AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS Linux benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2402117-NE-JANUARYLA61 Tuxedo Drivers Ryzen 7 7840HS Linux Perf - Phoronix Test Suite Tuxedo Drivers Ryzen 7 7840HS Linux Perf AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS Linux benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2402117-NE-JANUARYLA61&export=pdf&sor&gru .
Tuxedo Drivers Ryzen 7 7840HS Linux Perf Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution stock performance AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS @ 5.29GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads) NB05 TUXEDO Pulse 14 Gen3 R14FA1 (8.06 BIOS) AMD Device 14e8 4 x 8GB DRAM-6400MT/s Micron MT62F2G32D4DS-026 WT 2000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB AMD Phoenix1 4GB (2700/800MHz) AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio MEDIATEK MT7921K Ubuntu 23.10 6.7.0-060700-generic (x86_64) GNOME Shell 45.2 X Server 1.21.1.7 4.6 Mesa 24.1~git2401200600.ebcab1~oibaf~m (git-ebcab14 2024-01-20 mantic-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 16.0.6 DRM 3.56) GCC 13.2.0 ext4 2880x1800 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Processor Details - Scaling Governor: amd-pstate-epp powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xa704104 Graphics Details - GLAMOR - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 4096 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-PHXGENERIC-001 Python Details - Python 3.11.6 Security Details - gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of Safe RET + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Tuxedo Drivers Ryzen 7 7840HS Linux Perf pytorch: CPU - 1 - ResNet-152 pytorch: CPU - 1 - ResNet-50 pytorch: CPU - 1 - Efficientnet_v2_l pytorch: CPU - 64 - ResNet-50 pytorch: CPU - 64 - ResNet-152 pytorch: CPU - 64 - Efficientnet_v2_l openvino: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - CPU openvino: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - CPU openvino: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - CPU paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 3dmark: 1920 x 1080 gravitymark: 1920 x 1080 - Vulkan kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Ultra Fast unigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGL uvg266: Bosphorus 4K - Very Fast uvg266: Bosphorus 4K - Super Fast uvg266: Bosphorus 4K - Ultra Fast vvenc: Bosphorus 4K - Fast vvenc: Bosphorus 4K - Faster embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crown svt-av1: Preset 12 - Bosphorus 4K svt-av1: Preset 8 - Bosphorus 4K svt-av1: Preset 4 - Bosphorus 4K kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Very Fast embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon svt-av1: Preset 13 - Bosphorus 4K kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Super Fast tensorflow: CPU - 1 - ResNet-50 tensorflow: CPU - 64 - ResNet-50 indigobench: CPU - Supercar indigobench: CPU - Bedroom compress-zstd: 12 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 12 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Decompression Speed paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 compress-7zip: Compression Rating compress-7zip: Decompression Rating paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 selenium: Speedometer - Google Chrome selenium: Jetstream 2 - Firefox glmark2: 1920 x 1080 selenium: Jetstream 2 - Google Chrome phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite llamafile: mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q8_0 - CPU llamafile: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - CPU vkmark: 1920 x 1080 - Mailbox v-ray: CPU pybench: Total For Average Test Times pyperformance: crypto_pyaes pyperformance: django_template pyperformance: json_loads pyperformance: python_startup pyperformance: regex_compile selenium: WASM collisionDetection - Google Chrome selenium: WASM imageConvolute - Google Chrome selenium: Kraken - Google Chrome openvino: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - CPU openvino: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - CPU openvino: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - CPU selenium: PSPDFKit WASM - Google Chrome build-linux-kernel: defconfig build-godot: Time To Compile build-php: Time To Compile build-ffmpeg: Time To Compile build-apache: Time To Compile blender: BMW27 - CPU-Only appleseed: Emily appleseed: Disney Material gimp: unsharp-mask gimp: resize gimp: rotate gimp: auto-levels darktable: Boat - CPU-only darktable: Masskrug - CPU-only darktable: Server Room - CPU-only darktable: Server Rack - CPU-only rawtherapee: Total Benchmark Time openscad: Projector Mount Swivel openscad: Pistol openscad: Mini-ITX Case stock performance 20.32 49.94 12.01 30.22 12.75 8.31 9.90 19400.10 997.22 582.18 542.97 60.32 1735.47 221.43 29.43 155.82 231.46 96.51 42.8 36.13 68.9 16.93 17.87 21.22 4.072 8.411 11.1522 100.910 28.767 3.640 21.39 13.3324 98.374 26.97 12.58 22.88 4.122 1.853 1949.9 12.3 121.1 1619.5 6.85 1574.6 878.16 5574.7 138.27 5048.5 44.54 5257.5 1623.833 2949.858 75487 63606 3703.303 295 183.417 4538 288.392 1103866 5.48 9.03 2646 10610 587 45.5 21.2 11.8 7.30 71.4 258.23 19.23 422.3 403.27 0.38 7.93 6.83 7.33 66.21 4.55 35.91 2524 113.468 430.845 68.176 56.202 20.222 148.69 369.681163 205.2241 15.451 13.485 13.187 13.876 6.144 3.867 2.815 0.392 59.745 4.245 55.485 25.650 21.33 50.88 12.10 31.88 13.52 8.73 11.34 22003.95 1150.78 663.25 614.63 67.32 1999.21 256.24 29.42 162.54 239.20 97.50 42.8 41.29 69.0 19.98 21.42 25.67 4.426 8.187 12.1618 110.992 33.708 4.149 24.46 14.1399 106.441 31.06 12.95 23.19 4.649 2.088 1986.9 12.4 120.9 1638.9 6.80 1557.8 879.97 5594.7 137.82 5043.9 44.50 5219.7 1693.833 2949.412 78807 70001 3827.156 296 186.909 4597 286.906 1103996 5.55 9.11 2651 11943 593 45.5 21.0 11.8 7.28 71.1 258.85 19.32 422.4 352.27 0.33 6.90 5.99 6.46 59.34 3.95 31.13 2546 103.240 399.748 65.278 50.973 19.709 131.21 333.212986 182.142765 15.349 13.390 13.290 13.807 5.566 3.643 2.637 0.354 57.480 4.261 55.092 25.706 OpenBenchmarking.org
CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring stock performance 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 2.65 / Avg: 26.43 / Max: 35.64 Min: 2.5 / Avg: 34.09 / Max: 54.71
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 performance stock 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 21.33 20.32 MIN: 17.23 / MAX: 22.16 MIN: 13.74 / MAX: 21.11
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 stock performance 0.1429 0.2858 0.4287 0.5716 0.7145 0.635 0.480
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 performance stock 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.71, N = 3 50.88 49.94 MIN: 39.51 / MAX: 53.02 MIN: 31.46 / MAX: 52.62
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l performance stock 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 12.10 12.01 MIN: 9.85 / MAX: 12.78 MIN: 9.63 / MAX: 12.36
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l stock performance 0.0821 0.1642 0.2463 0.3284 0.4105 0.365 0.298
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 performance stock 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 31.88 30.22 MIN: 21.53 / MAX: 33.62 MIN: 19.6 / MAX: 31.2
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 stock performance 0.2102 0.4204 0.6306 0.8408 1.051 0.934 0.685
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 performance stock 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 13.52 12.75 MIN: 8.45 / MAX: 14.03 MIN: 8.78 / MAX: 13.12
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l performance stock 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 8.73 8.31 MIN: 5.86 / MAX: 9.52 MIN: 5.73 / MAX: 8.96
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 stock performance 0.3915 0.783 1.1745 1.566 1.9575 1.740 1.358
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 stock performance 0.0851 0.1702 0.2553 0.3404 0.4255 0.378 0.272
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l stock performance 0.0549 0.1098 0.1647 0.2196 0.2745 0.244 0.194
OpenVINO Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU performance stock 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 11.34 9.90 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU performance stock 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 18.25, N = 3 SE +/- 9.12, N = 3 22003.95 19400.10 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU performance stock 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.97, N = 3 SE +/- 0.75, N = 3 1150.78 997.22 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU performance stock 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.80, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 663.25 582.18 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU performance stock 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 0.97, N = 3 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 614.63 542.97 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU performance stock 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 67.32 60.32 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU performance stock 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.93, N = 3 SE +/- 0.83, N = 3 1999.21 1735.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU performance stock 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.86, N = 3 256.24 221.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 29.43 29.42
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 performance stock 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.35, N = 5 SE +/- 1.20, N = 5 162.54 155.82
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 performance stock 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.25, N = 15 SE +/- 2.06, N = 15 239.20 231.46
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 performance stock 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 97.50 96.51
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 0.675 1.35 2.025 2.7 3.375 3.000 2.535
GravityMark Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: Vulkan OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better GravityMark 1.82 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: Vulkan performance stock 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 42.8 42.8
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast performance stock 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.07, N = 4 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 41.29 36.13 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
GravityMark Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: Vulkan OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better GravityMark 1.82 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: Vulkan stock performance 0.3562 0.7124 1.0686 1.4248 1.781 1.583 1.573
Unigine Superposition Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL stock performance 0.47 0.94 1.41 1.88 2.35 2.089 1.666
Unigine Superposition Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL performance stock 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.62, N = 7 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 69.0 68.9 MAX: 103.8 MAX: 101
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast performance stock 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.22, N = 4 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 19.98 16.93
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast performance stock 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 21.42 17.87
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast performance stock 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 25.67 21.22
VVenC Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast performance stock 0.9959 1.9918 2.9877 3.9836 4.9795 SE +/- 0.006, N = 3 SE +/- 0.038, N = 3 4.426 4.072 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto=auto -fno-fat-lto-objects
