AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core testing with a MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2008290-SYST-LINUX5962
Linux 5.9 Frequency Scaling,
"Selenium - Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",729.6,733.9,734.4
"CPUFreq Powersave",1351.3,1355.3,1351.3
"CPUFreq Performance",697.5,697.2,689.1
"CPUFreq Schedutil",706.4,708.5,698.4
"Open Porous Media - OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 8",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",228.93,229.162,228.932
"CPUFreq Powersave",371.194,371.878,371.704
"CPUFreq Performance",229.242,228.66,229.027
"CPUFreq Schedutil",230.074,230.048,230.463
"Selenium - Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",14437,12760,13725,14437,14181,14033,13834,12476,13808,12793,14009,12689
"CPUFreq Powersave",8488,8511,8435
"CPUFreq Performance",13766,13915
"Selenium - Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",86,84.5,85.6
"CPUFreq Powersave",63,62.3,62.2
"CPUFreq Performance",102,101,101
"CPUFreq Schedutil",78.4,79.4,80
"Selenium - Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",4.5,4.3,4.4
"CPUFreq Powersave",4.7,4.8,4.7
"CPUFreq Performance",
"CPUFreq Schedutil",4.4,4.7,4,4.8,4.8,4.8,4.8,4.9,4.7,4.7,4.8,4.8,4.4,4.8,4.6
"Selenium - Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",
"CPUFreq Powersave",54.2,55.01,54.3
"CPUFreq Performance",104,105,107.5
"CPUFreq Schedutil",100,104,101
"Selenium - Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",694.3,677.1,694.4
"CPUFreq Powersave",1283.5,1284.4,1291.5
"CPUFreq Performance",658.1,671.1,642.5
"CPUFreq Schedutil",681.2,684.5,684.8
"Selenium - Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",1300,1311,1284
"CPUFreq Powersave",2361,2356,2378
"CPUFreq Performance",1239,1244,1218
"CPUFreq Schedutil",1380,1404,1388
"Selenium - Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google Chrome",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",22134,22449,21853
"CPUFreq Powersave",13471,13635,13448
"CPUFreq Schedutil",21158,21519
"Selenium - Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",36.8,35.97,36.8
"CPUFreq Powersave",20.57,20.46,20.66
"CPUFreq Performance",38.9,38.9,38.2
"CPUFreq Schedutil",38.9,39.1,39.3
"Selenium - Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google Chrome",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",4.2,4.4,4.3
"CPUFreq Powersave",4.7,4.7,4.6
"CPUFreq Performance",3.7,3.7,3.7
"CPUFreq Schedutil",4.8,5.2,4.6,4.7,4.7,4.6,4.7,4.2,4.8,4.6,4.5,4.6,4.8,4.6,4.7
"Selenium - Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",144,144,142
"CPUFreq Powersave",76.51,76.95,77.2
"CPUFreq Performance",148.1,148.1,148.5
"CPUFreq Schedutil",
"Selenium - Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",1313,1306,1309
"CPUFreq Powersave",2452,2449,2467
"CPUFreq Performance",
"CPUFreq Schedutil",1347,1349,1342
"Selenium - Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",25.8,26.7,26.5
"CPUFreq Powersave",52.5,52.6,53.3
"CPUFreq Performance",25.8,25.4,25.8
"CPUFreq Schedutil",25.3,25,25.3
"Selenium - Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",349,361.9,358.8
"CPUFreq Powersave",715.5,715.3,723.5
"CPUFreq Performance",346.6,367.9,363,363
"CPUFreq Schedutil",357.5,339.3,338.6,365.4,345.7,339.5,352.3
"Selenium - Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",27.469,27.568,26.503
"CPUFreq Powersave",54.352,54.919,54.4515
"CPUFreq Performance",26.6045,27.754,27.732
"CPUFreq Schedutil",26.4705,27.619,27.437
"Selenium - Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",271.5845,281.3355,265.627
"CPUFreq Powersave",555.1615,554.748,555.11
"CPUFreq Performance",278.809,282.2645,280.2125
"CPUFreq Schedutil",277.499,278.9935,264.92
"TSCP 1.81 - AI Chess Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",1336839,1449415,1441827,1449415,1449415,1412251,1412251
"CPUFreq Powersave",664388,665190,667609,670862,667609
"CPUFreq Performance",1376945,1314505,1387350,1320810,1308261
"CPUFreq Schedutil",1349946,1397913,1401470,1412251,1412251
"Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Multi Core",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",11379,11319,11397
"CPUFreq Powersave",7742,7729,7768
"CPUFreq Performance",11399,11374,11353
"CPUFreq Schedutil",11137,11192,11293
"Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Multi Core - Gaussian Blur",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",793.5,794.4,796.1
