2024-01-31-1541 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 testing with a Intel S2600CWR (SE5C610.86B.01.01.0028.121720182203 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] on SystemRescue 10.01 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2402022-NE-INTELS26077&grr&sro .
2024-01-31-1541 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Display Server Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #29 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #30 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #31 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #33 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #35 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #36 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #37 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #38 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #39 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #40 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #42 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #43 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #44 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #45 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #46 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #47 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #48 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #51 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #52 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #53 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #54 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #55 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #56 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #58 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #60 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #61 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 3.30GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads) Intel S2600CWR (SE5C610.86B.01.01.0028.121720182203 BIOS) Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT/s Samsung M393A4K40BB0-CPB 4 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2UB1 + 3 x 480GB KINGSTON SA400S3 + 2 x 480GB TEAM T253480GB + 3001GB Seagate ST3000DM001-1CH1 + 123GB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] 2 x Intel I350 SystemRescue 10.01 6.1.30-1-lts (x86_64) X Server 1.21.1.8 GCC 13.1.1 20230429 btrfs 1024x768 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: always Compiler Details - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #2, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #3, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #4, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #6, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #7, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #9, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #10, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #11, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #12, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #13, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #14, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #15, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #16, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #17, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #18, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #19, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #20, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #21, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #22, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #23, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #24, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #25, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #26, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #27, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #29, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #30, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #31, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #32, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #33, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #34, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #35, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #37, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #39, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #40, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #42, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #43, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #44, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #45, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #46, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #47, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #48, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #50, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #51, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #52, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #53, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #54, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #58, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #59, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #61: --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet=auto --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-default-ssp --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=ada,c,c++,d,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-link-serialization=1 --enable-lto --enable-multilib --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-linker-hash-style=gnu Processor Details - Scaling Governor: intel_cpufreq performance - CPU Microcode: 0xb000040 Security Details - itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of VMX unsupported + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + mmio_stale_data: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable Java Details - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #8, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #36, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #55, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #56, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #57: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 20.0.1+9) Python Details - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #12, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #15, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #16, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #18, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #45: Python 3.11.3
