Apple M1 testing with a Apple Mac mini (M1 2020) and llvmpipe on Arch Linux ARM via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2208202-NE-BLOSCETCD91
blosc etcd apple m1,
"C-Blosc 2.3 - Test: blosclz shuffle",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",12406.1,12776.5,13009.6
"B",
"C",
"C-Blosc 2.3 - Test: blosclz bitshuffle",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",3368.6,3393.7,3382.9
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",77044.6075,76781.5417,77468.3205
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",67702.0753,67425.526,67291.8473
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",105004.8445,104525.731,104602.358
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",67665.8673,67632.9015,67648.976
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",97405.8513,97422.3566,97163.5917
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",68195.7999,67964.6466,68138.0325
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",77670.6786,77425.9293,77489.1979
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",67199.6509,67379.41,67218.5775
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",104513.2782,104330.5877,104574.3499
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",67851.3589,67425.3009,67471.3226
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",97249.0746,96934.0593,97343.0676
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",68202.0922,68158.2334,68241.5301
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"A",1.3,1.3,1.3
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"A",1.4,1.4,1.5
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"A",9.2,9.3,9.2
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"A",1.4,1.4,1.4
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"A",9.9,9.9,9.9
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"A",13.8,13.8,13.8
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"A",1.3,1.3,1.3
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"A",1.5,1.4,1.5
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"A",9.2,9.3,9.2
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"A",1.4,1.4,1.4
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"A",9.9,9.9,9.9
"B",
"C",
"etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"A",13.8,13.8,13.8
"B",
"C",