"CPUFreq Powersave",455,455.8,455.3
"CPUFreq Performance",788,797.2,793.8
"CPUFreq Schedutil",750.8,729,745.7
"Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Multi Core - Face Detection",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",138.8,136.8,137.1
"CPUFreq Powersave",73.1,75.7,75.2
"CPUFreq Performance",138,132.4,135.1
"CPUFreq Schedutil",141.3,138.5,138.4
"Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Multi Core - Horizon Detection",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",240.6,240.3,239.8
"CPUFreq Powersave",192.8,191.3,192.9
"CPUFreq Performance",242.9,242,242.7
"CPUFreq Schedutil",241.7,242,242.4
"Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Single Core",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",1431,1434,1454
"CPUFreq Powersave",726,724,723
"CPUFreq Performance",1442,1448,1443
"CPUFreq Schedutil",1404,1404,1406
"Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Single Core - Gaussian Blur",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",89.6,86.3,89.8
"CPUFreq Powersave",44,44.1,44.4
"CPUFreq Performance",88.2,89.2,88.5
"CPUFreq Schedutil",86.1,87.5,85.7
"Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Single Core - Face Detection",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",11.8,11.1,11.9
"CPUFreq Powersave",5.7,5.73,5.73
"CPUFreq Performance",11.7,11.7,11.8
"CPUFreq Schedutil",11.5,11.5,11.4
"Geekbench 5 - Test: CPU Single Core - Horizon Detection",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",33.5,32.5,33.7
"CPUFreq Powersave",16.8,16.9,16.7
"CPUFreq Performance",33.5,33.6,33.8
"CPUFreq Schedutil",32.3,32.6,32.8
"FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 - WAV To FLAC",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",7.654,7.583,7.501,7.563,7.62
"CPUFreq Powersave",14.984,14.979,14.981,14.956,14.973
"CPUFreq Performance",7.499,7.536,7.504,7.481,7.62
"CPUFreq Schedutil",7.599,7.596,7.732,7.656,7.724
"LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 - WAV To MP3",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",6.788,7.113,6.806
"CPUFreq Powersave",14.02,14.015,14.057
"CPUFreq Performance",7.104,6.901,7.106
"CPUFreq Schedutil",7.045,6.81,6.775
"ASTC Encoder 2.0 - Preset: Thorough",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",17.51,17.53,17.51
"CPUFreq Powersave",31.95,31.95,31.95
"CPUFreq Performance",17.51,17.52,17.51
"CPUFreq Schedutil",17.48,17.48,17.47
"ASTC Encoder 2.0 - Preset: Exhaustive",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",138.79,138.89,138.88
"CPUFreq Powersave",252.22,252.15,252.06
"CPUFreq Performance",138.78,138.96,138.99
"CPUFreq Schedutil",138.77,138.81,138.89
"Hugin - Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",44.495,43.059,43.956
"CPUFreq Powersave",81.107,82.265,81.555
"CPUFreq Performance",44.001,43.445,43.389
"CPUFreq Schedutil",44.387,43.761,44.336
"OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg - Processing 60 Page PDF Document",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",21.134,20.78,20.734
"CPUFreq Powersave",39.13,38.42,38.57
"CPUFreq Performance",20.188,20.555,20.432
"CPUFreq Schedutil",20.675,20.375,20.253
"Open Porous Media - OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 12",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",303.085,303.339,303.522
"CPUFreq Powersave",507.744,507.6,509.15
"CPUFreq Performance",304.455,304.227,304.127
"CPUFreq Schedutil",304.15,304.057,304.435
"Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 - Time To OCR 7 Images",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",22.724,22.734,22.905
"CPUFreq Powersave",42.693,42.538,42.822
"CPUFreq Performance",22.313,22.809,22.516
"CPUFreq Schedutil",22.59,22.414,22.523
"Tesseract 2014-05-12 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",317.0625,314.4636,315.8195
"CPUFreq Powersave",277.8911,281.4059,281.8972
"CPUFreq Performance",337.0061,346.0456,339.3789
"CPUFreq Schedutil",288.3051,290.4196,296.2149
"Xonotic 0.8.2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Low",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",480.1378441,485.6235983,488.0581757
"CPUFreq Powersave",295.5370197,296.1342979,297.2708776
"CPUFreq Performance",506.4803967,511.0590704,504.3884939
"CPUFreq Schedutil",496.8545889,506.0886064,496.6228929
"Xonotic 0.8.2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",302.1751285,307.9696178,301.9098292
