ddd Benchmarks for a future article. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS) and AMD Radeon 16GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2311276-PTS-DDD3212111&grw&rdt .
ddd Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution a b AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core @ 5.88GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads) ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS) AMD Device 14d8 32GB 2000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB AMD Radeon 16GB (2124/1218MHz) AMD Navi 31 HDMI/DP DELL U2723QE Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 Ubuntu 23.10 6.6.0-phx-bcachefs (x86_64) GNOME Shell 45.0 X Server + Wayland 4.6 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54) GCC 13.2.0 + LLVM 16.0.6 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Processor Details - Scaling Governor: amd-pstate-epp powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xa601203 Java Details - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.20+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu1) Python Details - Python 3.11.6 Security Details - gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Vulnerable: Safe RET no microcode + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
ddd dacapobench: Jython dacapobench: Eclipse dacapobench: GraphChi dacapobench: Tradesoap dacapobench: Tradebeans dacapobench: Spring Boot dacapobench: Apache Kafka dacapobench: Apache Tomcat dacapobench: jMonkeyEngine dacapobench: Apache Cassandra dacapobench: Apache Xalan XSLT dacapobench: Batik SVG Toolkit dacapobench: H2 Database Engine dacapobench: FOP Print Formatter dacapobench: PMD Source Code Analyzer dacapobench: Apache Lucene Search Index dacapobench: Apache Lucene Search Engine dacapobench: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework dacapobench: BioJava Biological Data Framework dacapobench: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing dacapobench: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning java-scimark2: Composite java-scimark2: Monte Carlo java-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform java-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply java-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization java-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation webp2: Default webp2: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 webp2: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 webp2: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 webp2: Quality 100, Lossless Compression pytorch: CPU - 1 - ResNet-50 pytorch: CPU - 1 - ResNet-152 pytorch: CPU - 16 - ResNet-50 pytorch: CPU - 32 - ResNet-50 pytorch: CPU - 64 - ResNet-50 pytorch: CPU - 16 - ResNet-152 pytorch: CPU - 256 - ResNet-50 openssl: SHA256 pytorch: CPU - 32 - ResNet-152 pytorch: CPU - 512 - ResNet-50 pytorch: CPU - 64 - ResNet-152 pytorch: CPU - 256 - ResNet-152 pytorch: CPU - 512 - ResNet-152 pytorch: CPU - 16 - Efficientnet_v2_l pytorch: CPU - 1 - Efficientnet_v2_l pytorch: CPU - 32 - Efficientnet_v2_l pytorch: CPU - 64 - Efficientnet_v2_l pytorch: CPU - 512 - Efficientnet_v2_l openssl: RSA4096 openssl: RSA4096 openssl: SHA512 pytorch: CPU - 256 - Efficientnet_v2_l build-ffmpeg: Time To Compile blender: BMW27 - CPU-Only blender: Classroom - CPU-Only blender: Fishy Cat - CPU-Only blender: Barbershop - CPU-Only blender: Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Only ffmpeg: libx264 - Live ffmpeg: libx265 - Live ffmpeg: libx264 - Upload ffmpeg: libx265 - Upload ffmpeg: libx264 - Platform ffmpeg: libx265 - Platform ffmpeg: libx264 - Video On Demand ffmpeg: libx265 - Video On Demand embree: Pathtracer - Crown embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crown embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon Obj embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon Obj a b 3659 7098 2131 2361 3370 1329 6297 3377 6806 5442 469 1009 1721 407 1104 2526 1223 3030 4376 616 2278 5660.58 2346.34 470.52 3936.57 18996.73 2552.76 14.62 0.35 0.17 9.87 0.04 75.01 30.99 50.05 50.23 50.66 20.96 50.38 36100491030 20.79 49.51 20.46 20.90 20.82 12.62 16.43 12.63 12.70 12.76 393292.9 15089.6 11690406590 12.67 22.121 51.34 130.65 64.18 464.43 158.37 308.92 189.62 18.21 36.72 70.58 75.33 70.72 75.21 32.8364 33.8042 33.1786 29.3398 35.1025 29.9144 3608 7066 2112 2297 3383 1306 6299 3389 6809 5473 461 985 1667 382 1168 2614 1267 3100 4333 621 2383 5653.55 2351.47 471.56 3912.13 18979.83 2552.76 14.82 0.35 0.17 9.79 0.04 76.74 30.35 49.83 50.30 50.39 20.93 50.29 36172449040 20.10 50.34 20.87 20.38 20.93 12.56 16.56 12.62 12.41 12.58 393267.4 15061.3 11681461040 12.63 22.214 51.33 130.74 64 463.31 159.01 307.75 193.02 18.52 36.77 70.50 74.81 70.75 75.16 32.6698 33.7582 32.9509 29.2337 34.9738 29.8613 OpenBenchmarking.org
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython a b 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3659 3608
