Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2206098-NE-2201259NE04
Y
B200-8.5-uek-3
B200-8.5-uek:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5222 @ 3.90GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Cisco UCSB-B200-M5 (B200M5.4.1.3e.0.1210201721 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 12 x 32 GB DDR4-2933MT/s M393A4K40DB2-CVF, Disk: 12 x 215GB FlashArray + 12 x 161GB FlashArray, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot], Network: Cisco VIC NIC
OS: OracleServer 8.5, Kernel: 5.4.17-2136.302.7.2.el8uek.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.5.0 20210514, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
B200-8.5-uek-2:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5222 @ 3.90GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Cisco UCSB-B200-M5 (B200M5.4.1.3e.0.1210201721 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 12 x 32 GB DDR4-2933MT/s M393A4K40DB2-CVF, Disk: 12 x 215GB FlashArray + 12 x 161GB FlashArray, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot], Network: Cisco VIC NIC
OS: Oracle Linux Server 8.6, Kernel: 5.4.17-2136.307.3.5.el8uek.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.5.0 20210514, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
B200-8.5-uek-3:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5222 @ 3.90GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Cisco UCSB-B200-M5 (B200M5.4.1.3e.0.1210201721 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 12 x 32 GB DDR4-2933MT/s M393A4K40DB2-CVF, Disk: 12 x 215GB FlashArray + 12 x 161GB FlashArray, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot], Network: Cisco VIC NIC
OS: Oracle Linux Server 8.6, Kernel: 5.4.17-2136.307.3.5.el8uek.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.5.0 20210514, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
PHP Micro Benchmarks
Test: Zend bench
Seconds < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 0.429 |=========================================================
PHP Micro Benchmarks
Test: Zend micro_bench
Seconds < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 2.292 |=========================================================
BlogBench 1.1
Test: Read
Final Score > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 1967205 |=====================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1964362 |=====================================================
BlogBench 1.1
Test: Write
Final Score > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 11236 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 10885 |=====================================================
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 1
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 84333.62 |======================================================
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 20
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 196498.78 |=====================================================
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 201850.87 |=====================================================
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 200
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 202894.53 |=====================================================
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 202494.33 |=====================================================
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 200968.88 |=====================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48
Concurrent Requests: 1
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 8446.72 |=======================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48
Concurrent Requests: 20
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 46716.46 |======================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48
Concurrent Requests: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 66967.50 |======================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48
Concurrent Requests: 200
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 68259.63 |======================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48
Concurrent Requests: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 57489.62 |======================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48
Concurrent Requests: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 52406.77 |======================================================
OpenSSL 3.0
Algorithm: SHA256
byte/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 2723211617 |==================================================
OpenSSL 3.0
Algorithm: RSA4096
sign/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 2374.1 |======================================================
OpenSSL 3.0
Algorithm: RSA4096
verify/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 156808.9 |====================================================
Apache Siege 2.4.29
Concurrent Users: 200
Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache Siege 2.4.29
Concurrent Users: 250
Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 66593.90 |======================================================
Node.js Express HTTP Load Test
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 8753 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 9038 |========================================================
PHPBench 0.8.1
PHP Benchmark Suite
Score > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 592745 |========================================================
Apache CouchDB 3.2.1
Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24
Seconds < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 87.75 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 89.46 |=======================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 8825 |==========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 1
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 114 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 25632 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 4
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 155 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 48101 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 16
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 331 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 54063 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 32
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 589 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 56444 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 64
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 1132 |==========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 55638 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 128
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 2300 |==========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Increment - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 11194 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 1
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 92 |============================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 47013 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 4
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 84 |============================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 100356 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 16
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 158 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 127197 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 32
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 249 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 138844 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 64
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 458 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 73047 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 1
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 13 |============================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 213088 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 4
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 29 |============================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 139720 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 128
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 910 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 238028 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 16
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 98 |============================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 166110 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 32
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 229 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 83310 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 191 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 105038 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 303 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 107958 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 590 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 91023 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 10 |============================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 260053 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 35 |============================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 10860 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 93 |============================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 39347 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 101 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 125409 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 1017 |==========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 422154 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 67 |============================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 513600 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 81 |============================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 402886 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 213 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 71883 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 221 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 93425 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 341 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 91920 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 694 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 5100 |==========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 200 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 16923 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 235 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 385771 |========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 457 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 55502 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 2303 |==========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 27371 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 596 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 36376 |=========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 881 |===========================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
InfluxDB 1.8.2
Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000
val/sec > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 1080984.0 |=====================================================
InfluxDB 1.8.2
Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000
val/sec > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 1351873.4 |=====================================================
InfluxDB 1.8.2
Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000
val/sec > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 1372446.4 |=====================================================
Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17
Protocol: Redis
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 2225496.36 |====================================================
KeyDB 6.2.0
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
Redis 6.0.9
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 2036043.03 |====================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 1663383.12 |====================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 1430054.68 |====================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 1925696.54 |====================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 1614821.76 |====================================================
SQLite 3.30.1
Threads / Copies: 1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 13.08 |=======================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 31.35 |=======================================================
Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1
Test: Random Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 589655 |========================================================
Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1
Test: Random Read
Op/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 40795942 |======================================================
Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1
Test: Update Random
Op/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 355583 |========================================================
Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1
Test: Sequential Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 640849 |========================================================
Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1
Test: Random Fill Sync
Op/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 4294 |==========================================================
Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1
Test: Read While Writing
Op/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 1346717 |=======================================================
Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1
Test: Read Random Write Random
Op/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 1127470 |=======================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Hot Read
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 19.13 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 18.99 |=======================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Fill Sync
MB/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 1.0 |=========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.5 |=============================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Fill Sync
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 1692.76 |=========================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 3550.31 |=====================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Overwrite
MB/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 26.0 |========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 25.9 |========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Overwrite
