new t

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U testing with a PHX Ray_PEU (V1.04 BIOS) and GFX1103 512MB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2308054-NE-NEWT4354621
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive 2 Tests
Creator Workloads 2 Tests
Database Test Suite 6 Tests
Java Tests 2 Tests
Multi-Core 3 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 4 Tests
Server 6 Tests
Vulkan Compute 4 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
a
August 03 2023
  23 Hours, 18 Minutes
b
August 04 2023
  22 Hours, 35 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  22 Hours, 57 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

new t AMD Ryzen 7 7840U testing with a PHX Ray_PEU (V1.04 BIOS) and GFX1103 512MB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U @ 3.30GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: PHX Ray_PEU (V1.04 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14e8, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Graphics: GFX1103 512MB (2700/800MHz), Audio: AMD Device 1640, Network: MEDIATEK Device 0616 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.4.0-060400-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.24.7, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.2.5-0ubuntu0.1~22.04.3 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.52), Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3200x2000 b: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U @ 3.30GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: PHX Ray_PEU (V1.04 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14e8, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Graphics: GFX1103 512MB (2700/800MHz), Audio: AMD Device 1640, Network: MEDIATEK Device 0616 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.4.0-060400-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.24.7, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.2.5-0ubuntu0.1~22.04.3 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.52), Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3200x2000 Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better a . 819.76 |=================================================================== b . 815.60 |=================================================================== Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better a . 548.99 |=================================================================== b . 550.00 |=================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.36 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 41630 |==================================================================== b . 41495 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better a . 27.50 |==================================================================== b . 27.43 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.32 |===================================================================== b . 8.32 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.03 |===================================================================== b . 8.03 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better a . 5.82 |===================================================================== b . 5.70 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.05 |===================================================================== b . 8.01 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better a . 11.35 |==================================================================== b . 11.31 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.78 |===================================================================== b . 1.78 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better a . 21.15 |==================================================================== b . 21.12 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better a . 75.37 |==================================================================== b . 75.36 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better a . 15.28 |==================================================================== b . 15.29 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better a . 11.63 |==================================================================== b . 11.68 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better a . 38.24 |=================================================================== b . 38.98 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better a . 37.21 |=================================================================== b . 37.55 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better a . 16.14 |==================================================================== b . 16.09 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better a . 17.66 |==================================================================== b . 17.66 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better a . 290.59 |=================================================================== b . 290.71 |=================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better a . 4.19 |================================================================ b . 4.51 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better a . 27.61 |==================================================================== b . 27.52 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.36 |===================================================================== b . 8.34 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.03 |===================================================================== b . 8.04 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better a . 5.86 |===================================================================== b . 5.83 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.02 |===================================================================== b . 8.04 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better a . 11.37 |==================================================================== b . 11.36 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.79 |===================================================================== b . 1.79 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better a . 21.15 |==================================================================== b . 21.18 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better a . 75.36 |==================================================================== b . 75.37 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better a . 15.31 |==================================================================== b . 15.30 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better a . 11.69 |==================================================================== b . 11.70 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better a . 38.23 |==================================================================== b . 38.26 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better a . 37.46 |==================================================================== b . 37.23 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better a . 16.06 |==================================================================== b . 16.09 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better a . 17.71 |==================================================================== b . 17.71 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better a . 291.38 |=================================================================== b . 289.97 |=================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better a . 4.38 |===================================================================== b . 4.37 |===================================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 2640.78 |================================================================== b . 2641.58 |================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1.154 |==================================================================== b . 1.155 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2.418 |=================================================================== b . 2.441 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.731 |==================================================================== b . 3.737 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 8.466 |==================================================================== b . 8.494 |==================================================================== VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT R2C / C2R Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better a . 141 |====================================================================== b . 142 |====================================================================== VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in half precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better a . 259 |====================================================================== b . 259 |====================================================================== VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in double precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better a . 218 |===================================================================== b . 220 |====================================================================== VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better a . 280 |====================================================================== b . 280 |====================================================================== VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C multidimensional in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better a . 166 |===================================================================== b . 168 |====================================================================== VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein benchmark in double precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision, no reshuffling Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better a . 303 |====================================================================== b . 303 |====================================================================== vkpeak 20230730 fp32-scalar GFLOPS > Higher Is Better a . 191.61 |=================================================================== b . 191.92 |=================================================================== vkpeak 20230730 fp32-vec4 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better a . 194.96 |=================================================================== b . 194.40 |=================================================================== vkpeak 20230730 fp16-scalar GFLOPS > Higher Is Better a . 44.53 |==================================================================== b . 44.61 |==================================================================== vkpeak 20230730 fp16-vec4 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better a . 114.59 |=================================================================== b . 114.66 |=================================================================== vkpeak 20230730 fp64-scalar GFLOPS > Higher Is Better a . 161.17 |=================================================================== b . 