AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Eight-Core testing with a Gigabyte AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF (F20 BIOS) and HIS AMD Radeon HD 6450/7450/8450 / R5 230 OEM 1GB on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2201025-NE-27002022569
2700 2022
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Eight-Core testing with a Gigabyte AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF (F20 BIOS) and HIS AMD Radeon HD 6450/7450/8450 / R5 230 OEM 1GB on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
A:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Eight-Core @ 3.20GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF (F20 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB ADATA SU700, Graphics: HIS AMD Radeon HD 6450/7450/8450 / R5 230 OEM 1GB, Audio: AMD Caicos HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel 3165
OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20201004-generic (x86_64) 20201003, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.8 (LLVM 9.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
B:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Eight-Core @ 3.20GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF (F20 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB ADATA SU700, Graphics: HIS AMD Radeon HD 6450/7450/8450 / R5 230 OEM 1GB, Audio: AMD Caicos HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel 3165
OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20201004-generic (x86_64) 20201003, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.8 (LLVM 9.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
C:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Eight-Core @ 3.20GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF (F20 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB ADATA SU700, Graphics: HIS AMD Radeon HD 6450/7450/8450 / R5 230 OEM 1GB, Audio: AMD Caicos HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel 3165
OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20201004-generic (x86_64) 20201003, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.8 (LLVM 9.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: DXT1
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
A . 1638.56 |==================================================================
B . 1642.82 |==================================================================
C . 1650.96 |==================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC1
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
A . 229.84 |===================================================================
B . 230.93 |===================================================================
C . 230.90 |===================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC2
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
A . 146.45 |===================================================================
B . 147.55 |===================================================================
C . 146.71 |===================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
A . 217.60 |===================================================================
B . 217.58 |===================================================================
C . 217.73 |===================================================================
KTX-Software toktx 4.0
Settings: UASTC 3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 16.62 |===================================================================
B . 16.75 |====================================================================
C . 16.71 |====================================================================
KTX-Software toktx 4.0
Settings: Zstd Compression 9
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 3.356 |====================================================================
B . 3.346 |====================================================================
C . 3.313 |===================================================================
KTX-Software toktx 4.0
Settings: Zstd Compression 19
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 25.52 |====================================================================
B . 25.41 |====================================================================
C . 25.59 |====================================================================
KTX-Software toktx 4.0
Settings: UASTC 3 + Zstd Compression 19
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 24.20 |====================================================================
B . 24.19 |====================================================================
C . 24.16 |====================================================================
KTX-Software toktx 4.0
Settings: UASTC 4 + Zstd Compression 19
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 470.16 |===================================================================
B . 469.69 |===================================================================
C . 470.16 |===================================================================
OpenJPEG 2.4
Encode: NASA Curiosity Panorama M34
ms < Lower Is Better
Primesieve 7.7
1e12 Prime Number Generation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 28.04 |===================================================================
B . 28.42 |====================================================================
C . 28.06 |===================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 4.52 |=====================================================================
B . 4.52 |=====================================================================
C . 4.53 |=====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 4.61 |=====================================================================
B . 4.61 |=====================================================================
C . 4.62 |=====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 22.49 |====================================================================
B . 22.29 |===================================================================
C . 22.40 |====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 23.08 |====================================================================
B . 23.04 |====================================================================
C . 23.20 |====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 10.50 |====================================================================
B . 10.51 |====================================================================
C . 10.43 |===================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 18.20 |====================================================================
B . 18.08 |====================================================================
C . 17.96 |===================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 42.14 |====================================================================
B . 42.01 |====================================================================
C . 41.85 |====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 75.59 |====================================================================
B . 74.12 |===================================================================
C . 75.46 |====================================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 1.39 |=====================================================================
B . 1.38 |=====================================================================
C . 1.38 |=====================================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 0.88 |=====================================================================
B . 0.81 |================================================================
C . 0.77 |============================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2.14 |=====================================================================
B . 2.13 |=====================================================================
C . 2.12 |====================================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 0.91 |====================================================================
B . 0.93 |=====================================================================
C . 0.91 |====================================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 5.69 |====================================================================
B . 5.74 |=====================================================================
C . 5.73 |=====================================================================
Timed Node.js Compilation 17.3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
srsRAN 21.10
Test: OFDM_Test
Samples / Second > Higher Is Better
A . 78200000 |=================================================================
B . 78000000 |=================================================================
C . 78100000 |=================================================================
srsRAN 21.10
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 302.2 |====================================================================
B . 304.0 |====================================================================
C . 302.4 |====================================================================
srsRAN 21.10
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 106.2 |====================================================================
B . 106.7 |====================================================================
C . 106.1 |====================================================================
srsRAN 21.10
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 310.5 |====================================================================
B . 310.1 |====================================================================
C . 310.1 |====================================================================
srsRAN 21.10
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 116.6 |====================================================================
B . 116.3 |====================================================================
C . 113.3 |==================================================================
srsRAN 21.10
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 330.2 |====================================================================
B . 331.2 |====================================================================
C . 332.1 |====================================================================
srsRAN 21.10
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 114.0 |====================================================================
B . 113.9 |====================================================================
C . 114.5 |====================================================================
srsRAN 21.10
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 338.2 |====================================================================
B . 338.4 |====================================================================
C . 336.6 |====================================================================
srsRAN 21.10
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 123.2 |====================================================================
B . 123.4 |====================================================================
C . 123.1 |====================================================================
srsRAN 21.10
Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 86.6 |=====================================================================
B . 86.4 |=====================================================================
C . 86.3 |=====================================================================
srsRAN 21.10
Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 46 |=======================================================================
B . 46 |=======================================================================
C . 46 |=======================================================================