AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U platform profile benchmarks for a future article.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2112229-TJ-LENOVOTHI90 Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen2 Power Mode - Phoronix Test Suite Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen2 Power Mode AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U platform profile benchmarks for a future article.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2112229-TJ-LENOVOTHI90&grw&sor&rro .
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen2 Power Mode Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Power Saver Balanced Power Performance AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U @ 1.90GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads) LENOVO 20XF004WUS (R1NET39W 1.09 BIOS) AMD Renoir/Cezanne 32GB 1024GB SAMSUNG MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 AMD Cezanne 1GB (2000/400MHz) AMD Renoir Radeon HD Audio Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + MEDIATEK Device 7961 Ubuntu 21.10 5.16.0-051600rc6daily20211221-generic (x86_64) GNOME Shell 40.5 X Server + Wayland 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1) 1.2.182 GCC 11.2.0 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Processor Details - Power Saver: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - Platform Profile: low-power - CPU Microcode: 0xa50000c - ACPI Profile: low-power - Balanced Power: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - Platform Profile: balanced - CPU Microcode: 0xa50000c - ACPI Profile: balanced - Performance: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - Platform Profile: performance - CPU Microcode: 0xa50000c - ACPI Profile: performance Graphics Details - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 1024 MB Python Details - Python 3.9.7 Security Details - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: always-on RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen2 Power Mode selenium: ARES-6 - Google Chrome selenium: Basemark - Google Chrome selenium: WebXPRT - Google Chrome selenium: Jetstream 2 - Google Chrome selenium: StyleBench - Google Chrome selenium: PSPDFKit WASM - Google Chrome selenium: WASM collisionDetection - Google Chrome selenium: WASM imageConvolute - Google Chrome selenium: Kraken - Google Chrome basis: ETC1S basis: UASTC Level 2 basis: UASTC Level 3 ngspice: C2670 ngspice: C7552 stargate: 480000 - 512 stargate: 480000 - 1024 stargate: 96000 - 512 stargate: 96000 - 1024 astcenc: Thorough unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - High astcenc: Exhaustive unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra warsow: 1920 x 1080 etcpak: ETC1 etcpak: ETC2 etcpak: DXT1 toktx: Zstd Compression 19 toktx: UASTC 3 toktx: UASTC 4 + Zstd Compression 19 hugin: Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time rawtherapee: Total Benchmark Time rsvg: SVG Files To PNG ocrmypdf: Processing 60 Page PDF Document tesseract: 1920 x 1080 quantlib: onnx: yolov4 - CPU onnx: fcn-resnet101-11 - CPU onnx: shufflenet-v2-10 - CPU onnx: super-resolution-10 - CPU opencv: DNN - Deep Neural Network opencv: Features 2D opencv: Object Detection stockfish: Total Time compress-7zip: Compression Rating compress-7zip: Decompression Rating build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile aom-av1: Speed 9 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K aom-av1: Speed 6 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K svt-av1: Preset 8 - Bosphorus 4K svt-av1: Preset 4 - Bosphorus 4K svt-hevc: 7 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-hevc: 10 - Bosphorus 1080p blender: BMW27 - CPU-Only rav1e: 10 rav1e: 6 build-godot: Time To Compile natron: Spaceship build-mesa: Time To Compile build-wasmer: Time To Compile libreoffice: 20 Documents To PDF liquid-dsp: 1 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 8 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 16 - 256 - 57 pybench: Total For Average Test Times Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 13.23 997.17 261 180.913 38.0 3017 273.29 24.51 545.9 28.876 41.746 81.970 153.165 114.408 2.077708 2.126988 1.585855 1.624233 11.0318 237.7 107.6966 148.8 144.9 354.779 218.955 1399.508 21.218 16.015 491.194 46.138 73.431 18.575 25.782 151.0224 3182.6 219 34 25946 2553 19859 109886 83556 15998614 48342 41706 143.367 38.32 7.39 10.656 1.039 76.16 164.02 257.24 7.659 2.905 190.449 1.8 80.752 94.239 6.117 65997000 330580000 349150000 862 13.55 905.55 256 180.397 37.9 3099 274.04 25.36 554.3 28.597 41.621 81.824 150.571 114.700 2.084681 2.132544 1.590124 1.630407 11.0586 222.4 107.9125 143.4 143.4 353.472 218.320 1396.008 21.230 16.019 491.987 46.106 73.414 18.701 25.772 147.9919 3188.2 219 34 24542 2529 19658 110893 75030 15857270 48464 41812 142.669 38.17 7.36 10.625 1.039 76.60 165.73 256.51 7.695 2.939 190.393 1.8 80.638 94.485 6.190 66167250 326740000 348836667 862 13.40 1018.02 268 183.772 38.2 3022 273.44 24.65 545.1 28.983 41.771 82.006 150.824 115.029 2.094135 2.133118 1.590076 1.633331 11.0110 236.5 107.4482 151.1 144.7 354.215 218.700 1399.392 21.104 16.045 491.424 45.540 73.375 18.586 25.757 149.0348 3180.7 220 34 25942 2549 20525 109408 82897 16044135 48119 41867 143.384 38.45 7.44 10.625 1.037 76.44 164.72 256.27 7.706 2.918 191.178 1.8 80.952 93.838 6.084 65397333 332676667 348796667 890 OpenBenchmarking.org
Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 13.55 13.40 13.23 1. chrome 96.0.4664.110
Selenium Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Overall Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 29.74, N = 9 SE +/- 21.43, N = 12 SE +/- 19.87, N = 12 905.55 997.17 1018.02 1. chrome 96.0.4664.110
Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 256 261 268 1. chrome 96.0.4664.110
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.51, N = 3 SE +/- 1.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.94, N = 3 180.40 180.91 183.77 1. chrome 96.0.4664.110
Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs / Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 37.9 38.0 38.2 1. chrome 96.0.4664.110
Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 SE +/- 13.86, N = 3 SE +/- 11.02, N = 3 3099 3022 3017 1. chrome 96.0.4664.110
Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.10, N = 4 SE +/- 0.19, N = 4 SE +/- 0.27, N = 4 274.04 273.44 273.29 1. chrome 96.0.4664.110
Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.16, N = 15 SE +/- 0.23, N = 6 SE +/- 0.16, N = 6 25.36 24.65 24.51 1. chrome 96.0.4664.110
Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 2.56, N = 3 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 SE +/- 1.10, N = 3 554.3 545.9 545.1 1. chrome 96.0.4664.110
Basis Universal Settings: ETC1S OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.13 Settings: ETC1S Performance Power Saver Balanced Power 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 28.98 28.88 28.60 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
Basis Universal Settings: UASTC Level 2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.13 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Performance Power Saver Balanced Power 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 41.77 41.75 41.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
Basis Universal Settings: UASTC Level 3 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.13 Settings: UASTC Level 3 Performance Power Saver Balanced Power 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 82.01 81.97 81.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
Ngspice Circuit: C2670 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Ngspice 34 Circuit: C2670 Power Saver Performance Balanced Power 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.94, N = 3 SE +/- 1.88, N = 3 SE +/- 1.46, N = 3 153.17 150.82 150.57 1. (CC) gcc options: -O0 -fopenmp -lm -lstdc++ -lfftw3 -lXaw -lXmu -lXt -lXext -lX11 -lXft -lfontconfig -lXrender -lfreetype -lSM -lICE
Ngspice Circuit: C7552 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Ngspice 34 Circuit: C7552 Performance Balanced Power Power Saver 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.23, N = 3 SE +/- 1.38, N = 4 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 115.03 114.70 114.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -O0 -fopenmp -lm -lstdc++ -lfftw3 -lXaw -lXmu -lXt -lXext -lX11 -lXft -lfontconfig -lXrender -lfreetype -lSM -lICE
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Render Ratio, More Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512 Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 0.4712 0.9424 1.4136 1.8848 2.356 SE +/- 0.005604, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001906, N = 3 SE +/- 0.003835, N = 3 2.077708 2.084681 2.094135 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -lsndfile -lm -O3 -march=native -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fstrength-reduce -fstrict-aliasing -finline-functions
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Render Ratio, More Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 0.48 0.96 1.44 1.92 2.4 SE +/- 0.004301, N = 3 SE +/- 0.004409, N = 3 SE +/- 0.005692, N = 3 2.126988 2.132544 2.133118 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -lsndfile -lm -O3 -march=native -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fstrength-reduce -fstrict-aliasing -finline-functions
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Render Ratio, More Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512 Power Saver Performance Balanced Power 0.3578 0.7156 1.0734 1.4312 1.789 SE +/- 0.003425, N = 3 SE +/- 0.002633, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001681, N = 3 1.585855 1.590076 1.590124 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -lsndfile -lm -O3 -march=native -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fstrength-reduce -fstrict-aliasing -finline-functions
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Render Ratio, More Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 0.3675 0.735 1.1025 1.47 1.8375 SE +/- 0.005082, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001996, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001017, N = 3 1.624233 1.630407 1.633331 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -lsndfile -lm -O3 -march=native -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fstrength-reduce -fstrict-aliasing -finline-functions
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 4 SE +/- 0.08, N = 4 SE +/- 0.09, N = 4 11.06 11.03 11.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.21, N = 3 SE +/- 1.92, N = 3 SE +/- 1.19, N = 3 222.4 236.5 237.7
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 107.91 107.70 107.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.08, N = 3 SE +/- 1.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 143.4 148.8 151.1
Warsow Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Warsow 2.5 Beta Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.50, N = 5 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 143.4 144.7 144.9
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.13, N = 4 SE +/- 0.07, N = 4 SE +/- 0.10, N = 4 353.47 354.22 354.78 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 218.32 218.70 218.96 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Configuration: DXT1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.44, N = 9 SE +/- 0.67, N = 9 SE +/- 0.31, N = 9 1396.01 1399.39 1399.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
KTX-Software toktx Settings: Zstd Compression 19 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 Settings: Zstd Compression 19 Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 21.23 21.22 21.10
KTX-Software toktx Settings: UASTC 3 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 Settings: UASTC 3 Performance Balanced Power Power Saver 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.10, N = 4 SE +/- 0.10, N = 4 SE +/- 0.10, N = 4 16.05 16.02 16.02
KTX-Software toktx Settings: UASTC 4 + Zstd Compression 19 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 Settings: UASTC 4 + Zstd Compression 19 Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.86, N = 3 SE +/- 0.92, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 491.99 491.42 491.19
Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 46.14 46.11 45.54
RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 73.43 73.41 73.38 1. RawTherapee, version 5.8, command line.
