n2z_test Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 testing with a Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM (2.0a BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 on RedHatEnterpriseWorkstation 6.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2012171-HA-N2ZTEST7487&grs .
n2z_test Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution n1z_test Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads) Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM (2.0a BIOS) Intel Xeon E3-1200 v2/Ivy 32GB 256GB Samsung SSD 840 Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 Intel 82579LM + Intel 82574L RedHatEnterpriseWorkstation 6.10 2.6.32-754.23.1.el6.x86_64 (x86_64) X Server 1.17.4 modesetting 1.17.4 2.1 Mesa 10.4.3 GCC 4.4.7 20120313 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org - LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=/usr/caen/matlab-2016a/local/usr/lib64/dri - --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-dssi --disable-libjava-multilib --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-java-maintainer-mode --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada --enable-libgcj-multifile --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=i686 --with-cloog --with-ppl --with-tune=generic - Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand - CPU Microcode: 33 - Java SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_25-b17) - Python 3.7.0
n2z_test git: Time To Complete Common Git Commands phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite nginx: Static Web Page Serving hint: FLOAT pybench: Total For Average Test Times system-libxml2: 950 KB system-libxml2: 900 KB system-libxml2: 850 KB system-libxml2: 800 KB system-libxml2: 750 KB system-libxml2: 700 KB system-libxml2: 650 KB system-libxml2: 600 KB system-libxml2: 550 KB system-libxml2: 500 KB system-libxml2: 450 KB system-libxml2: 400 KB system-libxml2: 350 KB system-libxml2: 300 KB system-libxml2: 250 KB system-libxml2: 200 KB system-libxml2: 150 KB system-libxml2: 112 MB system-libxml2: 100 KB system-libxml2: 50 KB system-libxml2: 5 KB system-libxml2: 3 MB system-libxml2: 2 MB system-libxml2: 1 MB sudokut: Total Time gnupg: 2GB File Encryption encode-mp3: WAV To MP3 encode-flac: WAV To FLAC dcraw: RAW To PPM Image Conversion compress-gzip: Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz numpy: node-octane: swet: Average scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform scimark2: Monte Carlo scimark2: Composite luajit: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation luajit: Dense LU Matrix Factorization luajit: Sparse Matrix Multiply luajit: Fast Fourier Transform luajit: Monte Carlo luajit: Composite cachebench: Read / Modify / Write cachebench: Write cachebench: Read byte: Dhrystone 2 fhourstones: Complex Connect-4 Solving bork: File Encryption Time java-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation java-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization java-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply java-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform java-scimark2: Monte Carlo java-scimark2: Composite blake2: polyhedron: mp_prop_design polyhedron: test_fpu2 polyhedron: gas_dyn2 polyhedron: fatigue2 polyhedron: channel2 polyhedron: capacita polyhedron: protein polyhedron: induct2 polyhedron: rnflow polyhedron: aermod polyhedron: tfft2 polyhedron: linpk polyhedron: doduc polyhedron: mdbx polyhedron: air polyhedron: ac polybench-c: 3 Matrix Multiplications polybench-c: Correlation Computation polybench-c: Covariance Computation n1z_test 6.272 116706 20065.80 290683585.39931 1581 530 519 717 444 425 381 367 514 307 433 253 349 194 177 135 117 81 81244 96 26 4 2628 1761 575 22.297 17.010 36.364 14.855 56.267 45.245 211.74 15397 687840353 1124.41 807.27 596.50 159.83 123.34 562.27 1627.89 2159.91 1091.51 278.11 438.35 1119.16 26339.408978095 13689.588654619 3219.10 27961854.7 13141.8 10.085 1601.13 4186.52 1673.85 1172.39 896.93 1906.17 5.12 98.44 51.39 77.4 98.46 79.5 17.39 21.01 52.01 15.3 16.33 49.13 4.55 15.19 7.17 2.68 6.11 5.377 3.095 2.903 OpenBenchmarking.org
Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands n1z_test 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.024, N = 3 6.272
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite n1z_test 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1007.09, N = 3 116706
NGINX Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving n1z_test 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 250.55, N = 15 20065.80
Hierarchical INTegration Test: FLOAT OpenBenchmarking.org QUIPs, More Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT n1z_test 60M 120M 180M 240M 300M SE +/- 19356.99, N = 3 290683585.40
PyBench Total For Average Test Times OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times n1z_test 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 4.33, N = 3 1581
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 950 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 950 KB n1z_test 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 530
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 900 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 900 KB n1z_test 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 519
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 850 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 850 KB n1z_test 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 717
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 800 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 800 KB n1z_test 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 444
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 750 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 750 KB n1z_test 90 180 270 360 450 425
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 700 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 700 KB n1z_test 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 381
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 650 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 650 KB n1z_test 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 367
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 600 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 600 KB n1z_test 110 220 330 440 550 514
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 550 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 550 KB n1z_test 70 140 210 280 350 307
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 500 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 500 KB n1z_test 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 433
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 450 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 450 KB n1z_test 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 253
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 400 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 400 KB n1z_test 80 160 240 320 400 349
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 350 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 350 KB n1z_test 40 80 120 160 200 194
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 300 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 300 KB n1z_test 40 80 120 160 200 177
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 250 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 250 KB n1z_test 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 135
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 200 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 200 KB n1z_test 30 60 90 120 150 117
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 150 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 150 KB n1z_test 20 40 60 80 100 81
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 112 MB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 112 MB n1z_test 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 116.76, N = 3 81244
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 100 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 100 KB n1z_test 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 96
