ARMv8 Cortex-A72 testing on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2108307-TJ-2021AUG3071
2021Aug30-8G-tmpfs,
"Primesieve 7.4 - 1e12 Prime Number Generation",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",505.79,566.745,504.514,575.178,513.21,653.333
"7-Zip Compression 16.02 - Compress Speed Test",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",3585,3560,3595
"John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Blowfish",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",1300,1294,1296
"John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: MD5",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",30336,30421,30485
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.10.20 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",5686.528,5683.888,5699.422
"C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",636.482,756.106,614.271,732.747,622.465,614.089,747.241,613.932,655.744
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",5589.644798,5558.936701,5618.352761
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",0.179,0.18,0.178
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",808.961806,831.183516,825.076851
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",1.236,1.203,1.212
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",9168.686018,9105.942069,9022.216666
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",5.454,5.491,5.542
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",8119.412279,8106.329534,7997.279602
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",12.318,12.337,12.506
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",7314.832701,7222.453007,7276.297248
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",34.181,34.618,34.362
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",539.461051,537.55442,538.728177
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",92.694,93.023,92.82
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",4544.301175,4531.640484,4545.590423
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",0.22,0.221,0.22
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",395.255528,397.932245,394.936067
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",253.03,251.33,253.236
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",221.583298,216.7629,219.511831
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",1128.363,1153.469,1139.041
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",692.892069,686.562726,695.226099
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",1.443,1.457,1.438
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",7091.028771,7098.745249,7064.300983
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",7.052,7.044,7.079
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",6180.626164,6040.653481,6158.363147
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",16.182,16.557,16.24
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",5797.13142,5745.739236,5801.145584
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",43.13,43.516,43.1
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",1285.624244,1273.182639,1284.453114
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",38.896,39.275,38.931
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",1191.501943,1190.143147,1189.389322
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",83.937,84.033,84.086
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",991.786901,994.694183,997.339125
"PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 - Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency",
Lower Results Are Better
"CFS",252.098,251.36,250.697
"ebizzy 0.3 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"CFS",5773,5758,5771