Intel Core i9-7980XE testing with a ASRock X299E-ITX/ac (P1.60 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2107068-IB-SS480160652
ss4,
"Hackbench - Count: 16 - Type: Thread",
Lower Results Are Better
"hackbench-i9Ph10",85.688,81.992,92.936,81.463,87.144,81.806,96.88,80.827,87.82,96.32,86.814,82.978,86.635,87.143,88.752
"Hackbench - Count: 16 - Type: Process",
Lower Results Are Better
"hackbench-i9Ph10",94.44,78.537,80.706,87.912,77.703,78.158,75.456,84.065,79.304,77.3,76.707,77.114,75.368,78.848,82.924
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: CPU Cache",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",35.43,39.13,38.89,39.63,35.86,41.03,39.02,39.33,38.89,39.56,39.36,37.13,41.99,41.42,41.89
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: System V Message Passing",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",2882542.94,2787205.8,2745273.86,2975646.57,2950083.51,2958780.83,2982745.87,2913846.14,3010986.37,2925549.08,2707303.34,2954584.82,2947237.23,2906042.02,2925717.1
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Socket Activity",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",5586.24,4953.82,3853.42,5067.71,5106.12,4945.02,5059.6,4094.85,5316.12,3734.78,4707.58,4050.1,5158.64,4865.89,5129.93
"CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"cachebench-19Ph10",48313.01526,48327.990704,48328.726124
"CacheBench - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"cachebench-19Ph10",29732.899254,29729.800761,29718.647522
"CacheBench - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"cachebench-19Ph10",3549.493727,3549.822828,3549.775138
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Rotate",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-i9Ph10",777,743,736,775,760
"Sysbench 1.0.20 - Test: CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"sysbench-i9Ph10",12522.27,12514.62,12525.22
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",4018.02,4014.04,4015.46
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",4018.79,4015.95,4015.98
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",4018.99,4014.66,4014.56
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",2527.84,2531.33,2528.87
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",2531.15,2525.49,2529.06
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",2530.85,2529.02,2531.79
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-i9Ph10",29872.01,29900.92,29869.58
"ramspeed-i9Ph10-2",29836.78,29726.13,29810.3
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: EP.D",
Higher Results Are Better
"npb-i9Ph10",2072.48,2091.28,2052.37
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: MMAP",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",284.37,284.78,284.65
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-i9Ph10-2",28576.82,28452.41,28448.53
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-i9Ph10-2",28935.9,28914.27,28867.15
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-i9Ph10-2",28905.51,29429.09,29285.6
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-i9Ph10",29412.51,29402.97,29411.77
"ramspeed-i9Ph10-2",28997.38,28973.6,29024.07
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Enhanced",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-i9Ph10",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Noise-Gaussian",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-i9Ph10",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Sharpen",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-i9Ph10",78,77,77
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Context Switching",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",2141475.29,2214967.06,2265042.26,2137123.39,2134154.23,2167567.24
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Resizing",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-i9Ph10",580,581,582
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Swirl",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-i9Ph10",
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: HWB Color Space",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-i9Ph10",712,713,709
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-i9Ph10",28940.62,28987.67,28920.24
"ramspeed-i9Ph10-2",28965.22,28956.76,28926.83
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",22.1269,20.91,21.5627,23.1321,22.4194,21.6011,22.9318,21.0941,22.0195,22.6241,23.075,22.4175,22.8003,21.345,21.0487
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",30.4318,29.1115,28.2683,28.3932,30.05,29.089,30.2237,30.6145,30.9888,29.8043,28.6108,29.1037,27.9142,30.3301,29.7526
"Sysbench 1.0.20 - Test: RAM / Memory",
Higher Results Are Better
"sysbench-i9Ph10",12656.23,12676.9,12538.08
"Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 - Static Web Page Serving",
Higher Results Are Better
"apache-i9Ph10",23553.19,23583.68,23615.58
"perf-bench - Benchmark: Sched Pipe",
Higher Results Are Better
"perf-bench-i9Ph10",128322,128596,131016
"NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: EP.C",
Higher Results Are Better
"npb-i9Ph10",1487.84,1503.72,1602.22,1525.21,1668.09,1475.55,1480.65,1488.96,1498.82,1486.25,1434.01,1458.69,1507.41,1503.81,1474.82
"perf-bench - Benchmark: Epoll Wait",
Higher Results Are Better
"perf-bench-i9Ph10",12543,12830,12695
"perf-bench - Benchmark: Syscall Basic",
Higher Results Are Better
"perf-bench-i9Ph10",3222689,3225178,3227193
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: RdRand",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",184604.78,184582.42,184869.48
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: NUMA",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",159.79,160.27,158.72