VVenC Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster stock performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.008, N = 3 SE +/- 0.013, N = 3 8.411 8.187 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto=auto -fno-fat-lto-objects
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon stock performance 0.0916 0.1832 0.2748 0.3664 0.458 0.407 0.282
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown stock performance 0.0756 0.1512 0.2268 0.3024 0.378 0.336 0.240
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K stock performance 1.0429 2.0858 3.1287 4.1716 5.2145 4.635 3.667
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K stock performance 1.0717 2.1434 3.2151 4.2868 5.3585 4.763 3.822
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K stock performance 0.2264 0.4528 0.6792 0.9056 1.132 1.006 0.819
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K stock performance 0.0263 0.0526 0.0789 0.1052 0.1315 0.117 0.091
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast stock performance 0.1568 0.3136 0.4704 0.6272 0.784 0.697 0.540
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown performance stock 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 12.16 11.15 MIN: 12.01 / MAX: 12.57 MIN: 11.02 / MAX: 11.44
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K performance stock 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.22, N = 6 SE +/- 0.12, N = 6 110.99 100.91 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K performance stock 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 33.71 28.77 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K performance stock 0.9335 1.867 2.8005 3.734 4.6675 SE +/- 0.005, N = 3 SE +/- 0.017, N = 3 4.149 3.640 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast performance stock 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.28, N = 4 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 24.46 21.39 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast stock performance 0.2027 0.4054 0.6081 0.8108 1.0135 0.901 0.703
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast stock performance 0.2826 0.5652 0.8478 1.1304 1.413 1.256 0.990
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast stock performance 0.1204 0.2408 0.3612 0.4816 0.602 0.535 0.423
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon performance stock 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.14 13.33 MIN: 13.98 / MAX: 14.43 MIN: 13.23 / MAX: 13.55
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K performance stock 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.95, N = 15 SE +/- 1.01, N = 15 106.44 98.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast performance stock 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 31.06 26.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast stock performance 0.128 0.256 0.384 0.512 0.64 0.569 0.458
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast stock performance 0.1557 0.3114 0.4671 0.6228 0.7785 0.692 0.565
VVenC Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast stock performance 0.029 0.058 0.087 0.116 0.145 0.129 0.098
VVenC Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster stock performance 0.0617 0.1234 0.1851 0.2468 0.3085 0.274 0.203
TensorFlow Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 performance stock 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 12.95 12.58
TensorFlow Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 performance stock 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 23.19 22.88
TensorFlow Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec Per Watt, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 stock performance 0.1211 0.2422 0.3633 0.4844 0.6055 0.538 0.449
TensorFlow Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec Per Watt, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 stock performance 0.1519 0.3038 0.4557 0.6076 0.7595 0.675 0.524
IndigoBench Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom stock performance 0.0128 0.0256 0.0384 0.0512 0.064 0.057 0.042
IndigoBench Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/s, More Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar performance stock 1.046 2.092 3.138 4.184 5.23 SE +/- 0.011, N = 3 SE +/- 0.011, N = 3 4.649 4.122
IndigoBench Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/s, More Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom performance stock 0.4698 0.9396 1.4094 1.8792 2.349 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.006, N = 3 2.088 1.853
IndigoBench Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar stock performance 0.0284 0.0568 0.0852 0.1136 0.142 0.126 0.093
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed stock performance 20 40 60 80 100 90.05 88.92
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed performance stock 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 9.54, N = 3 SE +/- 27.48, N = 3 1986.9 1949.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed performance stock 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 12.4 12.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed performance stock 20 40 60 80 100 83.09 81.92
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed stock performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 121.1 120.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed performance stock 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 10.94, N = 3 SE +/- 4.94, N = 3 1638.9 1619.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed stock performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 6.85 6.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed stock performance 20 40 60 80 100 102.12 101.27
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed performance stock 90 180 270 360 450 437.70 428.69
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed stock performance 90 180 270 360 450 392.33 391.14