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 50 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 50 KB n1z_test 6 12 18 24 30 26
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 5 KB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 5 KB n1z_test 0.9 1.8 2.7 3.6 4.5 4
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 3 MB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 3 MB n1z_test 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 5.84, N = 3 2628
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 2 MB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 2 MB n1z_test 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.48, N = 3 1761
System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 1 MB OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 1 MB n1z_test 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 575
Sudokut Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Sudokut 0.4 Total Time n1z_test 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.27, N = 4 22.30
GnuPG 2GB File Encryption OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GnuPG 1.4.22 2GB File Encryption n1z_test 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 17.01
LAME MP3 Encoding WAV To MP3 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 n1z_test 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 36.36
FLAC Audio Encoding WAV To FLAC OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC n1z_test 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 5 14.86
dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion n1z_test 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 56.27
Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz n1z_test 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.34, N = 15 45.25
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark n1z_test 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.28, N = 3 211.74
Node.js Octane Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Node.js Octane Benchmark n1z_test 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 48.52, N = 3 15397 1. Nodejs
Swet Average OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Average n1z_test 150M 300M 450M 600M 750M SE +/- 263037.04, N = 3 687840353
SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation n1z_test 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.74, N = 3 1124.41
SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization n1z_test 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 807.27
SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply n1z_test 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 596.50
SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform n1z_test 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 159.83
SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo n1z_test 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.82, N = 3 123.34
SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite n1z_test 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 562.27
LuaJIT Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation n1z_test 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 1.44, N = 3 1627.89
LuaJIT Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization n1z_test 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 27.00, N = 3 2159.91
LuaJIT Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply n1z_test 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 10.89, N = 3 1091.51
LuaJIT Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform n1z_test 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.80, N = 3 278.11
LuaJIT Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo n1z_test 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 4.55, N = 3 438.35
LuaJIT Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite n1z_test 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 8.35, N = 3 1119.16
CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write n1z_test 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 208.86, N = 3 26339.41 MIN: 22396.53 / MAX: 28324.88
CacheBench Test: Write OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Write n1z_test 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 5.40, N = 3 13689.59 MIN: 11906.3 / MAX: 14450.07
CacheBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Read n1z_test 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 3219.10 MIN: 3216.45 / MAX: 3220.31
BYTE Unix Benchmark Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 OpenBenchmarking.org LPS, More Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 n1z_test 6M 12M 18M 24M 30M SE +/- 5852.37, N = 3 27961854.7
Fhourstones Complex Connect-4 Solving OpenBenchmarking.org Kpos / sec, More Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving n1z_test 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 5.19, N = 3 13141.8
Bork File Encrypter File Encryption Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time n1z_test 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.11, N = 5 10.09
Java SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation n1z_test 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.27, N = 4 1601.13
Java SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization n1z_test 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 23.24, N = 4 4186.52
Java SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply n1z_test 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.01, N = 4 1673.85
Java SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform n1z_test 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 5.86, N = 4 1172.39
Java SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo n1z_test 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.09, N = 4 896.93
Java SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite n1z_test 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 5.10, N = 4 1906.17
BLAKE2 OpenBenchmarking.org Cycles Per Byte, Fewer Is Better BLAKE2 20170307 n1z_test 1.152 2.304 3.456 4.608 5.76 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.12
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design n1z_test 20 40 60 80 100 98.44
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 n1z_test 12 24 36 48 60 51.39
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 n1z_test 20 40 60 80 100 77.4
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 n1z_test 20 40 60 80 100 98.46
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 n1z_test 20 40 60 80 100 79.5
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: capacita OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: capacita n1z_test 4 8 12 16 20 17.39
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein n1z_test 5 10 15 20 25 21.01
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 n1z_test 12 24 36 48 60 52.01
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow n1z_test 4 8 12 16 20 15.3
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod n1z_test 4 8 12 16 20 16.33
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: tfft2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: tfft2 n1z_test 11 22 33 44 55 49.13
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk n1z_test 1.0238 2.0476 3.0714 4.0952 5.119 4.55
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc n1z_test 4 8 12 16 20 15.19
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx n1z_test 2 4 6 8 10 7.17
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air n1z_test 0.603 1.206 1.809 2.412 3.015 2.68
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac n1z_test 2 4 6 8 10 6.11
PolyBench-C Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications n1z_test 1.2098 2.4196 3.6294 4.8392 6.049 SE +/- 0.101, N = 15 5.377
PolyBench-C Test: Correlation Computation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation n1z_test 0.6964 1.3928 2.0892 2.7856 3.482 SE +/- 0.087, N = 15 3.095
PolyBench-C Test: Covariance Computation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation n1z_test 0.6532 1.3064 1.9596 2.6128 3.266 SE +/- 0.092, N = 15 2.903
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4