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Eclipse OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Eclipse a b 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 7098 7066
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: GraphChi OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: GraphChi a b 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2131 2112
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradesoap OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradesoap a b 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2361 2297
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradebeans OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans a b 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 3370 3383
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Spring Boot OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Spring Boot a b 300 600 900 1200 1500 1329 1306
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Kafka OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Kafka a b 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 6297 6299
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Tomcat OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Tomcat a b 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 3377 3389
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: jMonkeyEngine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: jMonkeyEngine a b 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 6806 6809
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Cassandra OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Cassandra a b 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 5442 5473
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT a b 100 200 300 400 500 469 461
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit a b 200 400 600 800 1000 1009 985
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2 Database Engine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2 Database Engine a b 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1721 1667
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: FOP Print Formatter OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: FOP Print Formatter a b 90 180 270 360 450 407 382
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer a b 300 600 900 1200 1500 1104 1168
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index a b 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2526 2614
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine a b 300 600 900 1200 1500 1223 1267
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework a b 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 3030 3100
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework a b 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 4376 4333
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing a b 130 260 390 520 650 616 621
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning a b 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2278 2383
Java SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Composite a b 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 5660.58 5653.55
Java SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Monte Carlo a b 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2346.34 2351.47
Java SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform a b 100 200 300 400 500 470.52 471.56
Java SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply a b 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3936.57 3912.13
Java SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization a b 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 18996.73 18979.83
Java SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation a b 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2552.76 2552.76
WebP2 Image Encode Encode Settings: Default OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Default a b 4 8 12 16 20 14.62 14.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -msse4.2 -fno-rtti -O3 -ldl
WebP2 Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 a b 0.0788 0.1576 0.2364 0.3152 0.394 0.35 0.35 1. (CXX) g++ options: -msse4.2 -fno-rtti -O3 -ldl
WebP2 Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 a b 0.0383 0.0766 0.1149 0.1532 0.1915 0.17 0.17 1. (CXX) g++ options: -msse4.2 -fno-rtti -O3 -ldl
WebP2 Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 a b 3 6 9 12 15 9.87 9.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -msse4.2 -fno-rtti -O3 -ldl
WebP2 Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression a b 0.009 0.018 0.027 0.036 0.045 0.04 0.04 1. (CXX) g++ options: -msse4.2 -fno-rtti -O3 -ldl
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 a b 20 40 60 80 100 75.01 76.74 MIN: 72.04 / MAX: 75.41 MIN: 72.34 / MAX: 77.21
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 a b 7 14 21 28 35 30.99 30.35 MIN: 30.53 / MAX: 31.3 MIN: 29.88 / MAX: 30.69
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 a b 11 22 33 44 55 50.05 49.83 MIN: 48.65 / MAX: 50.82 MIN: 48.35 / MAX: 50.41
