Intel Core i7-1280P testing with a MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS) and MSI Intel ADL GT2 15GB on Arch rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2208203-NE-ETCDALDER49
etcd alderlake
Intel Core i7-1280P testing with a MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS) and MSI Intel ADL GT2 15GB on Arch rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite.
A:
Processor: Intel Core i7-1280P @ 4.80GHz (14 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Graphics: MSI Intel ADL GT2 15GB (1450MHz), Audio: Intel Alder Lake PCH-P HD Audio, Network: Intel Alder Lake-P PCH CNVi WiFi
OS: Arch rolling, Kernel: 5.19.1-arch2-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.25.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.1.6, Vulkan: 1.3.211, Compiler: GCC 12.1.1 20220730, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
B:
Processor: Intel Core i7-1280P @ 4.80GHz (14 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Graphics: MSI Intel ADL GT2 15GB (1450MHz), Audio: Intel Alder Lake PCH-P HD Audio, Network: Intel Alder Lake-P PCH CNVi WiFi
OS: Arch rolling, Kernel: 5.19.1-arch2-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.25.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.1.6, Vulkan: 1.3.211, Compiler: GCC 12.1.1 20220730, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
C:
Processor: Intel Core i7-1280P @ 4.80GHz (14 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Graphics: MSI Intel ADL GT2 15GB (1450MHz), Audio: Intel Alder Lake PCH-P HD Audio, Network: Intel Alder Lake-P PCH CNVi WiFi
OS: Arch rolling, Kernel: 5.19.1-arch2-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.25.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.1.6, Vulkan: 1.3.211, Compiler: GCC 12.1.1 20220730, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
C-Blosc 2.3
Test: blosclz shuffle
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 6389.8 |===================================================================
B . 6031.5 |===============================================================
C . 6337.7 |==================================================================
C-Blosc 2.3
Test: blosclz bitshuffle
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 4067.0 |=============================================================
B . 3912.9 |===========================================================
C . 4437.6 |===================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 68145.69 |================================================
B . 91986.49 |=================================================================
C . 36395.26 |==========================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.5 |=======================================
B . 1.1 |=============================
C . 2.7 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 59199.59 |===================================================
B . 75725.33 |=================================================================
C . 60413.63 |====================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.8 |======================================================================
B . 1.3 |===================================================
C . 1.7 |==================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 76856.01 |=====================================================
B . 94654.68 |=================================================================
C . 92631.40 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 13.0 |=====================================================================
B . 10.5 |========================================================
C . 10.8 |=========================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 60284.87 |===================================================
B . 76520.70 |=================================================================
C . 75011.21 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.7 |======================================================================
B . 1.3 |======================================================
C . 1.3 |======================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 74038.37 |=======================================================
B . 87036.82 |================================================================
C . 87764.43 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 13.5 |=====================================================================
B . 11.5 |===========================================================
C . 11.4 |==========================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 69135.80 |======================================================
B . 82804.68 |=================================================================
C . 80968.03 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 14.4 |=====================================================================
B . 12.0 |==========================================================
C . 12.3 |===========================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 61193.39 |==================================================
B . 78668.52 |=================================================================
C . 78814.68 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.7 |======================================================================
B . 1.3 |======================================================
C . 1.3 |======================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 56850.16 |==================================================
B . 74204.00 |=================================================================
C . 74389.55 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.8 |======================================================================
B . 1.3 |===================================================
C . 1.3 |===================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 69686.14 |==================================================
B . 90142.13 |=================================================================
C . 90581.02 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 14.4 |=====================================================================
B . 11.1 |=====================================================
C . 11.0 |=====================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 57747.82 |==================================================
B . 74689.47 |=================================================================
C . 69230.68 |============================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.7 |======================================================================
B . 1.3 |======================================================
C . 1.4 |==========================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 73666.32 |==========================================================
B . 81586.14 |=================================================================
C . 81960.27 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 13.6 |=====================================================================
B . 12.2 |==============================================================
C . 12.2 |==============================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 68740.62 |==========================================================
B . 77618.66 |=================================================================
C . 77225.11 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 14.5 |=====================================================================
B . 12.8 |=============================================================
C . 12.9 |=============================================================