amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2401114-NE-C6A4XLARG64
c6a.4xlarge,
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: KASUMI",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",83.085,83.08,83.085
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: KASUMI - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",79.856,79.85,79.854
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: AES-256",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",5485.094,5486.427,5471.192
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: AES-256 - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",5510.37,5512.861,5500.818
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Twofish",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",350.014,351.706,351.758
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Twofish - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",344.532,346.404,346.345
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Blowfish",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",423.19,423.293,423.204
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: Blowfish - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",422.882,423.051,422.719
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: CAST-256",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",129.455,129.824,129.982
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",129.186,129.539,129.683
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: ChaCha20Poly1305",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",615.565,616.154,615.877
"Botan 2.17.3 - Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",611.482,611.486,611.162
"BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 - Computational Test: Dhrystone 2",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",40005055.1,39941394.1,35981942.2,39927749.3,40030647,39932263.1,40059524.1,39973012.7,39947730.7,39913342.8,39931875.3,39858880.4
"C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",70.909,70.982,70.995
"CacheBench - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",9141.990859,9141.217646,9141.654378
"CacheBench - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",51542.312738,51989.116572,51745.448182
"CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",102500.623571,101788.006431,102123.874679
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Atol",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",50.581,51.03,51.149
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Ctype",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",52.09,51.407,51.405
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Math Library",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",365.437,366.025,365.341
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Random Numbers",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1052.28,1052.254,1052.417
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Stepanov Vector",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",57.488,57.496,57.493
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Function Objects",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",15.416,15.416,15.413
"CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Stepanov Abstraction",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",25.784,25.786,25.784
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Jython",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",5863,5809,5797
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Eclipse",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: GraphChi",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",3494,3515,3448
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Tradesoap",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Tradebeans",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Spring Boot",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",2160,2219,2100,2101,2181
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Apache Kafka",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",5393,5412,5399
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Apache Tomcat",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: jMonkeyEngine",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",6949,6960,6953
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Apache Cassandra",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",754,745,745
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",2269,2229,2284
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: H2 Database Engine",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: FOP Print Formatter",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",636,631,683,653,642,637,644,651,665,673,656,636
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1610,1624,1672
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",4262,4192,4243
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 - Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",3030,3028,3137
"GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 - Total Time",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: Swirl",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: Rotate",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: Sharpen",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: Enhanced",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: Resizing",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",868,870,869
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: Noise-Gaussian",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 - Operation: HWB Color Space",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1017,1012,1014
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Idle Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",120.8,121.1,120.8
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",40342.58,40444.52,40346.89
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",44989.38,45013.23,45141.24
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",45752.7,46178.55,45852
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",45416.09,45402.79,45325.98
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",45641.73,45737.42,45659.32
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",40029.7,40039.4,40075.6
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",44385.3,44735,44602.3
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",45661,45014.2,45415.5
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",45217.1,45043.2,45250.8
"Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 - Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",45470.6,44586.9,45535.2
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",11403.05,11374.63,11339.9
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",12961.4,13105.6,13071.4
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",53.28,53.42,53.3
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",12208.4,12163.1,12267.6
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",51.45,51.93,52.03
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",12200.3,12261.9,12276
"nginx 1.23.2 - Connections: 1",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"nginx 1.23.2 - Connections: 20",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",52594.89,54076.99,53110.76
"nginx 1.23.2 - Connections: 100",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",68814.17,68840.09,68763.63
"nginx 1.23.2 - Connections: 200",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",69164.76,69152.94,69211.33
"nginx 1.23.2 - Connections: 500",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",67220.48,67265.75,67376.96
"nginx 1.23.2 - Connections: 1000",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",64070.26,63910.04,65446.28
"nginx 1.23.2 - Connections: 4000",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",49233.27,51558.08,52061.03,51512.82
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: SHA256",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",11069993360,11063888730,11079849500
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: SHA512",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",3833808360,3834491960,3820669350
