AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core testing with a Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2101232-HA-EPYC7F52W33
EPYC 7F52 Weekend
AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core testing with a Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
1:
Processor: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.10.3-051003-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
2:
Processor: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.10.3-051003-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
3:
Processor: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.10.3-051003-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Magi
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 834.50 |===================================================================
2 . 834.73 |===================================================================
3 . 834.13 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: x25x
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 529.63 |===================================================================
2 . 532.07 |===================================================================
3 . 531.57 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Deepcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 14710 |====================================================================
2 . 14533 |===================================================================
3 . 14343 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Ringcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 2226.54 |==================================================================
2 . 2224.47 |==================================================================
3 . 2232.93 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Blake-2 S
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 555593 |===================================================================
2 . 553680 |===================================================================
3 . 532650 |================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Garlicoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 3561.12 |==================================================================
2 . 3581.84 |==================================================================
3 . 3557.62 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Skeincoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 125147 |===================================================================
2 . 126070 |===================================================================
3 . 125807 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 19561.50 |=================================================================
2 . 14408.49 |================================================
3 . 15840.18 |=====================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 46290 |===================================================================
2 . 46673 |===================================================================
3 . 47293 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 100563 |===================================================================
2 . 100697 |===================================================================
3 . 99417 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 133183 |===================================================================
2 . 133213 |===================================================================
3 . 132467 |===================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: DXT1
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1186.40 |==================================================================
2 . 1185.72 |==================================================================
3 . 1189.08 |==================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC1
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 271.93 |===================================================================
2 . 271.78 |===================================================================
3 . 272.00 |===================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC2
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 160.12 |===================================================================
2 . 160.12 |===================================================================
3 . 160.07 |===================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 257.21 |===================================================================
2 . 257.12 |===================================================================
3 . 257.05 |===================================================================
FinanceBench 2016-07-25
Benchmark: Repo OpenMP
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 44212.69 |=================================================================
2 . 44469.53 |=================================================================
3 . 44145.30 |=================================================================
FinanceBench 2016-07-25
Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 75330.26 |================================================================
2 . 74841.87 |================================================================
3 . 75991.29 |=================================================================
Gcrypt Library 1.9
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 224.16 |===================================================================
2 . 223.60 |===================================================================
3 . 224.01 |===================================================================
GnuPG 2.2.27
2.7GB Sample File Encryption
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 73.17 |====================================================================
2 . 72.90 |====================================================================
3 . 72.89 |====================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 38 |=======================================================================
2 . 38 |=======================================================================
3 . 38 |=======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 117 |======================================================================
2 . 116 |=====================================================================
3 . 117 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 513 |======================================================================
2 . 512 |======================================================================
3 . 512 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1556 |=====================================================================
2 . 1557 |=====================================================================
3 . 1555 |=====================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 97 |======================================================================
2 . 97 |======================================================================
3 . 98 |=======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1740 |=====================================================================
2 . 1739 |=====================================================================
3 . 1738 |=====================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 106 |======================================================================
2 . 106 |======================================================================
3 . 106 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 454 |======================================================================
2 . 455 |======================================================================
3 . 454 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 486 |======================================================================
2 . 488 |======================================================================
3 . 487 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 563 |======================================================================
2 . 563 |======================================================================
3 . 564 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 194 |======================================================================
2 . 193 |======================================================================
3 . 193 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 670 |======================================================================
2 . 669 |======================================================================
3 . 670 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 240 |======================================================================
2 . 239 |======================================================================
3 . 239 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1126 |=====================================================================
2 . 1126 |=====================================================================
3 . 1125 |=====================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: BT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 74244.18 |=================================================================
2 . 74409.14 |=================================================================
3 . 74392.62 |=================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: CG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 17362.66 |================================================================
2 . 17290.04 |================================================================
3 . 17678.30 |=================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1406.82 |==================================================================
2 . 1406.37 |==================================================================
3 . 1398.91 |==================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1412.71 |==================================================================
2 . 1412.62 |==================================================================
3 . 1413.20 |==================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: FT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 36835.15 |=================================================================
2 . 36845.54 |=================================================================
3 . 36810.96 |=================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: IS.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1596.44 |==================================================================
2 . 1595.17 |==================================================================
3 . 1595.74 |==================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: LU.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 66210.72 |================================================================
2 . 67598.46 |=================================================================
3 . 67655.54 |=================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: MG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 46933.86 |=================================================================
2 . 46981.16 |=================================================================
3 . 46951.91 |=================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 60930.18 |=================================================================
2 . 60521.16 |=================================================================
3 . 59747.78 |================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 269 |===================================================================
2 . 278 |=====================================================================
3 . 282 |======================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 476 |============================================================
2 . 555 |======================================================================
3 . 545 |=====================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 79 |=======================================================================
2 . 79 |=======================================================================
3 . 79 |=======================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 9782 |=====================================================================
2 . 9790 |=====================================================================
3 . 9775 |=====================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 4919 |===================================================================
2 . 4945 |===================================================================
3 . 5103 |=====================================================================
QMCPACK 3.10
Input: simple-H2O
Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 26.94 |===================================================================
2 . 27.31 |====================================================================
3 . 26.85 |===================================================================
QuantLib 1.21
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 2322.3 |===================================================================
2 . 2314.0 |===================================================================
3 . 2324.0 |===================================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1762023.78 |===============================================================
2 . 1189182.29 |===========================================
3 . 1165576.55 |==========================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1485937.90 |===============================================================
2 . 1472079.42 |==============================================================
3 . 1495629.17 |===============================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1161192.96 |===============================================================
2 . 1145456.96 |==============================================================
3 . 1134796.29 |==============================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1614743.50 |===============================================================
2 . 1593488.17 |==============================================================
3 . 1563673.46 |=============================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1314077.04 |===============================================================
2 . 1293523.87 |==============================================================
3 . 1296106.71 |==============================================================