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed stock performance 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 5.90, N = 3 SE +/- 1.31, N = 3 1574.6 1557.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed performance stock 90 180 270 360 450 416.86 416.32
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed performance stock 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.58, N = 3 SE +/- 2.46, N = 3 879.97 878.16 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed performance stock 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 6.53, N = 3 SE +/- 4.68, N = 3 5594.7 5574.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed stock performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 138.27 137.82 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed stock performance 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 10.93, N = 3 SE +/- 19.77, N = 3 5048.5 5043.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed stock performance 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 44.54 44.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed stock performance 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 19.83, N = 3 SE +/- 30.09, N = 3 5257.5 5219.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 performance stock 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.63, N = 5 SE +/- 12.52, N = 5 1693.83 1623.83
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 30 60 90 120 150 126.81 121.92
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 20 40 60 80 100 94.36 90.96
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 2949.86 2949.41
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS Per Watt, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating stock performance 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2219.33 1694.29
7-Zip Compression Test: Compression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating performance stock 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 32.20, N = 3 SE +/- 125.57, N = 3 78807 75487 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating performance stock 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 420.21, N = 3 SE +/- 280.35, N = 3 70001 63606 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 performance stock 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 36.04, N = 15 SE +/- 33.02, N = 15 3827.16 3703.30
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 performance stock 60 120 180 240 300 274.74 270.04
Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome performance stock 5 10 15 20 25 21.73 21.31
Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome performance stock 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 296 295 1. chrome 120.0.6099.224
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome performance stock 5 10 15 20 25 18.64 17.83
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox performance stock 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.40, N = 11 SE +/- 1.49, N = 3 186.91 183.42 1. firefox 121.0.1
GLmark2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better GLmark2 2023.01 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 performance stock 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 4597 4538
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox performance stock 3 6 9 12 15 13.50 12.60
GLmark2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better GLmark2 2023.01 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 stock performance 30 60 90 120 150 135.66 124.03
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite performance stock 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 91884.81 90621.73
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.71, N = 3 288.39 286.91 1. chrome 120.0.6099.224
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite performance stock 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3091.62, N = 3 SE +/- 5109.68, N = 3 1103996 1103866
Llamafile Test: mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q8_0 - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second, More Is Better Llamafile 0.6 Test: mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q8_0 - Acceleration: CPU performance stock 1.2488 2.4976 3.7464 4.9952 6.244 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 5.55 5.48
Llamafile Test: mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q8_0 - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Llamafile 0.6 Test: mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q8_0 - Acceleration: CPU stock performance 0.0365 0.073 0.1095 0.146 0.1825 0.162 0.138
Llamafile Test: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Llamafile 0.6 Test: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - Acceleration: CPU stock performance 0.065 0.13 0.195 0.26 0.325 0.289 0.210
Llamafile Test: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second, More Is Better Llamafile 0.6 Test: llava-v1.5-7b-q4 - Acceleration: CPU performance stock 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 9.11 9.03
VKMark Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Present Mode: Mailbox OpenBenchmarking.org VKMark Score, More Is Better VKMark 2022-05-16 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Present Mode: Mailbox performance stock 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 2651 2646 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -ldl -std=c++14 -O0 -MD -MQ -MF
VKMark Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Present Mode: Mailbox OpenBenchmarking.org VKMark Score Per Watt, More Is Better VKMark 2022-05-16 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Present Mode: Mailbox stock performance 20 40 60 80 100 88.53 87.76
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org vsamples, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 Mode: CPU performance stock 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 93.51, N = 3 SE +/- 41.36, N = 3 11943 10610
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org vsamples Per Watt, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 Mode: CPU stock performance 80 160 240 320 400 354.36 266.68
