AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core testing with a TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS) and ASPEED 24GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2312164-NE-S5EPYC40C72

Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result

Hide
Result

Result
Identifier

View Logs

Performance Per
Dollar

Date
Run

Test
Duration

S5.EPYC40c+256GBRAM+24+6+8GBVRAM

December 16 2023

1 Minute

S5.EPYC40c+256GBRAM+24+6+8GBVRAM _

December 16 2023

1 Minute

Invert Hiding All Results Option

1 Minute

Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

s5epyc40c256gbram2468gbvram_ AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core testing with a TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS) and ASPEED 24GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. S5.EPYC40c+256GBRAM+24+6+8GBVRAM: Processor: AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870 + 6707GB iSCSI Disk, Graphics: ASPEED 24GB, Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P4317Q + 4 x S32D850, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-14-lowlatency (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3590.0) + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.3.68, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + Clang 16.0.6 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 S5.EPYC40c+256GBRAM+24+6+8GBVRAM _: Processor: AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870 + 6707GB iSCSI Disk, Graphics: ASPEED 24GB, Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P4317Q + 4 x S32D850, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-14-lowlatency (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3590.0) + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.3.68, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + Clang 16.0.6 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better BRL-CAD 7.36 VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 DuckDB 0.9.1 Benchmark: IMDB Seconds < Lower Is Better DuckDB 0.9.1 Benchmark: TPC-H Parquet Seconds < Lower Is Better ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Git Seconds < Lower Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 8192 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 4000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 Score > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Seconds < Lower Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: Memory Events Per Second > Higher Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 256

s5epyc40c256gbram2468gbvram_

View

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Statistics

Graph Settings

Multi-Way Comparison

Table

Run Management