librsvg Operation: SVG Files To PNG OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better librsvg Operation: SVG Files To PNG Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 18.70 18.59 18.58 1. rsvg-convert version 2.50.7
OCRMyPDF Processing 60 Page PDF Document OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OCRMyPDF 10.3.1+dfsg Processing 60 Page PDF Document Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 25.78 25.77 25.76
Tesseract Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 SE +/- 1.35, N = 3 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 147.99 149.03 151.02
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 Performance Power Saver Balanced Power 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 23.59, N = 14 SE +/- 19.53, N = 15 SE +/- 23.28, N = 14 3180.7 3182.6 3188.2 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 219 219 220 1. (CXX) g++ options: -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
ONNX Runtime Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 34 34 34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
ONNX Runtime Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 474.87, N = 12 SE +/- 54.23, N = 3 SE +/- 38.27, N = 3 24542 25942 25946 1. (CXX) g++ options: -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 10.37, N = 3 SE +/- 3.17, N = 3 SE +/- 7.16, N = 3 2529 2549 2553 1. (CXX) g++ options: -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
OpenCV Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network Performance Power Saver Balanced Power 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 216.59, N = 15 SE +/- 252.77, N = 15 SE +/- 320.11, N = 15 20525 19859 19658 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -msse -msse2 -msse3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -shared
OpenCV Test: Features 2D OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 864.13, N = 3 SE +/- 738.85, N = 3 SE +/- 570.25, N = 3 110893 109886 109408 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -msse -msse2 -msse3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -shared
OpenCV Test: Object Detection OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection Power Saver Performance Balanced Power 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1832.54, N = 12 SE +/- 2005.49, N = 15 SE +/- 617.16, N = 3 83556 82897 75030 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -msse -msse2 -msse3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -shared
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Stockfish 13 Total Time Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 142484.25, N = 3 SE +/- 147869.95, N = 3 SE +/- 89308.13, N = 3 15857270 15998614 16044135 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lgcov -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++17 -fprofile-use -fno-peel-loops -fno-tracer -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -mavx2 -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse2 -mbmi2 -flto -flto=jobserver
7-Zip Compression Test: Compression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 21.06 Test: Compression Rating Performance Power Saver Balanced Power 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 28.05, N = 3 SE +/- 46.84, N = 3 SE +/- 78.05, N = 3 48119 48342 48464 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 21.06 Test: Decompression Rating Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 264.51, N = 3 SE +/- 282.55, N = 3 SE +/- 236.67, N = 3 41706 41812 41867 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 Time To Compile Performance Power Saver Balanced Power 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 143.38 143.37 142.67
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 38.17 38.32 38.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 7.36 7.39 7.44 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 10.63 10.63 10.66 1. (CXX) g++ options: -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -pie
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Performance Power Saver Balanced Power 0.2338 0.4676 0.7014 0.9352 1.169 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 1.037 1.039 1.039 1. (CXX) g++ options: -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -pie
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Power Saver Performance Balanced Power 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.28, N = 6 SE +/- 0.28, N = 6 SE +/- 0.28, N = 6 76.16 76.44 76.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O3 -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Power Saver Performance Balanced Power 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.72, N = 8 SE +/- 0.78, N = 8 SE +/- 0.89, N = 8 164.02 164.72 165.73 1. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O3 -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 257.24 256.51 256.27
rav1e Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.5 Speed: 10 Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.021, N = 4 SE +/- 0.023, N = 4 SE +/- 0.037, N = 4 7.659 7.695 7.706
rav1e Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.5 Speed: 6 Power Saver Performance Balanced Power 0.6613 1.3226 1.9839 2.6452 3.3065 SE +/- 0.022, N = 3 SE +/- 0.014, N = 3 SE +/- 0.015, N = 3 2.905 2.918 2.939
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Performance Power Saver Balanced Power 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 191.18 190.45 190.39
Natron Input: Spaceship OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better Natron 2.4 Input: Spaceship Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 0.405 0.81 1.215 1.62 2.025 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 9 1.8 1.8 1.8
