2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 testing with a GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 21.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2109142-TJ-XEONPLATI94
Xeon Platinum 8280 2P September,
"Apache Cassandra 4.0 - Test: Reads",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"Apache Cassandra 4.0 - Test: Writes",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"Apache Cassandra 4.0 - Test: Mixed 1:1",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"Apache Cassandra 4.0 - Test: Mixed 1:3",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 - Concurrent Requests: 100",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 - Concurrent Requests: 200",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 - Concurrent Requests: 500",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 - Concurrent Requests: 1000",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"ASTC Encoder 3.0 - Preset: Medium",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"ASTC Encoder 3.0 - Preset: Thorough",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"ASTC Encoder 3.0 - Preset: Exhaustive",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"BRL-CAD 7.32.2 - VGR Performance Metric",
Higher Results Are Better
"4",
"2",
"4",
"C-Blosc 2.0 - Compressor: blosclz",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"dav1d 0.9.2 - Video Input: Chimera 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"dav1d 0.9.2 - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"dav1d 0.9.2 - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"dav1d 0.9.2 - Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"ECP-CANDLE 0.4 - Benchmark: P1B2",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"ECP-CANDLE 0.4 - Benchmark: P3B1",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"ECP-CANDLE 0.4 - Benchmark: P3B2",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"Embree 3.13 - Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Embree 3.13 - Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Embree 3.13 - Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Embree 3.13 - Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Embree 3.13 - Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Embree 3.13 - Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 - Test: Random Fill",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 - Test: Random Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 - Test: Update Random",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 - Test: Sequential Fill",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 - Test: Random Fill Sync",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 - Test: Read While Writing",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 - Test: Read Random Write Random",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"Google SynthMark 20201109 - Test: VoiceMark_100",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"GROMACS 2021.2 - Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 - Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",1.8504571554403
"2",1.8704139787259
"3",1.8546785192989
"4",1.8627038263662
"Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 - Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",1.8601432682345
"2",1.8599633587218
"3",1.8547817200133
"4",1.8357785904158
"Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 - Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",0.91187627662679
"2",0.90425724310052
"3",0.88198976891868
"4",0.86161587441087
"JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 - CPU Threads: 1",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 - CPU Threads: All",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 - Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 - Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 - Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 - Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 - Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 - Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"KeyDB 6.2.0 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"LeelaChessZero 0.28 - Backend: BLAS",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"LeelaChessZero 0.28 - Backend: Eigen",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Mobile Neural Network 1.2 - Model: mobilenetV3",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Mobile Neural Network 1.2 - Model: squeezenetv1.1",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Mobile Neural Network 1.2 - Model: resnet-v2-50",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Mobile Neural Network 1.2 - Model: SqueezeNetV1.0",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Mobile Neural Network 1.2 - Model: MobileNetV2_224",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Mobile Neural Network 1.2 - Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Mobile Neural Network 1.2 - Model: inception-v3",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: BT.C",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: CG.C",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: EP.C",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: EP.D",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: FT.C",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: IS.D",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: LU.C",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: MG.C",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: SP.B",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: SP.C",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Natron 2.4 - Input: Spaceship",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: blazeface",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: googlenet",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: vgg16",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: resnet18",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: alexnet",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: resnet50",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"NCNN 20210720 - Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"nginx 1.21.1 - Concurrent Requests: 20",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"nginx 1.21.1 - Concurrent Requests: 100",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"nginx 1.21.1 - Concurrent Requests: 200",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"nginx 1.21.1 - Concurrent Requests: 500",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"nginx 1.21.1 - Concurrent Requests: 1000",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",
"ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 - Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",299.5
"2",
"4",
"ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 - Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",445.5
