Alienware-Win11 Intel Core i7-12700H testing with a Alienware 0TJXCY (1.17.0 BIOS) and Intel Iris Xe + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU 8GB on Microsoft Windows 11 Home Single Language Build 22621 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2307102-NE-ALIENWARE60&sro&gru .
Alienware-Win11 Processor Motherboard Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Display Driver File-System Screen Resolution Compiler win11-compress-7zip win11-encode-flac win11-primesieve win11-cpuminer-opt win11-dav1d win11-aircrack-ng win11-svt-av1 win11-rav1e win11-blender win11-astcenc win11-intel-mlc win11-geekbench win11-sqlite win11-pgbench win11-xonotic Intel Core i7-12700H @ 2.30GHz (14 Cores / 20 Threads) Alienware 0TJXCY (1.17.0 BIOS) 2 x 16384 MB 4800MHz HMCG78MEBSA095N 954GB NVMe PC801 SK hynix 1TB Intel Iris Xe + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU 8GB Tecnologia Intel Smart Sound para udio USB + NVIDIA HD Audio + Realtek Audio + Tecnologia Intel Smart Sound para udio Bluetooth + Tecnologia Intel Smart Sound para microfones digitais + NVIDIA Virtual Audio Device (Wave Extensible) (WDM) Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit + Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless (211NGW) Microsoft Windows 11 Home Single Language Build 22621 10.0.22621.1928 (x86_64) 536.40 (31.0.101.4146) NTFS 2560x1440 Tecnologia Intel Smart Sound para udio USB + NVIDIA HD Audio + Realtek Audio + Tecnologia Intel Smart Sound para udio Bluetooth + NVIDIA Virtual Audio Device (Wave Extensible) (WDM) + Tecnologia Intel Smart Sound para microfones digitais GCC 8.3.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Processor Details - CPU Microcode: 0000000029040000 Security Details - VBS: Disabled
Alienware-Win11 geekbench: CPU Multi Core geekbench: CPU Single Core xonotic: 800 x 600 - Low xonotic: 1024 x 768 - Low xonotic: 800 x 600 - High xonotic: 1024 x 768 - High xonotic: 1280 x 1024 - Low xonotic: 1600 x 1200 - Low xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Low xonotic: 1920 x 1200 - Low xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Low xonotic: 800 x 600 - Ultra xonotic: 1024 x 768 - Ultra xonotic: 1280 x 1024 - High xonotic: 1600 x 1200 - High xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - High xonotic: 1920 x 1200 - High xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - High xonotic: 1280 x 1024 - Ultra xonotic: 1600 x 1200 - Ultra xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra xonotic: 1920 x 1200 - Ultra xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultra xonotic: 800 x 600 - Ultimate xonotic: 1024 x 768 - Ultimate xonotic: 1280 x 1024 - Ultimate xonotic: 1600 x 1200 - Ultimate xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimate xonotic: 1920 x 1200 - Ultimate xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultimate geekbench: CPU Multi Core geekbench: CPU Single Core intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - All Reads intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like astcenc: Fast astcenc: Medium astcenc: Thorough astcenc: Exhaustive geekbench: GPU OpenCL geekbench: GPU Vulkan geekbench: CPU Multi Core geekbench: CPU Single Core pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 25000 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 25000 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 25000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 25000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency intel-mlc: Idle Latency blender: BMW27 - CPU-Only blender: BMW27 - NVIDIA CUDA blender: BMW27 - NVIDIA OptiX blender: Classroom - CPU-Only blender: Fishy Cat - CPU-Only blender: Barbershop - CPU-Only blender: Classroom - NVIDIA CUDA blender: Fishy Cat - NVIDIA CUDA blender: Barbershop - NVIDIA CUDA blender: Classroom - NVIDIA OptiX blender: Fishy Cat - NVIDIA OptiX blender: Barbershop - NVIDIA OptiX blender: Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Only blender: Pabellon Barcelona - NVIDIA CUDA blender: Pabellon Barcelona - NVIDIA OptiX sqlite: 1 sqlite: 2 sqlite: 4 sqlite: 8 sqlite: 16 sqlite: 20 win11-compress-7zip win11-encode-flac win11-primesieve win11-cpuminer-opt win11-dav1d win11-aircrack-ng win11-svt-av1 win11-rav1e win11-blender win11-astcenc win11-intel-mlc win11-geekbench win11-sqlite win11-pgbench win11-xonotic 375.31 19.29 10.50 1038.45 328.42 1652.30 36.89 36.93 153.83 24.46 19.00 91.63 529.88 90.05 27.94 165.6227 59.4961 7.4847 0.7594 65620.99 61063.04 60461.41 59868.38 60838.71 61711.6 57802.2 57556.2 57294.5 58064.5 98.0 15467 2560 11882 2296 120522 107929 13031 2385 25.665 57.362 66.564 61.278 108.854 116.793 34482 4029 28442 3302 24136 3096 6799 5479 2113 1825 0.029 0.248 0.035 0.303 0.041 0.323 0.147 0.183 0.474 0.548 688.3389075 692.5531731 563.9162182 567.9779186 685.9602878 680.8402096 671.8263914 691.5916377 683.7349346 492.6491383 507.2311409 563.1598956 563.7341600 565.2335203 562.4155704 564.1204076 500.4588810 517.7289883 502.1217346 516.7420094 507.2714909 410.5621293 408.6052458 391.3477307 374.6220641 384.5327708 404.6214995 389.6462677 OpenBenchmarking.org
Geekbench Test: CPU Multi Core OpenBenchmarking.org Floating Point Score, More Is Better Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Multi Core win11-geekbench 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 44.54, N = 3 15467
Geekbench Test: CPU Single Core OpenBenchmarking.org Floating Point Score, More Is Better Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Single Core win11-geekbench 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 6.81, N = 3 2560
Xonotic Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Low win11-xonotic 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 5.35, N = 10 688.34 MIN: 298 / MAX: 1250
Xonotic Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Low win11-xonotic 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 8.27, N = 4 692.55 MIN: 331 / MAX: 1277
Xonotic Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: High win11-xonotic 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 4.68, N = 9 563.92 MIN: 227 / MAX: 1111
Xonotic Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: High win11-xonotic 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 3.91, N = 15 567.98 MIN: 194 / MAX: 1091
Xonotic Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Low win11-xonotic 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 7.99, N = 3 685.96 MIN: 228 / MAX: 1200
Xonotic Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Low win11-xonotic 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 7.45, N = 3 680.84 MIN: 229 / MAX: 1277