Timed Mesa Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 Time To Compile Performance Power Saver Balanced Power 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 80.95 80.75 80.64
Timed Wasmer Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 1.0.2 Time To Compile Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 94.49 94.24 93.84 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -pie -nodefaultlibs -ldl -lgcc_s -lutil -lrt -lpthread -lm -lc
LibreOffice Test: 20 Documents To PDF OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better LibreOffice Test: 20 Documents To PDF Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.057, N = 7 SE +/- 0.049, N = 7 SE +/- 0.043, N = 7 6.190 6.117 6.084 1. LibreOffice 7.2.3.2 20(Build:2)
Liquid-DSP Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 Performance Power Saver Balanced Power 14M 28M 42M 56M 70M SE +/- 128187.80, N = 3 SE +/- 282278.23, N = 3 SE +/- 760229.39, N = 4 65397333 65997000 66167250 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 70M 140M 210M 280M 350M SE +/- 3816230.69, N = 4 SE +/- 3222178.35, N = 3 SE +/- 2832821.52, N = 3 326740000 330580000 332676667 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 Performance Balanced Power Power Saver 70M 140M 210M 280M 350M SE +/- 2497794.58, N = 3 SE +/- 2576394.98, N = 3 SE +/- 2925035.61, N = 3 348796667 348836667 349150000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
PyBench Total For Average Test Times OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Performance Balanced Power Power Saver 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 6.89, N = 3 SE +/- 7.51, N = 3 SE +/- 9.77, N = 3 890 862 862
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.1 14.2 24.5 Power Saver 2.3 13.5 24.9 Balanced Power 2.4 13.5 24.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 44.8 77.7 86.3 Power Saver 48.3 77.6 86.1 Balanced Power 42.3 76.8 86.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Selenium Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Overall Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 15 30 45 60 75 60.74 67.64 69.20
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 2.17 / Avg: 14.91 / Max: 26.02 Min: 1.75 / Avg: 14.74 / Max: 25.73 Min: 2.21 / Avg: 14.71 / Max: 26.29
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 16 32 48 64 80 Min: 52.88 / Avg: 75.65 / Max: 85.63 Min: 53.75 / Avg: 74.28 / Max: 83.63 Min: 48.88 / Avg: 73.61 / Max: 84.38
Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 11 22 33 44 55 45.04 47.40 47.90
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 2.31 / Avg: 5.68 / Max: 20.79 Min: 1.57 / Avg: 5.59 / Max: 21.06 Min: 2.29 / Avg: 5.51 / Max: 20.86
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 15 30 45 60 75 Min: 48.5 / Avg: 56.34 / Max: 79.63 Min: 48.5 / Avg: 55.84 / Max: 78.25 Min: 48 / Avg: 55.4 / Max: 76.75
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 3 6 9 12 15 12.12 13.13 13.22
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.3 14.9 25.3 Performance 2.4 13.9 25.6 Power Saver 2.3 13.8 25.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 47.4 81.7 86.8 Power Saver 47.9 80.3 86.5 Performance 47.3 80.2 86.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs / Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 0.605 1.21 1.815 2.42 3.025 2.620 2.668 2.689
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.2 14.5 19.8 Performance 2.2 14.3 20.5 Power Saver 2.1 14.1 18.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 58.4 83.0 86.3 Balanced Power 58.4 82.9 86.0 Performance 57.6 82.8 86.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.4 14.9 25.0 Performance 2.4 14.7 22.3 Power Saver 2.4 14.6 22.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 60.9 78.4 86.1 Performance 60.3 78.2 86.1 Balanced Power 61.3 78.1 86.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.3 10.0 19.3 Performance 2.0 9.8 19.4 Power Saver 2.1 9.8 19.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 61.0 76.0 85.6 Balanced Power 61.1 75.9 85.4 Performance 60.4 75.6 85.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.2 6.4 17.6 Power Saver 2.3 6.0 15.5 Performance 2.3 6.0 16.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 56.6 63.2 71.8 Balanced Power 56.9 63.2 71.0 Performance 56.5 62.9 71.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.4 10.6 21.1 Performance 2.4 10.3 21.1 Power Saver 2.2 10.2 20.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 49.9 69.4 83.4 Power Saver 50.1 68.7 82.9 Balanced Power 49.6 68.4 84.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
RawTherapee CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.1 17.5 23.1 Power Saver 2.3 17.5 23.1 Balanced Power 2.2 17.4 23.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
RawTherapee CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 56.3 81.0 83.8 Performance 55.0 80.7 83.6 Balanced Power 55.5 80.5 83.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Hugin CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.4 16.2 25.1 Performance 2.3 16.1 25.1 Power Saver 2.2 16.0 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Hugin CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Hugin CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 65.0 82.5 86.3 Performance 64.6 82.1 86.3 Balanced Power 64.0 82.1 86.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hugin CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OCRMyPDF CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.3 15.9 25.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OCRMyPDF CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