PyBench Total For Average Test Times OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times stock performance 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 2.33, N = 4 SE +/- 2.78, N = 4 587 593
PyPerformance Benchmark: crypto_pyaes OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes stock performance 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 45.5 45.5
PyPerformance Benchmark: django_template OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template performance stock 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 21.0 21.2
PyPerformance Benchmark: json_loads OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 11.8 11.8
PyPerformance Benchmark: python_startup OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup performance stock 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 7.28 7.30
PyPerformance Benchmark: regex_compile OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile performance stock 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 71.1 71.4
Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.04, N = 4 SE +/- 0.58, N = 4 258.23 258.85 1. chrome 120.0.6099.224
Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 6 SE +/- 0.06, N = 6 19.23 19.32 1. chrome 120.0.6099.224
Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 1.34, N = 3 422.3 422.4 1. chrome 120.0.6099.224
OpenVINO Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU performance stock 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 352.27 403.27 MIN: 250.33 / MAX: 410.52 MIN: 194.05 / MAX: 453.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU performance stock 0.0855 0.171 0.2565 0.342 0.4275 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.33 0.38 MIN: 0.19 / MAX: 9.78 MIN: 0.19 / MAX: 7.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU performance stock 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 6.90 7.93 MIN: 3.65 / MAX: 24.71 MIN: 4.16 / MAX: 25.9 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU performance stock 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.99 6.83 MIN: 3.35 / MAX: 22.84 MIN: 4.03 / MAX: 19.87 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU performance stock 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 6.46 7.33 MIN: 4.46 / MAX: 20.84 MIN: 5.45 / MAX: 17.77 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU performance stock 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 59.34 66.21 MIN: 34.42 / MAX: 85.01 MIN: 41.75 / MAX: 97.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU performance stock 1.0238 2.0476 3.0714 4.0952 5.119 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 3.95 4.55 MIN: 2.35 / MAX: 13.73 MIN: 2.69 / MAX: 25.68 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVINO Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU performance stock 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 31.13 35.91 MIN: 19.45 / MAX: 58.37 MIN: 25.74 / MAX: 58.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome stock performance 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 7.51, N = 3 SE +/- 4.06, N = 3 2524 2546 1. chrome 120.0.6099.224
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Build: defconfig OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig performance stock 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 103.24 113.47
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile performance stock 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 399.75 430.85
Timed PHP Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile performance stock 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 65.28 68.18
Timed FFmpeg Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile performance stock 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 50.97 56.20
Timed Apache Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile performance stock 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 19.71 20.22
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only performance stock 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 131.21 148.69
Appleseed Scene: Emily OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily performance stock 80 160 240 320 400 333.21 369.68
Appleseed Scene: Disney Material OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material performance stock 50 100 150 200 250 182.14 205.22
GIMP Test: unsharp-mask OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 Test: unsharp-mask performance stock 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 4 SE +/- 0.06, N = 4 15.35 15.45
GIMP Test: resize OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 Test: resize performance stock 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.08, N = 4 13.39 13.49
GIMP Test: rotate OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 Test: rotate stock performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.04, N = 4 13.19 13.29
GIMP Test: auto-levels OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 Test: auto-levels performance stock 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 13.81 13.88
Darktable Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only performance stock 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.012, N = 6 SE +/- 0.003, N = 6 5.566 6.144
Darktable Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only performance stock 0.8701 1.7402 2.6103 3.4804 4.3505 SE +/- 0.009, N = 7 SE +/- 0.012, N = 7 3.643 3.867
Darktable Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only performance stock 0.6334 1.2668 1.9002 2.5336 3.167 SE +/- 0.002, N = 8 SE +/- 0.004, N = 8 2.637 2.815
Darktable Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only performance stock 0.0882 0.1764 0.2646 0.3528 0.441 SE +/- 0.002, N = 12 SE +/- 0.003, N = 15 0.354 0.392
RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time performance stock 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 57.48 59.75 1. RawTherapee, version 5.9, command line.