"CPUFreq Powersave",215.8401271,217.4972081,216.2722998
"CPUFreq Performance",350.4069904,355.9332437,360.8868961
"CPUFreq Schedutil",338.9537907,342.4681368,341.1662498
"Xonotic 0.8.2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",273.3347527,278.5387322,277.3647899
"CPUFreq Powersave",197.5459701,198.4623532,197.1678441
"CPUFreq Performance",318.7901346,325.8368466,323.1133845
"CPUFreq Schedutil",311.3863091,316.6304145,310.2798243
"Xonotic 0.8.2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",239.1670714,236.6267573,236.7327654
"CPUFreq Powersave",171.3473416,172.7252225,171.6297298
"CPUFreq Performance",261.2037546,260.6430195,263.4837222
"CPUFreq Schedutil",255.3782836,256.1214604,254.8192167
"TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Inception V4",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",1944670,1957560,1958760
"CPUFreq Powersave",3561220,3563430,3562950
"CPUFreq Performance",1942770,1956570,1958450
"CPUFreq Schedutil",1939860,1952820,1955140
"TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Mobilenet Quant",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",94128.4,94341.1,94416.9
"CPUFreq Powersave",173467,173479,173469
"CPUFreq Performance",94554.1,94722.9,94907.6
"CPUFreq Schedutil",94376.5,94418.6,94407.4
"TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Inception ResNet V2",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",1756300,1758770,1758930
"CPUFreq Powersave",3204290,3204950,3204170
"CPUFreq Performance",1755900,1758070,1758800
"CPUFreq Schedutil",1751880,1755880,1755430
"NAMD 2.14 - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",1.48392,1.48886,1.4888
"CPUFreq Powersave",2.6216,2.6192,2.6203
"CPUFreq Performance",1.48581,1.49779,1.49057
"CPUFreq Schedutil",1.48477,1.48571,1.48955
"WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test - ",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",193.574,193.118,196.458
"CPUFreq Powersave",311.118,307.365,312.462
"CPUFreq Performance",187.486,187.801,191.319
"CPUFreq Schedutil",194.857,193.128,196.49
"Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",433.506,441.053,440.276
"CPUFreq Powersave",706.651,715.033,714.295
"CPUFreq Performance",424.363,440.199,426.638
"CPUFreq Schedutil",423.72,422.263,423.754
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",57.153,55.937,55.592
"CPUFreq Powersave",97.727,96.757,97.833
"CPUFreq Performance",55.961,55.098,55.585
"CPUFreq Schedutil",58.15,55.845,56.762
"VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 - Speed: Speed 0",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",7.7,7.72,7.69
"CPUFreq Powersave",4.32,4.33,4.34
"CPUFreq Performance",8.16,8.17,8.18
"CPUFreq Schedutil",8.05,8.19,8.17
"VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 - Speed: Speed 5",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",25.73,26.28,25.85
"CPUFreq Powersave",15.97,15.95,15.97
"CPUFreq Performance",29.58,29.17,29.44
"CPUFreq Schedutil",28.76,29.05,28.32
"x264 2019-12-17 - H.264 Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",133.74,142.5,142.63,142.77,141.64
"CPUFreq Powersave",80.02,81.35,82.72
"CPUFreq Performance",140.81,148.65,148.76,150.32
"CPUFreq Schedutil",126.13,130.18,133.66
"dav1d 0.7.0 - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",197.91447562358,199.14526360544,198.65150793651
"CPUFreq Powersave",147.10790249433,147.73181122449,146.98085034014
"CPUFreq Performance",206.32385770975,206.47511054422,205.59626417233
"CPUFreq Schedutil",197.6731462585,198.6383361678,198.63218820862
"dav1d 0.7.0 - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",537.53902210884,548.02617913832,545.25238095238
"CPUFreq Powersave",408.97250283447,408.60905895692,409.67117346939
"CPUFreq Performance",693.58828798186,696.30428287982,688.18547052154
"CPUFreq Schedutil",448.76264739229,451.45066326531,453.10711451247
"SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",4.56,4.52,4.535
"CPUFreq Powersave",2.594,2.599,2.593
"CPUFreq Performance",4.602,4.587,4.598
"CPUFreq Schedutil",4.562,4.555,4.557
"SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",36.744,36.854,36.99
"CPUFreq Powersave",21.471,21.375,21.352
"CPUFreq Performance",38.141,38.136,38.218
"CPUFreq Schedutil",37.218,37.05,36.697
"x265 3.1.2 - H.265 1080p Video Encoding",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",61.59,62.87,62.05
"CPUFreq Powersave",38.6,38.35,38.36