OCRMyPDF CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 61.6 76.3 86.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OCRMyPDF CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LibreOffice CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.3 11.3 24.5 Power Saver 1.4 11.1 24.8 Performance 2.0 10.8 24.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LibreOffice CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
LibreOffice CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 60.5 79.4 85.6 Balanced Power 60.1 79.0 85.4 Performance 59.8 78.9 85.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LibreOffice CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
librsvg CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.2 15.7 21.5 Power Saver 2.0 15.5 19.7 Performance 2.1 15.3 20.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better librsvg CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
librsvg CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 58.1 76.7 83.0 Balanced Power 58.6 76.5 83.0 Performance 58.1 76.1 82.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better librsvg CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.3 17.5 25.0 Performance 2.4 17.5 25.3 Power Saver 2.2 17.5 25.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 62.1 76.1 86.1 Performance 61.6 75.7 86.0 Balanced Power 62.5 75.4 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.4 17.3 25.0 Performance 2.4 17.3 25.0 Power Saver 2.4 17.3 25.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 67.9 78.6 86.3 Performance 67.3 78.0 86.3 Balanced Power 67.5 77.7 86.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Mesa Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.2 17.2 25.2 Performance 2.3 17.2 25.2 Power Saver 2.5 17.1 25.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Timed Mesa Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 67.5 78.1 86.6 Performance 66.9 77.4 86.5 Balanced Power 66.0 77.0 86.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Wasmer Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.5 17.5 25.1 Performance 2.5 17.4 25.0 Power Saver 2.4 17.4 25.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 1.0.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Timed Wasmer Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 67.0 78.7 85.9 Performance 65.9 77.9 85.8 Balanced Power 65.6 77.5 85.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 1.0.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.4 17.8 25.0 Balanced Power 2.4 17.8 25.2 Power Saver 2.4 17.8 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Blender CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 67.1 77.9 81.8 Performance 66.0 77.1 81.0 Balanced Power 65.8 76.7 81.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS Per Watt, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 21.06 Test: Decompression Rating Power Saver Performance Balanced Power 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2443.76 2456.29 2464.76
7-Zip Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 2.3 17.1 25.1 Performance 2.2 17.0 25.1 Balanced Power 2.2 17.0 25.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 21.06 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
7-Zip Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 66.3 77.5 81.6 Performance 65.6 76.7 80.8 Balanced Power 65.3 76.2 80.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 21.06 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Stockfish 13 Total Time Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K 908491.23 917857.66 922848.75
Stockfish CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.1 17.5 25.2 Power Saver 1.3 17.4 25.1 Performance 2.0 17.4 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stockfish 13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Stockfish CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 64.9 76.8 80.8 Performance 64.3 76.0 79.5 Balanced Power 63.9 75.7 79.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Stockfish 13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Render Ratio Per Watt, More Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512 Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 0.0272 0.0544 0.0816 0.1088 0.136 0.120 0.120 0.121
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.1 17.4 25.0 Power Saver 2.3 17.4 25.0 Performance 2.1 17.4 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 65.4 77.5 82.6 Performance 65.0 77.0 83.1 Balanced Power 64.4 76.5 83.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Render Ratio Per Watt, More Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 0.0277 0.0554 0.0831 0.1108 0.1385 0.122 0.123 0.123
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 2.2 17.4 25.1 Balanced Power 2.3 17.3 25.0 Performance 2.4 17.3 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 64.6 77.3 82.4 Performance 64.8 76.8 83.6 Balanced Power 63.9 76.4 81.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Render Ratio Per Watt, More Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512 Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 0.0207 0.0414 0.0621 0.0828 0.1035 0.091 0.092 0.092
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.3 17.4 25.0 Power Saver 2.3 17.3 25.1 Performance 2.1 17.3 25.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 64.9 77.7 84.0 Performance 64.5 77.2 84.1 Balanced Power 63.8 76.8 84.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Render Ratio Per Watt, More Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 0.0212 0.0424 0.0636 0.0848 0.106 0.094 0.094 0.094
