2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core testing with a ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T (P3.10 BIOS) and ASPEED on Fedora Linux 35 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2111087-TJ-NEWNOV45627
new-nov
2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core testing with a ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T (P3.10 BIOS) and ASPEED on Fedora Linux 35 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
A:
Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core @ 2.95GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T (P3.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T
OS: Fedora Linux 35, Kernel: 5.14.14-300.fc35.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20210728, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
AA:
Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core @ 2.95GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T (P3.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T
OS: Fedora Linux 35, Kernel: 5.14.14-300.fc35.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20210728, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
B:
Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core @ 2.95GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T (P3.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T
OS: Fedora Linux 35, Kernel: 5.14.14-300.fc35.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20210728, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
C:
Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core @ 2.95GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T (P3.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T
OS: Fedora Linux 35, Kernel: 5.14.14-300.fc35.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20210728, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
AA . 1182263.54 |==============================================
B .. 1583531.25 |==============================================================
C .. 1201923.12 |===============================================
ONNX Runtime 1.9.1
Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
AA . 166 |==========================================================
B .. 159 |=======================================================
C .. 198 |=====================================================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: SET
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
AA . 300716.94 |========================================================
B .. 336661.24 |===============================================================
C .. 324048.37 |=============================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.9.1
Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
AA . 252 |===============================================================
B .. 278 |=====================================================================
C .. 272 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 0.011 |=============================================================
B .. 0.012 |===================================================================
C .. 0.011 |=============================================================
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1
CPU Threads: 1
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A .. 58.09 |===================================================================
AA . 57.62 |==================================================================
B .. 54.64 |===============================================================
C .. 57.56 |==================================================================
rav1e 0.5
Speed: 5
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A .. 2.161 |===============================================================
AA . 2.277 |==================================================================
B .. 2.163 |===============================================================
C .. 2.295 |===================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1
Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A .. 65.72 |================================================================
AA . 68.83 |===================================================================
B .. 66.61 |=================================================================
C .. 68.91 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 0.046 |===================================================================
B .. 0.045 |==================================================================
C .. 0.044 |================================================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
AA . 1215874.48 |==============================================================
B .. 1169533.50 |============================================================
C .. 1212665.19 |==============================================================
rav1e 0.5
Speed: 6
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A .. 2.972 |==================================================================
AA . 2.921 |=================================================================
B .. 3.030 |===================================================================
C .. 2.953 |=================================================================
rav1e 0.5
Speed: 10
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A .. 6.427 |=================================================================
AA . 6.471 |=================================================================
B .. 6.627 |===================================================================
C .. 6.428 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 0.170 |===================================================================
B .. 0.167 |==================================================================
C .. 0.165 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 0.034 |===================================================================
B .. 0.033 |=================================================================
C .. 0.033 |=================================================================
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1
CPU Threads: All
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A .. 244.63 |=================================================================
AA . 249.45 |==================================================================
B .. 242.85 |================================================================
C .. 249.44 |==================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1
Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A .. 70.82 |=================================================================
AA . 71.07 |==================================================================
B .. 72.49 |===================================================================
C .. 72.67 |===================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1
Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A .. 71.26 |==================================================================
AA . 70.95 |==================================================================
B .. 72.29 |===================================================================
C .. 72.52 |===================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1
Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A .. 27.78 |==================================================================
AA . 27.89 |==================================================================
B .. 28.33 |===================================================================
C .. 27.90 |==================================================================
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9
Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512
Render Ratio > Higher Is Better
A . 3.918886 |=================================================================
B . 3.860799 |================================================================
C . 3.936974 |=================================================================
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9
Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512
Render Ratio > Higher Is Better
A . 5.636240 |================================================================
B . 5.735381 |=================================================================
C . 5.691988 |=================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 0.120 |===================================================================
B .. 0.118 |==================================================================
C .. 0.119 |==================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1
Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A .. 9.39 |====================================================================
AA . 9.35 |====================================================================
B .. 9.26 |===================================================================
C .. 9.38 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 1.025 |===================================================================
B .. 1.021 |===================================================================
C .. 1.012 |==================================================================
Blender 2.92
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 64.16 |===================================================================
B .. 64.64 |===================================================================
C .. 63.83 |==================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1
Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A .. 0.96 |===================================================================
AA . 0.97 |====================================================================
B .. 0.96 |===================================================================
C .. 0.96 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 0.486 |===================================================================
B .. 0.485 |===================================================================
C .. 0.482 |==================================================================
Blender 2.92
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 37.85 |===================================================================
B .. 37.54 |==================================================================
C .. 37.65 |===================================================================
Blender 2.92
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 26.28 |===================================================================
B .. 26.33 |===================================================================
C .. 26.45 |===================================================================
Blender 2.92
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 96.89 |===================================================================
B .. 96.89 |===================================================================
C .. 97.40 |===================================================================
rav1e 0.5
Speed: 1
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A .. 0.501 |===================================================================
AA . 0.502 |===================================================================
B .. 0.503 |===================================================================
C .. 0.503 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 2.029 |===================================================================
B .. 2.021 |===================================================================
C .. 2.024 |===================================================================
Blender 2.92
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 76.88 |===================================================================
B .. 76.88 |===================================================================
C .. 77.08 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 0.009 |===================================================================
B .. 0.009 |===================================================================
C .. 0.009 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AA . 0.002 |===================================================================
B .. 0.002 |===================================================================
C .. 0.002 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ONNX Runtime 1.9.1
Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
AA . 4913 |==========================================
B .. 4721 |========================================
C .. 7945 |====================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.9.1
Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
AA . 4560 |=====================================
B .. 7976 |================================================================
C .. 8430 |====================================================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: MIX
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
AA . 434753.04 |=====================================================
B .. 515974.69 |===============================================================
C .. 478538.61 |==========================================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: GET
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
AA . 737589.42 |===========================================================
B .. 745562.90 |============================================================
C .. 782383.89 |===============================================================