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 67.98 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 68.25 |=======================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Random Fill
MB/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 25.7 |========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 25.8 |========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Random Fill
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 68.70 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 68.45 |=======================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Random Read
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 18.41 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 18.89 |=======================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Seek Random
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 24.35 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 23.99 |======================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Random Delete
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 65.22 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 65.66 |=======================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Sequential Fill
MB/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 25.9 |========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 25.8 |========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Sequential Fill
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 68.28 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 68.45 |=======================================================
SQLite Speedtest 3.30
Timed Time - Size 1,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 68.13 |=========================================================
Apache Cassandra 4.0
Test: Reads
Op/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 68865 |=========================================================
Apache Cassandra 4.0
Test: Writes
Op/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 79550 |=========================================================
Apache Cassandra 4.0
Test: Mixed 1:1
Op/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 64727 |=========================================================
Apache Cassandra 4.0
Test: Mixed 1:3
Op/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 66033 |=========================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 29501 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 30035 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.034 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.034 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 1279 |========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 602 |==========================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.833 |==========================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1.758 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 268936 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 268674 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.186 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.186 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 284372 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 283336 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.352 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.353 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 275535 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 274812 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.907 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.910 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 1445 |========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 678 |==========================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 40.19 |==============================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 74.40 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 215760 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 214897 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 2.317 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 2.327 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 28246 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 28701 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.035 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.035 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 1748 |========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 682 |======================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 57.21 |=====================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 147.01 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 1131 |========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 645 |================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 227.95 |===============================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 393.16 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 908 |=========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 479 |==============================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 550.90 |============================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1059.79 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 1113 |========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 624 |===============================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.899 |===============================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1.618 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 253350 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 252565 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.197 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.198 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 24701 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 24660 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.041 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.041 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 261494 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 259525 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.382 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.385 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 253842 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 252328 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.985 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.991 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 19644 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 12771 |====================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 2.546 |====================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 3.916 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 199032 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 198714 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 2.512 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 2.516 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 1044 |========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 642 |==================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.958 |==================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1.558 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 216051 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 217013 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.231 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.230 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 21731 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 21214 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.046 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.047 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 21980 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 15608 |=======================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 4.581 |=======================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 6.407 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 20302 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 16756 |=============================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 12.32 |============================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 15.30 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 17460 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 14419 |=============================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 28.64 |=============================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 35.17 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 209752 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 210835 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.477 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.474 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 199897 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 199835 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 1.251 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1.251 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 15559 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 10631 |======================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 3.215 |====================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 4.953 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 167765 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 167938 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 2.981 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 2.977 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 991 |=========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 621 |====================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 1.009 |==================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1.611 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 182991 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 182189 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.273 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.275 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 17345 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 13743 |============================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 5.812 |============================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 7.278 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 18040 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 16375 |==================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 13.94 |==================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 15.40 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 15828 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 13899 |================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 31.59 |================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 36.24 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 174773 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 174465 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.572 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.573 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 166978 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 166385 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 1.497 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1.502 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 13733 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 10299 |=========================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 3.642 |========================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 4.980 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 147242 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 145932 |======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 3.396 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 3.426 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 13831 |=========================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 7.426 |=========================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 16612 |=========================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 15.06 |=========================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 12145 |=========================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek . 45.32 |=========================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 10.6.4
Clients: 1
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 10.6.4
Clients: 8
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 10.6.4
Clients: 16
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 10.6.4
Clients: 32
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 10.6.4
Clients: 64
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 10.6.4
Clients: 128
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 10.6.4
Clients: 256
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 10.6.4
Clients: 512
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 10.6.4
Clients: 1024
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 10.6.4
Clients: 2048
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 10.6.4
Clients: 4096
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
ebizzy 0.3
Records/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 470178 |======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 450839 |====================================================
Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark
runs/s > Higher Is Better
simdjson 1.0
Throughput Test: Kostya
GB/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 2.13 |=======================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 2.15 |========================================================
simdjson 1.0
Throughput Test: LargeRandom
GB/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.81 |========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.81 |========================================================
simdjson 1.0
Throughput Test: PartialTweets
GB/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 3.14 |========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 3.16 |========================================================
simdjson 1.0
Throughput Test: DistinctUserID
GB/s > Higher Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 3.81 |========================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 3.83 |========================================================
Perl Benchmarks
Test: Pod2html
Seconds < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.11672991 |==================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.11576472 |==================================================
Perl Benchmarks
Test: Interpreter
Seconds < Lower Is Better
B200-8.5-uek ... 0.00117870 |==================================================
B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.00118583 |==================================================