OpenSCAD Render: Projector Mount Swivel OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenSCAD Render: Projector Mount Swivel stock performance 0.9587 1.9174 2.8761 3.8348 4.7935 SE +/- 0.015, N = 8 SE +/- 0.015, N = 8 4.245 4.261 1. OpenSCAD version 2021.01
OpenSCAD Render: Pistol OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenSCAD Render: Pistol performance stock 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 55.09 55.49 1. OpenSCAD version 2021.01
OpenSCAD Render: Mini-ITX Case OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenSCAD Render: Mini-ITX Case stock performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 25.65 25.71 1. OpenSCAD version 2021.01
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 5.2 13.6 21.6 stock 5.2 13.8 22.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor performance stock 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 4.93 / Avg: 13.85 / Max: 44.84 Min: 5.06 / Avg: 14.55 / Max: 32.44
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.8 15.4 45.3 stock 5.3 16.2 34.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 11.0 17.3 performance 5.1 11.1 17.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 5.1 9.5 14.5 stock 5.2 9.6 14.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 5.0 7.8 14.6 stock 5.1 8.0 14.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 5.2 10.0 18.7 stock 5.2 10.1 19.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
3DMark Wild Life Extreme CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 32.2 35.4 performance 5.2 38.5 49.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
GravityMark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 27.0 34.1 performance 5.0 27.2 36.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GravityMark 1.82 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Unigine Superposition CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 33.0 35.1 performance 5.2 41.4 51.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
ParaView CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 23.3 35.0 performance 5.1 24.2 38.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
ParaView CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 17.2 35.1 performance 5.0 18.6 48.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
ParaView CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 13.7 30.4 performance 4.9 13.9 30.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
GLmark2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 33.5 35.3 performance 5.1 37.1 53.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GLmark2 2023.01 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
VKMark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.5 29.9 35.0 performance 5.1 30.2 39.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better VKMark 2022-05-16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 30.5 35.3 performance 5.0 44.9 54.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor stock performance 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 5.2 / Avg: 32.94 / Max: 35.45 Min: 4.96 / Avg: 49.87 / Max: 54.51
Timed PHP Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 25.5 35.2 performance 5.1 33.3 54.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Timed FFmpeg Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 31.0 35.2 performance 5.1 45.8 54.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Timed Apache Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 18.6 31.7 performance 5.0 21.5 47.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 32.6 35.3 performance 5.1 50.1 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 33.0 35.3 performance 5.0 50.6 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 33.1 35.1 performance 5.0 50.4 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 33.0 35.4 performance 5.0 50.6 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 32.9 35.3 performance 5.0 50.4 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.5 32.8 35.2 performance 4.9 50.3 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 33.0 35.4 performance 4.9 50.6 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 33.0 35.3 performance 5.1 50.7 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Llamafile CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.4 33.8 35.1 performance 5.1 40.1 50.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Llamafile 0.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
Llamafile CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 31.3 35.1 performance 5.2 43.4 54.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Llamafile 0.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
PyTorch CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 28.7 35.1 performance 5.0 37.5 48.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
PyTorch CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 32.0 35.1 performance 5.2 44.4 50.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
PyTorch CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 32.9 35.1 performance 5.0 40.6 44.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
PyTorch CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 32.3 35.3 performance 4.9 46.6 53.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
PyTorch CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 33.7 35.2 performance 5.3 49.7 53.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
PyTorch CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 34.1 35.1 performance 5.1 44.9 49.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
TensorFlow CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 23.4 35.1 performance 5.1 28.8 48.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