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 a b 11 22 33 44 55 50.23 50.30 MIN: 48.58 / MAX: 51.94 MIN: 48.87 / MAX: 50.97
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 a b 11 22 33 44 55 50.66 50.39 MIN: 48.86 / MAX: 50.9 MIN: 48.74 / MAX: 51.32
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-152 a b 5 10 15 20 25 20.96 20.93 MIN: 20.69 / MAX: 21.16 MIN: 20.49 / MAX: 21.22
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 a b 11 22 33 44 55 50.38 50.29 MIN: 48.86 / MAX: 50.92 MIN: 48.52 / MAX: 50.96
OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 a b 8000M 16000M 24000M 32000M 40000M 36100491030 36172449040 1. OpenSSL 3.0.10 1 Aug 2023 (Library: OpenSSL 3.0.10 1 Aug 2023)
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-152 a b 5 10 15 20 25 20.79 20.10 MIN: 20.64 / MAX: 21.1 MIN: 19.91 / MAX: 20.3
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 a b 11 22 33 44 55 49.51 50.34 MIN: 48.66 / MAX: 50.72 MIN: 48.97 / MAX: 51.11
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 a b 5 10 15 20 25 20.46 20.87 MIN: 20.27 / MAX: 20.53 MIN: 16.38 / MAX: 21.04
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-152 a b 5 10 15 20 25 20.90 20.38 MIN: 20.7 / MAX: 21.03 MIN: 19.99 / MAX: 20.49
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-152 OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-152 a b 5 10 15 20 25 20.82 20.93 MIN: 16.95 / MAX: 20.98 MIN: 20.74 / MAX: 21.15
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l a b 3 6 9 12 15 12.62 12.56 MIN: 11.04 / MAX: 12.93 MIN: 10.87 / MAX: 12.85
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l a b 4 8 12 16 20 16.43 16.56 MIN: 16.28 / MAX: 16.49 MIN: 16.45 / MAX: 16.68
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l a b 3 6 9 12 15 12.63 12.62 MIN: 11.17 / MAX: 12.9 MIN: 10.81 / MAX: 12.87
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l a b 3 6 9 12 15 12.70 12.41 MIN: 10.84 / MAX: 12.99 MIN: 11.09 / MAX: 12.69
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l a b 3 6 9 12 15 12.76 12.58 MIN: 10.03 / MAX: 13.12 MIN: 10.87 / MAX: 12.88
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 a b 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K 393292.9 393267.4 1. OpenSSL 3.0.10 1 Aug 2023 (Library: OpenSSL 3.0.10 1 Aug 2023)
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org sign/s, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 a b 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 15089.6 15061.3 1. OpenSSL 3.0.10 1 Aug 2023 (Library: OpenSSL 3.0.10 1 Aug 2023)
OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA512 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA512 a b 3000M 6000M 9000M 12000M 15000M 11690406590 11681461040 1. OpenSSL 3.0.10 1 Aug 2023 (Library: OpenSSL 3.0.10 1 Aug 2023)
PyTorch Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l a b 3 6 9 12 15 12.67 12.63 MIN: 10.93 / MAX: 12.96 MIN: 11.11 / MAX: 12.89
Timed FFmpeg Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile a b 5 10 15 20 25 22.12 22.21
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only a b 12 24 36 48 60 51.34 51.33
Blender Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only a b 30 60 90 120 150 130.65 130.74
Blender Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only a b 14 28 42 56 70 64.18 64.00
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only a b 100 200 300 400 500 464.43 463.31
Blender Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only a b 40 80 120 160 200 158.37 159.01
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live a b 70 140 210 280 350 308.92 307.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live a b 40 80 120 160 200 189.62 193.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload a b 5 10 15 20 25 18.21 18.52 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload a b 8 16 24 32 40 36.72 36.77 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform a b 16 32 48 64 80 70.58 70.50 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform a b 20 40 60 80 100 75.33 74.81 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand a b 16 32 48 64 80 70.72 70.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand a b 20 40 60 80 100 75.21 75.16 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown a b 8 16 24 32 40 32.84 32.67 MIN: 32.59 / MAX: 33.55 MIN: 32.39 / MAX: 33.37
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown a b 8 16 24 32 40 33.80 33.76 MIN: 33.47 / MAX: 34.6 MIN: 33.43 / MAX: 34.72
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon a b 8 16 24 32 40 33.18 32.95 MIN: 33.04 / MAX: 33.52 MIN: 32.74 / MAX: 33.58
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj a b 7 14 21 28 35 29.34 29.23 MIN: 29.18 / MAX: 29.77 MIN: 29.04 / MAX: 29.74
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon a b 8 16 24 32 40 35.10 34.97 MIN: 34.82 / MAX: 36.02 MIN: 34.65 / MAX: 36.25
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj a b 7 14 21 28 35 29.91 29.86 MIN: 29.62 / MAX: 30.89 MIN: 29.6 / MAX: 30.48
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5