Linux 5.9 Frequency Scaling

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core testing with a MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2008290-SYST-LINUX5962
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Audio Encoding 2 Tests
AV1 3 Tests
Web Browsers 1 Tests
Timed Code Compilation 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 10 Tests
CPU Massive 15 Tests
Creator Workloads 15 Tests
Desktop Graphics 3 Tests
Encoding 8 Tests
Game Development 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 2 Tests
Imaging 2 Tests
Multi-Core 12 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 2 Tests
OCR 2 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 3 Tests
Python Tests 5 Tests
Renderers 3 Tests
Server CPU Tests 11 Tests
Single-Threaded 4 Tests
Video Encoding 6 Tests
Common Workstation Benchmarks 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
CPUFreq Ondemand
August 28 2020
  3 Hours, 59 Minutes
CPUFreq Powersave
August 28 2020
  5 Hours, 12 Minutes
CPUFreq Performance
August 29 2020
  4 Hours, 11 Minutes
CPUFreq Schedutil
August 29 2020
  4 Hours, 37 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  4 Hours, 30 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Linux 5.9 Frequency Scaling, "TSCP 1.81 - AI Chess Performance", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",1336839,1449415,1441827,1449415,1449415,1412251,1412251 "CPUFreq Powersave",664388,665190,667609,670862,667609 "CPUFreq Performance",1376945,1314505,1387350,1320810,1308261 "CPUFreq Schedutil",1349946,1397913,1401470,1412251,1412251 "Selenium - Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",25.8,26.7,26.5 "CPUFreq Powersave",52.5,52.6,53.3 "CPUFreq Performance",25.8,25.4,25.8 "CPUFreq Schedutil",25.3,25,25.3 "Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks - Benchmark: protein", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand", "CPUFreq Powersave", "CPUFreq Performance", "CPUFreq Schedutil", "Selenium - Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",349,361.9,358.8 "CPUFreq Powersave",715.5,715.3,723.5 "CPUFreq Performance",346.6,367.9,363,363 "CPUFreq Schedutil",357.5,339.3,338.6,365.4,345.7,339.5,352.3 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: regex_compile", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",153,152,152 "CPUFreq Powersave",310,312,311 "CPUFreq Performance",155,154,153 "CPUFreq Schedutil",155,154,153 "Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Single Core - Face Detection", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",11.8,11.1,11.9 "CPUFreq Powersave",5.7,5.73,5.73 "CPUFreq Performance",11.7,11.7,11.8 "CPUFreq Schedutil",11.5,11.5,11.4 "LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 - WAV To MP3", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",6.788,7.113,6.806 "CPUFreq Powersave",14.02,14.015,14.057 "CPUFreq Performance",7.104,6.901,7.106 "CPUFreq Schedutil",7.045,6.81,6.775 "Selenium - Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",271.5845,281.3355,265.627 "CPUFreq Powersave",555.1615,554.748,555.11 "CPUFreq Performance",278.809,282.2645,280.2125 "CPUFreq Schedutil",277.499,278.9935,264.92 "Selenium - Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",27.469,27.568,26.503 "CPUFreq Powersave",54.352,54.919,54.4515 "CPUFreq Performance",26.6045,27.754,27.732 "CPUFreq Schedutil",26.4705,27.619,27.437 "Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Single Core - Gaussian Blur", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",89.6,86.3,89.8 "CPUFreq Powersave",44,44.1,44.4 "CPUFreq Performance",88.2,89.2,88.5 "CPUFreq Schedutil",86.1,87.5,85.7 "Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Single Core - Horizon Detection", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",33.5,32.5,33.7 "CPUFreq Powersave",16.8,16.9,16.7 "CPUFreq Performance",33.5,33.6,33.8 "CPUFreq Schedutil",32.3,32.6,32.8 "Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks - Benchmark: ac", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand", "CPUFreq Powersave", "CPUFreq Performance", "CPUFreq Schedutil", "Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Single Core", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",1431,1434,1454 "CPUFreq Powersave",726,724,723 "CPUFreq Performance",1442,1448,1443 "CPUFreq Schedutil",1404,1404,1406 "FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 - WAV To FLAC", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",7.654,7.583,7.501,7.563,7.62 "CPUFreq Powersave",14.984,14.979,14.981,14.956,14.973 "CPUFreq Performance",7.499,7.536,7.504,7.481,7.62 "CPUFreq Schedutil",7.599,7.596,7.732,7.656,7.724 "PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: python_startup", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",8.05,8.03,8.18 "CPUFreq Powersave",12.6,12.6,12.6 "CPUFreq Performance",6.45,6.44,6.41 "CPUFreq Schedutil",12.6,12.5,12.5 "Selenium - Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",694.3,677.1,694.4 "CPUFreq Powersave",1283.5,1284.4,1291.5 "CPUFreq Performance",658.1,671.1,642.5 "CPUFreq Schedutil",681.2,684.5,684.8 "Selenium - Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",729.6,733.9,734.4 "CPUFreq Powersave",1351.3,1355.3,1351.3 "CPUFreq Performance",697.5,697.2,689.1 "CPUFreq Schedutil",706.4,708.5,698.4 "Selenium - Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand", "CPUFreq Powersave",54.2,55.01,54.3 "CPUFreq Performance",104,105,107.5 "CPUFreq Schedutil",100,104,101 "Selenium - Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",144,144,142 "CPUFreq Powersave",76.51,76.95,77.2 "CPUFreq Performance",148.1,148.1,148.5 "CPUFreq Schedutil", "Selenium - Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",1300,1311,1284 "CPUFreq Powersave",2361,2356,2378 "CPUFreq Performance",1239,1244,1218 "CPUFreq Schedutil",1380,1404,1388 "Selenium - Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",36.8,35.97,36.8 "CPUFreq Powersave",20.57,20.46,20.66 "CPUFreq Performance",38.9,38.9,38.2 "CPUFreq Schedutil",38.9,39.1,39.3 "OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg - Processing 60 Page PDF Document", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",21.134,20.78,20.734 "CPUFreq Powersave",39.13,38.42,38.57 "CPUFreq Performance",20.188,20.555,20.432 "CPUFreq Schedutil",20.675,20.375,20.253 "Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 - Time To OCR 7 Images", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",22.724,22.734,22.905 "CPUFreq Powersave",42.693,42.538,42.822 "CPUFreq Performance",22.313,22.809,22.516 "CPUFreq Schedutil",22.59,22.414,22.523 "VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 - Speed: Speed 0", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",7.7,7.72,7.69 "CPUFreq Powersave",4.32,4.33,4.34 "CPUFreq Performance",8.16,8.17,8.18 "CPUFreq Schedutil",8.05,8.19,8.17 "Selenium - Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",1313,1306,1309 "CPUFreq Powersave",2452,2449,2467 "CPUFreq Performance", "CPUFreq Schedutil",1347,1349,1342 "libavif avifenc 0.7.3 - Encoder Speed: 0", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",66.187,66.533,66.3 "CPUFreq Powersave",124.552,124.377,124.727 "CPUFreq Performance",65.754,66.35,66.414 "CPUFreq Schedutil",66.488,66.831,66.616 "libavif avifenc 0.7.3 - Encoder Speed: 2", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",40.007,40.67,39.857 "CPUFreq Powersave",74.721,75.212,74.843 "CPUFreq Performance",39.993,40.261,40.071 "CPUFreq Schedutil",39.742,39.685,40.191 "Hugin - Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",44.495,43.059,43.956 "CPUFreq Powersave",81.107,82.265,81.555 "CPUFreq Performance",44.001,43.445,43.389 "CPUFreq Schedutil",44.387,43.761,44.336 "libavif avifenc 0.7.3 - Encoder Speed: 10", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",4.269,4.328,4.385 "CPUFreq Powersave",8.092,8.11,8.085 "CPUFreq Performance",4.389,4.387,4.378 "CPUFreq Schedutil",4.37,4.334,4.294 "Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Multi Core - Face Detection", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",138.8,136.8,137.1 "CPUFreq Powersave",73.1,75.7,75.2 "CPUFreq Performance",138,132.4,135.1 "CPUFreq Schedutil",141.3,138.5,138.4 "libavif avifenc 0.7.3 - Encoder Speed: 8", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",4.6,4.479,4.468 "CPUFreq Powersave",8.339,8.4,8.394 "CPUFreq Performance",4.545,4.484,4.491 "CPUFreq Schedutil",4.627,4.511,4.582 "VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 - Speed: Speed 5", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",25.73,26.28,25.85 "CPUFreq Powersave",15.97,15.95,15.97 "CPUFreq Performance",29.58,29.17,29.44 "CPUFreq Schedutil",28.76,29.05,28.32 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Mobilenet Quant", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",94128.4,94341.1,94416.9 "CPUFreq Powersave",173467,173479,173469 "CPUFreq Performance",94554.1,94722.9,94907.6 "CPUFreq Schedutil",94376.5,94418.6,94407.4 "C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",41.857,41.912,41.943 "CPUFreq Powersave",76.688,76.661,76.692 "CPUFreq Performance",41.901,41.904,41.994 "CPUFreq Schedutil",41.956,42.002,41.995 "ASTC Encoder 2.0 - Preset: Thorough", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",17.51,17.53,17.51 "CPUFreq Powersave",31.95,31.95,31.95 "CPUFreq Performance",17.51,17.52,17.51 "CPUFreq Schedutil",17.48,17.48,17.47 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Inception V4", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",1944670,1957560,1958760 "CPUFreq Powersave",3561220,3563430,3562950 "CPUFreq Performance",1942770,1956570,1958450 "CPUFreq Schedutil",1939860,1952820,1955140 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Inception ResNet V2", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",1756300,1758770,1758930 "CPUFreq Powersave",3204290,3204950,3204170 "CPUFreq Performance",1755900,1758070,1758800 "CPUFreq Schedutil",1751880,1755880,1755430 "ASTC Encoder 2.0 - Preset: Exhaustive", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",138.79,138.89,138.88 "CPUFreq Powersave",252.22,252.15,252.06 "CPUFreq Performance",138.78,138.96,138.99 "CPUFreq Schedutil",138.77,138.81,138.89 "x264 2019-12-17 - H.264 Video Encoding", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",133.74,142.5,142.63,142.77,141.64 "CPUFreq Powersave",80.02,81.35,82.72 "CPUFreq Performance",140.81,148.65,148.76,150.32 "CPUFreq Schedutil",126.13,130.18,133.66 "x265 3.1.2 - H.265 1080p Video Encoding", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",61.59,62.87,62.05 "CPUFreq Powersave",38.6,38.35,38.36 "CPUFreq Performance",69.37,69.27,69.43 "CPUFreq Schedutil",43.59,44.08,43.46 "Blender 2.82 - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",108.94,108.93,108.86 "CPUFreq Powersave",196.01,195.31,195.92 "CPUFreq Performance",109.14,109.77,109.8 "CPUFreq Schedutil",108.59,109.52,108.55 "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",36.744,36.854,36.99 "CPUFreq Powersave",21.471,21.375,21.352 "CPUFreq Performance",38.141,38.136,38.218 "CPUFreq Schedutil",37.218,37.05,36.697 "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",4.56,4.52,4.535 "CPUFreq Powersave",2.594,2.599,2.593 "CPUFreq Performance",4.602,4.587,4.598 "CPUFreq