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.1 17.3 25.0 Performance 2.2 17.3 25.2 Power Saver 2.3 17.3 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 65.1 77.6 84.1 Performance 64.5 77.4 84.4 Balanced Power 64.4 76.7 83.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Natron Input: Spaceship OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better Natron 2.4 Input: Spaceship Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 0.0236 0.0472 0.0708 0.0944 0.118 0.105 0.105 0.105
Natron CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.4 17.2 25.9 Power Saver 2.4 17.2 25.3 Balanced Power 2.3 17.2 25.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Natron 2.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Natron CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 64.5 79.1 86.0 Power Saver 64.6 78.8 86.0 Balanced Power 64.3 77.2 85.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Natron 2.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 60 120 180 240 300 257.57 266.60 270.00
QuantLib CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 1.4 12.4 17.7 Performance 1.9 11.9 17.6 Power Saver 2.0 11.8 17.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
QuantLib CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 65.9 85.2 86.4 Performance 66.9 85.2 86.4 Balanced Power 64.9 85.0 86.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Ngspice CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.0 14.3 16.2 Power Saver 2.3 14.2 16.2 Performance 2.4 14.1 16.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Ngspice 34 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Ngspice CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 60.3 79.5 84.6 Performance 59.9 79.0 81.9 Power Saver 60.0 78.9 82.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Ngspice 34 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Ngspice CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.3 12.1 17.7 Power Saver 2.4 12.0 17.0 Performance 2.2 12.0 17.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Ngspice 34 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Ngspice CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 61.4 75.4 85.8 Balanced Power 60.3 75.1 85.8 Power Saver 60.9 73.6 85.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Ngspice 34 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Tesseract Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 3 6 9 12 15 8.744 8.854 8.962
Tesseract CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.2 16.9 24.2 Power Saver 2.4 16.9 23.8 Performance 2.1 16.8 24.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Tesseract CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 59.3 72.0 82.3 Power Saver 58.5 71.7 82.3 Balanced Power 57.3 71.4 81.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 4 8 12 16 20 13.58 14.59 14.77
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.4 16.4 24.0 Performance 2.5 16.2 23.8 Power Saver 2.4 16.1 24.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 61.9 77.5 86.8 Power Saver 61.4 77.4 86.8 Balanced Power 60.8 76.8 86.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 3 6 9 12 15 8.567 9.011 9.149
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.2 16.7 23.5 Performance 2.3 16.5 24.6 Power Saver 2.3 16.5 23.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 63.4 76.5 86.8 Power Saver 62.6 76.2 86.9 Balanced Power 61.9 75.6 86.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Warsow Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Warsow 2.5 Beta Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 2 4 6 8 10 8.372 8.470 8.476
Warsow CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.3 17.1 25.0 Power Saver 2.5 17.1 25.3 Performance 2.7 17.1 24.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Warsow 2.5 Beta CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Warsow CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 64.1 76.1 86.3 Balanced Power 62.9 75.9 86.3 Power Saver 63.4 75.8 86.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Warsow 2.5 Beta CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 0.1386 0.2772 0.4158 0.5544 0.693 0.611 0.613 0.616
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.4 17.4 24.8 Performance 1.9 17.3 24.8 Power Saver 2.3 17.3 25.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 65.8 78.7 82.5 Power Saver 65.6 78.5 82.0 Balanced Power 65.3 78.1 81.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 0.0133 0.0266 0.0399 0.0532 0.0665 0.059 0.059 0.059
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.2 17.7 25.2 Power Saver 2.1 17.7 25.2 Balanced Power 2.2 17.7 25.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 65.5 82.1 85.0 Performance 66.0 82.0 84.5 Balanced Power 65.4 81.2 84.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Power Saver Performance Balanced Power 1.1495 2.299 3.4485 4.598 5.7475 4.988 5.010 5.109
SVT-HEVC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 2.2 15.3 25.2 Performance 2.3 15.3 25.1 Balanced Power 2.2 15.0 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
SVT-HEVC CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 66.9 75.7 78.1 Performance 66.9 75.3 77.8 Balanced Power 65.3 74.2 76.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Power Saver Performance Balanced Power 3 6 9 12 15 12.17 12.27 12.38
SVT-HEVC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 2.1 13.5 25.1 Performance 2.2 13.4 25.1 Balanced Power 2.3 13.4 25.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
SVT-HEVC CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 63.8 72.8 76.3 Performance 63.4 72.1 75.8 Balanced Power 62.4 70.9 74.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
rav1e Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.5 Speed: 10 Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 0.1087 0.2174 0.3261 0.4348 0.5435 0.480 0.483 0.483
