new ice

Intel Core i7-1065G7 testing with a Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS) and Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2311164-NE-NEWICE12056
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive 2 Tests
Creator Workloads 2 Tests
Java Tests 2 Tests
Multi-Core 4 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 2 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
a
November 15 2023
  4 Hours, 36 Minutes
b
November 16 2023
  4 Hours, 28 Minutes
c
November 16 2023
  4 Hours, 34 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  4 Hours, 33 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

new ice Intel Core i7-1065G7 testing with a Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS) and Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake-LP DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Toshiba KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Ice Lake-LP PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-35-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.3, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Compiler: GCC 12.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 b: Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake-LP DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Toshiba KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Ice Lake-LP PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-35-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.3, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Compiler: GCC 12.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 c: Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake-LP DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Toshiba KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Ice Lake-LP PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-35-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.3, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Compiler: GCC 12.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 ArrayFire 3.9 Test: BLAS CPU FP16 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better a . 90.56 |============================================================== b . 98.72 |==================================================================== c . 99.42 |==================================================================== ArrayFire 3.9 Test: BLAS CPU FP32 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better a . 384.62 |=================================================================== b . 372.69 |================================================================= c . 372.87 |================================================================= ArrayFire 3.9 Test: Conjugate Gradient CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 17.82 |=================================================================== b . 18.10 |==================================================================== c . 18.02 |==================================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 674.68 |=================================================================== b . 629.68 |=============================================================== c . 635.92 |=============================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1771.34 |================================================================== b . 1684.97 |=============================================================== c . 1694.45 |=============================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 838.67 |=================================================================== b . 804.74 |================================================================ c . 816.11 |================================================================= Blender 4.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 2176.15 |=============================================================== b . 2190.13 |=============================================================== c . 2282.91 |================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better a . 5694 |===================================================================== b . 5575 |==================================================================== c . 5541 |=================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Eclipse msec < Lower Is Better a . 17045 |==================================================================== b . 15762 |=============================================================== c . 15768 |=============================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: GraphChi msec < Lower Is Better a . 6748 |==================================================================== b . 6819 |===================================================================== c . 6798 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better a . 6059 |===================================================================== b . 5858 |=================================================================== c . 5993 |==================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better a . 12149 |====================================================== b . 15356 |==================================================================== c . 12421 |======================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Spring Boot msec < Lower Is Better a . 9189 |===================================================================== b . 8514 |================================================================ c . 7999 |============================================================ DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Kafka msec < Lower Is Better a . 5823 |===================================================================== b . 5600 |================================================================== c . 5609 |================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Tomcat msec < Lower Is Better a . 15682 |==================================================================== b . 15279 |================================================================== c . 15413 |=================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: jMonkeyEngine msec < Lower Is Better a . 6934 |===================================================================== b . 6965 |===================================================================== c . 6936 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Cassandra msec < Lower Is Better a . 8915 |=================================================================== b . 9159 |===================================================================== c . 9208 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT msec < Lower Is Better a . 1684 |============================================================= b . 1900 |===================================================================== c . 1664 |============================================================ DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit msec < Lower Is Better a . 1678 |==================================================================== b . 1614 |================================================================= c . 1702 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2 Database Engine msec < Lower Is Better a . 10328 |==================================================================== b . 8852 |========================================================== c . 10099 |================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: FOP Print Formatter msec < Lower Is Better a . 933 |====================================================================== b . 901 |==================================================================== c . 905 |==================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer msec < Lower Is Better a . 6056 |===================================================================== b . 5425 |============================================================== c . 5601 |================================================================ DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index msec < Lower Is Better a . 4610 |===================================================================== b . 4425 |================================================================== c . 4546 |==================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine msec < Lower Is Better a . 13222 |==================================================================== b . 12881 |================================================================== c . 12830 |================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework msec < Lower Is Better a . 3571 |===================================================================== b . 3553 |===================================================================== c . 3575 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework msec < Lower Is Better a . 7499 |===================================================================== b . 7469 |===================================================================== c . 7489 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing msec < Lower Is Better a . 6193 |===================================================================== b . 6023 |=================================================================== c . 5985 |=================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning msec < Lower Is Better a . 4905 |================================================================== b . 5118 |===================================================================== c . 5078 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 188.90 |=================================================================== b . 187.37 |================================================================== c . 184.49 |================================================================= FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 71.26 |=================================================================== b . 72.60 |==================================================================== c . 72.85 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 10.77 |================================================================ b . 11.51 |==================================================================== c . 11.37 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 8.48 |=========================================================== b . 9.99 |===================================================================== c . 9.00 |============================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 39.30 |============================================================== b . 43.18 |==================================================================== c . 42.62 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 17.61 |=============================================================== b . 18.91 |==================================================================== c . 18.62 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 41.37 |================================================================= b . 43.30 |==================================================================== c . 42.46 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 17.75 |================================================================ b . 18.88 |==================================================================== c . 18.61 |=================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 71388 |================================================================== b . 74072 |==================================================================== c . 73884 |==================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 37455 |=============================================================== b . 40385 |==================================================================== c . 39254 |================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 37821 |=============================================================== b . 40762 |==================================================================== c . 39892 |=================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 38484 |=============================================================== b . 41262 |==================================================================== c . 40124 |================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 39043 |================================================================ b . 41762 |==================================================================== c . 40627 |================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 30578 |================================================================== b . 31422 |==================================================================== c . 31404 |==================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 30527 |================================================================== b . 31568 |==================================================================== c . 31463 |==================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 33024 |=============================================================== b . 35501 |==================================================================== c . 34580 |================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 33158 |=============================================================== b . 35882 |==================================================================== c . 34853 |================================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 231.83 |=================================================================== b . 216.13 |============================================================== c . 222.81 |================================================================