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: CPU Stress",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",3346.04,3382.03,3367.38
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",94.83,94.33,94.96
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Vector Math",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",45153,45174.41,45169.92
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: SENDFILE",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",83368.13,83393.27,83417.06
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Crypto",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",1271.87,1273.07,1270.34
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Atomic",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",204840.25,202426.66,202451.22
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Glibc C String Functions",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",769141.53,769558.93,768910.72
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Memory Copying",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",5955.94,5957.86,5961.18
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: MEMFD",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",1018.22,1023.07,1022.19
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Matrix Math",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",32127.16,32085.17,32031.73
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Malloc",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",79485317.03,79922408.27,79090726.01
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Forking",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",48934.08,48449.99,48835.01
"Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Semaphores",
Higher Results Are Better
"stress-ng-19Ph10",2678282.53,2676276.43,2677475.49
"perf-bench - Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi",
Higher Results Are Better
"perf-bench-i9Ph10",208,208,210
"perf-bench - Benchmark: Futex Hash",
Higher Results Are Better
"perf-bench-i9Ph10",1345429,1344233,1343345
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark-i9Ph10",666.71,667.99,667.62
"IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128",
Higher Results Are Better
"ipc-benchmark-i9Ph10",1724964,1850190,1637523,1547907,1898709,1534196,1637015,1671495,1676561,1863363,1796564,1793380,1838453,1754632,1827490
"Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"amg-i9Ph10",421861800,421917700,421211800
"perf-bench - Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB",
Higher Results Are Better
"perf-bench-i9Ph10",20.037362,19.150406,19.465053
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",31.2269,31.2126,31.2369
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",10.2695,10.3352,10.2047
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",3.32931,3.32776,3.32574
"OpenSSL 1.1.1 - RSA 4096-bit Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"openssl-i9Ph10",1776.5,1778,1786.6
"perf-bench - Benchmark: Memset 1MB",
Higher Results Are Better
"perf-bench-i9Ph10",65.683142,63.9766,62.201433,61.723411,64.220577,63.307828
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",29.8589,29.3837,30.4403
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",15.3223,15.3373,15.3475
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",3.19931,3.20196,3.1934
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",2.54746,2.5441,2.53626
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",5.44448,5.43404,5.43598
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",1.85751,1.86095,1.85612
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",60.4494,60.9975,59.095
"IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024",
Higher Results Are Better
"ipc-benchmark-i9Ph10",983249,980993,981798
"IPC_benchmark - Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024",
Higher Results Are Better
"ipc-benchmark-i9Ph10",1245117,1220630,1228537
"IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128",
Higher Results Are Better
"ipc-benchmark-i9Ph10",1102082,1098594,1102750
"IPC_benchmark - Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128",
Higher Results Are Better
"ipc-benchmark-i9Ph10",1618183,1617094,1620884
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",9.38673,9.38234,9.38605
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",8.69152,8.6917,8.69368
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",22.1685,22.1807,22.2005
"IPC_benchmark - Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024",
Higher Results Are Better
"ipc-benchmark-i9Ph10",1486417,1552686,1548035
"IPC_benchmark - Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024",
Higher Results Are Better
"ipc-benchmark-i9Ph10",1535599,1551572,1554146
"IPC_benchmark - Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128",
Higher Results Are Better
"ipc-benchmark-i9Ph10",1849017,1762684,1788624
"ctx_clock - Context Switch Time",
Lower Results Are Better
"ctx-clock-i9Ph10",
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",26.6797,26.7916,26.7571
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",6.22164,6.23688,6.21412
"oneDNN 2.1.2 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-i9Ph10",3.75238,3.79999,3.71616
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark-i9Ph10",1186.97,1187.39,1186.99
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark-i9Ph10",937.58,939.65,939.08
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark-i9Ph10",759.32,760.56,759.57
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark-i9Ph10",304.52,307.24,307.36
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark-i9Ph10",145.17,145.14,145.11