stock performance 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 26.97 31.06 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast stock performance 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 SE +/- 0.07, N = 4 36.13 41.29 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K stock performance 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 28.77 33.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
GIMP Test: unsharp-mask OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 Test: unsharp-mask stock performance 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 4 SE +/- 0.06, N = 4 15.45 15.35
Timed Apache Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile stock performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 20.22 19.71
GIMP Test: auto-levels OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 Test: auto-levels stock performance 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 13.88 13.81
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 12.52, N = 5 SE +/- 3.63, N = 5 1623.83 1693.83
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.20, N = 5 SE +/- 0.35, N = 5 155.82 162.54
PyBench Total For Average Test Times OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times stock performance 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 2.33, N = 4 SE +/- 2.78, N = 4 587 593
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite stock performance 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 5109.68, N = 3 SE +/- 3091.62, N = 3 1103866 1103996
Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 1.34, N = 3 422.3 422.4 1. chrome 120.0.6099.224
GIMP Test: resize OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 Test: resize stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.08, N = 4 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 13.49 13.39
GIMP Test: rotate OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 Test: rotate stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.04, N = 4 13.19 13.29
Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.04, N = 4 SE +/- 0.58, N = 4 258.23 258.85 1. chrome 120.0.6099.224
TensorFlow Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 12.58 12.95
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K stock performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.12, N = 6 SE +/- 0.22, N = 6 100.91 110.99 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
Darktable Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only stock performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.003, N = 6 SE +/- 0.012, N = 6 6.144 5.566
Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 6 SE +/- 0.06, N = 6 19.23 19.32 1. chrome 120.0.6099.224
Darktable Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only stock performance 0.8701 1.7402 2.6103 3.4804 4.3505 SE +/- 0.012, N = 7 SE +/- 0.009, N = 7 3.867 3.643
OpenSCAD Render: Projector Mount Swivel OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenSCAD Render: Projector Mount Swivel stock performance 0.9587 1.9174 2.8761 3.8348 4.7935 SE +/- 0.015, N = 8 SE +/- 0.015, N = 8 4.245 4.261 1. OpenSCAD version 2021.01
Darktable Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only stock performance 0.6334 1.2668 1.9002 2.5336 3.167 SE +/- 0.004, N = 8 SE +/- 0.002, N = 8 2.815 2.637
Darktable Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only stock performance 0.0882 0.1764 0.2646 0.3528 0.441 SE +/- 0.003, N = 15 SE +/- 0.002, N = 12 0.392 0.354
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.8 9.4 25.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.8 17.4 51.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.9 20.1 51.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 5.0 26.7 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 5.0 13.6 18.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.8 11.5 14.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.9 16.1 25.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 5.0 14.9 20.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring stock performance 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 2.65 / Avg: 26.43 / Max: 35.64 Min: 2.5 / Avg: 34.09 / Max: 54.71
PHPBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 12.2 14.8 performance 4.8 12.0 15.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite stock performance 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 90621.73 91884.81
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 13.5 15.5 performance 5.0 13.4 15.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 12.1 13.2 performance 5.0 12.1 13.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 12.8 15.0 performance 4.9 12.3 14.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 13.7 15.5 performance 4.9 13.6 15.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 13.5 15.4 performance 4.9 13.4 15.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
PyBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 12.6 15.9 performance 2.5 11.9 15.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
VVenC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 30.7 35.2 performance 5.0 40.3 54.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better VVenC 1.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
VVenC Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster stock performance 0.0617 0.1234 0.1851 0.2468 0.3085 0.274 0.203
VVenC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 31.5 35.2 performance 4.9 45.0 54.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better VVenC 1.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
VVenC Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast stock performance 0.029 0.058 0.087 0.116 0.145 0.129 0.098
uvg266 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 30.7 35.2 performance 5.0 45.4 53.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast stock performance 0.1557 0.3114 0.4671 0.6228 0.7785 0.692 0.565
uvg266 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 31.4 35.2 performance 5.0 46.8 54.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast stock performance 0.128 0.256 0.384 0.512 0.64 0.569 0.458
uvg266 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 31.6 35.2 performance 5.0 47.3 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast stock performance 0.1204 0.2408 0.3612 0.4816 0.602 0.535 0.423
Kvazaar CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 28.8 35.0 performance 5.0 41.7 53.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast stock performance 0.2826 0.5652 0.8478 1.1304 1.413 1.256 0.990
Kvazaar CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 29.9 35.1 performance 5.1 44.2 54.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast stock performance 0.2027 0.4054 0.6081 0.8108 1.0135 0.901 0.703