"CPUFreq Performance",69.37,69.27,69.43
"CPUFreq Schedutil",43.59,44.08,43.46
"C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",41.857,41.912,41.943
"CPUFreq Powersave",76.688,76.661,76.692
"CPUFreq Performance",41.901,41.904,41.994
"CPUFreq Schedutil",41.956,42.002,41.995
"Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 - Mode: CPU",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",21558,21693,21676
"CPUFreq Powersave",12712,12605,12595
"CPUFreq Performance",21726,21594,21441
"CPUFreq Schedutil",21742,21709,21541
"Blender 2.82 - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",108.94,108.93,108.86
"CPUFreq Powersave",196.01,195.31,195.92
"CPUFreq Performance",109.14,109.77,109.8
"CPUFreq Schedutil",108.59,109.52,108.55
"libavif avifenc 0.7.3 - Encoder Speed: 0",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",66.187,66.533,66.3
"CPUFreq Powersave",124.552,124.377,124.727
"CPUFreq Performance",65.754,66.35,66.414
"CPUFreq Schedutil",66.488,66.831,66.616
"libavif avifenc 0.7.3 - Encoder Speed: 2",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",40.007,40.67,39.857
"CPUFreq Powersave",74.721,75.212,74.843
"CPUFreq Performance",39.993,40.261,40.071
"CPUFreq Schedutil",39.742,39.685,40.191
"libavif avifenc 0.7.3 - Encoder Speed: 8",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",4.6,4.479,4.468
"CPUFreq Powersave",8.339,8.4,8.394
"CPUFreq Performance",4.545,4.484,4.491
"CPUFreq Schedutil",4.627,4.511,4.582
"libavif avifenc 0.7.3 - Encoder Speed: 10",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",4.269,4.328,4.385
"CPUFreq Powersave",8.092,8.11,8.085
"CPUFreq Performance",4.389,4.387,4.378
"CPUFreq Schedutil",4.37,4.334,4.294
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: regex_compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",153,152,152
"CPUFreq Powersave",310,312,311
"CPUFreq Performance",155,154,153
"CPUFreq Schedutil",155,154,153
"PyPerformance 1.0.0 - Benchmark: python_startup",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",8.05,8.03,8.18
"CPUFreq Powersave",12.6,12.6,12.6
"CPUFreq Performance",6.45,6.44,6.41
"CPUFreq Schedutil",12.6,12.5,12.5
"Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks - Benchmark: ac",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",
"CPUFreq Powersave",
"CPUFreq Performance",
"CPUFreq Schedutil",
"Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks - Benchmark: linpk",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",
"CPUFreq Powersave",
"CPUFreq Performance",
"CPUFreq Schedutil",
"Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks - Benchmark: protein",
Lower Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",
"CPUFreq Powersave",
"CPUFreq Performance",
"CPUFreq Schedutil",
"ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",37.12,37.34,37.22
"CPUFreq Powersave",37.38,36.88,36.5
"CPUFreq Performance",37.22,37.31,37.34
"CPUFreq Schedutil",37.36,37.52,37.6
"ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",3721.817,3743.761,3731.739
"CPUFreq Powersave",3747.593,3697.831,3658.908
"CPUFreq Performance",3731.169,3740.255,3743.747
"CPUFreq Schedutil",3745.517,3761.625,3769.238
"ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",144.58,138.22,132.95,128.88,136.04,132,139.42,131.23,137.47,136.45,140.57,145.1,140.85,143.86,142.03
"CPUFreq Powersave",137.09,131.49,134.34
"CPUFreq Performance",169.51,162.85,164.74
"CPUFreq Schedutil",161.93,157.79,136.26,165.88,154.94,133.76,165.13,156.44,161,154.63,148.67,154.84,162.28,157.33,145.57
"ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",2313.222,2211.577,2127.201,2062.039,2176.718,2112.019,2230.716,2099.728,2199.459,2183.139,2249.097,2321.532,2253.642,2301.793,2272.438
"CPUFreq Powersave",2193.459,2103.774,2149.472
"CPUFreq Performance",2712.15,2605.527,2635.884
"CPUFreq Schedutil",2590.934,2524.593,2180.093,2654.037,2479.083,2140.152,2642.158,2503.088,2576.032,2474.06,2378.767,2477.388,2596.414,2517.238,2329.189
"ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",149.94,152.76,147.15
"CPUFreq Powersave",148.15,148.36,148.4
"CPUFreq Performance",148.42,150.85,151.32
"CPUFreq Schedutil",155.36,148.52,147.94
"ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160",
Higher Results Are Better
"CPUFreq Ondemand",1562.569,1591.92,1533.478
"CPUFreq Powersave",1543.874,1546.077,1546.513
"CPUFreq Performance",1546.758,1572.062,1576.943
"CPUFreq Schedutil",1619.005,1547.74,1541.724