"2",466.5
"4",
"ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 - Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",234.5
"2",
"4",249.5
"ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 - Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",7152.5
"2",7152.5
"4",7100.5
"ONNX Runtime 1.8.2 - Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"4",6133.5
"OpenSSL 3.0 - Algorithm: SHA256",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"OpenSSL 3.0 - Algorithm: RSA4096",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"OpenSSL 3.0 - Algorithm: RSA4096",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"OpenVKL 1.0 - Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"OpenVKL 1.0 - Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PJSIP 2.11 - Method: INVITE",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PJSIP 2.11 - Method: OPTIONS, Stateful",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PJSIP 2.11 - Method: OPTIONS, Stateless",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",21570.299153
"2",21088.913609
"3",21183.43437
"4",20628.813287
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",2954.71881
"2",2911.463913
"3",2973.154998
"4",2929.873975
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",756824.029801
"2",751730.703301
"3",754029.191715
"4",741889.498585
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",951718.588979
"2",958555.658336
"3",955922.335276
"4",950666.984453
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",747023.642146
"2",742961.880688
"3",745025.000291
"4",753157.768955
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",1931.898882
"2",1965.638216
"3",1920.108645
"4",1955.887958
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",18861.748365
"2",17921.776916
"3",18675.795592
"4",18259.802659
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",1227.827466
"2",1280.376231
"3",1251.955274
"4",1241.253881
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",724.826137
"2",708.130311
"3",716.349171
"4",779.543448
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",2605.732263
"2",2498.610366
"3",2565.260645
"4",2499.016283
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",628680.607722
"2",631133.990569
"3",628979.667278
"4",618206.748548
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",809900.400226
"2",799950.700802
"3",798485.068851
"4",800706.270825
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",629258.352463
"2",645577.651138
"3",649011.027628
"4",638016.13718
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",53187.707416
"2",53289.045451
"3",53168.463774
"4",52934.163455
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",57664.624605
"2",56780.56578
"3",56648.486652
"4",57246.303821
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",53022.913241
"2",53030.310492
"3",52744.53751
"4",52968.437823
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Quantum ESPRESSO 6.8 - Input: AUSURF112",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Renaissance 0.12 - Test: Scala Dotty",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",981.829108
"2",964.478351
"3",965.953798
"4",1005.383593
"5",947.233281
"Renaissance 0.12 - Test: Random Forest",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",1255.655749
"2",1205.432426
"3",1199.461723
"4",1235.939687
"5",1148.241531
"Renaissance 0.12 - Test: ALS Movie Lens",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",15139.697205
"2",15089.987083
"3",15193.593452
"4",15135.411422
"5",15005.830306
"Renaissance 0.12 - Test: Apache Spark ALS",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",2697.438283
"2",2581.916734
"3",2664.187227
"4",2690.136056
"5",2684.565515
"Renaissance 0.12 - Test: Apache Spark Bayes",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",918.637322
"2",838.066292
"3",873.393713
"4",854.455506
"5",856.671567
"Renaissance 0.12 - Test: Savina Reactors.IO",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",13154.262498
"2",15082.507333
"3",13975.239678
"4",15864.310306
"5",14413.906994
"Renaissance 0.12 - Test: Apache Spark PageRank",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",4990.881977
"2",4797.71207
"3",4878.472616
"4",5157.607695
"5",4766.851689
"Renaissance 0.12 - Test: Finagle HTTP Requests",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",4236.42678
"2",4202.46464
"3",4355.248581
"4",4296.219067
"5",4512.236641
"Renaissance 0.12 - Test: In-Memory Database Shootout",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",12353.098631
"2",11897.426921
"3",12224.352154
"4",12704.359875
"5",12929.470472
"Renaissance 0.12 - Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",20467.529114
"2",20740.347425
"3",20541.175275
"4",20569.709084
"5",20820.199902
"Renaissance 0.12 - Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",6762.454942
"2",6760.99591
"3",6362.905849
"4",6700.548099
"5",6591.132112
"simdjson 1.0 - Throughput Test: Kostya",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"simdjson 1.0 - Throughput Test: LargeRandom",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"simdjson 1.0 - Throughput Test: PartialTweets",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"simdjson 1.0 - Throughput Test: DistinctUserID",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: OFDM_Test",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"srsRAN 21.04 - Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"SVT-AV1 0.8.7 - Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"SVT-AV1 0.8.7 - Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"SVT-AV1 0.8.7 - Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"SVT-AV1 0.8.7 - Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Tachyon 0.99b6 - Total Time",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"TNN 0.3 - Target: CPU - Model: DenseNet",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"TNN 0.3 - Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"TNN 0.3 - Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v2",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"TNN 0.3 - Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"YafaRay 3.5.1 - Total Time For Sample Scene",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.0 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.0 - Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.0 - Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.0 - Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.0 - Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.0 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.0 - Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.0 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.0 - Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.0 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"Zstd Compression 1.5.0 - Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",