Kvazaar CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.8 30.7 35.2 performance 4.9 45.3 53.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast stock performance 0.1568 0.3136 0.4704 0.6272 0.784 0.697 0.540
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 31.0 35.2 performance 5.2 45.7 54.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K stock performance 0.0263 0.0526 0.0789 0.1052 0.1315 0.117 0.091
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 28.6 35.6 performance 4.9 41.2 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K stock performance 0.2264 0.4528 0.6792 0.9056 1.132 1.006 0.819
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 21.2 35.2 performance 4.9 29.0 54.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K stock performance 1.0717 2.1434 3.2151 4.2868 5.3585 4.763 3.822
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 21.2 35.3 performance 4.9 29.0 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K stock performance 1.0429 2.0858 3.1287 4.1716 5.2145 4.635 3.667
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 12.6 15.8 performance 4.7 12.5 15.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed stock performance 90 180 270 360 450 416.32 416.86
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 12.9 15.4 performance 5.0 12.9 15.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed stock performance 90 180 270 360 450 392.33 391.14
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 13.0 15.8 performance 4.8 12.8 15.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed stock performance 90 180 270 360 450 428.69 437.70
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 15.4 24.3 performance 4.9 15.4 23.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed stock performance 20 40 60 80 100 102.12 101.27
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 19.8 33.9 performance 4.9 19.7 33.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed stock performance 20 40 60 80 100 81.92 83.09
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 21.7 35.0 performance 4.8 22.3 37.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed stock performance 20 40 60 80 100 90.05 88.92
7-Zip Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 28.7 35.2 performance 4.9 41.3 54.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS Per Watt, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating stock performance 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2219.33 1694.29
OpenSCAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 13.1 15.4 performance 4.7 13.0 15.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSCAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
OpenSCAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 13.4 15.2 performance 4.9 13.5 15.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSCAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
OpenSCAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 10.2 15.6 performance 4.8 10.1 15.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSCAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
RawTherapee CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 22.3 28.1 performance 5.1 27.0 39.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 8.8 21.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 14.9 34.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 17.0 34.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 19.9 35.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 13.0 17.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 11.6 14.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 15.7 25.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 13.9 17.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
IndigoBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 32.8 35.4 performance 4.9 50.2 54.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
IndigoBench Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom stock performance 0.0128 0.0256 0.0384 0.0512 0.064 0.057 0.042
IndigoBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 32.6 35.3 performance 5.0 49.8 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
IndigoBench Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar stock performance 0.0284 0.0568 0.0852 0.1136 0.142 0.126 0.093
Chaos Group V-RAY CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 29.9 35.2 performance 5.1 44.8 54.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org vsamples Per Watt, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 Mode: CPU stock performance 80 160 240 320 400 354.36 266.68
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 33.2 35.2 performance 5.0 50.7 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 4.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown stock performance 0.0756 0.1512 0.2268 0.3024 0.378 0.336 0.240
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 32.8 35.3 performance 5.0 50.1 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 4.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon stock performance 0.0916 0.1832 0.2748 0.3664 0.458 0.407 0.282
Appleseed CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 34.5 35.3 performance 5.3 51.7 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Appleseed 2.0 Beta CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Appleseed CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 34.5 35.5 performance 5.3 52.4 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Appleseed 2.0 Beta CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 34.1 35.3 performance 4.9 52.2 54.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
TensorFlow CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.4 33.9 35.2 performance 4.6 44.3 51.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
TensorFlow Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec Per Watt, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 stock performance 0.1519 0.3038 0.4557 0.6076 0.7595 0.675 0.524
TensorFlow CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 23.4 35.1 performance 5.1 28.8 48.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
TensorFlow Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec Per Watt, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 stock performance 0.1211 0.2422 0.3633 0.4844 0.6055 0.538 0.449
PyTorch CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 34.1 35.1 performance 5.1 44.9 49.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l stock performance 0.0549 0.1098 0.1647 0.2196 0.2745 0.244 0.194
