ARMv8 Cortex-A72 testing on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2109016-TJ-2021AUG3005
2021aug30-8g-tmpfs,
"John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Blowfish",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",1300,1294,1296
"cacULE",
"cacULE-run2",
"John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: MD5",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",30336,30421,30485
"cacULE",30351,30455,30483
"cacULE-run2",30523,30523,30549
"7-Zip Compression 16.02 - Compress Speed Test",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",3585,3560,3595
"cacULE",3600,3580,3582
"cacULE-run2",3584,3589,3575
"ebizzy 0.3 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",5773,5758,5771
"cacULE",5898,5843,5850
"cacULE-run2",5903,5873,5870
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.10.20 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",5686.528,5683.888,5699.422
"cacULE",5646.549,5637.126,5630.234
"C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",636.482,756.106,614.271,732.747,622.465,614.089,747.241,613.932,655.744
"cacULE",628.714,629.476,714.882,624.034,772.689,628.612,646.532,623.682,629.206
"cacULE-run2",632.375,800.244,614.973,858.684,638.275,641.506,747.835,615.152,653.761
"Primesieve 7.4 - 1e12 Prime Number Generation",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",505.79,566.745,504.514,575.178,513.21,653.333
"cacULE",558.305,652.682,580.317,602.491,529.074,599.335,598.699,608.085,568.759
"cacULE-run2",621.58,543.212,618.442,580.121,592.804,498.004,615.686,568.317,598.318
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",5589.644798,5558.936701,5618.352761
"cacULE",5752.25857,5817.72503,5733.082649
"cacULE-run2",5804.647869,5730.036997,5721.099832
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",0.179,0.18,0.178
"cacULE",0.174,0.172,0.174
"cacULE-run2",0.172,0.175,0.175
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",808.961806,831.183516,825.076851
"cacULE",839.547555,836.202322,832.741697
"cacULE-run2",827.496497,831.75982,833.715349
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",1.236,1.203,1.212
"cacULE",1.191,1.196,1.201
"cacULE-run2",1.209,1.202,1.2
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",9168.686018,9105.942069,9022.216666
"cacULE",8708.053116,8668.744348,8744.256585
"cacULE-run2",8858.206269,8728.358306,8530.712839
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",5.454,5.491,5.542
"cacULE",5.742,5.768,5.719
"cacULE-run2",5.645,5.729,5.862
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",8119.412279,8106.329534,7997.279602
"cacULE",7750.443055,7833.86836,7858.233157
"cacULE-run2",7937.869352,7814.696537,7911.955594
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",12.318,12.337,12.506
"cacULE",12.904,12.767,12.727
"cacULE-run2",12.599,12.798,12.64
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",7314.832701,7222.453007,7276.297248
"cacULE",7163.188978,7432.601241,7425.259798
"cacULE-run2",7490.184852,7459.7527,7527.54758
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",34.181,34.618,34.362
"cacULE",34.906,33.639,33.672
"cacULE-run2",33.381,33.517,33.215
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",539.461051,537.55442,538.728177
"cacULE",522.41949,517.310895,520.106027
"cacULE-run2",522.200331,520.475357,519.663851
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",92.694,93.023,92.82
"cacULE",95.717,96.663,96.144
"cacULE-run2",95.758,96.075,96.225
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",4544.301175,4531.640484,4545.590423
"cacULE",4584.024324,4622.98629,4676.139729
"cacULE-run2",4697.68281,4659.888786,4625.205319
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",0.22,0.221,0.22
"cacULE",0.218,0.216,0.214
"cacULE-run2",0.213,0.215,0.216
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",395.255528,397.932245,394.936067
"cacULE",370.304333,367.88183,369.55613
"cacULE-run2",372.286237,370.476376,372.684176
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",253.03,251.33,253.236
"cacULE",270.078,271.855,270.623
"cacULE-run2",268.636,269.951,268.352
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",221.583298,216.7629,219.511831
"cacULE",202.564442,198.718426,198.137885
"cacULE-run2",189.698162,201.645272,202.729627,204.457452,206.547911,201.014037,201.976217,201.585165
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",1128.363,1153.469,1139.041
"cacULE",1234.315,1258.203,1261.889
"cacULE-run2",1318.023,1239.926,1233.301,1222.871,1210.503,1243.83,1237.906,1240.309
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",692.892069,686.562726,695.226099
"cacULE",708.411037,708.74152,704.353874
"cacULE-run2",703.227149,701.123304,710.124283
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",1.443,1.457,1.438
"cacULE",1.412,1.411,1.42
"cacULE-run2",1.422,1.426,1.408
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",7091.028771,7098.745249,7064.300983
"cacULE",6741.481393,6794.688141,6492.151556
"cacULE-run2",6659.818689,6538.050665,6628.154264
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",7.052,7.044,7.079
"cacULE",7.418,7.359,7.702
"cacULE-run2",7.508,7.648,7.544
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",6180.626164,6040.653481,6158.363147
"cacULE",6114.785786,6105.091322,6026.363278
"cacULE-run2",6161.224686,6105.741097,6130.287977
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",16.182,16.557,16.24
"cacULE",16.356,16.381,16.596
"cacULE-run2",16.232,16.38,16.314
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",5797.13142,5745.739236,5801.145584
"cacULE",5867.918183,5835.162151,5853.006035
"cacULE-run2",5873.619219,5818.792301,5842.304961
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",43.13,43.516,43.1
"cacULE",42.61,42.848,42.718
"cacULE-run2",42.568,42.969,42.796
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",1285.624244,1273.182639,1284.453114
"cacULE",1463.365345,1467.653007,1449.030397
"cacULE-run2",1463.524863,1465.04399,1464.789559
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",38.896,39.275,38.931
"cacULE",34.171,34.071,34.509
"cacULE-run2",34.167,34.132,34.138
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",1191.501943,1190.143147,1189.389322
"cacULE",1282.489266,1277.244282,1286.839631
"cacULE-run2",1286.714339,1288.591958,1288.819463
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",83.937,84.033,84.086
"cacULE",77.982,78.302,77.718
"cacULE-run2",77.726,77.612,77.599
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",991.786901,994.694183,997.339125
"cacULE",1013.810706,1012.09284,1013.859141
"cacULE-run2",1016.244497,1017.031166,1016.516361
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",252.098,251.36,250.697
"cacULE",246.621,247.038,246.61
"cacULE-run2",246.029,245.839,245.965
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"cacULE-run2",5403.112,5392.881,5392.788