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low win11-xonotic 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 6.23, N = 3 671.83 MIN: 236 / MAX: 1200
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Low win11-xonotic 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 8.19, N = 4 691.59 MIN: 233 / MAX: 1224
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Low win11-xonotic 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 7.59, N = 3 683.73 MIN: 238 / MAX: 1277
Xonotic Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultra win11-xonotic 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 4.93, N = 3 492.65 MIN: 191 / MAX: 1053
Xonotic Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultra win11-xonotic 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 4.18, N = 15 507.23 MIN: 195 / MAX: 1071
Xonotic Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: High win11-xonotic 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 5.62, N = 3 563.16 MIN: 181 / MAX: 1091
Xonotic Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Effects Quality: High win11-xonotic 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 3.95, N = 15 563.73 MIN: 167 / MAX: 1053
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High win11-xonotic 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 5.31, N = 6 565.23 MIN: 185 / MAX: 1071
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: High win11-xonotic 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 5.14, N = 3 562.42 MIN: 231 / MAX: 1111
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: High win11-xonotic 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 5.90, N = 5 564.12 MIN: 211 / MAX: 1091
Xonotic Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultra win11-xonotic 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 4.79, N = 15 500.46 MIN: 210 / MAX: 1053
Xonotic Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Ultra win11-xonotic 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 7.03, N = 3 517.73 MIN: 204 / MAX: 1034
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra win11-xonotic 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 4.45, N = 15 502.12 MIN: 207 / MAX: 1034
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Ultra win11-xonotic 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 6.40, N = 3 516.74 MIN: 191 / MAX: 1034
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultra win11-xonotic 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 5.68, N = 4 507.27 MIN: 206 / MAX: 1000
Xonotic Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultimate win11-xonotic 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 5.19, N = 3 410.56 MIN: 101 / MAX: 1034
Xonotic Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultimate win11-xonotic 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 2.51, N = 3 408.61 MIN: 101 / MAX: 1017
Xonotic Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultimate win11-xonotic 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 3.05, N = 15 391.35 MIN: 92 / MAX: 1034
Xonotic Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Ultimate win11-xonotic 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 6.97, N = 12 374.62 MIN: 94 / MAX: 1034
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate win11-xonotic 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 3.64, N = 6 384.53 MIN: 87 / MAX: 984
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Ultimate win11-xonotic 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 4.61, N = 3 404.62 MIN: 96 / MAX: 968
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.6 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultimate win11-xonotic 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 3.56, N = 3 389.65 MIN: 94 / MAX: 968
Geekbench Test: CPU Multi Core OpenBenchmarking.org Integer Score, More Is Better Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Multi Core win11-geekbench 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 12.20, N = 3 11882
Geekbench Test: CPU Single Core OpenBenchmarking.org Integer Score, More Is Better Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Single Core win11-geekbench 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 2296
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads win11-intel-mlc 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 12.58, N = 3 65620.99
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes win11-intel-mlc 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 53.09, N = 3 61063.04
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes win11-intel-mlc 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 34.77, N = 3 60461.41
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes win11-intel-mlc 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 22.59, N = 3 59868.38
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like win11-intel-mlc 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 45.95, N = 3 60838.71
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads win11-intel-mlc 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 170.91, N = 3 61711.6
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes win11-intel-mlc 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 69.96, N = 3 57802.2
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes win11-intel-mlc 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 174.05, N = 3 57556.2
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes win11-intel-mlc 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 208.48, N = 3 57294.5
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like win11-intel-mlc 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 90.20, N = 3 58064.5
ASTC Encoder Preset: Fast OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Fast win11-astcenc 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.27, N = 3 165.62
ASTC Encoder Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Medium win11-astcenc 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 59.50
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Thorough win11-astcenc 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.0754, N = 6 7.4847
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Exhaustive win11-astcenc 0.1709 0.3418 0.5127 0.6836 0.8545 SE +/- 0.0043, N = 3 0.7594
Geekbench Test: GPU OpenCL OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Geekbench 6.1 Test: GPU OpenCL win11-geekbench 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 506.86, N = 3 120522
Geekbench Test: GPU Vulkan OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Geekbench 6.1 Test: GPU Vulkan win11-geekbench 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 778.71, N = 12 107929