2024-01-31-1541 core-latency: Average Latency Between CPU Cores cryptopp: All Algorithms build-llvm: Unix Makefiles cryptopp: Keyed Algorithms fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 4096 easywave: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - 2400 build-llvm: Ninja fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 4096 build-nodejs: Time To Compile ffmpeg: libx264 - Upload compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed ffmpeg: libx265 - Platform ffmpeg: libx265 - Video On Demand ffmpeg: libx264 - Video On Demand ffmpeg: libx264 - Platform build-godot: Time To Compile ffmpeg: libx265 - Upload helsing: 14 digit cryptopp: Unkeyed Algorithms compress-gzip: Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz easywave: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - 1200 hackbench: 16 - Thread asmfish: 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth build2: Time To Compile intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - All Reads hackbench: 16 - Process deepspeech: CPU gmpbench: Total Time fhourstones: Complex Connect-4 Solving build-eigen: Time To Compile cachebench: Read cachebench: Read / Modify / Write cachebench: Write dacapobench: Spring Boot ebizzy: ffmpeg: libx265 - Live dacapobench: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 2048 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 2048 hackbench: 8 - Thread etcpak: Single-Threaded - ETC2 etcpak: Single-Threaded - DXT1 blosc: blosclz noshuffle - 256MB blosc: blosclz bitshuffle - 256MB dacapobench: Tradebeans blosc: blosclz shuffle - 256MB compress-zstd: 19 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Compression Speed ffmpeg: libx264 - Live luxcorerender: Rainbow Colors and Prism - CPU kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Slow compress-zstd: 8 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 8 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 3 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed luxcorerender: Orange Juice - CPU compress-zstd: 12 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 12 - Compression Speed luxcorerender: Danish Mood - CPU build-wasmer: Time To Compile kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Medium luxcorerender: LuxCore Benchmark - CPU luxcorerender: DLSC - CPU dacapobench: Eclipse blosc: blosclz noshuffle - 128MB hackbench: 32 - Process himeno: Poisson Pressure Solver espeak: Text-To-Speech Synthesis aobench: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time blosc: blosclz bitshuffle - 128MB blosc: blosclz shuffle - 128MB embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon Obj dacapobench: H2 Database Engine compress-7zip: Decompression Rating compress-7zip: Compression Rating embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon Obj blosc: blosclz noshuffle - 64MB build-ffmpeg: Time To Compile encode-flac: WAV To FLAC ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 2048 dacapobench: Apache Xalan XSLT blosc: blosclz bitshuffle - 64MB dacapobench: Tradesoap clomp: Static OMP Speedup blosc: blosclz noshuffle - 32MB c-ray: Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel dacapobench: GraphChi blosc: blosclz shuffle - 64MB ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 1024 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 1024 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 4096 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 256 dacapobench: Apache Lucene Search Index ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 512 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 256 dacapobench: BioJava Biological Data Framework ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 128 botan: AES-256 - Decrypt botan: AES-256 crafty: Elapsed Time ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 128 luajit: Composite blosc: blosclz bitshuffle - 32MB embree: Pathtracer - Crown botan: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt botan: ChaCha20Poly1305 botan: Blowfish - Decrypt botan: Blowfish botan: Twofish - Decrypt botan: Twofish botan: CAST-256 - Decrypt botan: CAST-256 botan: KASUMI - Decrypt botan: KASUMI blosc: blosclz noshuffle - 16MB dacapobench: Jython fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 2048 compress-lz4: 9 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Compression Speed blosc: blosclz shuffle - 32MB blosc: blosclz noshuffle - 8MB kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Very Fast build-mplayer: Time To Compile embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crown dav1d: Chimera 1080p 10-bit blosc: blosclz bitshuffle - 8MB blosc: blosclz bitshuffle - 16MB blosc: blosclz shuffle - 8MB embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon coremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 1024 blosc: blosclz shuffle - 16MB compress-lz4: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Compression Speed dacapobench: PMD Source Code Analyzer dacapobench: Apache Kafka amg: dav1d: Chimera 1080p compress-xz: Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon compress-lz4: 1 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Compression Speed intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads java-scimark2: Composite kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Super Fast dacapobench: jMonkeyEngine ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 4096 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 4096 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 1024 hackbench: 8 - Process dacapobench: Apache Tomcat ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 256 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 2048 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 128 bork: File Encryption Time kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Slow ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 2048 dacapobench: Apache Lucene Search Engine fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 32 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 512 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 512 dav1d: Summer Nature 4K kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Ultra Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Medium easywave: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - 240 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 4096 hackbench: 4 - Thread ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 128 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 256 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 128 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 4096 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 1024 hackbench: 4 - Process ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 1024 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 2048 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 512 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 512 kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Very Fast dacapobench: Batik SVG Toolkit hackbench: 1 - Process fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 512 intel-mlc: Idle Latency ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 512 dav1d: Summer Nature 1080p helsing: 12 digit dacapobench: FOP Print Formatter fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 4096 etcpak: Multi-Threaded - ETC2 dacapobench: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing etcpak: Multi-Threaded - DXT1 kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Super Fast fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 256 hackbench: 2 - Thread fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 64 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 1024 kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Ultra Fast fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 256 hackbench: 2 - Process fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 512 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 32 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 128 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 1024 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 64 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 2048 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 32 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 256 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 128 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 256 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 32 hackbench: 1 - Thread fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 128 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 64 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 64 blake2: luajit: Dense LU Matrix Factorization luajit: Sparse Matrix Multiply luajit: Monte Carlo luajit: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation luajit: Fast Fourier Transform java-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization java-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply java-scimark2: Monte Carlo java-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation java-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform bullet: 1000 Stack 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #29 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #30 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #31 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #33 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #35 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #36 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #37 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #38 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #39 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #40 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #42 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #43 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #44 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #45 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #46 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #47 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #48 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #51 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #52 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #53 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #54 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #55 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #56 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #58 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #60 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #61 266.1041 1154.017406 605.601 423.344573 3538.0 510.443 496.800 13260 435.890 7.72 534.2 6.69 28.02 28.05 28.05 28.17 293.746 14.12 246.246 251.763187 44.457 201.941 39.207 61168569 146.057 28.708 160.40138 4003.4 11936.8 134.302 8338.763430 65855.691992 46653.513904 3766 639819 72.14 6002 21873 3628.7 16.810 162.598 164.114 3821.5 4204.4 21536 4261.0 526.9 12.0 125.03 12.46 9.21 607.5 592.7 590.9 1696.4 629.9 518.5 5.68 571.9 141.5 2.69 62.823 9.58 2.87 3.45 16332 5375.2 56.960 3355.425624 40.153 38.227 6205.2 6372.4 25.8821 3038 122894 147251 27.7865 6874.9 44.469 26.608 1115568 2267 8245.7 9041 24.6 8405.6 36.528 6407 8500.3 1222292 1242633 31744 1298656 5652 1304421 1312275 10587 1369982 2994.450 2955.895 6197092 1414730 1283.98 10177.7 25.0612 640.088 645.305 340.581 340.017 283.144 283.621 110.337 110.268 70.579 73.095 10567.1 8022 34801 2785.2 25.35 10689.3 10729.4 20.54 29.062 26.3674 315.48 11126.0 11126.9 11465.5 28.8361 787673.319248 24402 12023.4 2644.1 68.26 2339 6285 669950867 368.30 23.997 32.3760 2769.3 511.25 1877.35 26.84 6959 568475 623763 4790.7 14.953 3124 785571 873369 811593 11.038 33.56 664680 4541 11495.4 1153408 34804 208.56 34.70 35.15 7.362 908811 8.233 1256417 1258688 25201 927982 749609 7.936 1055129 1135568 23650 782745 80.75 1977 2.889 4773.8 1280892 631.82 2.707 924 4983.7 2637.554 889 2655.454 111.34 23188 4.481 14821 36919 138.72 4676.4 4.256 5408.2 5882.2 17612 5246.8 30500 5068.6 6027.7 5341.2 4945.4 25690 33391 2.914 5459.5 5277.8 5935.1 4.55 2896.53 1086.12 438.92 1648.53 349.79 4890.98 1700.53 1006.33 1463.68 325.22 93628.64 77892.00 93052.31 100143.91 107701.82 89708.6 77968.1 93414.6 100245.7 107439.0 109.5 OpenBenchmarking.org
Core-Latency Average Latency Between CPU Cores OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Core-Latency Average Latency Between CPU Cores 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 60 120 180 240 300 266.10 MIN: 76.46 / MAX: 518.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -pthread -O3
Crypto++ Test: All Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 Test: All Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 1154.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -fno-devirtualize -pthread -pipe
Timed LLVM Compilation Build System: Unix Makefiles OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 605.60
Crypto++ Test: Keyed Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Keyed Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 423.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -fno-devirtualize -pthread -pipe
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 32.54, N = 6 3538.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
easyWave Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 2400 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 2400 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 510.44 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp
Timed LLVM Compilation Build System: Ninja OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 496.80
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 45.98, N = 3 13260 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Timed Node.js Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 435.89
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 7.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 3.78, N = 15 534.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.08, N = 15 6.69 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 28.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 28.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 28.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 28.17 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.97, N = 3 293.75
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 14.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
Helsing Digit Range: 14 digit OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 14 digit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 246.25 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
Crypto++ Test: Unkeyed Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 251.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -fno-devirtualize -pthread -pipe
Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.36, N = 15 44.46
