c5.4xlarge

amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2401115-NE-C54XLARGE20
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
c5.4xlarge
January 11
  6 Hours, 45 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

c5.4xlarge, "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Random Numbers", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",1235.893,1235.727,1235.642 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Math Library", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",458.567,455.352,455.492 "x265 3.4 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",8.69,8.22,8.77,8,8.36,8.08,8.78,8.8,8.7,8.41,8.94,8.95,8.58,8.4,8.38 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",20607746050,20608908770,20606109010 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: AES-256-GCM", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",32199749630,32201529480,32200964510 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: AES-128-GCM", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",44237905920,44218875900,44227297010 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: ChaCha20", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",40737837330,40743937370,40740359650 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: SHA512", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",2782112170,2780398570,2789360490 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: SHA256", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",2493818200,2490553760,2493683030 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",90793.94,90842.95,90743.58 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",92325.35,93041.36,91891.38 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",93377.75,93988.18,93478.74 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",94763,95156.58,95011.39 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",92814.69,93140.04,91758.4 "GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 - Total Time", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: raytrace", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",770,771,772 "CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",78124.894472,79066.30206,78610.699431 "CacheBench - Test: Write", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",26201.485409,26197.927217,26198.632692 "CacheBench - Test: Read", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",6855.389588,6856.072492,6856.504049 "Stockfish 15 - Total Time", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",18732931,19031220,18922195 "BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 - Computational Test: Dhrystone 2", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",34970261.1,34984218.1,34719936.3 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Stepanov Vector", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",104.546,104.551,104.542 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: python_startup", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",11.1,11.1,11.1 "Sysbench 1.0.20 - Test: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",16066.49,16072.01,16072.39 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: 2to3", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Atol", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",80.951,80.988,81.068 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: go", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",784.9,781.4,784 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",10.3,10.2,10.5 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",5804.2,5830,5824.7 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",42.03,42.02,42.02 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",5787.6,5795,5787.4 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",43.01,43.01,43 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",774.7,775.3,779.9 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",5.42,5.39,5.38 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",1060.2,1067,1065.5 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",768.8,770.5,765.6 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",1010.2,1012.1,1017 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",1364.5,1381,1393.4 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",1020.1,1016.5,1017.2 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",355.9,348.7,354.7 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",1024.5,1030.6,1026.8 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",374.1,371,371.6 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",922.9,916.1,924.2 "Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",124.5,124.6,123.2 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: Sharpen", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: Noise-Gaussian", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: Enhanced", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: Resizing", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: Swirl", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: HWB Color Space", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: Rotate", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",568,563,582 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: RSA4096", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",144407.1,144602.9,144707.9 "OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: RSA4096", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",2195.9,2184.5,2195 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: regex_compile", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",265,264,264 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Stepanov Abstraction", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",41.04,41.033,41.032 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: django_template", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",83.4,83.6,83.7 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",5990.1,6012.1,5995.3 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",4848.6,4830.66,4839.01 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Ctype", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",37.056,37.053,37.072 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: nbody", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: json_loads", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",37.4,37.4,37.5 "x264 2022-02-22 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",17.94,17.95,17.94 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: chaos", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: AES-256 - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",3347.814,3349.063,3349.086 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: AES-256", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",3348.946,3351.077,3348.597 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: float", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: crypto_pyaes", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",623.675,620.198,622.848 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: ChaCha20Poly1305", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",627.286,627.058,628.202 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Blowfish - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",381.405,380.605,380.735 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Blowfish", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",385.094,384.274,384.357 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Twofish - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",317.111,316.908,317.535 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Twofish", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",307.012,307.006,307.365 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",121.787,121.853,121.802 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: CAST-256", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",121.942,122.002,121.951 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: KASUMI - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",76.803,76.8,76.808 "Botan 2.17.3 - Test: KASUMI", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",79.296,79.258,79.293 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Copy", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",84865.3,84823.8,84452.9,84697.4,84459.3 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: pathlib", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",26.2,26.4,26.3 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",85028.7,84845.7,85163.9 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",83452.3,83106.2,83287.3 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",90731.1,90464.4,90730.1 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",92465.2,93745.6,94020 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",92660,92032.2,93164.8 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: pickle_pure_python", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge", "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Function Objects", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",16.572,16.57,16.573 "x265 3.4 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",41.92,42.42,42.03 "Smallpt 1.0 - Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",14.134,14.141,14.188 "x264 2022-02-22 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",75.8,75.57,75.6 "Sysbench 1.0.20 - Test: RAM / Memory", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",12820.55,13386.87,12985.63 "Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Idle Latency", Lower Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",91.6,91.7,91.5 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Add", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",72021.7,72763,71350.7,72619.1,72389.6 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Triad", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",71939.7,72938.4,71514,72493.5,71790.5 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Scale", Higher Results Are Better "c5.4xlarge",64392.8,64491.5,64127.7,64609.5,64892.8