cddds

Intel Core i7-1065G7 testing with a Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS) and Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2307310-NE-CDDDS966848
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive 2 Tests
Creator Workloads 2 Tests
Database Test Suite 5 Tests
Multi-Core 3 Tests
Server 5 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
s
July 31 2023
  5 Hours, 15 Minutes
b
July 31 2023
  3 Hours, 58 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  4 Hours, 36 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


cddds, "Crypto++ 8.8 - Test: Keyed Algorithms", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Crypto++ 8.8 - Test: Unkeyed Algorithms", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "VVenC 1.9 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "VVenC 1.9 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "VVenC 1.9 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "VVenC 1.9 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "s", "b", "Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 - Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30", Lower Results Are Better "s", "b", "Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 - Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30", Lower Results Are Better "s", "b", "Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 - Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30", Lower Results Are Better "s", "b", "Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 - Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30", Lower Results Are Better "s", "b", "Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 - Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30", Lower Results Are Better "s", "b", "Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 - Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30", Lower Results Are Better "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200", "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500", "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200", "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500", "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200", "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500", "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200", "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500", "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200", "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500", "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200", "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500", "s", "b", "Dragonflydb 1.6.2 - Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Dragonflydb 1.6.2 - Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Dragonflydb 1.6.2 - Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Dragonflydb 1.6.2 - Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Dragonflydb 1.6.2 - Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Dragonflydb 1.6.2 - Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Dragonflydb 1.6.2 - Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Dragonflydb 1.6.2 - Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Dragonflydb 1.6.2 - Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Dragonflydb 1.6.2 - Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Dragonflydb 1.6.2 - Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Dragonflydb 1.6.2 - Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 - Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 - Test: Writes", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "BRL-CAD 7.36 - VGR Performance Metric", Higher Results Are Better "s", "b", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500", Higher Results Are Better "s", "Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 - Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500", Higher Results Are Better "s",