TensorFlow CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.4 33.9 35.2 performance 4.6 44.3 51.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 34.1 35.3 performance 4.9 52.2 54.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Appleseed CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 34.5 35.5 performance 5.3 52.4 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Appleseed 2.0 Beta CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Appleseed CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 34.5 35.3 performance 5.3 51.7 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Appleseed 2.0 Beta CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 32.8 35.3 performance 5.0 50.1 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 4.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 33.2 35.2 performance 5.0 50.7 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 4.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Chaos Group V-RAY CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 29.9 35.2 performance 5.1 44.8 54.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
IndigoBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 32.6 35.3 performance 5.0 49.8 54.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
IndigoBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 32.8 35.4 performance 4.9 50.2 54.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.3 13.9 17.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 15.7 25.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 11.6 14.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 13.0 17.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 19.9 35.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 17.0 34.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 14.9 34.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 8.8 21.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
RawTherapee CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 22.3 28.1 performance 5.1 27.0 39.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
OpenSCAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.8 10.1 15.4 stock 4.9 10.2 15.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSCAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
OpenSCAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 13.4 15.2 performance 4.9 13.5 15.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSCAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
OpenSCAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.7 13.0 15.2 stock 5.1 13.1 15.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSCAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
7-Zip Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 28.7 35.2 performance 4.9 41.3 54.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 21.7 35.0 performance 4.8 22.3 37.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.9 19.7 33.5 stock 5.1 19.8 33.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.9 15.4 23.8 stock 4.9 15.4 24.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.8 12.8 15.4 stock 4.9 13.0 15.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 12.9 15.4 performance 5.0 12.9 15.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.7 12.5 15.7 stock 5.2 12.6 15.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 21.2 35.3 performance 4.9 29.0 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 21.2 35.2 performance 4.9 29.0 54.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 28.6 35.6 performance 4.9 41.2 54.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 31.0 35.2 performance 5.2 45.7 54.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Kvazaar CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.8 30.7 35.2 performance 4.9 45.3 53.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Kvazaar CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 4.9 29.9 35.1 performance 5.1 44.2 54.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Kvazaar CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 28.8 35.0 performance 5.0 41.7 53.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
uvg266 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.2 31.6 35.2 performance 5.0 47.3 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
uvg266 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 31.4 35.2 performance 5.0 46.8 54.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
uvg266 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 30.7 35.2 performance 5.0 45.4 53.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
VVenC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 31.5 35.2 performance 4.9 45.0 54.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better VVenC 1.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
VVenC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.0 30.7 35.2 performance 5.0 40.3 54.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better VVenC 1.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
PyBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 2.5 11.9 15.8 stock 5.1 12.6 15.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.9 13.4 15.5 stock 5.1 13.5 15.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.9 13.6 15.5 stock 4.9 13.7 15.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.9 12.3 14.9 stock 4.9 12.8 15.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max stock 5.1 12.1 13.2 performance 5.0 12.1 13.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 5.0 13.4 15.5 stock 5.2 13.5 15.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
PHPBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.8 12.0 15.1 stock 5.1 12.2 14.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 5.0 14.9 20.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.9 16.1 25.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.8 11.5 14.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
GIMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 5.0 13.6 18.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.34 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 5.0 26.7 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.9 20.1 51.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.8 17.4 51.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Darktable CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max performance 4.8 9.4 25.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 4.4.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4