161.56 |=================================================================== vkpeak 20230730 fp64-vec4 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better a . 96.34 |==================================================================== b . 96.91 |==================================================================== vkpeak 20230730 int32-scalar GIOPS > Higher Is Better a . 269.09 |=================================================================== b . 269.36 |=================================================================== vkpeak 20230730 int32-vec4 GIOPS > Higher Is Better a . 241.85 |================================================================== b . 244.74 |=================================================================== vkpeak 20230730 int16-scalar GIOPS > Higher Is Better a . 267.34 |=================================================================== b . 267.27 |=================================================================== vkpeak 20230730 int16-vec4 GIOPS > Higher Is Better a . 708.28 |=================================================================== b . 709.85 |=================================================================== VkResample 1.0 Upscale: 2x - Precision: Single ms < Lower Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 81.50 |==================================================================== b . 81.18 |==================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 267.24 |=================================================================== b . 266.89 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 134.34 |================================================================== b . 136.36 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 444.12 |=================================================================== b . 445.48 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 238.90 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 942.50 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 764198.22 |================================================================ b . 754295.46 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 12.25 |=================================================================== b . 12.37 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1434283.46 |============================================================= b . 1469303.82 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 20.89 |==================================================================== b . 20.15 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1148481.56 |=============================================================== b . 1151261.34 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 10.47 |==================================================================== b . 10.47 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1904407.96 |=============================================================== b . 1902392.91 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 19.26 |==================================================================== b . 19.29 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 31156415.06 |============================================================== b . 30973284.30 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 48.74 |=================================================================== b . 49.27 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 37173315.01 |============================================================== b . 36760107.65 |============================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 118.12 |=================================================================== b . 118.58 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 34027351.93 |============================================================ b . 35441446.08 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 50.63 |==================================================================== b . 48.20 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 30434143.68 |============================================================= b . 30869603.97 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 154.17 |=================================================================== b . 151.94 |================================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1379888.16 |========================================================== b . 1491166.66 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3840222.05 |=============================================================== b . 3831976.08 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3688737.76 |=============================================================== b . 3697778.34 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3586089.56 |============================================================== b . 3624676.16 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1637117.07 |=============================================================== b . 1502494.92 |========================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3869729.38 |============================================================== b . 3922671.60 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3697587.29 |=============================================================== b . 3708754.43 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3591856.98 |=============================================================== b . 3600224.35 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1499036.96 |============================================================= b . 1538274.60 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3937888.94 |============================================================== b . 3970717.74 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3755227.91 |============================================================== b . 3789965.37 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3676368.91 |=============================================================== b . 3645464.56 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3170726.69 |=============================================================== b . 2973746.29 |=========================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3069952.67 |=============================================================== b . 2849758.37 |========================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3050497.79 |=============================================================== b . 3054116.42 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2779173.08 |============================================================= b . 2884149.30 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2880502.94 |=============================================================== b . 2895297.95 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2847988.80 |============================================================= b . 2918894.71 |=============================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 4847.12 |==================================================== b . 6161.63 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5085.19 |======================================================== b . 6018.89 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5128.71 |================================================================== b . 4674.10 |============================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5042.93 |=================================================== b . 6576.40 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 6087.76 |================================================================== b . 4312.29 |=============================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 51050.66 |================================================================= b . 48138.55 |============================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 32899.69 |============================================= b . 47496.53 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 42448.33 |================================================================= b . 25837.10 |======================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 58589.84 |================================================================= b . 53696.74 |============================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 4966.57 |================================================================== b . 4678.43 |============================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 6052.40 |================================================================= b . 6184.37 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 26474.34 |============================================================ b . 28523.23 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 38593.13 |================================================================ b . 39107.77 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5369.55 |============================================================ b . 5918.62 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 4117.93 |============================================================= b . 4467.15 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 48848.26 |================================================================= b . 42497.31 |========================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 38485.27 |=============================================================== b . 39864.58 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5195.87 |================================================================== b . 4712.61 |============================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 4562.18 |====================================================== b . 5622.46 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 50925.69 |================================================================= b . 50394.90 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 32758.11 |============================================= b . 47245.32 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 7436.82 |================================================================== b . 2367.74 |===================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 52428.30 |=================================================== b . 66912.26 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 42619.03 |======================================== b . 68865.02 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 27192.29 |======================= b . 76398.39 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 34204.91 |================================================================ b . 34813.01 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 42063.16 |================================================================= b . 19662.00 |============================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 24786.46 |==================================================== b . 30787.11 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better b . 76379.98 |================================================================= Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 44343 |==================================================================== b . 44610 |====================================================================