PyTorch CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 33.7 35.2 performance 5.3 49.7 53.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 stock performance 0.0851 0.1702 0.2553 0.3404 0.4255 0.378 0.272
PyTorch CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 32.3 35.3 performance 4.9 46.6 53.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 stock performance 0.2102 0.4204 0.6306 0.8408 1.051 0.934 0.685
PyTorch CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 32.9 35.1 performance 5.0 40.6 44.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l stock performance 0.0821 0.1642 0.2463 0.3284 0.4105 0.365 0.298
PyTorch CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 32.0 35.1 performance 5.2 44.4 50.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 stock performance 0.1429 0.2858 0.4287 0.5716 0.7145 0.635 0.480
PyTorch CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 28.7 35.1 performance 5.0 37.5 48.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 stock performance 0.3915 0.783 1.1745 1.566 1.9575 1.740 1.358
Llamafile CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 31.3 35.1 performance 5.2 43.4 54.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Llamafile 0.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Llamafile Test: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Llamafile 0.6 Test: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - Acceleration: CPU stock performance 0.065 0.13 0.195 0.26 0.325 0.289 0.210
Llamafile CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.4 33.8 35.1 performance 5.1 40.1 50.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Llamafile 0.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
Llamafile Test: mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q8_0 - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Llamafile 0.6 Test: mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q8_0 - Acceleration: CPU stock performance 0.0365 0.073 0.1095 0.146 0.1825 0.162 0.138
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 33.0 35.3 performance 5.1 50.7 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 33.0 35.4 performance 4.9 50.6 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.5 32.8 35.2 performance 4.9 50.3 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 32.9 35.3 performance 5.0 50.4 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 33.0 35.4 performance 5.0 50.6 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 33.1 35.1 performance 5.0 50.4 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 33.0 35.3 performance 5.0 50.6 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 32.6 35.3 performance 5.1 50.1 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Timed Apache Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 18.6 31.7 performance 5.0 21.5 47.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
Timed FFmpeg Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 31.0 35.2 performance 5.1 45.8 54.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Timed PHP Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 25.5 35.2 performance 5.1 33.3 54.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor stock performance 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 5.2 / Avg: 32.94 / Max: 35.45 Min: 4.96 / Avg: 49.87 / Max: 54.51
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 30.5 35.3 performance 5.0 44.9 54.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
VKMark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.5 29.9 35.0 performance 5.1 30.2 39.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better VKMark 2022-05-16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
VKMark Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Present Mode: Mailbox OpenBenchmarking.org VKMark Score Per Watt, More Is Better VKMark 2022-05-16 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Present Mode: Mailbox stock performance 20 40 60 80 100 88.53 87.76
GLmark2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 33.5 35.3 performance 5.1 37.1 53.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GLmark2 2023.01 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
GLmark2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better GLmark2 2023.01 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 30 60 90 120 150 135.66 124.03
ParaView CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 13.7 30.4 performance 4.9 13.9 30.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 60 120 180 240 300 270.04 274.74
ParaView CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 17.2 35.1 performance 5.0 18.6 48.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 20 40 60 80 100 94.36 90.96
ParaView CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 23.3 35.0 performance 5.1 24.2 38.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 30 60 90 120 150 126.81 121.92
Unigine Superposition CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 33.0 35.1 performance 5.2 41.4 51.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Unigine Superposition Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL stock performance 0.47 0.94 1.41 1.88 2.35 2.089 1.666
GravityMark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 27.0 34.1 performance 5.0 27.2 36.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GravityMark 1.82 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
GravityMark Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: Vulkan OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better GravityMark 1.82 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: Vulkan stock performance 0.3562 0.7124 1.0686 1.4248 1.781 1.583 1.573
3DMark Wild Life Extreme CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 32.2 35.4 performance 5.2 38.5 49.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 0.675 1.35 2.025 2.7 3.375 3.000 2.535
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 10.1 19.4 performance 5.2 10.0 18.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 8.0 14.4 performance 5.0 7.8 14.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 9.6 14.7 performance 5.1 9.5 14.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 11.0 17.3 performance 5.1 11.1 17.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 16.2 34.4 performance 4.8 15.4 45.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 5 10 15 20 25 17.83 18.64
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 14.6 32.4 performance 4.9 13.8 44.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 12.60 13.50
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 13.8 22.7 performance 5.2 13.6 21.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 5 10 15 20 25 21.31 21.73
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4