AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO (0703 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 on Ubuntu 22.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2210132-PTS-NEWTESTS88 new tests thurs - Phoronix Test Suite new tests thurs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO (0703 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 on Ubuntu 22.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2210132-PTS-NEWTESTS88&grw&sor .
new tests thurs Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution A B C AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core @ 5.88GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads) ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO (0703 BIOS) AMD Device 14d8 32GB 1000GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus + 32GB Flash Drive AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 (2475/1000MHz) AMD Navi 21/23 ASUS MG28U Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 Ubuntu 22.10 5.19.0-19-generic (x86_64) GNOME Shell 43.0 X Server + Wayland 4.6 Mesa 22.2.0 (LLVM 15.0.1 DRM 3.47) 1.3.224 GCC 12.2.0 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-12-U8K4Qv/gcc-12-12.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-12-U8K4Qv/gcc-12-12.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Processor Details - Scaling Governor: amd-pstate schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xa601203 Python Details - Python 3.10.7 Security Details - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
new tests thurs deepsparse: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Synchronous Single-Stream pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency A B C 12.4522 638.8974 11.5121 86.8613 98.0672 81.5508 63.7802 15.6733 108.8582 73.4622 94.7993 10.5409 292.3360 27.3539 199.4460 5.0093 182.4756 43.8288 110.6643 9.0330 95.1952 84.0250 59.3638 16.8416 12.3847 642.8514 11.4986 86.9634 62767 0.016 2023 0.494 920485 0.054 912904 0.110 1948 25.673 59058 0.017 1783 56.090 1908 0.524 883539 0.057 875399 0.114 21799 2.399 16107 6.223 12.4112 638.1756 11.554 86.5455 98.5629 81.1405 63.8912 15.6465 108.4406 73.7555 95.1541 10.5018 294.1383 27.1854 199.7547 5.0011 183.3384 43.6223 112.6892 8.8697 95.5659 83.6989 59.0345 16.9351 12.417 641.4336 11.5312 86.7171 63854 0.016 1840 0.544 920816 0.054 906853 0.11 1946 25.7 59808 0.017 1774 56.367 1938 0.516 888448 0.056 876999 0.114 13634 3.667 16298 6.136 12.4228 639.7481 11.5559 86.5315 97.6198 81.9166 63.6226 15.7122 108.4287 73.7633 94.987 10.5203 292.4597 27.3421 200.4667 4.9834 183.7551 43.5235 112.6704 8.8714 96.0598 83.2679 59.4114 16.8274 12.4234 640.5274 11.5134 86.8511 64067 0.016 1780 0.562 923688 0.054 917912 0.109 1865 26.814 55784 0.018 1767 56.58 1770 0.565 881737 0.057 881660 0.113 13307 3.758 18136 5.514 OpenBenchmarking.org
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream A C B 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 12.45 12.42 12.41
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream B A C 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 638.18 638.90 639.75
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream C B A 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 11.56 11.55 11.51
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream C B A 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 86.53 86.55 86.86
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream B A C 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 98.56 98.07 97.62
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream B A C 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 81.14 81.55 81.92
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream B A C 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 63.89 63.78 63.62
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream B A C 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 15.65 15.67 15.71
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream A B C 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 108.86 108.44 108.43
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream A B C 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 73.46 73.76 73.76
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream B C A 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 95.15 94.99 94.80
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream B C A 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 10.50 10.52 10.54
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream B C A 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 294.14 292.46 292.34
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream B C A 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 27.19 27.34 27.35
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream C B A 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 200.47 199.75 199.45
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream C B A 1.1271 2.2542 3.3813 4.5084 5.6355 SE +/- 0.0077, N = 3 4.9834 5.0011 5.0093
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream C B A 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 183.76 183.34 182.48
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream C B A 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 43.52 43.62 43.83
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream B C A 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.70, N = 3 112.69 112.67 110.66
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream B C A 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.0577, N = 3 8.8697 8.8714 9.0330
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream C B A 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 96.06 95.57 95.20
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream C B A 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 83.27 83.70 84.03
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream C A B 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 59.41 59.36 59.03
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream C A B 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 16.83 16.84 16.94
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream C B A 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 12.42 12.42 12.38
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream C B A 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 640.53 641.43 642.85
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream B C A 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 11.53 11.51 11.50
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream B C A 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 86.72 86.85 86.96
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only C B A 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 1062.17, N = 12 64067 63854 62767 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency A B C 0.0036 0.0072 0.0108 0.0144 0.018 SE +/- 0.000, N = 12 0.016 0.016 0.016 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write A B C 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.33, N = 3 2023 1840 1780 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency A B C 0.1265 0.253 0.3795 0.506 0.6325 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.494 0.544 0.562 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only C B A 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3579.02, N = 3 923688 920816 920485 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency A B C 0.0122 0.0244 0.0366 0.0488 0.061 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.054 0.054 0.054 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only C A B 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 846.90, N = 3 917912 912904 906853 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency C A B 0.0248 0.0496 0.0744 0.0992 0.124 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.109 0.110 0.110 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write A B C 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 1948 1946 1865 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency A B C 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 25.67 25.70 26.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only B A C 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 713.26, N = 3 59808 59058 55784 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency A B C 0.0041 0.0082 0.0123 0.0164 0.0205 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.017 0.017 0.018 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write A B C 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 2.78, N = 3 1783 1774 1767 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency A B C 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 56.09 56.37 56.58 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write B A C 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 14.23, N = 3 1938 1908 1770 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency B A C 0.1271 0.2542 0.3813 0.5084 0.6355 SE +/- 0.004, N = 3 0.516 0.524 0.565 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only B A C 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4167.10, N = 3 888448 883539 881737 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency B A C 0.0128 0.0256 0.0384 0.0512 0.064 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.056 0.057 0.057 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only C B A 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3052.72, N = 3 881660 876999 875399 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency C A B 0.0257 0.0514 0.0771 0.1028 0.1285 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.113 0.114 0.114 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write A B C 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 1612.40, N = 12 21799 13634 13307 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency A B C 0.8456 1.6912 2.5368 3.3824 4.228 SE +/- 0.130, N = 12 2.399 3.667 3.758 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write C B A 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 252.73, N = 12 18136 16298 16107 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency C B A 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.088, N = 12 5.514 6.136 6.223 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4