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 2.3 16.0 25.5 Performance 2.4 16.0 24.7 Balanced Power 2.3 15.9 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
rav1e CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 61.3 78.7 84.3 Performance 60.9 78.0 83.1 Balanced Power 60.4 77.6 84.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
rav1e Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.5 Speed: 6 Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 0.0403 0.0806 0.1209 0.1612 0.2015 0.176 0.176 0.179
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.0 16.7 25.4 Power Saver 2.1 16.5 24.6 Performance 2.2 16.3 24.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
rav1e CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 62.8 79.5 83.3 Performance 62.3 78.8 82.5 Balanced Power 61.1 78.4 82.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Performance Balanced Power Power Saver 0.5231 1.0462 1.5693 2.0924 2.6155 2.307 2.315 2.325
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.2 16.7 27.2 Balanced Power 2.1 16.5 26.9 Power Saver 2.1 16.5 27.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 63.6 74.6 81.1 Performance 62.9 74.0 78.5 Balanced Power 62.4 73.4 79.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 0.0954 0.1908 0.2862 0.3816 0.477 0.419 0.420 0.424
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.0 17.6 25.1 Power Saver 2.1 17.6 25.2 Performance 2.3 17.6 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 62.3 81.9 85.3 Performance 62.0 81.2 85.1 Balanced Power 61.1 80.7 84.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
PyBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.0 11.4 15.0 Power Saver 2.4 10.7 13.7 Performance 2.1 10.3 14.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
PyBench CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 65.6 84.3 86.5 Power Saver 65.9 84.1 86.6 Balanced Power 65.0 84.1 86.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.2 15.7 25.1 Power Saver 2.3 15.4 25.1 Performance 2.1 15.4 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
ASTC Encoder CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 61.1 76.5 85.4 Balanced Power 60.6 76.2 85.1 Performance 59.9 76.0 85.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.3 17.5 25.1 Balanced Power 2.3 17.5 25.1 Power Saver 2.1 17.5 25.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
ASTC Encoder CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 62.1 75.5 85.4 Performance 61.9 75.2 85.5 Balanced Power 62.4 74.7 85.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Basis Universal CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.3 14.6 25.0 Performance 2.4 14.2 25.0 Power Saver 2.3 14.2 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Basis Universal CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 65.4 83.5 86.6 Power Saver 65.3 83.4 86.6 Balanced Power 64.3 83.0 86.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Basis Universal CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 2.6 16.7 25.1 Balanced Power 2.3 16.6 25.1 Performance 2.4 16.6 25.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Basis Universal CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 62.6 77.0 85.5 Power Saver 62.5 77.0 85.1 Balanced Power 62.1 76.2 85.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Basis Universal CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.3 17.2 25.1 Power Saver 2.4 17.2 25.1 Performance 2.3 17.2 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Basis Universal CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 63.9 77.4 85.4 Performance 64.0 77.3 85.6 Balanced Power 63.4 76.4 85.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Performance Balanced Power Power Saver 7 14 21 28 35 27.88 28.79 29.38
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.3 12.7 17.3 Balanced Power 2.2 12.3 18.7 Power Saver 2.1 12.1 18.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 65.3 82.6 85.8 Balanced Power 64.1 77.0 82.6 Power Saver 65.0 76.3 78.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Etcpak Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Performance Balanced Power Power Saver 4 8 12 16 20 16.25 16.63 17.02
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.3 13.5 16.8 Balanced Power 2.1 13.1 16.5 Power Saver 2.3 12.9 14.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 61.8 80.9 85.8 Balanced Power 58.8 78.0 82.9 Power Saver 59.6 75.5 78.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Etcpak Configuration: DXT1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 30 60 90 120 150 148.91 150.77 151.05
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.1 9.4 24.7 Performance 2.0 9.3 25.1 Power Saver 1.8 9.3 24.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 59.9 70.9 77.3 Power Saver 59.6 70.6 76.6 Balanced Power 59.0 70.1 76.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
KTX-Software toktx CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.0 11.4 18.8 Balanced Power 2.2 11.3 19.0 Power Saver 2.4 11.2 18.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
KTX-Software toktx CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 55.4 73.5 81.5 Balanced Power 54.8 72.5 80.3 Power Saver 55.4 71.8 76.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
KTX-Software toktx CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.2 15.8 25.1 Power Saver 2.3 15.8 25.1 Performance 1.9 15.8 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
KTX-Software toktx CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 57.8 74.2 82.3 Power Saver 57.0 74.0 82.3 Balanced Power 56.9 73.4 82.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
KTX-Software toktx CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 2.28 / Avg: 17.8 / Max: 25.14 Min: 1.89 / Avg: 17.8 / Max: 25.14 Min: 2.1 / Avg: 17.8 / Max: 25.14
