AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core testing with a ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2011286-HA-EPYC7502U76
EPYC 7502 Ubuntu 20.10
AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core testing with a ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
1:
Processor: AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core @ 2.50GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I350
OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-29-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
2:
Processor: AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core @ 2.50GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I350
OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-29-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
3:
Processor: AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core @ 2.50GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I350
OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-29-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 15.20 |====================================================================
2 . 12.70 |=========================================================
3 . 13.05 |==========================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-HPL
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 129.45 |===================================================================
2 . 128.04 |==================================================================
3 . 128.01 |==================================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ffte
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 16.88 |====================================================================
2 . 16.73 |===================================================================
3 . 16.85 |====================================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-DGEMM
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 29.20 |====================================================================
2 . 24.61 |=========================================================
3 . 25.26 |===========================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ptrans
GB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 10.08310 |=================================================================
2 . 8.57863 |=======================================================
3 . 8.61834 |========================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 2.75500 |==================================================================
2 . 2.70330 |=================================================================
3 . 2.72091 |=================================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Random Access
GUP/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 0.03066 |==================================================================
2 . 0.03041 |=================================================================
3 . 0.03046 |==================================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Latency
usecs < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.46075 |==================================================================
2 . 1.43676 |=================================================================
3 . 1.45287 |==================================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 2.12322 |==================================================================
2 . 2.10604 |=================================================================
3 . 2.12362 |==================================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 8933.00 |=================================================
2 . 10853.64 |============================================================
3 . 11745.09 |=================================================================
Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 176.95 |===================================================================
2 . 177.91 |===================================================================
3 . 177.73 |===================================================================
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020
Model: Rhodopsin Protein
ns/day > Higher Is Better
1 . 15.53 |====================================================================
2 . 13.67 |============================================================
3 . 13.56 |===========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 9485.52 |==================================================================
2 . 9474.88 |==================================================================
3 . 9516.51 |==================================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 10969.7 |=================================================================
2 . 10943.6 |=================================================================
3 . 11092.9 |==================================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 45.85 |====================================================================
2 . 45.51 |===================================================================
3 . 45.23 |===================================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 10248.1 |==================================================================
2 . 10249.2 |==================================================================
3 . 10131.9 |=================================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 44.63 |===================================================================
2 . 45.07 |====================================================================
3 . 44.67 |===================================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 10279.1 |==================================================================
2 . 10244.7 |==================================================================
3 . 10193.2 |=================================================================
Crafty 25.2
Elapsed Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 6743280 |==================================================================
2 . 6716153 |==================================================================
3 . 6719350 |==================================================================
rav1e 0.4 Alpha
Speed: 1
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 0.319 |====================================================================
2 . 0.316 |===================================================================
3 . 0.317 |====================================================================
rav1e 0.4 Alpha
Speed: 5
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 0.939 |====================================================================
2 . 0.931 |===================================================================
3 . 0.934 |====================================================================
rav1e 0.4 Alpha
Speed: 6
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1.254 |====================================================================
2 . 1.241 |===================================================================
3 . 1.248 |====================================================================
rav1e 0.4 Alpha
Speed: 10
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 2.699 |====================================================================
2 . 2.681 |====================================================================
3 . 2.687 |====================================================================
Stockfish 12
Total Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 59508694 |==============================================================
2 . 59967078 |===============================================================
3 . 62203405 |=================================================================
asmFish 2018-07-23
1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth
Nodes/second > Higher Is Better
1 . 77419217 |=================================================================
2 . 76320957 |================================================================
3 . 76128440 |================================================================
Numpy Benchmark
Score > Higher Is Better
1 . 296.25 |==================================================================
2 . 299.65 |===================================================================
3 . 299.96 |===================================================================
eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907
Text-To-Speech Synthesis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 35.97 |===================================================================
2 . 36.31 |====================================================================
3 . 36.20 |====================================================================
ASTC Encoder 2.0
Preset: Thorough
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 9.61 |=====================================================================
2 . 9.60 |=====================================================================
3 . 9.61 |=====================================================================
ASTC Encoder 2.0
Preset: Exhaustive
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 73.24 |====================================================================
2 . 73.17 |====================================================================
3 . 73.22 |====================================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: ETC1S
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 53.56 |====================================================================
2 . 53.64 |====================================================================
3 . 53.45 |====================================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: UASTC Level 0
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 8.324 |====================================================================
2 . 8.225 |===================================================================
3 . 8.243 |===================================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: UASTC Level 2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 16.63 |====================================================================
2 . 16.54 |====================================================================
3 . 16.53 |====================================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: UASTC Level 3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 25.77 |====================================================================
2 . 25.64 |====================================================================
3 . 25.65 |====================================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 765.14 |===================================================================
2 . 766.14 |===================================================================
3 . 765.13 |===================================================================
Darktable 3.2.1
Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 4.799 |====================================================================
2 . 4.213 |============================================================
3 . 4.275 |=============================================================
Darktable 3.2.1
Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 2.671 |====================================================================
2 . 2.662 |====================================================================
3 . 2.656 |====================================================================
Darktable 3.2.1
Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.090 |====================================================================
2 . 0.086 |=================================================================
3 . 0.086 |=================================================================
Darktable 3.2.1
Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 2.064 |====================================================================
2 . 2.060 |====================================================================
3 . 2.068 |====================================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 2060460.94 |===============================================================
2 . 1231139.82 |======================================
3 . 1587014.13 |=================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1547127.57 |===============================================================
2 . 1532225.05 |==============================================================
3 . 1554385.46 |===============================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1174620.57 |============================================================
2 . 1139195.67 |===========================================================
3 . 1226154.44 |===============================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1877683.87 |===============================================================
2 . 1711240.11 |=========================================================
3 . 1695718.20 |=========================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1340989.04 |=============================================================
2 . 1376800.91 |===============================================================
3 . 1350949.64 |==============================================================
IndigoBench 4.4
Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom
M samples/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 5.338 |====================================================================
2 . 5.351 |====================================================================
3 . 5.371 |====================================================================
IndigoBench 4.4
Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar
M samples/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 11.54 |====================================================================
2 . 11.55 |====================================================================
3 . 11.60 |====================================================================
PHPBench 0.8.1
PHP Benchmark Suite
Score > Higher Is Better
1 . 516931 |===================================================================
2 . 515230 |==================================================================
3 . 519240 |===================================================================