2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core testing with a ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T (P3.10 BIOS) and ASPEED on Fedora Linux 35 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2111087-TJ-NEWNOV45627
new-nov ,
"Blender 2.92 - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",26.22,26.3,26.31
"B",
"C",
"Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",64.13,64.08,64.27
"B",
"C",
"Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",37.82,38.04,37.68
"B",
"C",
"Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",97.22,96.67,96.78
"B",
"C",
"Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",77.06,76.88,76.71
"B",
"C",
"JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 - CPU Threads: 1",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"AA",57.79,57.42,57.65
"B",
"C",
"JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 - CPU Threads: All",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"AA",248.74,260.86,244.48,246.26,249.1,247.27
"B",
"C",
"JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 - Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"AA",69.05,68.85,68.58
"B",
"C",
"JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 - Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"AA",9.4,9.33,9.31
"B",
"C",
"JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 - Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"AA",0.97,0.97,0.96
"B",
"C",
"JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 - Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"AA",70.65,71.1,71.1
"B",
"C",
"JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 - Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"AA",71.44,70.66,71.1
"B",
"C",
"JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 - Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"AA",27.77,28.01,27.9
"B",
"C",
"ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 - Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"AA",267,226,256,256.5,267.5,226.5,265,250.5,254,245.5,247.5,266
"B",277.5
"C",271.5
"ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 - Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"AA",164,169.5,163.5
"B",
"C",
"ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 - Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"AA",5499.5,4479.5,4459,5006,4280,4026.5,6544,3384,3365.5
"B",
"C",
"ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 - Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"AA",4567.5,8001.5,4668,4758,4721,4652.5,4728,4560.5,4637,4568,4704,4389.5
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",0.002,0.002,0.002
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",0.009,0.009,0.009
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",0.011,0.011,0.011
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",0.033,0.034,0.037,0.033,0.034,0.034,0.034,0.034,0.034,0.034,0.034,0.034
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",0.046,0.046,0.046
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",0.12,0.12,0.12
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",0.171,0.169,0.171
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",0.485,0.488,0.486
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",1.024,1.026,1.025
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",2.032,2.028,2.027
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"AA",
"B",
"C",
"rav1e 0.5 - Speed: 1",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"AA",0.502,0.503,0.501
"B",
"C",
"rav1e 0.5 - Speed: 5",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"AA",2.361,2.271,2.19,2.284,2.306,2.136,2.26,2.313,2.338,2.306,2.289,2.301,2.35,2.298,2.155
"B",
"C",
"rav1e 0.5 - Speed: 6",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"AA",2.858,2.833,3.052,2.957,2.968,2.868,2.842,3.012,2.809,2.869,2.893,2.871,3.001,3.044,2.938
"B",
"C",
"rav1e 0.5 - Speed: 10",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"AA",6.241,6.528,6.516,6.599
"B",
"C",
"Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop",
Higher Results Are Better
"AA",1238083.5,1205254.88,1226391.88,1195886.12,1247038.25,1182592.25
"B",1165908.88,1173158.12
"C",1227295.12,1198035.25
"Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush",
Higher Results Are Better
"AA",1166180.75,1183291.88,1197318
"B",
"C",
"Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: GET",
Higher Results Are Better
"AA",740636.81,760800.91,793675.99,747758.58,754998.06,781708.1,749524.59,541837.89,767363.82
"B",
"C",
"Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: MIX",
Higher Results Are Better
"AA",561115.99,413238.66,394082.63,391411.95,465946.43,396668.71,429061.66,424370.2,394762.67,414159.32,450650.61,481567.67
"B",
"C",
"Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: SET",
Higher Results Are Better
"AA",338019.44,312413.49,307592.71,294498.4,300780.05,282791.06,291979.8,303576.21,288833.97,285448.84,303237.8,299431.49
"B",
"C",
"Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 - Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"B",
"C",
"Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 - Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512",
Higher Results Are Better
"A",
"B",
"C",