easyWave Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 1200 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 1200 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 201.94 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp
Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 1.64, N = 15 39.21 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 13M 26M 39M 52M 65M SE +/- 519098.97, N = 3 61168569
Build2 Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.15 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 146.06
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 40.88, N = 3 93628.64
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 175.98, N = 3 77892.00
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 86.36, N = 3 93052.31
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 69.78, N = 3 100143.91
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 37.26, N = 3 107701.82
Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.22, N = 15 28.71 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
DeepSpeech Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.36, N = 3 160.40
GNU GMP GMPbench Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org GMPbench Score, More Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 4003.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -lm
Fhourstones Complex Connect-4 Solving OpenBenchmarking.org Kpos / sec, More Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 60.41, N = 3 11936.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Timed Eigen Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.42, N = 3 134.30
CacheBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Read 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 3.69, N = 3 8338.76 MIN: 8289.51 / MAX: 8352.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt
CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 69.01, N = 3 65855.69 MIN: 49266.77 / MAX: 73931.82 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt
CacheBench Test: Write OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 36.81, N = 3 46653.51 MIN: 32464.67 / MAX: 50033.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Spring Boot OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Spring Boot 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 45.56, N = 15 3766
ebizzy OpenBenchmarking.org Records/s, More Is Better ebizzy 0.3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 8014.75, N = 15 639819 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 72.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 44.30, N = 15 6002
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 115.66, N = 3 21873 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 20.87, N = 3 3628.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.53, N = 15 16.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Etcpak Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 162.60 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 164.11 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
C-Blosc Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 10.55, N = 3 3821.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 33.43, N = 3 4204.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradebeans OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 218.15, N = 3 21536
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 14.27, N = 3 4261.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 3.46, N = 3 526.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 12.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.93, N = 3 125.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.35, N = 15 12.46 MIN: 9.73 / MAX: 13.82
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 9.21 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 0.15, N = 2 607.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 5.52, N = 3 592.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 590.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.37, N = 3 1696.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 4.58, N = 3 629.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 1.40, N = 3 518.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
LuxCoreRender Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1.278 2.556 3.834 5.112 6.39 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 5.68 MIN: 5.23 / MAX: 5.84
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 2.54, N = 3 571.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 141.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
LuxCoreRender Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.6053 1.2106 1.8159 2.4212 3.0265 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 2.69 MIN: 0.86 / MAX: 3.24
Timed Wasmer Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 62.82 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -ldl -lgcc_s -lutil -lrt -lpthread -lm -lc -pie -nodefaultlibs
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 9.58 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
LuxCoreRender Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.6458 1.2916 1.9374 2.5832 3.229 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 2.87 MIN: 0.9 / MAX: 3.47
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.7763 1.5526 2.3289 3.1052 3.8815 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 3.45 MIN: 3.33 / MAX: 3.64
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Eclipse OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Eclipse 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 109.78, N = 3 16332
C-Blosc Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 12.69, N = 3 5375.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 56.96 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 2.64, N = 3 3355.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -mavx2
eSpeak-NG Speech Engine Text-To-Speech Synthesis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 1.51 Text-To-Speech Synthesis 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.29, N = 4 40.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lpthread
AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.41, N = 4 38.23 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -O3
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 41.38, N = 3 6205.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 29.79, N = 3 6372.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 25.88 MIN: 25.53 / MAX: 26.4
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2 Database Engine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2 Database Engine 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 28.85, N = 3 3038
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 253.63, N = 3 122894 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
7-Zip Compression Test: Compression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 242.28, N = 3 147251 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 27.79 MIN: 27.36 / MAX: 28.37
C-Blosc Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 8.80, N = 3 6874.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
