alphacentauri

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 testing with a LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB on Linuxmint 21 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2212175-NE-ALPHACENT42
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

BLAS (Basic Linear Algebra Sub-Routine) Tests 2 Tests
C++ Boost Tests 3 Tests
Timed Code Compilation 18 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 9 Tests
Compression Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 8 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 4 Tests
LAPACK (Linear Algebra Pack) Tests 2 Tests
Linear Algebra 4 Tests
Multi-Core 21 Tests
OpenMPI Tests 2 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 31 Tests
Python 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 4 Tests
Software Defined Radio 4 Tests
Server 3 Tests
Server CPU Tests 6 Tests
Single-Threaded 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
linux-kernel-build-conf1-6c16g
December 11 2022
  15 Minutes
2x6c_2x16GdualCh
December 12 2022
  9 Minutes
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0
December 12 2022
  18 Hours, 36 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  6 Hours, 20 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

alphacentauri 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 testing with a LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB on Linuxmint 21 via the Phoronix Test Suite. linux-kernel-build-conf1-6c16g: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 2 x 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BW24, Graphics: NVIDIA NVC8 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC662 rev3, Monitor: HP L1950, Network: Intel 82579LM + Intel 82574L OS: Linuxmint 21, Kernel: 5.15.0-41-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 5.4.8, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 22.0.1, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 2x6c_2x16GdualCh: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2 x 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BW24, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC662 rev3, Monitor: DELL E198WFP, Network: Intel 82579LM + Intel 82574L OS: Linuxmint 21, Kernel: 5.15.0-56-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 5.4.12, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.157, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1440x900 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2 x 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BW24, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC662 rev3, Monitor: DELL E198WFP, Network: Intel 82579LM + Intel 82574L OS: Linuxmint 21, Kernel: 5.15.0-56-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 5.4.12, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.157, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1440x900 Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better linux-kernel-build-conf1-6c16g . 294.90 |====================================== 2x6c_2x16GdualCh ............... 160.72 |===================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 ....... 161.55 |===================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 300.9 |========================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 319.2 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 23.8 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 24.4 |============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1516.8 |=========================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1551.3 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 26.6 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 27.1 |============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1426.3 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1442.0 |============================================ ArrayFire 3.7 Test: BLAS CPU GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 405.13 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 408.69 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1680.0 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1693.9 |============================================ Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 42.47 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 42.81 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1840.7 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1854.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1720.0 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1709.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1818.4 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1809.0 |============================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 48.88 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 49.11 |============================================= ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.867792 |========================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.859928 |========================================== Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1970.06 |=========================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1965.41 |=========================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1586.1 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1589.8 |============================================ Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 91.16 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 90.94 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 364.4 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 365.0 |============================================= Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 118.61 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 118.76 |============================================ Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 24 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 345713333 |========================================= Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 311723333 |========================================= Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 206330000 |========================================= Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 106156667 |========================================= Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 52599667 |========================================== Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 27680333 |========================================== GNU Radio Test: Hilbert Transform MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 225.6 |============================================= GNU Radio Test: Five Back to Back FIR Filters MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 434.2 |============================================= LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: Complex Phase MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 311.9 |============================================= LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: Hilbert Transform MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 55.7 |============================================== LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: Five Back to Back FIR Filters MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 472.7 |============================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 4.5 |=============================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 9.2 |=============================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 66.7 |============================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 210.4 |============================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 62.6 |============================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 209.6 |============================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 63.6 |============================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 190.1 |============================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 58.6 |============================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 186.8 |============================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: OFDM_Test Samples / Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 46933333 |========================================== Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 95.47 |============================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 982 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 123 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 19.1 |============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 347 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 206 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 49.0 |============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 955 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 50.8 |============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 268 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 206 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 228 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 689 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 456 |=============================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 2021 |============================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 128.82 |============================================ Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 217.2 |============================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 235.2 |============================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 233.9 |============================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 227.6 |============================================= Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1021.4 |============================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1031.6 |============================================ Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 235.5 |============================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 232.5 |============================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 217.3 |============================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 222.6 |============================================= Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1282.9 |============================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1285.8 |============================================ Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 316726 |============================================ Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 794777 |============================================ Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 4.15 |============================================== Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 136.39 |============================================ Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 197.28 |============================================ Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 176.54 |============================================ Build2 0.13 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 219.69 |============================================ Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 570.65 |============================================ Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 38.97 |============================================= Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 120.64 |============================================ Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1036.93 |=========================================== Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 62.32 |============================================= Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 86.79 |============================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1115.13 |=========================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1052.35 |=========================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1919.45 |=========================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 48.31 |============================================= Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 211.55 |============================================ Timed Gem5 Compilation 21.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 715.29 |============================================ simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.46 |============================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.35 |============================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 0.46 |============================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.46 |============================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.10 |============================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 250077433 |========================================= C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 2465.2 |============================================ C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 4744.6 |============================================ GNU Radio Test: FM Deemphasis Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 388.7 |============================================= GNU Radio Test: IIR Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 234.5 |============================================= GNU Radio Test: FIR Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 349.0 |============================================= GNU Radio Test: Signal Source (Cosine) MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1298.4 |============================================ LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: FM Deemphasis Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 235.2 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 398.7 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 384.2 |===========================================