AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core testing with a Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F4p BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2208209-PTS-TR3990XE08
tr 3990X etcd
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core testing with a Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F4p BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
A:
Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core @ 2.90GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F4p BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 128GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc7-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.47), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
B:
Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core @ 2.90GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F4p BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 128GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc7-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.47), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
C:
Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core @ 2.90GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F4p BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 128GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc7-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.47), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 51244.88 |============================================================
B . 55600.44 |=================================================================
C . 55314.04 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 19.5 |=====================================================================
B . 18.0 |================================================================
C . 18.1 |================================================================
C-Blosc 2.3
Test: blosclz shuffle
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 14205.4 |==================================================================
B . 13345.3 |==============================================================
C . 13307.0 |==============================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 20.6 |=====================================================================
B . 19.3 |=================================================================
C . 19.4 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 19.3 |=================================================================
B . 20.6 |=====================================================================
C . 19.4 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 51632.06 |=================================================================
B . 48456.98 |=============================================================
C . 51343.77 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 48450.87 |=============================================================
B . 51566.31 |=================================================================
C . 51367.76 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 20.5 |=====================================================================
B . 19.7 |==================================================================
C . 19.4 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 48658.98 |==============================================================
B . 50552.56 |================================================================
C . 51326.73 |=================================================================
C-Blosc 2.3
Test: blosclz bitshuffle
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 9327.1 |===================================================================
B . 8903.4 |================================================================
C . 8879.8 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 19.4 |==================================================================
B . 20.3 |=====================================================================
C . 19.4 |==================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 51437.80 |=================================================================
B . 49193.82 |==============================================================
C . 51422.18 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 53775.83 |==============================================================
B . 55694.72 |=================================================================
C . 55931.42 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 18.6 |=====================================================================
B . 17.9 |==================================================================
C . 17.9 |==================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 18562.53 |=================================================================
B . 18271.83 |================================================================
C . 18652.49 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 18058.74 |================================================================
B . 18269.78 |================================================================
C . 18429.81 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 5.4 |======================================================================
B . 5.3 |=====================================================================
C . 5.4 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 5.3 |=====================================================================
B . 5.4 |======================================================================
C . 5.3 |=====================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 5.5 |======================================================================
B . 5.5 |======================================================================
C . 5.4 |=====================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 5.5 |======================================================================
B . 5.5 |======================================================================
C . 5.4 |=====================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 5.4 |=====================================================================
B . 5.5 |======================================================================
C . 5.4 |=====================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 5.4 |=====================================================================
B . 5.5 |======================================================================
C . 5.4 |=====================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 18421.37 |================================================================
B . 18737.07 |=================================================================
C . 18636.48 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 18308.90 |================================================================
B . 18316.99 |================================================================
C . 18580.84 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 18752.09 |=================================================================
B . 18482.51 |================================================================
C . 18704.11 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 18447.00 |=================================================================
B . 18229.86 |================================================================
C . 18455.24 |=================================================================