Timed FFmpeg Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 44.47
FLAC Audio Encoding WAV To FLAC OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 WAV To FLAC 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.20, N = 5 26.61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fvisibility=hidden -lm
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 9054.93, N = 15 1115568
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 61.94, N = 15 2267
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 27.50, N = 3 8245.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradesoap OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradesoap 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 22.43, N = 3 9041
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup, More Is Better CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 24.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 16.35, N = 3 8405.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Ray Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 36.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: GraphChi OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: GraphChi 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 77.23, N = 4 6407
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 32.16, N = 3 8500.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 8590.49, N = 15 1222292
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 11543.29, N = 15 1242633
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 215.36, N = 13 31744 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 17954.69, N = 15 1298656
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 5.78, N = 3 5652
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 15022.93, N = 15 1304421
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 15454.67, N = 15 1312275
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 27.23, N = 3 10587
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 16442.79, N = 15 1369982
Botan Test: AES-256 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 2994.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: AES-256 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 2955.90 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Crafty Elapsed Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1.3M 2.6M 3.9M 5.2M 6.5M SE +/- 17363.11, N = 3 6197092 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lstdc++ -fprofile-use -lm
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 17444.74, N = 15 1414730
LuaJIT Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 2.15, N = 3 1283.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 32.60, N = 3 10177.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 25.06 MIN: 24.6 / MAX: 25.67
Botan Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 2.41, N = 3 640.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 5.16, N = 3 645.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Blowfish - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 340.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.19, N = 3 340.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Twofish - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 283.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Twofish OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 283.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 110.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: CAST-256 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 110.27 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: KASUMI - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 70.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: KASUMI OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 73.10 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
C-Blosc Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 68.32, N = 3 10567.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 90.54, N = 3 8022
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 268.80, N = 15 34801 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 19.97, N = 3 2785.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 25.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 78.32, N = 3 10689.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 138.95, N = 3 10729.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 20.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Timed MPlayer Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 29.06
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 26.37 MIN: 25.78 / MAX: 27.07
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 315.48 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 137.39, N = 3 11126.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 47.66, N = 3 11126.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 102.80, N = 3 11465.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 28.84 MIN: 28.41 / MAX: 29.36
Coremark CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 632.46, N = 3 787673.32 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 232.44, N = 3 24402 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 19.53, N = 3 12023.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 16.19, N = 3 2644.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 68.26 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 21.40, N = 7 2339
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Kafka OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Kafka 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 47.06, N = 3 6285
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140M 280M 420M 560M 700M SE +/- 1009642.84, N = 3 669950867
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 368.30 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
XZ Compression Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 24.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O2
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 32.38 MIN: 31.95 / MAX: 32.92
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 31.62, N = 3 2769.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 511.25 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 148.63, N = 3 89708.6
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 174.39, N = 3 77968.1
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 163.47, N = 3 93414.6
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 170.35, N = 3 100245.7
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 176.52, N = 3 107439.0
Java SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Composite 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.58, N = 3 1877.35
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 26.84 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: jMonkeyEngine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: jMonkeyEngine 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 13.91, N = 3 6959
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 4016.72, N = 4 568475
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 4234.73, N = 4 623763
