Intel Xeon Gold 6226R testing with a Supermicro X11SPL-F v1.02 (3.1 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2101245-HA-XEONGOLDW20
Xeon Gold Weekend
Intel Xeon Gold 6226R testing with a Supermicro X11SPL-F v1.02 (3.1 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
1:
Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 6226R @ 3.90GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPL-F v1.02 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I210
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200921-generic (x86_64) 20200920, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
2:
Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 6226R @ 3.90GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPL-F v1.02 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I210
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200921-generic (x86_64) 20200920, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
3:
Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 6226R @ 3.90GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPL-F v1.02 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I210
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200921-generic (x86_64) 20200920, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 39 |=======================================================================
2 . 39 |=======================================================================
3 . 39 |=======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 104 |======================================================================
2 . 104 |======================================================================
3 . 104 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 461 |======================================================================
2 . 460 |======================================================================
3 . 460 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1608 |=====================================================================
2 . 1607 |=====================================================================
3 . 1611 |=====================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 79 |=======================================================================
2 . 78 |======================================================================
3 . 79 |=======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1603 |=====================================================================
2 . 1604 |=====================================================================
3 . 1604 |=====================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 99 |=====================================================================
2 . 98 |=====================================================================
3 . 100 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 431 |======================================================================
2 . 431 |======================================================================
3 . 431 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 409 |======================================================================
2 . 407 |=====================================================================
3 . 410 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 566 |======================================================================
2 . 566 |======================================================================
3 . 566 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 176 |======================================================================
2 . 176 |======================================================================
3 . 176 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 652 |======================================================================
2 . 652 |======================================================================
3 . 652 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 199 |======================================================================
2 . 199 |======================================================================
3 . 199 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1083 |=====================================================================
2 . 1083 |=====================================================================
3 . 1083 |=====================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: DXT1
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1256.17 |==================================================================
2 . 1256.48 |==================================================================
3 . 1255.52 |==================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC1
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 306.88 |===================================================================
2 . 303.14 |==================================================================
3 . 308.19 |===================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC2
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 169.82 |===================================================================
2 . 170.22 |===================================================================
3 . 170.51 |===================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 283.45 |==================================================================
2 . 285.52 |===================================================================
3 . 287.35 |===================================================================
Google SynthMark 20201109
Test: VoiceMark_100
Voices > Higher Is Better
1 . 562.51 |===================================================================
2 . 563.38 |===================================================================
3 . 561.59 |===================================================================
Gcrypt Library 1.9
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 230.51 |===================================================================
2 . 231.10 |===================================================================
3 . 230.60 |===================================================================
QuantLib 1.21
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 2209.4 |===================================================================
2 . 2200.3 |===================================================================
3 . 2202.0 |===================================================================
RELION 3.1.1
Test: Basic - Device: CPU
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1249.33 |==================================================================
2 . 1245.32 |==================================================================
3 . 1238.75 |=================================================================
CloverLeaf
Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 45.83 |====================================================================
2 . 45.73 |====================================================================
3 . 45.73 |====================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 509 |======================================================================
2 . 511 |======================================================================
3 . 506 |=====================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 635 |======================================================================
2 . 636 |======================================================================
3 . 620 |====================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 130 |=====================================================================
2 . 131 |======================================================================
3 . 131 |======================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 7697 |=====================================================================
2 . 7688 |=====================================================================
3 . 7668 |=====================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 5788 |=================================================================
2 . 5947 |==================================================================
3 . 6176 |=====================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: BT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 46844.41 |=================================================================
2 . 47154.78 |=================================================================
3 . 47008.86 |=================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: CG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 11659.45 |=============================================================
2 . 11687.51 |=============================================================
3 . 12426.57 |=================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1508.72 |================================================================
2 . 1505.76 |===============================================================
3 . 1566.00 |==================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1850.52 |===============================================================
2 . 1788.49 |=============================================================
3 . 1938.05 |==================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: FT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 26314.36 |=================================================================
2 . 25803.94 |================================================================
3 . 25971.90 |================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: IS.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1418.74 |================================================================
2 . 1442.06 |=================================================================
3 . 1459.23 |==================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: LU.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 48539.47 |=================================================================
2 . 48085.57 |================================================================
3 . 48836.07 |=================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: MG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 26730.05 |===============================================================
2 . 26986.50 |===============================================================
3 . 27670.58 |=================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 20127.16 |================================================================
2 . 20173.98 |================================================================
3 . 20498.64 |=================================================================
QMCPACK 3.10
Input: simple-H2O
Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 55.04 |===================================================================
2 . 55.99 |====================================================================
3 . 56.27 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Magi
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 376.17 |==================================================================
2 . 381.78 |===================================================================
3 . 379.08 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: x25x
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 484.56 |===================================================================
2 . 471.95 |=================================================================
3 . 482.66 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Deepcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 13557 |====================================================================
2 . 13517 |====================================================================
3 . 13000 |=================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Ringcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 2826.13 |==================================================================
2 . 2624.28 |=============================================================
3 . 2756.73 |================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Blake-2 S
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 682701 |===================================================================
2 . 648007 |================================================================
3 . 674335 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Garlicoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 6345.86 |==================================================================
2 . 6289.09 |=================================================================
3 . 6287.71 |=================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Skeincoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 154083 |===================================================================
2 . 152283 |==================================================================
3 . 142930 |==============================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 13840 |===================================================================
2 . 13707 |===================================================================
3 . 13955 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 94847 |===================================================================
2 . 94405 |===================================================================
3 . 95738 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 109393 |==================================================================
2 . 110870 |===================================================================
3 . 102307 |==============================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 205558 |===================================================================
2 . 189637 |==============================================================
3 . 195802 |================================================================
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 104.80 |===================================================================
2 . 105.05 |===================================================================
3 . 105.45 |===================================================================
FinanceBench 2016-07-25
Benchmark: Repo OpenMP
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 52319.10 |================================================================
2 . 52456.92 |================================================================
3 . 52960.25 |=================================================================
FinanceBench 2016-07-25
Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 92868.07 |================================================================
2 . 94292.10 |=================================================================
3 . 92908.94 |================================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 2313006.91 |===============================================================
2 . 1599875.00 |============================================
3 . 1600325.79 |============================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1919267.04 |===============================================================
2 . 1906942.77 |===============================================================
3 . 1915277.54 |===============================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1498024.71 |==============================================================
2 . 1528246.50 |===============================================================
3 . 1500356.00 |==============================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 2238423.92 |===============================================================
2 . 2050163.46 |==========================================================
3 . 2148268.17 |============================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1701384.46 |=============================================================
2 . 1765064.67 |===============================================================
3 . 1741171.25 |==============================================================
GnuPG 2.2.27
2.7GB Sample File Encryption
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 77.72 |====================================================================
2 . 77.44 |====================================================================
3 . 77.43 |====================================================================