Geekbench Test: CPU Multi Core OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Multi Core win11-geekbench 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 17.02, N = 3 13031
Geekbench Test: CPU Single Core OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Single Core win11-geekbench 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 2385
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only win11-pgbench 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 409.88, N = 3 34482
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write win11-pgbench 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 41.41, N = 3 4029
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only win11-pgbench 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 246.04, N = 11 28442
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write win11-pgbench 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 28.08, N = 3 3302
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only win11-pgbench 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 412.30, N = 9 24136
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write win11-pgbench 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 14.85, N = 3 3096
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only win11-pgbench 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 24.89, N = 3 6799
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only win11-pgbench 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 31.34, N = 3 5479
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write win11-pgbench 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 27.78, N = 9 2113
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write win11-pgbench 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 16.74, N = 3 1825
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency win11-pgbench 0.0065 0.013 0.0195 0.026 0.0325 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.029
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency win11-pgbench 0.0558 0.1116 0.1674 0.2232 0.279 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 0.248
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency win11-pgbench 0.0079 0.0158 0.0237 0.0316 0.0395 SE +/- 0.000, N = 11 0.035
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency win11-pgbench 0.0682 0.1364 0.2046 0.2728 0.341 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 0.303
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency win11-pgbench 0.0092 0.0184 0.0276 0.0368 0.046 SE +/- 0.001, N = 9 0.041
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency win11-pgbench 0.0727 0.1454 0.2181 0.2908 0.3635 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.323
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency win11-pgbench 0.0331 0.0662 0.0993 0.1324 0.1655 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.147
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency win11-pgbench 0.0412 0.0824 0.1236 0.1648 0.206 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.183
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency win11-pgbench 0.1067 0.2134 0.3201 0.4268 0.5335 SE +/- 0.006, N = 9 0.474
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency win11-pgbench 0.1233 0.2466 0.3699 0.4932 0.6165 SE +/- 0.005, N = 3 0.548
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Idle Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Idle Latency win11-intel-mlc 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 98.0
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only win11-blender 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.40, N = 3 375.31
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA win11-blender 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 19.29
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX win11-blender 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.17, N = 14 10.50
Blender Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only win11-blender 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 3.17, N = 3 1038.45
Blender Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only win11-blender 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 58.33, N = 6 328.42
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only win11-blender 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 1.38, N = 3 1652.30
Blender Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA win11-blender 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 36.89
Blender Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA win11-blender 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 36.93
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA win11-blender 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.74, N = 3 153.83
Blender Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX win11-blender 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 24.46
Blender Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX win11-blender 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.21, N = 5 19.00
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX win11-blender 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 91.63
Blender Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only win11-blender 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 6.88, N = 9 529.88
Blender Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA win11-blender 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 90.05
Blender Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX win11-blender 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 27.94
SQLite Threads / Copies: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 1 win11-sqlite 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 3.13, N = 15 25.67
SQLite Threads / Copies: 2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 2 win11-sqlite 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 2.25, N = 13 57.36
SQLite Threads / Copies: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 4 win11-sqlite 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 2.83, N = 12 66.56
SQLite Threads / Copies: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 8 win11-sqlite 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 1.91, N = 15 61.28
SQLite Threads / Copies: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 16 win11-sqlite 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.24, N = 15 108.85
SQLite Threads / Copies: 20 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 20 win11-sqlite 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.64, N = 15 116.79
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5