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 20.15, N = 4 4790.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 14.95 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Tomcat OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Tomcat 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 6.12, N = 4 3124
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3838.12, N = 5 785571
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3940.78, N = 5 873369
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4977.24, N = 5 811593
Bork File Encrypter File Encryption Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.08, N = 5 11.04
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 33.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 5640.23, N = 4 664680
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 31.47, N = 3 4541
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 151.47, N = 15 11495.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 11011.23, N = 6 1153408
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 265.16, N = 15 34804 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 208.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 34.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 35.15 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
easyWave Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 240 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 240 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.036, N = 5 7.362 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 7599.81, N = 5 908811
Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.011, N = 6 8.233 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 3741.50, N = 6 1256417
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 4398.68, N = 6 1258688
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 185.46, N = 15 25201 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 8481.75, N = 5 927982
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 5704.32, N = 4 749609
Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.006, N = 6 7.936 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 6769.36, N = 5 1055129
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 10664.84, N = 6 1135568
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 65.70, N = 6 23650 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4019.70, N = 4 782745
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.09, N = 6 80.75 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 15.15, N = 5 1977
Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.65 1.3 1.95 2.6 3.25 SE +/- 0.027, N = 15 2.889 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 10.76, N = 7 4773.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Idle Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Idle Latency 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.38, N = 7 109.5
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 10678.01, N = 6 1280892
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.62, N = 7 631.82 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
Helsing Digit Range: 12 digit OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 12 digit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.6091 1.2182 1.8273 2.4364 3.0455 SE +/- 0.054, N = 15 2.707 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: FOP Print Formatter OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: FOP Print Formatter 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 4.95, N = 7 924
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 24.04, N = 7 4983.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Etcpak Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 1.92, N = 6 2637.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 6.44, N = 8 889
Etcpak Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 6.46, N = 6 2655.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.18, N = 7 111.34 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 54.91, N = 7 23188 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1.0082 2.0164 3.0246 4.0328 5.041 SE +/- 0.004, N = 8 4.481 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 116.64, N = 10 14821 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 309.08, N = 8 36919 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.15, N = 8 138.72 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 9.91, N = 7 4676.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.9576 1.9152 2.8728 3.8304 4.788 SE +/- 0.004, N = 8 4.256 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 20.72, N = 8 5408.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 26.36, N = 9 5882.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 90.06, N = 9 17612 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 18.75, N = 8 5246.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 164.49, N = 9 30500 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 10.55, N = 8 5068.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 3.14, N = 9 6027.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 18.30, N = 9 5341.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 9.61, N = 9 4945.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 125.59, N = 9 25690 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 134.30, N = 10 33391 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.6557 1.3114 1.9671 2.6228 3.2785 SE +/- 0.020, N = 9 2.914 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 13.86, N = 9 5459.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 22.86, N = 10 5277.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 13.63, N = 10 5935.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
BLAKE2 OpenBenchmarking.org Cycles Per Byte, Fewer Is Better BLAKE2 20170307 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1.0238 2.0476 3.0714 4.0952 5.119 SE +/- 0.02, N = 15 4.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lcrypto -lz
Java Graphics Basic Acceptance Test OpenBenchmarking.org Java Graphics Basic Acceptance Test 2.0 FAIL 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1
LuaJIT Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 9.57, N = 3 2896.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 1086.12 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 438.92 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 1648.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.85, N = 3 349.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 32 / Avg: 37.18 / Max: 40
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 29 / Avg: 34.45 / Max: 38
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 30 / Avg: 36.25 / Max: 39
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 22 / Avg: 33.18 / Max: 36
Java SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 24.86, N = 3 4890.98
Java SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 1700.53
Java SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Monte Carlo 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.12, N = 3 1006.33
Java SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 5.00, N = 3 1463.68
Java SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.89, N = 3 325.22
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31 / Max: 32
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.44 / Max: 30