Schedutil",4.562,4.555,4.557 "NAMD 2.14 - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",1.48392,1.48886,1.4888 "CPUFreq Powersave",2.6216,2.6192,2.6203 "CPUFreq Performance",1.48581,1.49779,1.49057 "CPUFreq Schedutil",1.48477,1.48571,1.48955 "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",57.153,55.937,55.592 "CPUFreq Powersave",97.727,96.757,97.833 "CPUFreq Performance",55.961,55.098,55.585 "CPUFreq Schedutil",58.15,55.845,56.762 "Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Multi Core - Gaussian Blur", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",793.5,794.4,796.1 "CPUFreq Powersave",455,455.8,455.3 "CPUFreq Performance",788,797.2,793.8 "CPUFreq Schedutil",750.8,729,745.7 "Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 - Mode: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",21558,21693,21676 "CPUFreq Powersave",12712,12605,12595 "CPUFreq Performance",21726,21594,21441 "CPUFreq Schedutil",21742,21709,21541 "Xonotic 0.8.2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Low", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",480.1378441,485.6235983,488.0581757 "CPUFreq Powersave",295.5370197,296.1342979,297.2708776 "CPUFreq Performance",506.4803967,511.0590704,504.3884939 "CPUFreq Schedutil",496.8545889,506.0886064,496.6228929 "dav1d 0.7.0 - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",537.53902210884,548.02617913832,545.25238095238 "CPUFreq Powersave",408.97250283447,408.60905895692,409.67117346939 "CPUFreq Performance",693.58828798186,696.30428287982,688.18547052154 "CPUFreq Schedutil",448.76264739229,451.45066326531,453.10711451247 "Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",433.506,441.053,440.276 "CPUFreq Powersave",706.651,715.033,714.295 "CPUFreq Performance",424.363,440.199,426.638 "CPUFreq Schedutil",423.72,422.263,423.754 "Open Porous Media - OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 12", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",303.085,303.339,303.522 "CPUFreq Powersave",507.744,507.6,509.15 "CPUFreq Performance",304.455,304.227,304.127 "CPUFreq Schedutil",304.15,304.057,304.435 "WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test - ", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",193.574,193.118,196.458 "CPUFreq Powersave",311.118,307.365,312.462 "CPUFreq Performance",187.486,187.801,191.319 "CPUFreq Schedutil",194.857,193.128,196.49 "Xonotic 0.8.2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",302.1751285,307.9696178,301.9098292 "CPUFreq Powersave",215.8401271,217.4972081,216.2722998 "CPUFreq Performance",350.4069904,355.9332437,360.8868961 "CPUFreq Schedutil",338.9537907,342.4681368,341.1662498 "Selenium - Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google Chrome", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",22134,22449,21853 "CPUFreq Powersave",13471,13635,13448 "CPUFreq Schedutil",21158,21519 "Selenium - Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",14437,12760,13725,14437,14181,14033,13834,12476,13808,12793,14009,12689 "CPUFreq Powersave",8488,8511,8435 "CPUFreq Performance",13766,13915 "Xonotic 0.8.2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",273.3347527,278.5387322,277.3647899 "CPUFreq Powersave",197.5459701,198.4623532,197.1678441 "CPUFreq Performance",318.7901346,325.8368466,323.1133845 "CPUFreq Schedutil",311.3863091,316.6304145,310.2798243 "Open Porous Media - OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 8", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",228.93,229.162,228.932 "CPUFreq Powersave",371.194,371.878,371.704 "CPUFreq Performance",229.242,228.66,229.027 "CPUFreq Schedutil",230.074,230.048,230.463 "Selenium - Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",86,84.5,85.6 "CPUFreq Powersave",63,62.3,62.2 "CPUFreq