AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (3103 BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 4GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2110273-TJ-3950XOKT523
3950X Okt,
"Zstd Compression - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"RAR Compression 6.0.2 - Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 - WAV To FLAC",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"ASTC Encoder 3.2 - Preset: Medium",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"ASTC Encoder 3.2 - Preset: Thorough",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Zstd Compression - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"GIMP 2.10.18 - Test: resize",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Zstd Compression - Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Zstd Compression - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Zstd Compression - Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Zstd Compression - Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Zstd Compression - Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"ASTC Encoder 3.2 - Preset: Exhaustive",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Zstd Compression - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"GIMP 2.10.18 - Test: rotate",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Zstd Compression - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"GIMP 2.10.18 - Test: auto-levels",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"GIMP 2.10.18 - Test: unsharp-mask",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Zstd Compression - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"OpenCV 4.5.4 - Test: Features 2D",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"OpenCV 4.5.4 - Test: Object Detection",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"OpenCV 4.5.4 - Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"OpenSSL - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"OpenSSL - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Theano - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: Bohrium - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"PyHPC Benchmarks 2.1 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 - Build System: Ninja",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 - Build System: Unix Makefiles",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 - Algorithm: Magi",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 - Algorithm: x25x",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 - Algorithm: Deepcoin",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Zstd Compression - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: MIX",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 - Algorithm: Ringcoin",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 - Algorithm: Blake-2 S",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 - Algorithm: Garlicoin",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 - Algorithm: Skeincoin",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 - Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 - Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 - Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 - Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Kvazaar 2.1 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Kvazaar 2.1 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Kvazaar 2.1 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Kvazaar 2.1 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Kvazaar 2.1 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Kvazaar 2.1 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"AOM AV1 3.2 - Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"AOM AV1 3.2 - Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"AOM AV1 3.2 - Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"AOM AV1 3.2 - Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"AOM AV1 3.2 - Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Nginx - Test: Short Connection - Connections: 1000",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Nginx - Test: Short Connection - Connections: 100",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Nginx - Test: Long Connection - Connections: 500",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Nginx - Test: Long Connection - Connections: 1000",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: SET",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Nginx - Test: Long Connection - Connections: 100",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"AOM AV1 3.2 - Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"AOM AV1 3.2 - Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: GET",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"AOM AV1 3.2 - Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Nginx - Test: Short Connection - Connections: 500",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"AOM AV1 3.2 - Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"AOM AV1 3.2 - Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"AOM AV1 3.2 - Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"AOM AV1 3.2 - Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",35710.67465
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",619.26626
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",585590.718571
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",575743.150728
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",584738.861847
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",633.307247
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",544415.410626
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",34592.687495
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",620.509501
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",592.510346
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",481.238731
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",297.745437
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",555121.709437
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",11984.823924
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",539716.33235
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",558383.922345
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",5012.177228
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",507098.068631
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",295.760103
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",90594.757619
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",4270.647365
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",4946.785822
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",4990.921689
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",83856.536906
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",77506.942314
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",1984.20312
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"Zstd Compression - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"4",
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 - Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",