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: RSA4096",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",2100.3,2099.8,2100.3
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: RSA4096",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",136741.4,136628.6,136733.9
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: ChaCha20",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",35546892420,35543230330,35545673730
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: AES-128-GCM",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",37926995830,37919354610,37908624180
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: AES-256-GCM",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",34667257580,34659285400,34663329520
"OpenSSL 3.1 - Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",24104608560,24112123900,24100013400
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: go",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",290,288,288
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: 2to3",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: chaos",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",142,143,143
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: float",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: nbody",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",142,143,143
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: pathlib",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",20.1,20.2,20.2
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: raytrace",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: json_loads",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",26.9,26.8,27
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: crypto_pyaes",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: regex_compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",222,227,223
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: python_startup",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",9.39,9.39,9.4
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: django_template",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",65.4,65.4,65.6
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: pickle_pure_python",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",550,551,551
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",2240694.33,2223368.39,2144130.18
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",2341459.45,2345750.07,2284211.46
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1998909.56,2020557.36,2022514.35
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",2098725.14,2093214.99,2072509.17
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",2256855.14,2220554.12,2184085.06
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1981694.2,1959061.06,1996900.28
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1941292.14,1923871.46,1949736.56
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",2231038.88,2253027.18,2294609.53
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1902506.67,1839442.94,1899657.7
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",2043746.15,2104884.69,2078078.84
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1832752.3,1788440.9,1811302.79
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1906680.84,1910743.78,1918982.77
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",2214921.11,2209457.06,2160458.82
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1771503.92,1773757.45,1759163.22
"Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",2019889.34,2060391.93,2100741.24
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Scala Dotty",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",903.858244,884.482595,894.870302
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Random Forest",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",653.221658,655.908013,647.011298
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: ALS Movie Lens",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",6770.374059,6785.736595,6754.667204
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Apache Spark ALS",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",2506.015844,2564.515196,2642.051052,2603.928098
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Apache Spark Bayes",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1225.767304,1196.655613,1192.882419
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Savina Reactors.IO",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",6036.449772,6135.21261,6001.875809
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Apache Spark PageRank",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",3048.111013,3052.709632,3046.583248
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Finagle HTTP Requests",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",4070.695445,3984.029575,4172.410244
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: In-Memory Database Shootout",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",3786.499866,3757.874677,3817.102395
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",15186.262612,14592.070262,14831.882377
"Renaissance 0.14 - Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1636.318337,1598.529287,1672.108008
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",646.25,646.73,646.01
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",138.04,135.76,137.21
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",366.31,372.29,366.23
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",624.94,622.47,624.4
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1077.04,1078.44,1077.71
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1024.94,1024.7,1024.49
"Smallpt 1.0 - Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples",
Lower Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",11.51,11.537,11.672
"Stockfish 15 - Total Time",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",26007915,25796519,26328339
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Copy",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",45044.3,45029,45012.1,45068.7,45091.7
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Scale",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",30717.4,30685.8,30688.5,30703.8,30705.6
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Triad",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",32840.1,32857.6,32795,32855.2,32832.1
"Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Add",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",32790.3,32793,32747.7,32803.1,32823.4
"Sysbench 1.0.20 - Test: RAM / Memory",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",16630.06,16385.49,16569.55
"Sysbench 1.0.20 - Test: CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",36694.03,36684.81,36679.46
"x264 2022-02-22 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",27.25,27.22,27.24
"x264 2022-02-22 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",112.91,112.69,112.06
"x265 3.4 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",12.37,12.97,12.67
"x265 3.4 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",56,56.2,56.15
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1704.4,1724.3,1716
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1326.8,1324.9,1327.3
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",397.5,385.3,389.9
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1428.4,1427.3,1430.1
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",140.3,136.5,136.9
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1432.7,1447.4,1434.6
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",12,11.8,11.9
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1268.4,1258.2,1265
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",941.5,943.9,946.2
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1352.7,1354.4,1358.2
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",402.5,401.5,399
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1433.1,1441.6,1440.8
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",6.6,6.6,6.65
"Zstd Compression 1.5.4 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"c6a.4xlarge",1187.6,1188,1189