KTX-Software toktx CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor Performance Power Saver Balanced Power 16 32 48 64 80 Min: 61 / Avg: 77.73 / Max: 85.25 Min: 61.25 / Avg: 77.69 / Max: 85.13 Min: 60.75 / Avg: 76.81 / Max: 84.38
OpenCV CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.2 16.6 25.9 Balanced Power 2.2 16.6 25.8 Power Saver 1.6 16.5 25.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
OpenCV CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 65.1 75.8 79.0 Power Saver 65.4 75.8 78.8 Balanced Power 64.0 75.0 78.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenCV CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.3 16.9 27.3 Performance 2.3 16.8 26.9 Power Saver 2.3 16.8 25.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
OpenCV CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 64.0 84.8 87.4 Performance 64.4 84.5 87.1 Balanced Power 63.3 84.4 87.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenCV CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 2.1 16.4 26.3 Performance 2.1 16.4 26.0 Balanced Power 2.3 16.4 25.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
OpenCV CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 65.6 83.8 87.1 Performance 65.5 83.6 87.1 Balanced Power 65.3 83.1 86.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU Power Saver Balanced Power Performance 3 6 9 12 15 12.37 12.39 12.44
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 2.3 17.7 25.2 Performance 2.3 17.7 25.1 Balanced Power 2.1 17.7 25.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
ONNX Runtime CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 65.1 79.5 84.0 Performance 63.6 78.9 83.4 Balanced Power 63.6 78.1 82.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ONNX Runtime Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 0.4327 0.8654 1.2981 1.7308 2.1635 1.919 1.919 1.923
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.4 17.7 25.2 Performance 2.0 17.7 25.1 Power Saver 2.2 17.7 25.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
ONNX Runtime CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 66.9 80.5 84.8 Performance 65.9 79.9 84.4 Balanced Power 65.5 79.2 84.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ONNX Runtime Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 300 600 900 1200 1500 1387.27 1463.73 1466.68
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.3 17.7 25.1 Balanced Power 2.2 17.7 25.1 Power Saver 2.1 17.7 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
ONNX Runtime CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 CPU Temperature Monitor Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 16 32 48 64 80 Min: 65.5 / Avg: 80.66 / Max: 86.13 Min: 66.88 / Avg: 79.47 / Max: 84.63 Min: 66.25 / Avg: 79.33 / Max: 84.38
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 30 60 90 120 150 142.85 144.04 144.32
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.3 17.7 25.1 Performance 2.4 17.7 25.1 Power Saver 2.4 17.7 25.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
ONNX Runtime CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 66.5 80.5 85.3 Performance 65.9 79.9 84.5 Balanced Power 66.6 79.7 84.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Liquid-DSP Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 1.3M 2.6M 3.9M 5.2M 6.5M 5840272.89 6058843.71 6154706.30
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.2 11.3 14.7 Performance 2.3 10.8 13.5 Power Saver 2.3 10.7 13.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 65.8 84.4 86.4 Power Saver 67.0 84.1 86.4 Performance 66.5 84.1 86.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Liquid-DSP Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M 19741368.46 19786159.03 19885532.14
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Performance 2.0 16.7 25.3 Power Saver 2.3 16.7 25.1 Balanced Power 1.9 16.6 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 61.3 72.8 77.9 Balanced Power 61.0 72.7 77.4 Performance 60.9 72.6 77.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Liquid-DSP Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M 20880955.77 20912638.36 20995364.76
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Balanced Power 2.4 16.7 25.1 Performance 2.2 16.7 25.1 Power Saver 2.2 16.6 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 61.9 73.9 78.1 Performance 61.8 73.7 78.0 Balanced Power 61.1 73.2 77.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Meta Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watts, More Is Better Meta Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts Balanced Power Power Saver Performance 90 180 270 360 450 392.66 396.26 397.53
CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Balanced Power Performance Power Saver 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 1.18 / Avg: 14.87 / Max: 27.33 Min: 1.22 / Avg: 14.79 / Max: 27.24 Min: 1.17 / Avg: 14.7 / Max: 27.31
CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Power Saver Performance Balanced Power 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 47.88 / Avg: 76.36 / Max: 87.38 Min: 44.75 / Avg: 76.1 / Max: 87.13 Min: 42.25 / Avg: 75.69 / Max: 87.13
OCRMyPDF CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 2.0 15.8 25.0 Performance 2.1 15.7 25.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OCRMyPDF 10.3.1+dfsg CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
OCRMyPDF CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max Power Saver 62.4 76.6 86.1 Performance 62.1 76.3 86.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OCRMyPDF 10.3.1+dfsg CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4