2021Aug30-8G-tmpfs

ARMv8 Cortex-A72 testing on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2108307-TJ-2021AUG3071
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
CFS
August 29 2021
  10 Hours, 51 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


2021Aug30-8G-tmpfs, "Primesieve 7.4 - 1e12 Prime Number Generation", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",505.79,566.745,504.514,575.178,513.21,653.333 "7-Zip Compression 16.02 - Compress Speed Test", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",3585,3560,3595 "John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Blowfish", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",1300,1294,1296 "John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: MD5", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",30336,30421,30485 "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.10.20 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",5686.528,5683.888,5699.422 "C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",636.482,756.106,614.271,732.747,622.465,614.089,747.241,613.932,655.744 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",5589.644798,5558.936701,5618.352761 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",0.179,0.18,0.178 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",808.961806,831.183516,825.076851 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",1.236,1.203,1.212 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",9168.686018,9105.942069,9022.216666 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",5.454,5.491,5.542 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",8119.412279,8106.329534,7997.279602 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",12.318,12.337,12.506 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",7314.832701,7222.453007,7276.297248 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",34.181,34.618,34.362 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",539.461051,537.55442,538.728177 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",92.694,93.023,92.82 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",4544.301175,4531.640484,4545.590423 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",0.22,0.221,0.22 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",395.255528,397.932245,394.936067 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",253.03,251.33,253.236 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",221.583298,216.7629,219.511831 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",1128.363,1153.469,1139.041 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",692.892069,686.562726,695.226099 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",1.443,1.457,1.438 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",7091.028771,7098.745249,7064.300983 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",7.052,7.044,7.079 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",6180.626164,6040.653481,6158.363147 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",16.182,16.557,16.24 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",5797.13142,5745.739236,5801.145584 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",43.13,43.516,43.1 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",1285.624244,1273.182639,1284.453114 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",38.896,39.275,38.931 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",1191.501943,1190.143147,1189.389322 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",83.937,84.033,84.086 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",991.786901,994.694183,997.339125 "PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "CFS",252.098,251.36,250.697 "ebizzy 0.3 - ", Higher Results Are Better "CFS",5773,5758,5771