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31 / Max: 32
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.11 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.11 / Max: 33
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.56 / Max: 30
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.13 / Max: 33
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.2 / Max: 32
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.55 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31 / Max: 32
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.1 / Max: 25
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.33 / Max: 32
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.33 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.25 / Max: 32
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.5 / Max: 30
Intel Memory Latency Checker System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 System Temperature Monitor 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 30 / Avg: 39.13 / Max: 41
Intel Memory Latency Checker CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 36 / Max: 38
Himeno Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.22 / Max: 34
Himeno Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25 / Max: 26
Hackbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 33 / Avg: 38.54 / Max: 41
Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 36.46 / Max: 40
Hackbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 37.62 / Max: 41
Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 35.42 / Max: 38
Hackbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 32 / Avg: 36.22 / Max: 39
Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 24 / Avg: 31.88 / Max: 36
GNU GMP GMPbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.43 / Max: 34
GNU GMP GMPbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 23.04 / Max: 28
Fhourstones System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.04 / Max: 32
Fhourstones CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 22.88 / Max: 25
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 29.55 / Max: 31
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 22.38 / Max: 24
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 32.19 / Max: 33
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 25.25 / Max: 26
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 29.33 / Max: 31
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 22 / Avg: 22.63 / Max: 23
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.11 / Max: 34
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.13 / Max: 25
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 22 / Avg: 22.29 / Max: 23
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.47 / Max: 33
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 23.56 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.06 / Max: 29
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 21 / Avg: 21 / Max: 21
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.94 / Max: 35
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 24 / Avg: 27.2 / Max: 31
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 32.94 / Max: 35
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 27.66 / Max: 33
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.07 / Max: 34
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 26.8 / Max: 33
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 32 / Max: 33
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 26.24 / Max: 30
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.59 / Max: 34
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 23.88 / Max: 32
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.54 / Max: 33
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 23.46 / Max: 27
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.94 / Max: 34
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.76 / Max: 32
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 31.75 / Max: 33
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.83 / Max: 28
Etcpak System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.29 / Max: 33
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.6 / Max: 28
Etcpak System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.14 / Max: 30
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 22 / Avg: 22.07 / Max: 23
eSpeak-NG Speech Engine System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 1.51 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 32 / Avg: 32.44 / Max: 33
eSpeak-NG Speech Engine CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 1.51 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 24.4 / Max: 25
FLAC Audio Encoding System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 30.25 / Max: 31
FLAC Audio Encoding CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 22 / Avg: 22.75 / Max: 23
easyWave System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 31 / Avg: 36.26 / Max: 37
easyWave CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 32.82 / Max: 36
easyWave System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.55 / Max: 38
easyWave CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 30.52 / Max: 35
DeepSpeech System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.88 / Max: 32
DeepSpeech CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 23.92 / Max: 25
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 31 / Avg: 34.4 / Max: 36
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 29.35 / Max: 34
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.86 / Max: 33
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24 / Max: 25
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 32.29 / Max: 33
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 26 / Max: 28
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.69 / Max: 32
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 25.15 / Max: 29
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.13 / Max: 35
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.88 / Max: 32
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 29.86 / Max: 31
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 25.43 / Max: 34
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.47 / Max: 33
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 23.95 / Max: 27
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.4 / Max: 33
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 23.8 / Max: 26
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 29.58 / Max: 30
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 22.57 / Max: 24
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 33.3 / Max: 35
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25.58 / Max: 26
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.95 / Max: 35
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.68 / Max: 26
Core-Latency System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Core-Latency System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.79 / Max: 34
Core-Latency CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Core-Latency CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 20 / Avg: 24.21 / Max: 31