Performance",102,101,101 "CPUFreq Schedutil",78.4,79.4,80 "Xonotic 0.8.2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",239.1670714,236.6267573,236.7327654 "CPUFreq Powersave",171.3473416,172.7252225,171.6297298 "CPUFreq Performance",261.2037546,260.6430195,263.4837222 "CPUFreq Schedutil",255.3782836,256.1214604,254.8192167 "Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Multi Core", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",11379,11319,11397 "CPUFreq Powersave",7742,7729,7768 "CPUFreq Performance",11399,11374,11353 "CPUFreq Schedutil",11137,11192,11293 "dav1d 0.7.0 - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",197.91447562358,199.14526360544,198.65150793651 "CPUFreq Powersave",147.10790249433,147.73181122449,146.98085034014 "CPUFreq Performance",206.32385770975,206.47511054422,205.59626417233 "CPUFreq Schedutil",197.6731462585,198.6383361678,198.63218820862 "Selenium - Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google Chrome", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",4.2,4.4,4.3 "CPUFreq Powersave",4.7,4.7,4.6 "CPUFreq Performance",3.7,3.7,3.7 "CPUFreq Schedutil",4.8,5.2,4.6,4.7,4.7,4.6,4.7,4.2,4.8,4.6,4.5,4.6,4.8,4.6,4.7 "Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Multi Core - Horizon Detection", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",240.6,240.3,239.8 "CPUFreq Powersave",192.8,191.3,192.9 "CPUFreq Performance",242.9,242,242.7 "CPUFreq Schedutil",241.7,242,242.4 "Tesseract 2014-05-12 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",317.0625,314.4636,315.8195 "CPUFreq Powersave",277.8911,281.4059,281.8972 "CPUFreq Performance",337.0061,346.0456,339.3789 "CPUFreq Schedutil",288.3051,290.4196,296.2149 "Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks - Benchmark: linpk", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand", "CPUFreq Powersave", "CPUFreq Performance", "CPUFreq Schedutil", "Selenium - Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",4.5,4.3,4.4 "CPUFreq Powersave",4.7,4.8,4.7 "CPUFreq Performance", "CPUFreq Schedutil",4.4,4.7,4,4.8,4.8,4.8,4.8,4.9,4.7,4.7,4.8,4.8,4.4,4.8,4.6 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",149.94,152.76,147.15 "CPUFreq Powersave",148.15,148.36,148.4 "CPUFreq Performance",148.42,150.85,151.32 "CPUFreq Schedutil",155.36,148.52,147.94 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",1562.569,1591.92,1533.478 "CPUFreq Powersave",1543.874,1546.077,1546.513 "CPUFreq Performance",1546.758,1572.062,1576.943 "CPUFreq Schedutil",1619.005,1547.74,1541.724 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",3721.817,3743.761,3731.739 "CPUFreq Powersave",3747.593,3697.831,3658.908 "CPUFreq Performance",3731.169,3740.255,3743.747 "CPUFreq Schedutil",3745.517,3761.625,3769.238 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",37.12,37.34,37.22 "CPUFreq Powersave",37.38,36.88,36.5 "CPUFreq Performance",37.22,37.31,37.34 "CPUFreq Schedutil",37.36,37.52,37.6 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",2313.222,2211.577,2127.201,2062.039,2176.718,2112.019,2230.716,2099.728,2199.459,2183.139,2249.097,2321.532,2253.642,2301.793,2272.438 "CPUFreq Powersave",2193.459,2103.774,2149.472 "CPUFreq Performance",2712.15,2605.527,2635.884 "CPUFreq Schedutil",2590.934,2524.593,2180.093,2654.037,2479.083,2140.152,2642.158,2503.088,2576.032,2474.06,2378.767,2477.388,2596.414,2517.238,2329.189 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Ondemand",144.58,138.22,132.95,128.88,136.04,132,139.42,131.23,137.47,136.45,140.57,145.1,140.85,143.86,142.03 "CPUFreq Powersave",137.09,131.49,134.34 "CPUFreq Performance",169.51,162.85,164.74 "CPUFreq Schedutil",161.93,157.79,136.26,165.88,154.94,133.76,165.13,156.44,161,154.63,148.67,154.84,162.28,157.33,145.57