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.55 / Max: 33
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 21 / Avg: 24.15 / Max: 32
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.83 / Max: 31
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 21 / Avg: 25 / Max: 30
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.09 / Max: 32
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.17 / Max: 27
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.45 / Max: 33
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 25 / Max: 31
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32 / Max: 33
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 26.73 / Max: 32
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.27 / Max: 31
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.36 / Max: 28
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.18 / Max: 33
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 20 / Avg: 24.91 / Max: 31
Gzip Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.39 / Max: 31
Gzip Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 20 / Avg: 21.41 / Max: 25
CacheBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 32 / Avg: 33.14 / Max: 34
CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.67 / Max: 25
CacheBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 31 / Max: 31
CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 21 / Avg: 26.43 / Max: 31
CacheBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.95 / Max: 29
CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 21 / Avg: 22 / Max: 23
Build2 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.15 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 37 / Max: 41
Build2 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.15 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 22 / Avg: 31.07 / Max: 39
Timed Wasmer Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 31 / Avg: 33.91 / Max: 36
Timed Wasmer Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 27.73 / Max: 34
Timed Node.js Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 38.22 / Max: 44
Timed Node.js Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 22 / Avg: 33.37 / Max: 41
Timed LLVM Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 38.21 / Max: 43
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 26 / Avg: 34.17 / Max: 41
Timed LLVM Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 31 / Avg: 39.36 / Max: 44
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 21 / Avg: 33.95 / Max: 42
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 31 / Avg: 37.33 / Max: 43
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 20 / Avg: 32.1 / Max: 40
Timed Eigen Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.61 / Max: 31
Timed Eigen Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 20 / Avg: 21.57 / Max: 24
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.54 / Max: 33
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25.31 / Max: 29
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 32 / Max: 33
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25.44 / Max: 28
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32 / Max: 34
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 26.43 / Max: 30
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 32.57 / Max: 33
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 26.43 / Max: 29
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 33 / Avg: 33.4 / Max: 35
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 24 / Avg: 27.7 / Max: 31
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 33.5 / Max: 35
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 24 / Avg: 26.75 / Max: 30
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 32 / Avg: 33.43 / Max: 35
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 24 / Avg: 27 / Max: 31
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.77 / Max: 33
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25.38 / Max: 28
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.56 / Max: 33
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.89 / Max: 28
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 26.29 / Max: 29
System Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius System Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #9 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 28 / Avg: 33.46 / Max: 43 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.25 / Max: 32 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.67 / Max: 33 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.36 / Max: 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 31.72 / Max: 36 Min: 30 / Avg: 34.15 / Max: 37 Min: 29 / Avg: 35.72 / Max: 38 Min: 30 / Avg: 35 / Max: 41 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.46 / Max: 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.63 / Max: 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 29.74 / Max: 34 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.25 / Max: 29 Min: 28 / Avg: 28 / Max: 28 Min: 27 / Avg: 28 / Max: 29 Min: 29 / Avg: 35.71 / Max: 41 Min: 30 / Avg: 38.5 / Max: 47 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.82 / Max: 33 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.43 / Max: 29 Min: 30 / Avg: 34.88 / Max: 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 28 / Max: 29 Min: 27 / Avg: 34.24 / Max: 41 Min: 29 / Avg: 32.11 / Max: 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.11 / Max: 33 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.88 / Max: 32 Min: 31 / Avg: 38.46 / Max: 44 Min: 29 / Avg: 29 / Max: 29 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.95 / Max: 34 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.67 / Max: 26 Min: 30 / Avg: 37.62 / Max: 41
CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #9 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 21 / Avg: 28.75 / Max: 41 Min: 22 / Avg: 23.82 / Max: 28 Min: 20 / Avg: 24.65 / Max: 32 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.05 / Max: 26 Min: 21 / Avg: 25.47 / Max: 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 28.45 / Max: 34 Min: 21 / Avg: 31.75 / Max: 36 Min: 23 / Avg: 29.35 / Max: 41 Min: 22 / Avg: 24 / Max: 32 Min: 22 / Avg: 25.56 / Max: 33 Min: 20 / Avg: 22.69 / Max: 27 Min: 21 / Avg: 21.5 / Max: 22 Min: 21 / Avg: 21 / Max: 21 Min: 21 / Avg: 21 / Max: 21 Min: 21 / Avg: 31.41 / Max: 40 Min: 21 / Avg: 33.1 / Max: 45 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.05 / Max: 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 21.57 / Max: 22 Min: 21 / Avg: 30.42 / Max: 38 Min: 20 / Avg: 20.89 / Max: 21 Min: 18 / Avg: 27.4 / Max: 39 Min: 21 / Avg: 26.29 / Max: 32 Min: 21 / Avg: 23.37 / Max: 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 23.63 / Max: 25 Min: 21 / Avg: 34.14 / Max: 42 Min: 22 / Avg: 22 / Max: 22 Min: 21 / Avg: 24.35 / Max: 31 Min: 18 / Avg: 18.25 / Max: 19 Min: 21 / Avg: 33.65 / Max: 38
AOBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.22 / Max: 32
AOBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 23.78 / Max: 25
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5